CHAPTER II

THE MAKING OF CONSTANTINOPLE, UNDER THE EMPERORS CONSTANTIUS, JULIAN,

VALENS, THEODOSIUS THE GREAT, AND ARCADIUS.

337-408 A.D.

AFTER visiting the sights of Rome, the Persian prince Hormisdas was

asked to give his impressions of the city. "One thing disappoints me,"

he replied, "men die here just as in the humblest village of the

Empire." So was it in New Rome. Seven years after the inauguration of

the city he founded, Constantine the Great died in the neighbourhood of

Nicomedia. His body was carried to Constantinople in a golden coffin,

and, amid demonstrations of public grief, was laid to rest in a

sarcophagus of porphyry in the Church of the Holy Apostles. The tomb was

flanked by twelve pillars, representing, so the fact was construed, the

glorious company of the Apostles, with whom he could fitly be

associated as the champion of the Christian faith. The good that men do

is, however, not always interred with their bones, and Constantinople

remained to attest the far-sighted wisdom of its founder, and to grow in

splendour and importance. But one hundred and ten years had to come and

go ere the city attained its full stature. It is the history of the

growth of Constantinople during this period that will now engage our

attention.

[Illustration: A CEMETERY BY THE BOSPORUS]

Upon the death of Constantine, the eastern division of the Empire came

under the rule of his second son, Constantius, who soon discovered how

much work upon the new seat of government remained to be done. Nor could

his visit to Old Rome fail to impress upon his mind the greatness and

the difficulty of the task before him. "Having entered," says the

historian, Ammianus Marcellinus, speaking of that visit of Constantius,

"the Forum of Trajan, the most marvellous structure in the whole world,

he was struck with admiration, and looked around in amazement without

being able to utter a word, wondering at the array of gigantic

buildings, which no pen can describe, and which men can create and see

but once in the course of centuries. Abandoning all hope of ever being

able to erect anything which would approach even at a respectful

distance Trajan's work, he turned his attention to the equestrian

statue found in the centre of the Forum, and said to his followers that

he would have one made like it. Hormisdas, who accompanied the Emperor,

quietly remarked, pointing to the Forum, 'For such a horse, you must

first provide such a stable.'"

Nevertheless, Constantius carried forward the improvement of New Rome to

such an extent that Themistius, a contemporary, speaking of the

Emperor's services in the matter, declares that the city was indebted to

Constantine the Great only for its name, and owed its actual

construction to Constantius. During this reign the fortifications of the

city were completed, the Church of the Holy Apostles underwent repair,

and the Church of S. Sophia, usually ascribed to the founder of the

city, was built, the date of its dedication being the 15th of February

360, two years before Constantius died. Constantius, moreover, placed

the city, like Rome, under a Prefect--_Præfectus Urbis_--and, what is

worthy of note, endowed the new capital with a library, thus placing in

its hand the lamp of learning which was to shine so far in the world's

history. If we may judge by the terms in which Themistius refers to the

foundation of this library, the value of books was fully appreciated in

those days. "Thus," he exclaims, "the Emperor has recalled and raised

from the dead the souls of wise men and of heroes for the welfare of the

city for the souls of wise men are in their wisdom, mind, and

intelligence, while their monuments are the books and writings in which

their remains are found." The author of the _Areopagitica_ said no more

when he declared, "A good book is the precious life-blood of a master

spirit embalmed and treasured up to a life beyond life."

[Illustration: "A KAFEDJI"

Turkish coffee is to be obtained everywhere; a "kafedji" has here set up

his little stall at the corner of a street.]

Julian, the successor of Constantius, was attached to the city by

special ties. It was the place of his birth, and there he had received

part of his early education. The school he attended was attached to the

Basilica which stood on the site of the Cistern now styled Yeri Batan

Serai, a little to the south-west of S. Sophia, and thither he went

under the conduct of his pædagogue, Mardonius, to study grammar and

rhetoric, dressed simply and associating freely with his

fellow-students. His progress in his studies soon became the talk of

society, and in public opinion presaged his fitness to become, in due

time, the ruler of the Empire. Whereupon the jealousy which besets

despotic rule was roused in Constantius, and Julian was banished to

Nicomedia. But Julian always retained a warm affection for the home of

his childhood and youth. Speaking of Constantinople in one of his

letters he says, "I love her as my mother, for I was born and brought up

there, and I can never be guilty of ingratitude towards her." Nor had he

reason to complain of his Alma Mater's feelings towards himself. When he

approached the city, in 361, to assume the crown, the whole population

poured out to meet him, and hailed him with transports of joy as at once

their sovereign and fellow-citizen. The young capital acquired a greater

sense of dignity and importance at the thought that one who had been

cradled within its precincts now occupied the throne of the Roman world.

Julian spent only ten months in Constantinople as Emperor, his stay

being cut short by war with Persia, whose hostility was not less intense

since the chief seat of the Empire had been brought nearer to the

frontier between the two States. Into those few months, however, Julian

put an immense amount of work. The condition of affairs in his native

city was not after his heart, either as a statesman, philosopher, or

devotee of the ancient faith of Athens and Rome. There the Christianity

he would fain destroy was strongly entrenched. There wrangling sects of

the new creed, more difficult to appease than the wild Franks and

Alemanni, who had felt the strength of his arm upon the banks of the

Rhine, kept the population in constant turmoil. There was found an

Augean stable of official corruption, of unpunished crimes, of relaxed

military discipline, and of extravagant luxury at the court. According

to Libanius, a thousand cooks, a thousand hairdressers, more than a

thousand cup-bearers, a crowd of waiters, swarming like bees in a hive,

and eunuchs, thick as flies in early summer, were employed in the

service of the imperial palace. One day Julian sent for a barber, and in

answer to the summons an official in a gorgeous uniform made his

appearance. "But I called for a barber, not for a receiver-general,"

exclaimed the indignant Emperor. An investigation of the case having

been made, it was discovered that in addition to a large salary the

barber enjoyed the right to many perquisites, and received daily rations

sufficient for twenty men and as many horses. Julian swept the palace

clean of such abuses. Furthermore, Julian increased the importance of

the Senate of the city by the embellishment of the Senate-House, by

additional privileges conferred on the members of that body, and by

taking part in the deliberations of the assembly. He also constructed

another harbour on the southern side of the city, placing it in the

hollow ground below the heights on which the Hippodrome stands, and thus

provided for the convenience and safety of ships that found it difficult

to make the Golden Horn from the Sea of Marmora, in the face of the

northern winds that prevail in the Bosporus. The harbour was first known

as the New Harbour and the Harbour of Julian, but, in the sixth century,

it was also named the Harbour of Sophia or the Sophias, in view of

extensive repairs made at the instance of the Empress Sophia, the

consort of Justin II. The basin of the harbour can still be traced in

the configuration of the ground it once occupied, where its memory is

preserved by the present name of the locality--Kadriga Limani, the Port

of the Galley. At the head of the harbour Julian built a portico, a

crescent in shape, and therefore spoken of as the Sigma, from its

resemblance to the curved form of that letter in the Greek alphabet.

Very appropriately the portico became a favourite lounge of the

philosophers in Constantinople, and the scene of their discussions. But

what Julian doubtless considered his richest and most filial gift to the

city of his birth, was the presentation to its public library of his

collection of books.

[Illustration: GOLDEN HORN FROM THE BRITISH HOSPITAL, GALATA]

Valens, the next Emperor concerned with the growth of the city, gave

special attention to the water-supply of Constantinople--always a

serious question owing to the comparative scarcity of water in the

immediate neighbourhood. The picturesque aqueduct which, with its double

tier of arches garlanded with ivy, still transports water across the

valley between the hills surmounted respectively by the Mosque of Sultan

Mehemet and the War Office, was built in this reign. It was an addition

to the system of water-supply provided by Constantine; a system which,

probably, had previously served the town of Byzantium, and which he only

extended and improved. Near the eastern end of the aqueduct a splendid

public fountain was placed. The Cistern of the Prætorian Prefect,

Modestius, now used as a Saddle-Market, near the Mosque of Sultan

Mehemet, belongs to this period; and, as a result of the abundance of

water thus introduced into the city, several public baths were erected.

The Baths or Thermae of Roman Constantinople, we should remember, are

the models of what we style the Turkish bath, and it is a curious fact

that this mode of bathing has been continued as a habit of popular life

only in countries comprised in the eastern division of the Empire.

But what, perhaps, makes the reign of Valens chiefly memorable in the

history of the city is that in his time the citizens of Constantinople

had their first experience of a usurpation of the throne, and of an

attack upon their walls.

The former event was brought about by a certain Procopius, a cousin of

the Emperor Julian.

Making the most of his relationship to the family of Constantine, he

took advantage of the discontent which the administration of Valens had

provoked, and having won the populace of the city and a body of troops

by means of liberal donatives, seized the palace and installed himself

as Emperor. A sharp war with Valens ensued, in which the usurper was at

length captured and put to death, while his partizans, and even persons

suspected of having favoured his cause, were put to the torture, and had

their property confiscated. Thus Constantinople learned--not for the

last time--the meaning of a reign of terror. A signal example also was

made of Chalcedon (Kadi Keui), on the opposite Asiatic shore, because

its inhabitants had sided with Procopius. The walls of the town were

ruthlessly torn down, and it was with the material thus made available

that the Aqueduct of Valens was built and that the Baths of Constantine

were repaired. Yet more serious was the quarrel of Valens with the

Goths, whom he had permitted to cross the Danube in their retreat before

the Huns, and settle in the territory we know as Bulgaria. The officials

entrusted with the control of the refugees, and with the duty of

providing them with food, did their work with such stupidity and

rapacity that the high-minded Goths flew to arms, and, at the close of a

struggle extending for upwards of a year, inflicted in 378 an

overwhelming defeat upon the imperial forces, outside the walls of

Adrianople. The Emperor himself and two-thirds of his army lay dead upon

the field. The Roman legions had not known such a disaster since they

were defeated by Hannibal at Cannæ. Flushed with victory, the Goths

marched upon Constantinople, assailed the walls, and nearly burst the

gates open. The honours of the defence fell to the widow of Valens, the

Empress Dominica, who, with the money found in the treasury, raised a

body of troops among the citizens, arming them with what weapons could

be found. A body of Arab soldiers, recently arrived in the city, also

rendered valuable aid. Sallying forth, they closed with the Goths in a

desperate struggle. Victory wavered between the two sets of barbarians;

when, suddenly, a long-haired, almost naked Arab, uttering a loud,

hoarse, and doleful cry, like a bird of evil omen, rushed upon the

Goths, and drawing his dagger, cut the throat of an opponent, and then

slaked his thirst at the flowing wound. What with the impression

produced by this horrid incident, added to a growing sense of the

impossibility of their taking a fortified place, the Goths gave up the

contest and retired from the city. This was the first siege of

Constantinople.

With the accession of Theodosius I., a brighter day dawned upon the

Empire. He not only subdued the Goths, but converted them into allies,

and persuaded them to put 40,000 of their brave troops at his service.

He even induced their aged king, Athanaric, who had sworn never to set a

friendly foot upon Roman soil, to visit Constantinople. The visitor was

profoundly impressed by the appearance of the city. "Now," said he, "I

see what I often heard of, but never believed, the renown of this great

city." Then, surveying the city's situation, the movement of ships

coming and going, the splendid fortifications, the crowded population

made up of various nationalities, like streams coming from different

directions to gush from the same fountain, the well-ordered troops, he

exclaimed, "Verily, the Emperor is a god upon earth; whoso lifts a

hand against him is guilty of his own blood." Upon the death of

Athanaric, which occurred about a fortnight after he reached

Constantinople, Theodosius buried the body of his guest with royal

honours in the Church of the Holy Apostles, and, by this act of

chivalrous courtesy, bound the Goths more firmly to his side.

[Illustration: STREET SCENE, CLAY WORKS]

The barbarians, however, were by no means the only disturbers of the

peace of the Empire with whom Theodosius found it necessary to deal.

Society in the Roman world was distracted by the conflict between pagans

and Christians on the one hand, and by the keener strife between

Christian sects on the other, and it was the ambition of Theodosius to

calm these troubled waters. For this laudable end he employed the

questionable means of edicts for the violent suppression of heathenism

and heresy. To destroy the old faith of the Empire was comparatively an

easy task, although it involved him in a war with the pagan party in the

West. But to uproot the tares of heresy was a more formidable

undertaking; they were so numerous, vigorous, and difficult to

distinguish from the true wheat. For the space of forty years, the views

of Arius on the Person of Christ had prevailed in Constantinople, and

the churches of the city were in the hands of that theological party.

Only in one small chapel, the Church of Anastasia, was the Creed of

Nicæa upheld there by Gregory of Nazianzus, and despite his eloquence he

was a voice crying in the wilderness. But Theodosius, having been won

over to the Nicene Creed, determined to make it the creed of the State.

Accordingly, upon his arrival in Constantinople on the 20th of November

380, he sent for Demophilus, the Arian bishop of the city, and commanded

him either to accept the orthodox views or leave Constantinople.

Demophilus had the courage of his convictions, and, bidding his flock in

S. Sophia farewell, left the capital in obedience, as he said, to the

injunction, "When they persecute you in one city, flee ye to another."

All the churches of the city were now transferred to the orthodox party.

The Arians, however, maintained religious services according to their

own tenets outside the city walls, in the district known as the

Exokionion (quarter of the outside column). The name was due to the

presence there of a column surmounted by a statue of Constantine. Owing

to their association with the district, Arians were sometimes designated

Exokionitæ. The district lay immediately outside the gateway in the

Constantinian walls already noted as the Ancient Gate of late

Byzantine times, and as Isa Kapoussi since the Turkish Conquest. It can

therefore be readily identified, and, curiously enough, under the

disguise of a Turkish garb--Alti Mermer, the Six Marbles--the locality

still retains its old name. For the Turkish designation is due to a

misunderstanding of the meaning of the term Exakionion, a corrupt form

of Exokionion frequently employed by Byzantine writers.

[Illustration: STREET SCENE, STAMBOUL]

In pursuance of his religious policy, Theodosius furthermore convened at

Constantinople an assembly of 355 bishops, known as the Second General

Council, to reaffirm the Nicene Creed as the true Catholic faith, and to

restore the orthodox character of the capital of the East. At this

Council, the question of precedence between the Sees of Rome, Antioch,

Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Constantinople, which awakened burning

jealousies in the Christian world, was finally settled. The first place

was assigned to the Bishop of Rome, the prestige of the ancient capital

asserting itself, but the second place was given to Constantinople,

because it was New Rome, notwithstanding the closer connection of the

remaining rival Sees with the earlier history of the Christian faith. In

this decision, political reasons outweighed religious considerations.

But while thus occupied with high matters of Church and State,

Theodosius did not forget the embellishment of his capital. On the

contrary, what Theodosius did for that object, and left to his son and

grandson to complete, entitles him to be regarded as the second founder

of Constantinople. Under his auspices, a great forum, named the Forum of

Theodosius and the Forum of Taurus, was constructed on the summit of the

hill now occupied by the Turkish War Office. It was the largest forum in

the city, and there Theodosius erected a hollow column, _columna

chochlis_, similar to the column of Trajan and the column of Marcus

Aurelius at Rome. For better or worse, the desire to emulate Rome was

always an ambition of the young capital. Around the exterior of the

column winded a spiral band of bas-reliefs commemorating the exploits of

the Emperor, while the stairway within led to his statue on the summit.

Up that stairway, the Emperor Murzuphlus was taken to the top of the

column by the Crusaders of the Fourth Crusade after their capture of the

city in 1204, and then barbarously hurled to the ground. Certain

persons, who became wise after the event, then pointed to a figure

represented on the column as falling from a high turret, and read there

the prophecy of this outrage upon humanity. The column was taken down

by Sultan Bajazet II. (1481-1512) to furnish material for the bath he

constructed in the vicinity. So does glory vanish. To the forum was

attached, as usual, a Basilica, the Basilica Theodosiana, 240 feet long

by 140 wide, remarkable for twelve marble columns 25 feet in height. To

the same Emperor is also ascribed a lofty pyramidal structure, in or

beside the forum, surmounted by a movable bronze figure to indicate the

direction of the wind, and appropriately named the Anemodulion. Judging

from the descriptions we have of it, the edifice displayed considerable

artistic taste. Upon it stood, in characteristic forms, the statues of

the twelve winds on the list of ancient meteorologists. There, one could

hear youths blowing trumpets, see laughing Cupids pelting each other

with apples, and admire wreaths of foliage, flowers, and fruit. It

recalls the Temple of the Winds at Athens. Another erection of the time

of Theodosius was the Golden Gate which was subsequently incorporated in

the fortifications built by his grandson and namesake, Theodosius II. It

was originally designed as a triumphal arch to celebrate the victory of

Theodosius I. over Maximus, who had usurped the throne of the western

division of the Empire, and through that archway Theodosius passed

three years later, when he returned to Constantinople in triumph. Like

similar monuments, the Golden Gate consisted of three arches, the

central arch being loftier than its companions, and was decorated with

statues of the Emperor, Victory, the Fortune of the city, and a group of

elephants in bronze. Upon the two fronts of the central arch was a Latin

inscription in gilt metal letters, gleaming like a crown of gold upon

the head of the gateway. The legend, "Theodosius adorns this place,

after the doom of the usurper," looked towards the west; while the

words, "He who constructed the Golden Gate brings in the Golden Age,"

faced the east. When incorporated in the fortifications of Theodosius

II., the Golden Gate served as the State entrance to the city.

Another monument of the city due to Theodosius is the obelisk which

still keeps its place, as though the symbol of eternity, amid the ruins

of the Hippodrome. It was brought from Egypt before the Emperor's reign,

but was successfully placed in position under his auspices, and two

inscriptions, one in Latin, the other in Greek, record the pride which

the achievement excited. They read to the effect that what others had

vainly attempted was accomplished by Theodosius during the prefecture

of Proclus--the time taken being thirty days according to the Latin

legend, thirty-two days according to the Greek version.

[Illustration: A VILLAGE STORE AT KAVAK]

The bas-reliefs of the pedestal on which the obelisk stands, however

little they flatter the art of the period, are extremely interesting for

the glimpses they afford us of life in Constantinople under Theodosius

I. Any one who wishes to look upon the events of that distant day, and

cares to breathe the atmosphere in which his fellowmen then lived,

should come and linger before these weather-worn figures in which the

Past is perpetuated. They are not of "Attic shape"; they have not the

"fair attitude" of "the brede of marble men and maidens," with which

Grecian urns were overwrought. Nevertheless, they too set the permanent

against the transitory scenes of our human history. Here the obelisk is

still being dragged through the city to the Hippodrome amidst the

deafening shouts of an enthusiastic population; it is still hoisted in

breathless silence and suspense from the ground, and set firm upon its

base to stand erect for these fifteen centuries. Here four-horse

chariots are still driving furiously around the _spina_ of the

race-course; the banners of the Factionsblue, green, white, red--still

wave frantically in the air; the crack of whips, the cheers of

spectators, urging steed and driver onward and faster, may still be

heard; the acclamations, the strains of music, the joyous dance, the

wild frenzy when the Emperor crowns the victor's brow with laurel still

rend the air. Theodosius, his Empress, his two sons, Honorius and

Arcadius, still stand or sit before us. Here are the senators of New

Rome, and the courtiers in attendance upon the Emperor. Barbarians,

eastern and western, are here doing homage on bended knee to their

conqueror, and offering him tribute. Here are the Gothic troops which

Theodosius subdued and won to his side, wearing their golden collars,

and guarding him with spear and shield. Here the people of the city hold

colloquy with their sovereign through the tall heralds--mandatores--who

stand on the steps leading to the imperial tribune. Here Christianity

with the Labarum in its hand triumphs, and in the Greek and Latin speech

inscribed upon these stones we still listen to the voices that mingled

in the Græco-Roman world.

Other works of Theodosius could be mentioned, such as the improvement of

the Harbour of Eleutherius (at Vlanga Bostan), and the palaces erected

for the accommodation of members of the imperial family. But perhaps

we shall obtain a more vivid impression of the extent to which the

growth and improvement of Constantinople were due to this Emperor, from

the impression which the changes he introduced made upon the mind of a

contemporary who had known the city from the days of Constantius. "No

longer," exclaims Themistius, as he surveys the altered aspect of the

place, "no longer is the vacant ground in the city more extensive than

the ground occupied by buildings; nor is the land under cultivation

within the walls more than that which is inhabited. The beauty of the

city is no longer scattered over it in patches, but is now continuous

throughout its whole area, like a robe finished to the very fringe. The

city is resplendent with gold and porphyry; it boasts of a new forum,

named after the Emperor; it is provided with baths, porticoes, gymnasia,

and what was its former extreme limit is now its centre. If Constantine

could see the city he founded, he would look upon a glorious and

splendid scene, not upon a bare and naked void; he would behold it fair,

not with apparent, but with real, beauty." The mansions of the wealthy

were now larger and more stately; the suburbs also had grown. "The

city," continues the orator, "is full of carpenters, builders,

decorators, and every other class of artisans, so that it might fitly be

described as a workshop of magnificence. Should the zeal of the Emperor

to adorn the city continue, a wider circuit will become necessary, and

the question will arise, whether the city added to Constantinople by

Theodosius does not excel in splendour the city which Constantine added

to Byzantium."

[Illustration: GALATA TOWER FROM THE BRIDGE

The stairway down which the Turkish lady is hurrying leads to one of the

many steamboat piers adjoining the bridge.]

In the reign of Arcadius, events of great moment in the history of the

city occurred. In the first place, the government of the Empire, which

had been in the hands of Theodosius alone for a few months, was now

again divided between his sons, the West falling to Honorius, the East

becoming the dominion of Arcadius. This proved the final division of the

government, and prepared the way for the ultimate sundering of Europe

into two worlds. For it stimulated a conflict of interests and

occasioned a warfare of intrigues that strengthened the tendency for the

parts of the Empire to fall apart and form, practically, distinct

States. Thus, however, the individuality and independence of

Constantinople came to be clearly and fully asserted. In the next place,

under Arcadius, the question how far Constantinople and the Balkan lands

were to remain under the control of the Germans settled to the south of

the Danube reached its most critical stage. Would the East be

Teutonized, as the West was destined to be? Was the unity of Europe to

assume a Germanic form after the old Roman unity was broken? There were

moments in the reign of Arcadius when the signs of the times indicated

that the same destiny awaited both divisions of the Empire. Alaric, at

the head of the Visigoths, was ravaging the Balkan peninsula, and seemed

ready to establish a permanent kingdom there. Constantinople was full of

Germans. A fair-haired German lady, the Empress Eudoxia, shared the

throne of Arcadius. Germans were largely employed as workmen and as

household servants. Germans demanded liberty to worship in a church

within the walls, according to the Arian views introduced among them by

Ulfilas. Chrysostom, opposed their demand, and carried on a mission for

the conversion of the Goths in the city to the orthodox faith. The

politicians of the capital were divided into a Roman and a German party.

Gainas, a Goth, was in command of the army, and had become all-powerful.

At his instance, Rufinus and Eutropius, successively chief Ministers of

the Government of Arcadius, were put to death. He incited the

Ostrogoths settled in Asia Minor to rebel, and brought them over to

Europe to support his ambitious plans. He filled Constantinople with

Gothic soldiers, and twice attempted to burn down the palace. And when,

in view of the precautions taken against him, he found it prudent to

quit the city, it was with the idea of returning with a larger force to

make himself the master of the place. His plan failed, as such schemes

often fail, through an accident of an accident. A Gothic soldier treated

a poor beggar woman roughly; a citizen took her part and struck the

assailant dead. In the condition of the public mind, this proved the

spark which produces a tremendous explosion. The city gates were

immediately closed and the ramparts manned, while an infuriated mob went

through the city hunting for Goths, and did not cease from the mad

pursuit until the blood of 7000 victims had stained the streets of the

city. Gainas was pursued and defeated, and eventually his head was sent

to Constantinople by the Huns among whom he had sought refuge. This,

indeed, did not put all further trouble at the hands of Goths to an end,

but it was the knell of German domination in Constantinople and the

East. The reign of Arcadius is the watershed upon which streams, which

might have flowed together, separated to run in opposite directions and

through widely diverse scenes of human affairs. The inscription, "_ob

devictos Gothos_," upon the column of Claudius Gothicus now acquired a

deeper meaning.

But one cannot think of the reign of Arcadius without recalling the fact

that for six years of that reign Constantinople was adorned by the

virtues, and thrilled by the eloquence, of John Chrysostom. Although

popular with the masses, he provoked the bitter hostility of the Court

and of a powerful section of the clergy, by his scathing rebukes of the

frivolous and luxurious habits of fashionable society, and by the

strictness of his ecclesiastical rule. He had the misfortune to quarrel

with the ladies of the city, including the Empress, for their

extravagance and looseness of manners. Ladies of fashion, for instance,

saw nothing unbecoming in taking a swim in the public cisterns of the

city. A sermon, preached while a statue of the Empress was being

inaugurated close to the cathedral of S. Sophia, filled the cup of his

offences. It may not be true that in the course of the discourse he

compared the Empress to Herodias demanding the head of his namesake,

John the Baptist. But whatever the precise form of his words, he said

enough to exasperate her to a degree that made her insist upon his final

banishment, notwithstanding all the popular opposition to that step. By

a strange fate, the pedestal of the column which bore the statue still

remains, being now placed for safe keeping within the railing that

encloses a narrow strip of ground on the northern side of the Church of

S. Irene, in the first court of the Seraglio. A Latin inscription upon

it records the erection of the monument in honour of Eudoxia, ever

Augusta, by Simplicius, the Prefect of the city; while an inscription in

Greek adds the information that the statue was of silver, the column of

porphyry, and that the monument stood near the Senate-House.

Notwithstanding, however, the anxieties of the period, the improvement

of the city continued to go forward. The splendour of the Court was

increased by the erection of four princely mansions, placed respectively

at the disposal of the Empress and her three daughters, Arcadia, Marina,

and the famous Pulcheria. New Thermæ were built, one of them, the Thermæ

Arcadianæ, situated near the Sea of Marmora on the level tract below S.

Irene, being a great ornament to the city. A more abundant supply of

water was secured by the construction of the large open reservoir,

whose basin, 152 metres square, now occupied by vegetable gardens and

houses, is still seen to the south-west of the Mosque of Sultan Selim,

above the quarter of the Phanar. But the most notable addition to the

equipment of the capital was a great forum placed upon the summit of the

Xerolophus, the hill at the south-western corner of the city. It was

commonly known as the Forum of Arcadius, but sometimes also as the Forum

of Theodosius, on account, probably, of additions made to it by

Theodosius II., the son and successor of Arcadius.

[Illustration: REFUGEE HUTS ON THE MARMORA

This pile of huts is perched on the old seaward walls overlooking the

Sea of Marmora. Petroleum cans are largely used for building material.]

As usual, the forum was surrounded by porticoes and adorned with many

statues; but its chief ornament was another lofty hollow column similar

to that in the Forum of Theodosius I., thus furnishing the city with the

same number of that class of columns as Rome possessed. On the summit of

the monument stood the statue of Arcadius, and the procession of

sculptured figures that winded their way around the shaft to his feet

celebrated his victories over the Goths. The column held its place, in

spite of storms, earthquakes, and fires, until 1715, when, threatening

to fall, it was taken down as far as its pedestal, for the safety of

neighbouring buildings. But it was inspected by many European visitors

to Constantinople previous to that date, with the fortunate result that

we have drawings and descriptions of the monument which allow us to form

some adequate idea of its general appearance and artistic merits. It

stood upon a platform of three steps, the uppermost step being 33½

feet square. The pedestal, a hollow cube, rose 26 feet high, each side

consisting of six huge blocks of marble. Along its upper portion it was

adorned profusely with wreaths, eagles, genii, and other usual forms of

architectural decoration, while the eastern, western, and southern sides

were covered with triumphal scenes in bas-relief. "Along the highest

part of the pedestal, on the southern side," says the traveller Wheler,

"one sees the Labarum in a wreath held by two Victories. Below it, are

the Emperors Arcadius and Honorius, in honour of whom the column was

erected, with two Victories crowning them in presence of a crowd of

senators. Still lower down, in a third line, appear Victories contending

with one another, and several figures wearing mural crowns, representing

the cities conquered by the armies of the two Emperors." From the

pedestal to the summit of the column 23 drums of marble, so well joined

as to seem one piece of stone, soared some 121 feet higher to give

the monument a total altitude of 146 feet. The figures on the upper part

of the shaft were larger than those nearer the ground, so as to appear

of the same size as the latter when seen from a distance. The hollow

shell of the shaft was 28 feet round, and from 2 feet to 1¾ foot

thick, the thickness diminishing as the shaft ascended. From the door in

the northern side of the pedestal 233 steps, lighted by 50 lights, led

one through the shaft to a door opening upon the abacus of the capital,

a platform 17¾ feet square, from which to survey securely the

glorious panorama presented by the great city below, and the surrounding

landscape of sea and islands and mountains.

[Illustration: TURKISH DELIGHT FACTORY

The contents of the large copper pans are kept stirring for two hours or

more over a wood fire; various flavourings are added during this process

according to the result desired; those mostly in use are essence of

almonds, vanilla, rose leaves, almonds and pistachios.]

Constantinople, painted by Warwick Goble, described by Alexander Van Millingen · 第 2 / 13 章