THE ENGLISH APOTHECARIES.

Although the Grocers were the recognised drug dealers of this country,

apothecaries who were associated in their Guild were also recognised.

Some authorities name Richard Fitznigel as apothecary to Henry II

before he was made Bishop of London. But this evidence cannot be

trusted. The first definite allusion to an apothecary in England occurs

in 1345, when Edward III granted a pension of sixpence a day for life

to Coursus de Gangeland, an apothecary of London, in recognition of

his services in attending on the king during his illness in Scotland.

The record of this grant is found in Rymer’s “Foedera,” which was not

published until 1704, but Rymer was historiographer royal, appointed

by William III, and his work was a compilation from official archives.

An earlier mention of an apothecary is found in the Scottish Exchequer

Rolls wherein it appears that on the death of Robert the Bruce, in

1329, payments were made to John the Apothecary, presumably for

materials for embalming the king’s body. Dr. J. Mason Good, who wrote

a “History of Medicine, so far as it relates to the Profession of the

Apothecary,” in 1795, mentions, on the authority of Regner, that J.

de Falcand de Luca publicly vended medicines in London in 1357, while

Freind (“History of Medicine,” 1725) states that Pierre de Montpellier

was appointed Apothecary to Edward III in 1360.

It is clear, therefore, that the apothecary was a familiar professional

personage in England five hundred years ago. Conclusive evidence of his

practice is given by Chaucer, who, in the Prologue to the “Canterbury

Tales” (written in the last quarter of the fourteenth century),

describing a “Doctour of Phisike” says--

Ful reddy hadde he his apothecaries

To send him dragges and his lettuaries

For eche of hem made other for to Winne.

The satirical suggestion of the mutual obligations of physicians and

apothecaries has been familiar for all these centuries.

It seems certain that in Henry VIII’s reign the apothecaries were

doing a considerable amount of medical practice, besides selling

drugs. The Act of 1511 incorporating the College of Physicians and

giving them the exclusive right to practise physic in London and

for seven miles round, was largely used, if not intended, against

apothecaries. In 1542, however, an Act was passed which rather modified

the severe restrictions of the original statute, and under the new law

apothecaries became more aggressive. In Mary’s reign the Physicians

again got the legislative advantage, and there is a record in the

archives of the College of Physicians (preserved by Dr. Goodall, who

wrote “A History of the Proceedings of the College against Empiricks,”

in 1684) stating that in Queen Elizabeth’s reign the President and

Censors of the College summoned the Wardens of the Grocers’ Company

and all the apothecaries of London and the suburbs to appear before

them, “and enjoyned them that when they made a dispensation of medicine

they should expose their several ingredients (of which they were

composed) to open view in their shops for six or eight days that so the

physicians passing by might judge of the goodness of them, and prevent

their buying or selling any corrupt or decayed medicines.” The grocers

and apothecaries do not appear to have raised any objection to this

decree. Whether they obeyed it or not is not stated.

Chronicles of Pharmacy, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 166 / 293 题