CHAPTER XIII

WATER COMPETITION

Rate Policy

We may now pass from the question of the relation of the Central

Pacific-Southern Pacific system to legislative bodies in California

and in Washington, to another matter of general importance in respect

to which Southern Pacific policies profoundly affected the development

of the West—the matter of railroad rates. Just as the associates were

compelled to face the possibility of government regulation soon after

they were fairly launched in their careers as railroad men, so they had

to consider and determine the rate policies which they should adopt,

independent of regulation, with respect to the shipping and traveling

interests of the territory which they served. Their decisions in rate

matters were certainly of no less significance than their attitude

toward political control, and deserve the same broad consideration.

We shall attempt in the following chapters to describe the conditions

which affected the ability of the associates to set rates in California

and on business to and from that state, and to consider the attitude

of the Southern Pacific with regard to the more important questions of

rates and of competition which arose. For reasons which will become

apparent as the discussion proceeds, the scope and importance of water

competition in the West will first be set forth.

Water Transportation

One of the most important conditions affecting railroad business in

California is the ease with which freight and passengers may take

advantage of the water routes. The long coast line of California

affords relatively few good harbors, but it is broken in the center

by the splendid bay of San Francisco, and in the south by the less

commodious but still adequate ports of San Pedro and San Diego. Between

these termini a considerable commerce has long been carried on.

Still more important than the coastwise trade, however, has always been

the deep sea commerce of San Francisco, and to a less extent that of

the other ports. San Francisco is a focus for ocean lines connecting

the Pacific Coast of the United States with the Atlantic seaboard,

with Europe, with South America, and with the Orient. Likewise from

San Francisco steamers ply up the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers,

carrying traffic well into the interior of the state. A mere mention

of these facilities is sufficient to suggest the part which water

transportation has played in the commercial and industrial life of the

Far West.

River Traffic

The local river traffic which helps to distribute the cargoes brought

by ocean boats to San Francisco attained some importance as early as

1847. In that year a small side-wheel steamer seems to have plied

between San Francisco and Sacramento. In 1849 and 1850 larger boats

were put on, the Sacramento was navigated to Colusa, and steamers

ascended the San Joaquin to 150 miles above Stockton. In 1856 two

steamers usually left San Francisco for Sacramento each afternoon

at 4 P.M., arriving between 12 and 3 A.M. of the following morning.

Corresponding boats left Sacramento at 2 P.M., arriving between 9 and

11 P.M. Often as many as four boats left San Francisco loaded in one

day.[339]

The total tonnage of steam vessels plying on California rivers and

bays was estimated by the State Transportation Commission in 1878

at 30,704. The bay vessels were all ferry-boats and tugs, but river

vessels with a total tonnage of 10,990 tons made trips of considerable

length. Most of these were small craft, but the larger river steamers

ranged between 400 and 520 tons each, while the ferry-boats sometimes

reached a size of 1,600 or 1,700 tons. Vallejo, Benicia, Napa, Knight’s

Landing, Colusa, Chico, Red Bluff, Antioch, and Pacheco were among

those able to take advantage of the water service.[340]

Generally speaking, the importance of the river traffic was diminished

by the fact that after 1853 most of it fell under the control of one

company, the California Steam Navigation Company,[341] and that in 1869

this company sold its steamships to the Central Pacific. The volume

of river traffic also fell off because of railroad competition. In

spite of these drawbacks competition on the river was lively at times

and rates were low, to the disgust of some merchants in the interior

cities. The California Steam Navigation Company charged $8 and $6 per

ton for freight, and $10 and $8 for cabin fares from San Francisco

to Sacramento and Stockton. Meals were a dollar apiece. These were,

however, the rates in the absence of competition. When the steamer

“Willamette” was brought from Oregon to Stockton, rates were fixed

at $3 for freight, $3 for cabin fare, and $1 for deck passage. In

December, 1860, the fare from Sacramento was $1 in a cabin and 25 cents

for deck accommodation. People traveled because it was as cheap to go

as to remain at home.[342]

Ocean Commerce

The first regular water connection between the eastern and western

coasts of the United States was provided by the clipper ships on

the route around Cape Horn. These swift sailing vessels supplied the

gold miners with the tools and manufactured goods necessary for their

enterprises, and took back such commodities as California was able to

export. Oil, soap, cement, coal, iron, nails, paper, glass, tobacco,

liquors, dry goods, and the like moved west—hides, wool, canned

fruits, salmon, sugar, wine, and grain went east. The business was for

the most part handled by ships chartered for single voyages, not by

lines of ships operating on regular schedules.[343]

As early as October, 1848, however, at least one regular line, the

Pacific Mail Steamship Company, entered the field. The establishment

of the Pacific Mail service was made possible by the grant of a

government contract for the carriage of mails—its profits during the

early years were largely derived from business arising out of the

gold discoveries in California. The business of the Pacific Mail grew

rapidly. In 1851 it operated eleven steamers varying in size from 600

to 1,300 tons, and had a capital stock of $2,000,000. Thirty years

later it operated fourteen ships, large and small,[344] reported gross

earnings of $3,762,083 (1882) and had $20,000,000 in stock outstanding.

At first the Pacific Mail operated steamships between Panama and San

Francisco. Later it extended its service to Astoria; and still later it

established a line across the Pacific to China and Australia. Among

its competitors by sea at one time or another, besides the clipper

ships, were Mr. Vanderbilt’s Atlantic and Pacific Company, the Mexican

Coast Steamship Company, and Messrs. Goodall and Perkins. At one time

Jay Gould, at another Trenor W. Park, of the Panama Railroad, were

dominant in its affairs.

Problem of Water Competition

There is much of romance in the history of ocean transportation into

and out of San Francisco, and in its proper place the story should be

told at length. Some aspects of the water service, indeed, will be

touched on later in this book. Attention is directed to the matter at

present, however, not for its own sake, but because the fact of water

competition raised one of the problems with which the Southern Pacific

had to deal. It seems clear that the associates were compelled to

define their attitude toward water competition as soon as their through

line was completed in 1869.

Broadly speaking, the alternatives were competition or agreement. In

respect to the Pacific Mail, however, the situation was complicated

by the fact that the relations between the railroads and the shipping

lines were of two sorts: In the first place, the Pacific Mail served as

a valuable connection for the transcontinental railroads on business

originating in or destined to China and Japan. Tea and silk eastbound

were usually delivered by the steamships to the rail lines at San

Francisco. Westbound the higher classes of manufactured goods likewise

moved part way by rail and part way by water haul. During the ten years

ending in February, 1881, the Pacific roads carried 177,278,505 pounds

of tea and other Asiatic goods, secured to them by the co-operation

of the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, resulting in earnings of

$3,264,456.44.[345] On the other hand, the rail and water lines were

competitors in important respects.

Steamship Company Organized

In 1874 the Huntington interests organized the Occidental and Oriental

Steamship Company and chartered three steamships to ply between

San Francisco and the Far East. This was said to be the result of

a decision of the Pacific Mail to make Panama the terminus of its

transpacific route, relegating San Francisco to the secondary position

of a port of call.[346]

Huntington wrote to Colton, on November 9, 1874:

I am surprised to learn that anyone should think it was for our

interest to put on the China line seven steamers to start with. I

think three is plenty, and we shall, no doubt, have such an opposition

on the start that we shall have to run them at a loss, but with those

three we can make the prices for the old line, and I think there is

enough to break them with, unless the managers of that company are

changed, and then we most likely can get their steamers.[347]

Huntington intended to develop the Occidental and Oriental Steamship

Company as a permanent connection of the Central Pacific for Oriental

business in competition with the Pacific Mail. At the time his decision

was made he discussed with his associates the advisability of asking

enough eastern lines to join with the Central Pacific to form a single

transcontinental route from the Pacific to the Atlantic coasts for

export and import traffic, but decided against this project because

it would make enemies of the railroads which were not included, and

because also the admission of partners would make it impossible for the

Central Pacific to control by itself a majority of the shares of the

Occidental and Oriental Company. Huntington’s letter to Colton on this

matter is a model of sound reasoning on a large question of policy:

I think very likely we could make out a through line. Very likely

the Baltimore and Ohio would come in, and make up a line that would

run to Omaha or Fort Kearney, passing through St. Louis and Chicago.

But if this was done, very likely it would be difficult for us to

control the steamship Company, and if we make up this line, leaving

out the roads above mentioned, of course they would not expect any

of the China business coming over our road, and then would they not

be likely to work against us by allowing the Pacific Mail Steamship

Company and any other companies to give bills of lading from China

and Japan to Chicago, St. Louis, etc., over their roads, and to bring

freight from those points to the sea coast here, to go by steamer

and sail to California?... We cannot be too careful in starting this

steamship line, for it is one of the things that if we go into, I have

little doubt we shall hold it for years, and therefore the more reason

why we should hold a majority of the stock of the company, as almost

every road here is controlled by those that are always short or long

of stock and endeavor to render everything bend to their particular

wants. If short, they want to put the stock down, and if long they

work for the reverse and we cannot afford to be in their power.[348]

Ownership of Shares

Doubtless for financial reasons the policy here laid down was departed

from sufficiently to allow the Union Pacific a half-interest in the new

company. For their part, Stanford, Huntington, Hopkins, Crocker and

Colton subscribed each to 10,000 shares of the stock of the Occidental

and Oriental Steamship Company. The account was charged to the Western

Development Company and was held by that company as an asset. The

remaining 50,000 shares were owned by the Union Pacific, and Mr. Gould

shared with the associates the management of the enterprise.[349]

It may be added that the Occidental and Oriental owned no steamers,

but chartered the “Oceanic,” the “Belgic,” and the “Gaelic.” The

“Oceanic” was a boat of 3,800 tons; the other ships were of 2,600 tons

each.[350] The first dividend was declared in July, 1878, and by 1881

the rate had been raised to 4 per cent. Mr. Stanford has testified that

the company expected to lose $100,000 a year, but that its owners were

pleasantly disappointed.[351]

Agreement with Pacific Mail

There is evidence that as early as 1870 some agreement was entered

into between the Huntington interests and the Pacific Mail Steamship

Company, and that in 1871 a formal contract was concluded by these

companies, defining their relation to each other. The terms of the

contract of 1871 are not available, but a subsequent agreement, dated

October 1, 1872, contained the following principal provisions:

The Pacific Mail Steamship Company agreed to provide every month three

first-class steamers to sail from the port of New York for the Isthmus

of Panama, with connecting steamers on the Pacific Ocean for the port

of San Francisco. The company undertook to supply space in these

steamers for an amount of freight not exceeding 14,700 tons annually.

The steamship company accorded to the railroad company the exclusive

right to fix the rates on freight of every description, moving from

New York to San Francisco during the period of the agreement, provided

that the rates should not exceed the rates then in force, nor in any

event $160 first-class, $140 second-class, $90 third-class, and $60

fourth-class and special.

Out of the gross receipts on the freight westbound the steamship

company was first to draw $735,000, or at the rate of $50 per ton on

14,700 tons. If the amount of the freight handled should not equal

14,700 tons, or if that quantity of freight should be handled but the

receipts therefrom should not amount to $50 per ton, the railroad

agreed to make up the difference, so that the receipts on the first

14,700 tons should always amount to $735,000. If, on the other hand,

the steamship should collect thereon an average rate exceeding $50, the

railroad was to be entitled to the surplus.

In the event that through westbound freight exceeded in volume 14,700

tons, the gross earnings on the excess quantity were to be divided

between steamship company and railroad company as follows: first, $30

per ton was to be taken by the steamship company; additional receipts

up to $50 a ton were to be divided equally between steamship and

railroad; and earnings over $50 were to go to the railroad.[352]

The essential facts in this agreement were that the steamship company

surrendered the power of fixing the westbound rates in return for a

guarantee of $735,000 a year.

Later Contracts

This feature was also characteristic of later agreements between the

same parties, different as the details of the subsequent arrangements

sometimes were. In 1879 the Union Pacific, Central Pacific, and Pacific

Mail companies agreed that the last-named should set aside space for

600 tons of railroad freight in each of its steamers moving monthly

between New York and San Francisco. The railroads were to exercise

full authority over the through rates of the steamship company, and

for their part were to guarantee that the earnings on the railroad

freight shipped were not to be less than $48,000 monthly westbound,

and $35,000 monthly eastbound. In case the earnings on the 600 tons or

less of railroad freight which might be sent in each vessel exceeded

the guaranteed minimum, the balance of freight money was to be paid

over to the railroad, while the moneys received on all freight between

New York and San Francisco and between San Francisco and New York in

excess of 600 tons for each vessel were to be equally divided between

the railroad and the steamship company.[353] An additional clause in

this agreement bound the railroads to pay to the steamship company $5

for each passenger carried whose ticket was purchased at a point east

of Ogdensburg, Suspension Bridge, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and Wheeling, to

a point west of Sacramento, and vice versa.

An agreement dated June 1, 1885, between the Transcontinental

Association and the Pacific Mail does not differ strikingly from that

of 1879 just summarized, except that the payments per month were to be

$85,000 for a two-way service, instead of $83,000, and that there was

no passenger subsidy. Moreover, the right of the steamship company to

fix rates for the use of its capacity above the 600 tons mentioned in

the agreement was specifically reserved. The $85,000 payment in this

year represented a reduction from the figure of $110,000 contained in

a contract dated March 4, 1880, and from one of $95,000 concluded in

1882. In 1887 the subsidy was set at $65,000, and in 1889, when still

another arrangement between the Transcontinental Association and the

Pacific Mail was signed, it was put at $75,000.[354]

From a statement made to the United States Pacific Railway Commission,

it appears that the aggregate earnings guaranteed by the railroads to

the Pacific Mail Steamship Company from September 30, 1871, to March

21, 1886, were $11,227,939.27. This did not include Central or South

American business. Of the guaranteed sum the steamship company earned

$5,854,113.06, leaving $5,373,826.21 to be made up by the guarantors.

The distribution of the burden among the railroads interested may be

suggested by the fact that out of $146,170.29 which had to be paid

during the three months from January to March, 1886, the Union Pacific

paid $34,652.94, the Central Pacific $31,927.57, the Southern Pacific

$30,172.79, the Santa Fé $15,086.11, the Galveston, Harrisburg and San

Antonio $11,536.82, and seven other companies smaller sums.[355]

Change in Ocean Traffic

The change which took place in the volume of water-borne commerce in

and out of San Francisco coincident with the arrangements between the

railroads and the Pacific Mail which have been described, is clearly

indicated in the following table:[356]

VALUE OF COMMODITIES SHIPPED FROM NEW YORK TO SAN FRANCISCO AND FROM

SAN FRANCISCO TO NEW YORK VIA PANAMA EACH YEAR FROM 1869 TO 1884

Shipped from New York Shipped from San

Year ended to San Francisco Francisco to New

June 30 York Total

1869 $50,015,994 $20,186,035 $70,202,029

1870 15,334,945 3,259,310 18,594,255

1871 9,391,607 2,161,106 11,552,713

1872 6,739,563 3,086,874 9,826,437

1873 3,042,617 3,667,107 6,709,724

1874 7,049,821 1,752,653 8,802,474

1875 6,057,202 2,382,928 8,440,130

1876 4,470,594 1,983,261 6,453,855

1877 3,398,864 2,205,979 5,604,843

1878 3,976,358 3,211,245 7,187,603

1879 2,781,065 2,166,690 4,947,755

1880 2,963,065 2,865,237 5,828,302

1881 815,893 2,598,868 3,414,761

1882 1,270,900 3,153,902 4,424,802

1883 1,192,912 2,394,430 3,587,342

1884 1,040,495 1,264,682 2,305,177

If we compare the year 1869—probably the last in which the Pacific

Mail and the Huntington interests were in active competition—with

the year 1884, it appears that the value of commodities shipped in and

out of San Francisco via Panama during these years declined from about

seventy to about two million dollars. Doubtless this falling off was

not all due to agreements between rail and water carriers. For instance

the sudden decline between 1869 and 1870 was occasioned in large part

by the sudden diversion of bullion shipments from the water routes when

the rail lines were opened, while passengers also rapidly deserted

the water for the more speedy and comfortable rail service. Moreover,

at a slightly later date the special contract system played its part

in limiting shipments by sea. Yet it is not unfair to credit the

arrangements between the Huntington group and the Pacific Mail with a

considerable share of the reduction in water tonnage so desirable from

the point of view of the land carriers.

Pacific Mail and Panama Railroad

The difficulty in bringing about a substantial lessening of competition

by agreement with a water carrier is found in the fact that the sea

is free, so that new ships and new shipping companies can readily

take the place of those that are withdrawn. The peculiar strength

of the Pacific Mail in negotiating with the railroad company lay in

the fact that it enjoyed for many years the exclusive privilege of

through-billing freight between San Francisco and New York, including

the privilege of quoting a through rate. From all other steamship

companies the Panama Railroad exacted a local rate for hauling freight

across the Isthmus.[357] Inasmuch as this local rate was very high,

it was impossible for a competing steamship company to handle through

business at a profit. It was thus the railroad which determined whether

competition by way of the Isthmus of Panama should succeed or fail. It

may be added that after the year 1893 the Panama Railroad assumed the

responsibility not only of the rail haul across the Isthmus, but of

the water connection between Colon and New York as well, thus becoming

the preponderant partner in respect to length of route, as well as in

respect to strategic position.

In return for the exclusive right of through-billing, and of quoting

through rates, as well as for its agreements not to operate vessels in

the Pacific, the Panama Railroad was promised a certain division of

the through rate, which was not to be less monthly than a stipulated

minimum. The minimum varied, but always was a substantial part of

the payment which the transcontinental railroads were making to the

Pacific Mail. In 1878 the railroads guaranteed the Pacific Mail $90,000

a month, out of which the Panama Railroad received $75,000. When the

Pacific Mail subsidy was lowered from $90,000 to $75,000, the amount

guaranteed to the Panama Railroad fell off from $75,000 to $55,000.

It is a matter of history also that during the years 1876 to 1878, the

Panama Railroad not only was a party to the elaborate traffic agreement

with the Pacific Mail which has been described, but that it exercised

for a time direct control of the steamship company by domination of

its president and board of directors. This control was the outcome of

a conflict between Jay Gould, then president of the Pacific Mail, and

Trenor W. Park, of the Panama Railroad, which in 1875 resulted in the

election of a board of directors satisfactory to the latter and in the

choice of a new president.

The lever which the railroad used at this time was the cancellation of

its contract with the Pacific Mail, the organization of a company known

as the Pacific Transit Company, the purchase of three old refitted

warships, and the threat to engage in active competition. Mr. Park

was asked if he would desist from his attack on the Pacific Mail if a

neutral board of directors were elected. He consented to this, and was

satisfied by a board composed for the most part of Panama Railroad

men. This was followed by the consolidation of the Pacific Mail and the

Panama Transit Company, by the renewal of contracts between railroad

and steamship, and finally in 1878, by the execution of a bill of

sale by the steamship to the railroad company for twenty-two steamers

to secure a loan of $1,000,000 in Panama Railroad bonds for four

years.[358]

Railroads’ Main Reliance

It thus appears that during the first ten years after the completion

of the Central Pacific, the interests of the Panama Railroad and those

of the Pacific Mail were closely bound together, so that during this

period an agreement with the former was sufficient to control the

route over which both were operating. It was upon this fact that the

transcontinental railroads chiefly relied. Nor was there any important

change in the relations between the Panama Railroad and the Pacific

Mail, or in those between the Pacific Mail and the transcontinental

railroads during the following twelve years. Mr. Park’s control of

the Pacific Mail proved only temporary, it is true, and the terms of

the contracts between the parties changed from time to time; yet the

principle of a guaranty of earnings to the Pacific Mail in return for

the maintenance of rates was always adhered to, and the Panama Railroad

always received the lion’s share of this guaranty for a division. The

amount of the subsidy paid by the railroad has already been given.

When in 1885 the Pacific Mail received $85,000 per month from the

transcontinental lines, it paid over $70,000 to the Panama Railroad.

When the Pacific Mail subsidy was reduced to $65,000 in 1887, the

payment to the Isthmian railroad likewise fell to $55,000. In 1881 the

Panama Canal Company, a French corporation under the direction of De

Lesseps, purchased the Panama Railroad for $20,000,000; but this does

not seem to have affected the relations between the last-named railroad

and the Pacific Mail.

Chapters on the History of the Southern Pacific · 第 13 / 25 章