Their losses in the action were terribly severe. Of the fifteen

thousand infantry, English and Hanoverian, for the Hanoverians bore

themselves not less nobly than their Allies, nearly six thousand were

killed or wounded, the casualties of the twenty English battalions just

exceeding four thousand men. The heaviest sufferers were the Twelfth

and Twenty-third regiments, both of which lost over three hundred men,

the Twenty-first and Thirty-first, which lost rather fewer than three

hundred men apiece, and the three battalions of Guards, which lost

each of them about two hundred and fifty. Of the Generals of Foot,

Cumberland, Ligonier, and Brigadier Skelton, though in the hottest of

the fire, alone came off unhurt; all of the rest were either killed

or wounded. Many regiments of cavalry also suffered not a little, in

particular the Blues and Royal Dragoons; and the total loss of the

British cavalry exceeded three hundred men and six hundred horses. The

loss of the French was never made public, but was certainly at least

equal to that of the Allies. Contemporary accounts set it down, with no

great improbability, at fully ten thousand men. As an example of the

prowess of British infantry, Fontenoy stands almost without a parallel

in its history. The battalions formed under a cross-fire of artillery,

remained halted under the same fire, advanced slowly for half a

mile in perfect order under the same fire, and marched up to within

pistol-shot of the French infantry to receive their volley before they

discharged a shot. They shattered the French battalions to pieces,

repulsed three separate attacks of cavalry, halted under a heavy

cannonade, retired for some distance and re-formed under a cross-fire,

advanced again with both artillery and musketry playing on front and

flanks, made the bravest brigade in the French service recoil, repelled

another desperate attack of cavalry, and retired slowly and orderly

under a cross-fire almost to the end. By consent of all the British

commanders it was Ingoldsby’s misunderstanding of his orders and his

failure to capture the Redoubt d’Eu that lost the battle; and Ingoldsby

was duly tried by court-martial for his behaviour. He was, however,

acquitted of all but an error in judgment; and indeed there was no

question of cowardice, for he accompanied the remainder of the infantry

in its advance with his own detachment and was severely wounded. It is

customary to blame Cumberland for dashing his head against a wall in

attempting such an attack; and no doubt he was guilty of a tactical

blunder in assaulting a re-entrant angle before the salient had been

carried. But he could hardly have been expected to count on such bad

luck as the failure of Ingoldsby on one flank and of the Dutch on

the other. The sheer audacity of his advance went near to give him

the victory. Saxe owned that he never dreamed that any General would

attempt such a stroke, or that any troops would execute it. Cumberland

is blamed also for not attacking either the Redoubt d’Eu or Fontenoy

after he had penetrated into the French camp. This charge is less

easy to rebut, for the French always know when they are beaten, and

seeing their left rolled up and troops advancing on Fontenoy in

flank and rear would probably have given up the game for lost, and

that the more readily since their ammunition in Fontenoy was for the

moment nearly exhausted. Even so, however, Saxe’s reserves were always

at hand at Ramecroix, and would have required to be held in check.

Another puzzling question, namely, why Cumberland did not make greater

use of his artillery in the action, is answered by the fact that the

contractors for the horsing of the guns ran off with the horses early

in the day. Such an occurrence was by no means unusual, and yet it

never happened to Marlborough, not even at Malplaquet. Altogether, the

conclusion seems to be that Cumberland stumbled on to a brilliant feat

of arms by mistake, and, though seconded by his troops with bravery

equal to his own, was not a General of sufficient capacity to turn his

success to account.

At the close of the action Cumberland retreated to Ath and encamped

under the guns of that fortress, leaving his wounded to the mercy of

the French, who, by a strange perversion of their usual chivalry,

treated them with shameful barbarity. Among the wounded, strangely

enough, were a few of the new sect of Methodists founded by John

Wesley, who faced death and wounds with the stern exultation that had

once inspired the troopers of Cromwell. One of them wrote to Wesley

that, even after a bullet in each arm had forced him to retire from the

field, he hardly knew whether he was on earth or in heaven, such was

the sweetness of the day. This man and a few more of his kind probably

helped their fellow-sufferers through the misery of the days following

the battle, until Cumberland’s furious remonstrances with Saxe procured

for them better treatment.

From Ath Cumberland fell back to Lessines and drew out such British

corps as were in garrison in Flanders, to replace those which had

suffered most heavily in the action. Meanwhile Tournay, very shortly

after the battle, fell by treachery into the hands of the French; and

Saxe’s field-army being thus raised to a force nearly double that of

the Allies, Cumberland was reduced to utter helplessness. The mischief

of Fontenoy lay not in the repulse and the loss of men, for the

British did not consider themselves to have been beaten, but in the

destruction of all confidence in the Dutch troops. The troubles which

had harassed Wade to despair now reappeared. Cumberland,

notwithstanding his inferiority in strength, was expected somehow to

defend Flanders, Brabant, and above all Brussels, and yet

simultaneously to keep an active army in the field. Worse than this,

he attempted to fulfil the expectation. Against his better judgment he

weakened his force still further by detaching a force for the garrison

of Mons,[83] after which, instead of taking up a strong position on

the Scheldt to cover Ghent at all hazards, he yielded to the pressure

of the Austrians and crossed the Dender to protect Brussels.[84]

Halting too long between two opinions he at last sent off a detachment

for the defence of Ghent, half of which was cut off and driven back

with heavy loss, while the other half, after enduring much rough usage

on the march, entered Ghent only to see the town surprised by the

French on the following day. ◆June 30./July 11.◆ Four British

regiments took part in this unlucky enterprise and suffered severely,

while the Royal Scots and the Twenty-third, which had been despatched

to Ghent after Fontenoy, of course became prisoners.[85] Moreover, a

vast quantity of British military stores were captured in Ghent,

although Cumberland had a week before ordered that they should be

removed.[86] After this blow Cumberland retired to Vilvorde, a little

to the north of Brussels, still hoping to cover both that city and

Antwerp, and so to preserve his communications both with Germany and

with the sea. Here again he sacrificed his better judgment to the

clamour of the Austrians, for he would much have preferred to secure

Antwerp only. His position was in fact most critical, and he was

keenly alive to it.[87] Just when his anxiety was greatest there came

a letter from the Secretary of State, announcing that invasion of

England was imminent, and hoping that troops could be spared from

Flanders without prejudice to his operations. “What!” answered

Ligonier indignantly; “are you aware that the enemy has seventy

thousand men against our thirty thousand, and that they can place a

superior force on the canal before us and send another army round

between us and Antwerp, to cut off our supplies and force us to fight

at a disadvantage? ◆August.◆ This is our position, and this is the

result of providing His Royal Highness with insufficient troops; and

yet you speak of our having a corps to spare to defend England!”[88]

Saxe’s plan for reducing the Allies was in fact uniformly the same

throughout the whole of the war, namely to cut off their

communications with the sea on one side and with Germany on the

other. Even before he began to press Cumberland northward toward

Antwerp, he had detached a force to lay siege to Ostend, which was the

English base. Cumberland, on his side, had advised that the dykes

should be broken down and the country inundated in order to preserve

it, and both Dutch and Austrians had promised that this should be

done; but as usual it was not done, and before the end of August

Ostend had surrendered to the French. ◆Aug. 13/24.◆ The English base

was then perforce shifted to Antwerp. But by this time the requests

for the return of troops to England had become urgent and imperative

orders. ◆Sept.–Oct.◆ First ten battalions were recalled, then the rest

of the foot, and at last practically the whole of the army, including

Cumberland himself.[89] The cause was the Jacobite rebellion which was

stamped out by the victory of Culloden in April 1746.

AUTHORITIES.—The official account of Fontenoy was drawn up by

Ligonier in French and translated into English, with some omissions,

for publication. The French version is far the better and will be

found in the State Papers. The account in the _Life of the Duke of

Cumberland_ is poor, though valuable as having been drawn up from the

reports of the English Generals. Of the French accounts Voltaire’s is

the best known, and, as might be expected from such a hand, admirably

spirited. More valuable are the accounts in the _Conquête des Pays

Bas_, in the _Mémoires du Maréchal de Saxe_, where Saxe’s own report

may be read, in the _Campagnes des Pays Bas_, and in Espagnac. The

newspapers furnish a few picturesque incidents of some value.

VOL. II BOOK VII. CHAPTER VII

◆1746.◆

The virtual evacuation of the Low Countries by the British, in

consequence of the Jacobite Rebellion, was an advantage too obvious to

be overlooked by the French. At the end of January, though

winter-quarters were not yet broken up, they severed the communication

between Antwerp and Brussels, and a week later took the town of

Brussels itself by escalade. The citadel, after defending itself for a

fortnight, went the way of the town, and the capital of the Spanish

Netherlands was turned into a French place of arms.[90] The

consternation in Holland was great, and was increased when the French

presently besieged and captured Antwerp. ◆May 20/31.◆ Meanwhile the

British Commander, Lord Dunmore, who had been left in the Netherlands

with a few squadrons of cavalry, could only look on in absolute

helplessness. It was not until June that the Hessian troops in British

pay and a few British battalions could be embarked, together with

General Ligonier to command them, from England; and it was not until

July, owing to foul winds, that they were finally landed at

Williamstadt. The change of base was significant in itself, for, since

the capture of Ostend and Antwerp, there was no haven for British

ships except in the United Provinces. Even after the disembarkation

these forces were found to be still unready to take the field. The

Hessians had not a grain of powder among them, and there were neither

horses for the artillery nor waggons for the baggage. Again, to add

small difficulties to great, the Austrian General, Batthyany, having

no British officer as his peer in command, denied to the British

troops the place of honour at the right of the line. It was a trifling

matter, but yet sufficient to embarrass counsel, destroy harmony, and

delay operations.[91]

While the Allies were thus painfully drawing their forces together, the

activity of the French never ceased. ◆June 30./July 11.◆ The Prince of

Conti was detached with a considerable force to the Haine, where he

quickly reduced Mons and St. Ghislain, thus throwing down almost the

last relics of the Austrian barrier in the south. ◆July 13/24.◆ Thence

moving to the Sambre, Conti laid siege to Charleroi. It was now

sufficiently clear that the plan of the French campaign was to operate

on the line of the Meuse for the invasion of Holland. Maestricht once

taken, the rest would be easy, for most of the Dutch army were prisoners

in the hands of the French; and, with the possession of the line of the

Meuse, communication between the Allied forces of England and of Austria

would be cut off. But before Maestricht could be touched, Namur must

first be captured; and the campaign of 1746 accordingly centred about

Namur.

For the first fortnight of July the Allies remained at Terheyden, a

little to the north of Breda, Saxe’s army lying some thirty miles

south-westward of them about Antwerp. ◆July 6/17.◆ On the 17th of July

the Allies at last got on the march, still with some faint hopes of

saving Charleroi, and proceeded south-eastward, a movement which Saxe at

once parried by marching parallel with them to the Dyle between Arschot

and Louvain. Pushing forward, despite endless difficulties of transport

and forage, through a wretched barren country, the Allies, now under

command of Prince Charles of Lorraine, reached Peer, turned southward

across the Denier at Hasselt, and by the 27th of July were at Borchloen.

◆July 16/27.◆ They were thus actually on the eastern side of the French

main army, within reach of the Mehaigne and not without good hope of

saving Namur if not Charleroi. ◆July 21./Aug. 1.◆ On the 1st of August

they crossed the Mehaigne, only to learn to their bitter disappointment

that Charleroi had surrendered that very morning. Saxe meanwhile, with

the principal part of his army, still lay entrenched at Louvain, with

detachments pushed forward to Tirlemont and Gembloux. The Allies

continued their march before the eyes of these detachments to Masy on

the Orneau, and there took up a position between that river and the

head-waters of the Mehaigne, fronting to the north-east. This was the

line approved through many generations of war as the best for the

protection of Namur.[92]

Saxe now drew nearer to them, and the two armies lay opposite to each

other, in many places not more than a musket-shot apart, both entrenched

to the teeth. The Allies so far had decidedly gained a success, but they

were outnumbered by the French by three to two, and they were confined

within a narrow space wherein subsistence was extremely difficult;

while, if they moved, Namur was lost. Ligonier, who was most uneasy over

the situation, longed for five thousand cavalry with which to make a

dash at Malines and so to call the enemy back in haste to defend

Brussels and Antwerp.[93] Prince Charles, however, was averse from

operations of such a nature. His hope was that Saxe would offer him

battle on the historic plain of Ramillies, where, notwithstanding the

disparity of numbers, he trusted that the quality of his troops and the

traditions of victory would enable him to prevail. But Saxe had no

intention of doing anything of the kind. He did indeed shift his

position farther to the north and east, with the field of Ramillies in

his rear, but it was not to offer battle. ◆Aug. 18/29.◆ Pushing out

detachments to eastward he captured Huy, and cutting off the Allies’

communications with Liège and Maestricht forced them to cross the Meuse

and to fall back on Maestricht from the other side of the river. Cross

the Meuse the Allies accordingly did, unmolested, to Ligonier’s great

relief, by twenty thousand French who were stationed on the eastern bank

of the stream. They then opened communication with Maestricht, five

leagues away, while Saxe extended his army comfortably with its face to

the eastward along the line of the Jaar from Warem to Tongres, waiting

till want of forage should compel the Allies to recross the Meuse.

◆Sept. 2/13.◆ Back they came over the river within a fortnight, as he

had expected, and the Marshal, without attempting to dispute the

passage, retreated quietly for a few miles, knowing full well that his

enemy could not follow him from lack of bread. Ligonier never in his

life longed so intensely for the end of a campaign.[94]

On the 17th of September the Allies advanced upon the French and

offered battle. ◆Sept. 6/17.◆ Saxe answered by retiring to an

impregnable position between Tongres and the Demer. There was no

occasion for him to fight, when his enemies were short of provisions

and their cavalry was going to ruin from want of forage. So there the

two armies remained once more, within sight of each other but

unwilling to fight, because an attack on the entrenchments of either

host would have led to the certain destruction of the attacking

force.◆Aug. 30./Sept. 10.◆ But meanwhile the trenches had been opened

before Namur by a French corps under the Prince of Clermont, and

within nine days the town had fallen. Ligonier again urged his design,

for which he had prepared the necessary magazines, to upset Saxe’s

plans by a dash upon Antwerp, but he could find no support in the

council of war; so there was nothing for the Allies to do but to wait

until some further French success should compel them to move. Such a

success was not long in coming. The castle of Namur surrendered after

a miserable defence of but eleven days; Clermont’s corps was released

for operations in the field, and the Allies were forced to fall back

for the protection of Liège. ◆Sept. 27./Oct. 7.◆ Accordingly, on the

7th of October they crossed the Jaar, not without annoyance from the

enemy, and took up a new position, which gave them indeed possession

of Liège, but placed them between the Meuse in their rear, and an army

of nearly twice their strength on the Jaar before their front.[95]

[Illustration:

ROUCOUX

Sep. 30th/Oct. 11th 1746

]

◆Sept. 29./Oct. 10.◆

Now at last Saxe resolved to strike a blow. On the 10th of October he

crossed the Jaar with evident intention of an attack, and the Allied

army received orders to be ready for action before the following dawn.

The Allies’ position faced very nearly due west, the army being drawn

up astride of the two paved roads leading into Liège from Tongres and

St. Trond. Their extreme right rested on the Jaar and was covered by

the villages of Slins, Fexhe, and Enick, all of which were strongly

entrenched and occupied by the Austrians. South of Enick extended an

open plain from that village to the village of Liers, and in this

plain was posted the Hanoverian infantry and four British battalions,

the Eighth, Nineteenth, Thirty-third, and Forty-third Foot, with the

Hessian infantry on their left, in rear of Liers. The Hanoverian

cavalry prolonged the line southward to the village of Varoux, and the

Sixth and Seventh Dragoons and Scots Greys continued it to the village

of Roucoux, from which point Dutch troops carried it on to the village

of Ance, which formed the extreme left of the position. Ligonier did

not like the situation, for he did not see how the turning of the left

flank could be prevented if, as would certainly be the case, the French

should seriously attempt it. Prince Charles, knowing that, if his right

were turned, his retreat to Maestricht would be cut off, had taken

care to hold the right flank in real strength and dared not weaken it;

but the position, with the Meuse in its rear, was perilously shallow,

while the convergence of two ravines from the Jaar and Mehaigne into

its centre allowed of but one narrow way of communication between the

right and the left of the army. The defects of the Allies’ dispositions

were in fact not unlike those which had proved fatal to King William

at Landen; and Ligonier’s anxiety was proved to rest on all too good

foundation.

◆Sept. 30./Oct. 11.◆

The morning of the 11th of October opened with bad news for the Allies.

The French had been admitted into Liège by the inhabitants behind the

backs of the Dutch, so that the Prince of Waldeck, who commanded on the

left, was obliged to withdraw eight battalions from Roucoux and post

them _en potence_ on his left flank, with his cavalry in support. Thus

the defence of Roucoux, as well as of Liers and Varoux, was left to

eight battalions of British, Hanoverians, and Hessians only. This made

the outlook for the Allied left the worse, since it was evident that

the brunt of the French attack would fall upon it. Saxe gave Prince

Charles little time for reflection. He had one hundred and twenty

thousand men against eighty thousand, and he knew that of the eighty

thousand at least one-third were tied to the Austrian entrenchments

about the Jaar. He opened the action by a furious assault upon the

Dutch on the left wing, his infantry being formed in dense columns,

so that the attack could be renewed continually by fresh troops.

Simultaneously fifty-five battalions in three similar columns were

launched upon Liers, Varoux, and Roucoux. Outmatched though they were,

Dutch, Germans, and British all fought splendidly and repelled more

than one attack. But, to use Ligonier’s words, as soon as two French

brigades had been repulsed in each village, a third brigade ran in;

and the eight battalions, though they still held Liers, were forced

to withdraw both from Roucoux and Varoux. Being rallied, however, by

Ligonier, they advanced again and recaptured both villages; and the

Nineteenth and Forty-third took up a position in a hollow road which

they held to the last. The Dutch now began to retire across the rear

of the position from the left, in good order despite of heavy losses,

while Ligonier checked the enemy in the plain with the British cavalry.

When the Dutch had passed, he ordered his own men to retreat in the

same direction, still covering the movement with the cavalry and with

the Thirteenth and Twenty-sixth Foot, which had been sent to the field

from the garrison of Maestricht. The Austrians formed a rear-guard in

turn when the British and their German comrades had passed; and thus

the whole army filed off, unpursued and in perfect order, and crossed

the Meuse in safety on the following morning.

The action may be looked upon as a fortunate escape for the Allies,

since it was impossible, humanly speaking, that it could have issued

favourably for them. Prince Charles, in seeking to cover both Liège

and Maestricht, had attempted too much. His army thus occupied too

wide a front, the villages in the centre were too weakly held, there

was hardly anywhere a second line of infantry, and the left flank

could not be sustained against so superior an enemy. The total loss of

the Allies was about five thousand men, which was sufficiently severe

considering that but a third of the army was engaged. The casualties of

the British were three hundred and fifty killed and wounded, of whom

no fewer than two hundred belonged to the Forty-third. The French lost

as many men as the Allies, or more, and gained little by the action

except eight guns captured from the British, Hanoverians, and Hessians.

Had not the Allied troops been far better in quality and discipline

than the French, they must have been lost during their retreat with

superior numbers both in flank and rear. Both armies presently retired

into winter-quarters, and the campaign ended far less disastrously than

might have been feared for the Allies.[96]

Unfortunately, however, it was not in Flanders only that discredit fell

upon the British arms. At the end of September a force of six

battalions[97] was sent, under command of General St. Clair, to the

coast of Brittany to attack Port L’Orient and destroy the stores of the

French East India Company there. ◆Sept. 20./Oct. 1.◆ The enterprise

was conducted with amazing feebleness. The troops landed at Ouimperle

Bay practically unopposed, but, being fired at on their march on the

following day, were turned loose to the plunder of a small town as a

punishment to the inhabitants for their resistance. On the following day

they reached L’Orient, which the Deputy Governor of the East India

Company offered to surrender on good terms. His overtures, however, were

rejected and a siege was begun in form; but, after a few days of firing

and the loss of about a hundred men killed and wounded, St. Clair

thought it prudent to retreat; and on the 12th of October the troops

re-embarked and returned to England. ◆Oct. 1/12.◆ Anything more

pointless than the design or more contemptible than the execution of

this project can hardly be conceived, for it simply employed regiments

which were badly needed in Flanders and America, in useless operations

which did not amount to a diversion.

◆1747.◆

If the cause of Queen Maria Theresa was to be saved, it was evident

that great efforts were imperative in the coming campaign of 1747.

To meet the vast numbers brought into the field by the French the

Austrians promised to have sixty thousand men at Maseyck on the Meuse

by April; the British contributed four regiments of cavalry and

fourteen battalions of infantry; and it was hoped that the Allies would

take the field with a total strength of one hundred and ten battalions,

one hundred and sixty squadrons, and two hundred and twenty guns,

besides irregular troops, the whole to be under command of the Duke

of Cumberland.[98] Unfortunately the weather was adverse to an early

opening of the campaign; and the French, by the seizure of Cadsand

and Sluys, which were shamefully surrendered by the Dutch, closed the

southern mouth of the Scheldt below Antwerp. This was a sad blow to the

arrangements for the transport of the Allies, since it brought about

the necessity of hauling all the forage for the British overland from

Breda. Had Cumberland been in a position to open the campaign before

the French, he meant to have laid siege to Antwerp; as things were, he

was compelled, thanks chiefly to the apathy of the Dutch, to attempt

to bring Saxe to a general action. His last letter before beginning

operations has, however, an interest of another kind. It contained a

recommendation that Major James Wolfe might be permitted to purchase

a vacant lieutenant-colonelcy in the Eighth Foot, that officer having

served constantly and well during the past two years as a major of

brigade, and proved himself capable and desirous to do his duty.[99]

British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794 Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army" · 第 10 / 28 段