Effect of Captivity and Human Contact

The necessary capture, captivity, translocation and contact of the

experimental wolves with humans had an unknown effect on the wolves.

They had been exposed to humans for over 2 months while in captivity. No

attempts were made to tame them, and they never passed the escape stage

of socialization as described by Woolpy and Ginsburg (1967). The

dominant wolves (No. 11 and No. 12) were more relaxed when approached

than were No. 10 and No. 13, however.

The failure of female No. 11 to bear young probably can be attributed to

her captivity and handling. The fact that two couplings were observed

over a 5-day period indicates normal estrus in the female, and a normal

response in the male. Conception would have been expected from such a

mating. In wild wolves, it is known that there is only a small loss

between number of ova shed, number of embryos implanting, and number of

fetuses being carried (Rausch 1967). Thus it seems unlikely that, if No.

11 conceived, she lost her fetuses _in utero_. Rather, she probably did

not conceive, or perhaps the embryos never implanted. This wolf lost

about 11% of her capture weight during captivity, despite an adequate

food supply. This fact, plus the results of her blood tests indicate a

high degree of stress, which probably explains why she never produced

pups.

The possible interference of the drugs used can be ruled out, for they

were chosen because of their known lack of effect on pregnancy (Seal et

al. 1970).

The radio collars placed on the wolves had no noticeable effect on the

animals. Radioed wolves are regularly accepted back into their packs in

Minnesota, where they also reproduce and function normally (Mech and

Frenzel 1971; Mech 1973, 1974).

An Experimental Translocation of the Eastern Timber Wolf · 第 57 / 72 题