SPIKENARD

is mentioned three times in the Song of Songs (i, 12, iv, 13, iv, 14),

and in the New Testament on two occasions (Mark xiv, 3, and John xii,

3), a box of spikenard ointment, “very costly” and “very precious” is,

in the instance recorded by St. Mark, poured on the Saviour’s head,

and in the narrative of St. John, is used to anoint His feet. On both

occasions we are told that the value of this box or vase was three

hundred pence. It is explained in the Revised Version that the coin

named was equivalent to about 8½d. The price of the ointment used was

therefore over ten pounds.

In the Greek text the word used is nardos pitike. It has been variously

conjectured that the adjective may have meant liquid, genuine or

powdered; the word lends itself to either of those meanings. Or it may

have been a local term, or possibly it may have been altered from a

word which would have meant what we understand by “spike” in botany.

The most likely meaning is “genuine,” for we know that this product

was at that period a perfume in high esteem, and that there were

several qualities, the best, and by far the costliest, being brought

from India. The ointment employed was really an otto, and it was

imported into Rome and other cities of the Empire in alabaster vessels.

Dioscorides and Galen refer to it as nardostachys. The Arab name for it

was Sumbul Hindi, but this must not be confounded with the sumbul which

we know. The word sumbul simply means spike. The botanical origin of

the Scripture spikenard, the nardostachys of Dioscorides, was cleared

up, it is generally agreed, by Sir William Jones in 1790. He traced

it to a Himalayan plant of the valerian order which was afterwards

exactly identified by Royle. A Brahman gave some of the fibrous roots

to Sir William Jones, and told him it was employed in their religious

sacrifices.

Pliny mentions an ointment of spikenard composed of the Indian nard,

with myrrh, balm, custos, amomum, and other ingredients, but the

“genuine” nard alluded to in the Gospels was probably the simple otto.

Pliny also states that the Indian nard was worth, in his time, in Rome,

one hundred denarii per pound.

Horace mentions an onyx box of nard which was considered of equal value

with a large vessel of wine:

Nardo vinum merebere

Nardi parvus onyx eliciet cadum.

Chronicles of Pharmacy, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 142 / 293 题