OF INFINITY.
1. Infinity, in its original Intention, attributed to Space, Duration,
and Number.
He that would know what kind of idea it is to which we give the name of
INFINITY, cannot do it better than by considering to what infinity is
by the mind more immediately attributed; and then how the mind comes to
frame it.
FINITE and INFINITE seem to me to be looked upon by the mind as the
MODES OF QUANTITY, and to be attributed primarily in their first
designation only to those things which have parts, and are capable of
increase or diminution by the addition or subtraction of any the least
part: and such are the ideas of space, duration, and number, which we
have considered in the foregoing chapters. It is true, that we cannot
but be assured, that the great God, of whom and from whom are all
things, is incomprehensibly infinite: but yet, when we apply to that
first and supreme Being our idea of infinite, in our weak and narrow
thoughts, we do it primarily in respect to his duration and ubiquity;
and, I think, more figuratively to his power, wisdom, and goodness, and
other attributes which are properly inexhaustible and incomprehensible,
&c. For, when we call THEM infinite, we have no other idea of this
infinity but what carries with it some reflection on, and imitation of,
that number or extent of the acts or objects of God’s power, wisdom,
and goodness, which can never be supposed so great, or so many, which
these attributes will not always surmount and exceed, let us multiply
them in our thoughts as far as we can, with all the infinity of endless
number. I do not pretend to say how these attributes are in God, who is
infinitely beyond the reach of our narrow capacities: they do, without
doubt, contain in them all possible perfection: but this, I say, is our
way of conceiving them, and these our ideas of their infinity.
2. The Idea of Finite easily got.
Finite then, and infinite, being by the mind looked on as MODIFICATIONS
of expansion and duration, the next thing to be considered, is,—HOW THE
MIND COMES BY THEM. As for the idea of finite, there is no great
difficulty. The obvious portions of extension that affect our senses,
carry with them into the mind the idea of finite: and the ordinary
periods of succession, whereby we measure time and duration, as hours,
days, and years, are bounded lengths. The difficulty is, how we come by
those BOUNDLESS IDEAS of eternity and immensity; since the objects we
converse with come so much short of any approach or proportion to that
largeness.
3. How we come by the Idea of Infinity.
Every one that has any idea of any stated lengths of space, as a foot,
finds that he can repeat that idea; and joining it to the former, make
the idea of two feet; and by the addition of a third, three feet; and
so on, without ever coming to an end of his additions, whether of the
same idea of a foot, or, if he pleases, of doubling it, or any other
idea he has of any length, as a mile, or diameter of the earth, or of
the orbis magnus: for whichever of these he takes, and how often soever
he doubles, or any otherwise multiplies it, he finds, that, after he
has continued his doubling in his thoughts, and enlarged his idea as
much as he pleases, he has no more reason to stop, nor is one jot
nearer the end of such addition, than he was at first setting out: the
power of enlarging his idea of space by further additions remaining
still the same, he hence takes the idea of infinite space.
4. Our Idea of Space boundless.
This, I think, is the way whereby the mind gets the IDEA of infinite
space. It is a quite different consideration, to examine whether the
mind has the idea of such a boundless space ACTUALLY EXISTING; since
our ideas are not always proofs of the existence of things: but yet,
since this comes here in our way, I suppose I may say, that we are APT
TO THINK that space in itself is actually boundless, to which
imagination the idea of space or expansion of itself naturally leads
us. For, it being considered by us, either as the extension of body, or
as existing by itself, without any solid matter taking it up, (for of
such a void space we have not only the idea, but I have proved, as I
think, from the motion of body, its necessary existence,) it is
impossible the mind should be ever able to find or suppose any end of
it, or be stopped anywhere in its progress in this space, how far
soever it extends its thoughts. Any bounds made with body, even
adamantine walls, are so far from putting a stop to the mind in its
further progress in space and extension that it rather facilitates and
enlarges it. For so far as that body reaches, so far no one can doubt
of extension; and when we are come to the utmost extremity of body,
what is there that can there put a stop, and satisfy the mind that it
is at the end of space, when it perceives that it is not; nay, when it
is satisfied that body itself can move into it? For, if it be necessary
for the motion of body, that there should be an empty space, though
ever so little, here amongst bodies; and if it be possible for body to
move in or through that empty space;—nay, it is impossible for any
particle of matter to move but into an empty space; the same
possibility of a body’s moving into a void space, beyond the utmost
bounds of body, as well as into a void space interspersed amongst
bodies, will always remain clear and evident: the idea of empty pure
space, whether within or beyond the confines of all bodies, being
exactly the same, differing not in nature, though in bulk; and there
being nothing to hinder body from moving into it. So that wherever the
mind places itself by any thought, either amongst, or remote from all
bodies, it can, in this uniform idea of space, nowhere find any bounds,
any end; and so must necessarily conclude it, by the very nature and
idea of each part of it, to be actually infinite.
5. And so of Duration.
As, by the power we find in ourselves of repeating, as often as we
will, any idea of space, we get the idea of IMMENSITY; so, by being
able to repeat the idea of any length of duration we have in our minds,
with all the endless addition of number, we come by the idea of
ETERNITY. For we find in ourselves, we can no more come to an end of
such repeated ideas than we can come to the end of number; which every
one perceives he cannot. But here again it is another question, quite
different from our having an IDEA of eternity, to know whether there
were ANY REAL BEING, whose duration has been eternal. And as to this, I
say, he that considers something now existing, must necessarily come to
Something eternal. But having spoke of this in another place, I shall
say here no more of it, but proceed on to some other considerations of
our idea of infinity.
6. Why other Ideas are not capable of Infinity.
If it be so, that our idea of infinity be got from the power we observe
in ourselves of repeating, without end, our own ideas, it may be
demanded,—Why we do not attribute infinity to other ideas, as well as
those of space and duration; since they may be as easily, and as often,
repeated in our minds as the other: and yet nobody ever thinks of
infinite sweetness or infinite whiteness, though he can repeat the idea
of sweet or white, as frequently as those of a yard or a day? To which
I answer,—All the ideas that are considered as having parts, and are
capable of increase by the addition of an equal or less parts, afford
us, by their repetition, the idea of infinity; because, with this
endless repetition, there is continued an enlargement of which there
CAN be no end. But for other ideas it is not so. For to the largest
idea of extension or duration that I at present have, the addition of
any the least part makes an increase; but to the perfectest idea I have
of the whitest whiteness, if I add another of a less equal whiteness,
(and of a whiter than I have, I cannot add the idea,) it makes no
increase, and enlarges not my idea at all; and therefore the different
ideas of whiteness, &c. are called degrees. For those ideas that
consist of part are capable of being augmented by every addition of the
least part; but if you take the idea of white, which one parcel of snow
yielded yesterday to our sight, and another idea of white from another
parcel of snow you see to-day, and put them together in your mind, they
embody, as it were, all run into one, and the idea of whiteness is not
at all increased and if we add a less degree of whiteness to a greater,
we are so far from increasing, that we diminish it. Those ideas that
consist not of parts cannot be augmented to what proportion men please,
or be stretched beyond what they have received by their senses; but
space, duration, and number, being capable of increase by repetition,
leave in the mind an idea of endless room for more; nor can we conceive
anywhere a stop to a further addition or progression: and so those
ideas ALONE lead our minds towards the thought of infinity.
7. Difference between infinity of Space, and Space infinite.
Though our idea of infinity arise from the contemplation of quantity,
and the endless increase the mind is able to make in quantity, by the
repeated additions of what portions thereof it pleases; yet I guess we
cause great confusion in our thoughts, when we join infinity to any
supposed idea of quantity the mind can be thought to have, and so
discourse or reason about an infinite quantity, as an infinite space,
or an infinite duration. For, as our idea of infinity being, as I
think, AN ENDLESS GROWING IDEA, but the idea of any quantity the mind
has, being at that time TERMINATED in that idea, (for be it as great as
it will, it can be no greater than it is,)—to join infinity to it, is
to adjust a standing measure to a growing bulk; and therefore I think
it is not an insignificant subtilty, if I say, that we are carefully to
distinguish between the idea of the infinity of space, and the idea of
a space infinite. The first is nothing but a supposed endless
progression of the mind, over what repeated ideas of space it pleases;
but to have actually in the mind the idea of a space infinite, is to
suppose the mind already passed over, and actually to have a view of
ALL those repeated ideas of space which an ENDLESS repetition can never
totally represent to it; which carries in it a plain contradiction.
8. We have no Idea of infinite Space.
This, perhaps, will be a little plainer, if we consider it in numbers.
The infinity of numbers, to the end of whose addition every one
perceives there is no approach, easily appears to any one that reflects
on it. But, how clear soever this idea of the infinity of number be,
there is nothing yet more evident than the absurdity of the actual idea
of an infinite number. Whatsoever POSITIVE ideas we have in our minds
of any space, duration, or number, let them be ever so great, they are
still finite; but when we suppose an inexhaustible remainder, from
which we remove all bounds, and wherein we allow the mind an endless
progression of thought, without ever completing the idea, there we have
our idea of infinity: which, though it seems to be pretty clear when we
consider nothing else in it but the negation of an end, yet, when we
would frame in our minds the idea of an infinite space or duration,
that idea is very obscure and confused, because it is made up of two
parts, very different, if not inconsistent. For, let a man frame in his
mind an idea of any space or number, as great as he will; it is plain
the mind RESTS AND TERMINATES in that idea, which is contrary to the
idea of infinity, which CONSISTS IN A SUPPOSED ENDLESS PROGRESSION. And
therefore I think it is that we are so easily confounded, when we come
to argue and reason about infinite space or duration, &c. Because the
parts of such an idea not being perceived to be, as they are,
inconsistent, the one side or other always perplexes, whatever
consequences we draw from the other; as an idea of motion not passing
on would perplex any one who should argue from such an idea, which is
not better than an idea of motion at rest. And such another seems to me
to be the idea of a space, or (which is the same thing) a number
infinite, i. e. of a space or number which the mind actually has, and
so views and terminates in; and of a space or number, which, in a
constant and endless enlarging and progression, it can in thought never
attain to. For, how large soever an idea of space I have in my mind, it
is no larger than it is that instant that I have it, though I be
capable the next instant to double it, and so on in infinitum; for that
alone is infinite which has no bounds; and that the idea of infinity,
in which our thoughts can find none.
9. Number affords us the clearest Idea of Infinity.
But of all other ideas, it is number, as I have said, which I think
furnishes us with the clearest and most distinct idea of infinity we
are capable of. For, even in space and duration, when the mind pursues
the idea of infinity, it there makes use of the ideas and repetitions
of numbers, as of millions and millions of miles, or years, which are
so many distinct ideas,—kept best by number from running into a
confused heap, wherein the mind loses itself; and when it has added
together as many millions, &c., as it pleases, of known lengths of
space or duration, the clearest idea it can get of infinity, is the
confused incomprehensible remainder of endless addible numbers, which
affords no prospect of stop or boundary.
10. Our different Conceptions of the Infinity of Number contrasted with
those of Duration and Expansion.
It will, perhaps, give us a little further light into the idea we have
of infinity, and discover to us, that it is NOTHING BUT THE INFINITY OF
NUMBER APPLIED TO DETERMINATE PARTS, OF WHICH WE HAVE IN OUR MINDS THE
DISTINCT IDEAS, if we consider that number is not generally thought by
us infinite, whereas duration and extension are apt to be so; which
arises from hence,—that in number we are at one end, as it were: for
there being in number nothing LESS than an unit, we there stop, and are
at an end; but in addition, or increase of number, we can set no
bounds: and so it is like a line, whereof one end terminating with us,
the other is extended still forwards, beyond all that we can conceive.
But in space and duration it is otherwise. For in duration we consider
it as if this line of number were extended BOTH ways—to an
unconceivable, undeterminate, and infinite length; which is evident to
anyone that will but reflect on what consideration he hath of Eternity;
which, I suppose, will find to be nothing else but the turning this
infinity of number both ways, a parte ante and a parte post, as they
speak. For, when we would consider eternity, a parte ante, what do we
but, beginning from ourselves and the present time we are in, repeat in
our minds ideas of years, or ages, or any other assignable portion of
duration past, with a prospect of proceeding in such addition with all
the infinity of number: and when we would consider eternity, a parte
post, we just after the same rate begin from ourselves, and reckon by
multiplied periods yet to come, still extending that line of number as
before. And these two being put together, are that infinite duration we
call ETERNITY which, as we turn our view either way, forwards or
backward appears infinite, because we still turn that way the infinite
end of number, i.e. the power still of adding more.
11. How we conceive the Infinity of Space.
The same happens also in space, wherein, conceiving ourselves to be, as
it were, in the centre, we do on all sides pursue those indeterminable
lines of number; and reckoning any way from ourselves, a yard, mile,
diameter of the earth or orbis magnus,—by the infinity of number, we
add others to them, as often as we will. And having no more reason to
set bounds to those repeated ideas than we have to set bounds to
number, we have that indeterminable idea of immensity.
12. Infinite Divisibility.
And since in any bulk of matter our thoughts can never arrive at the
utmost divisibility, therefore there is an apparent infinity to us also
in that, which has the infinity also of number; but with this
difference,—that, in the former considerations of the infinity of space
and duration, we only use addition of numbers; whereas this is like the
division of an unit into its fractions, wherein the mind also can
proceed in infinitum, as well as in the former additions; it being
indeed but the addition still of new numbers: though in the addition of
the one, we can have no more the POSITIVE idea of a space infinitely
great, than, in the division of the other, we can have the positive
idea of a body infinitely little;—our idea of infinity being, as I may
say, a growing or fugitive idea, still in a boundless progression, that
can stop nowhere.
13. No positive Idea of Infinity.
Though it be hard, I think, to find anyone so absurd as to say he has
the POSITIVE idea of an actual infinite number;—the infinity whereof
lies only in a power still of adding any combination of units to any
former number, and that as long and as much as one will; the like also
being in the infinity of space and duration, which power leaves always
to the mind room for endless additions;—yet there be those who imagine
they have positive ideas of infinite duration and space. It would, I
think, be enough to destroy any such positive idea of infinite, to ask
him that has it,—whether he could add to it or no; which would easily
show the mistake of such a positive idea. We can, I think, have no
positive idea of any space or duration which is not made up of, and
commensurate to, repeated numbers of feet or yards, or days and years;
which are the common measures, whereof we have the ideas in our minds,
and whereby we judge of the greatness of this sort of quantities. And
therefore, since an infinite idea of space or duration must needs be
made up of infinite parts, it can have no other infinity than that of
number CAPABLE still of further addition; but not an actual positive
idea of a number infinite. For, I think it is evident, that the
addition of finite things together (as are all lengths whereof we have
the positive ideas) can never otherwise produce the idea of infinite
than as number does; which consisting of additions of finite units one
to another, suggests the idea of infinite, only by a power we find we
have of still increasing the sum, and adding more of the same kind;
without coming one jot nearer the end of such progression.
14. How we cannot have a positive idea of infinity in Quantity.
They who would prove their idea of infinite to be positive, seem to me
to do it by a pleasant argument, taken from the negation of an end;
which being negative, the negation on it is positive. He that considers
that the end is, in body, but the extremity or superficies of that
body, will not perhaps be forward to grant that the end is a bare
negative: and he that perceives the end of his pen is black or white,
will be apt to think that the end is something more than a pure
negation. Nor is it, when applied to duration, the bare negation of
existence, but more properly the last moment of it. But as they will
have the end to be nothing but the bare negation of existence, I am
sure they cannot deny but the beginning of the first instant of being,
and is not by any body conceived to be a bare negation; and therefore,
by their own argument, the idea of eternal, A PARTE ANTE, or of a
duration without a beginning, is but a negative idea.
15. What is positive, what negative, in our Idea of infinite.
The idea of infinite has, I confess, something of positive in all those
things we apply to it. When we would think of infinite space or
duration, we at first step usually make some very large idea, as
perhaps of millions of ages, or miles, which possibly we double and
multiply several times. All that we thus amass together in our thoughts
is positive, and the assemblage of a great number of positive ideas of
space or duration. But what still remains beyond this we have no more a
positive distinct notion of than a mariner has of the depth of the sea;
where, having let down a large portion of his sounding-line, he reaches
no bottom. Whereby he knows the depth to be so many fathoms, and more;
but how much the more is, he hath no distinct notion at all: and could
he always supply new line, and find the plummet always sink, without
ever stopping, he would be something in the posture of the mind
reaching after a complete and positive idea of infinity. In which case,
let this line be ten, or ten thousand fathoms long, it equally
discovers what is beyond it, and gives only this confused and
comparative idea, that this is not all, but one may yet go farther. So
much as the mind comprehends of any space, it has a positive idea of:
but in endeavouring to make it infinite,—it being always enlarging,
always advancing,—the idea is still imperfect and incomplete. So much
space as the mind takes a view of in its contemplation of greatness, is
a clear picture, and positive in the understanding: but infinite is
still greater. 1. Then the idea of SO MUCH is positive and clear. 2.
The idea of GREATER is also clear; but it is but a comparative idea,
the idea of SO MUCH GREATER AS CANNOT BE COMPREHENDED. 3. And this is
plainly negative: not positive. For he has no positive clear idea of
the largeness of any extension, (which is that sought for in the idea
of infinite), that has not a comprehensive idea of the dimensions of
it: and such, nobody, I think, pretends to in what is infinite. For to
say a man has a positive clear idea of any quantity, without knowing
how great it is, is as reasonable as to say, he has the positive clear
idea of the number of the sands on the sea-shore, who knows not how
many there be, but only that they are more than twenty. For just such a
perfect and positive idea has he of an infinite space or duration, who
says it is LARGER THAN the extent or duration of ten, one hundred, one
thousand, or any other number of miles, or years, whereof he has or can
have a positive idea; which is all the idea, I think, we have of
infinite. So that what lies beyond our positive idea TOWARDS infinity,
lies in obscurity, and has the indeterminate confusion of a negative
idea, wherein I know I neither do nor can comprehend all I would, it
being too large for a finite and narrow capacity. And that cannot but
be very far from a positive complete idea, wherein the greatest part of
what I would comprehend is left out, under the undeterminate intimation
of being still greater. For to say, that, having in any quantity
measured so much, or gone so far, you are not yet at the end, is only
to say that that quantity is greater. So that the negation of an end in
any quantity is, in other words, only to say that it is bigger; and a
total negation of an end is but carrying this bigger still with you, in
all the progressions your thoughts shall make in quantity; and adding
this IDEA OF STILL GREATER to ALL the ideas you have, or can be
supposed to have, of quantity. Now, whether such an idea as that be
positive, I leave any one to consider.
16. We have no positive Idea of an infinite Duration.
I ask those who say they have a positive idea of eternity, whether
their idea of duration includes in it succession, or not? If it does
not, they ought to show the difference of their notion of duration,
when applied to an eternal Being, and to a finite; since, perhaps,
there may be others as well as I, who will own to them their weakness
of understanding in this point, and acknowledge that the notion they
have of duration forces them to conceive, that whatever has duration,
is of a longer continuance to-day than it was yesterday. If, to avoid
succession in external existence, they return to the punctum stans of
the schools, I suppose they will thereby very little mend the matter,
or help us to a more clear and positive idea of infinite duration;
there being nothing more inconceivable to me than duration without
succession. Besides, that punctum stans, if it signify anything, being
not quantum, finite or infinite cannot belong to it. But, if our weak
apprehensions cannot separate succession from any duration whatsoever,
our idea of eternity can be nothing but of INFINITE SUCCESSION OF
MOMENTS OF DURATION WHEREIN ANYTHING DOES EXIST; and whether any one
has, or can have, a positive idea of an actual infinite number, I leave
him to consider, till his infinite number be so great that he himself
can add no more to it; and as long as he can increase it, I doubt he
himself will think the idea he hath of it a little too scanty for
positive infinity.
17. No complete Idea of Eternal Being.
I think it unavoidable for every considering, rational creature, that
will but examine his own or any other existence, to have the notion of
an eternal, wise Being, who had no beginning: and such an idea of
infinite duration I am sure I have. But this negation of a beginning,
being but the negation of a positive thing, scarce gives me a positive
idea of infinity; which, whenever I endeavour to extend my thoughts to,
I confess myself at a loss, and I find I cannot attain any clear
comprehension of it.
18. No positive Idea of infinite Space.
He that thinks he has a positive idea of infinite space, will, when he
considers it, find that he can no more have a positive idea of the
greatest, than he has of the least space. For in this latter, which
seems the easier of the two, and more within our comprehension, we are
capable only of a comparative idea of smallness, which will always be
less than any one whereof we have the positive idea. All our POSITIVE
ideas of any quantity, whether great or little, have always bounds,
though our COMPARATIVE idea, whereby we can always add to the one, and
take from the other, hath no bounds. For that which remains, either
great or little, not being comprehended in that positive idea which we
have, lies in obscurity; and we have no other idea of it, but of the
power of enlarging the one and diminishing the other, WITHOUT CEASING.
A pestle and mortar will as soon bring any particle of matter to
indivisibility, as the acutest thought of a mathematician; and a
surveyor may as soon with his chain measure out infinite space, as a
philosopher by the quickest flight of mind reach it or by thinking
comprehend it; which is to have a positive idea of it. He that thinks
on a cube of an inch diameter, has a clear and positive idea of it in
his mind, and so can frame one of 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and so on, till he has
the idea in his thoughts of something very little; but yet reaches not
the idea of that incomprehensible littleness which division can
produce. What remains of smallness is as far from his thoughts as when
he first began; and therefore he never comes at all to have a clear and
positive idea of that smallness which is consequent to infinite
divisibility.
19. What is positive, what negative, in our Idea of Infinite.
Every one that looks towards infinity does, as I have said, at first
glance make some very large idea of that which he applies it to, let it
be space or duration; and possibly he wearies his thoughts, by
multiplying in his mind that first large idea: but yet by that he comes
no nearer to the having a positive clear idea of what remains to make
up a positive infinite, than the country fellow had of the water which
was yet to come, and pass the channel of the river where he stood:
‘Rusticus expectat dum defluat amnis, at ille
Labitur, et labetur in omne volubilis ævum.’
20. Some think they have a positive Idea of Eternity, and not of
infinite Space.
There are some I have met that put so much difference between infinite
duration and infinite space, that they persuade themselves that they
have a positive idea of eternity, but that they have not, nor can have
any idea of infinite space. The reason of which mistake I suppose to be
this—that finding, by a due contemplation of causes and effects, that
it is necessary to admit some Eternal Being, and so to consider the
real existence of that Being as taken up and commensurate to their idea
of eternity; but, on the other side, not finding it necessary, but, on
the contrary, apparently absurd, that body should be infinite, they
forwardly conclude that they can have no idea of infinite space,
because they can have no idea of infinite matter. Which consequence, I
conceive, is very ill collected, because the existence of matter is no
ways necessary to the existence of space, no more than the existence of
motion, or the sun, is necessary to duration, though duration uses to
be measured by it. And I doubt not but that a man may have the idea of
ten thousand miles square, without any body so big, as well as the idea
of ten thousand years, without any body so old. It seems as easy to me
to have the idea of space empty of body, as to think of the capacity of
a bushel without corn, or the hollow of a nut-shell without a kernel in
it: it being no more necessary that there should be existing a solid
body, infinitely extended, because we have an idea of the infinity of
space, than it is necessary that the world should be eternal, because
we have an idea of infinite duration. And why should we think our idea
of infinite space requires the real existence of matter to support it,
when we find that we have as clear an idea of an infinite duration to
come, as we have of infinite duration past? Though I suppose nobody
thinks it conceivable that anything does or has existed in that future
duration. Nor is it possible to join our idea of future duration with
present or past existence, any more than it is possible to make the
ideas of yesterday, to-day, and to-morrow to be the same; or bring ages
past and future together, and make them contemporary. But if these men
are of the mind, that they have clearer ideas of infinite duration than
of infinite space, because it is past doubt that God has existed from
all eternity, but there is no real matter co-extended with infinite
space; yet those philosophers who are of opinion that infinite space is
possessed by God’s infinite omnipresence, as well as infinite duration
by his eternal existence, must be allowed to have as clear an idea of
infinite space as of infinite duration; though neither of them, I
think, has any positive idea of infinity in either case. For whatsoever
positive ideas a man has in his mind of any quantity, he can repeat it,
and add it to the former, as easy as he can add together the ideas of
two days, or two paces, which are positive ideas of lengths he has in
his mind, and so on as long as he pleases: whereby, if a man had a
positive idea of infinite, either duration or space, he could add two
infinites together; nay, make one infinite infinitely bigger than
another—absurdities too gross to be confuted.
21. Supposed positive Ideas of Infinity, cause of Mistakes.
But yet if after all this, there be men who persuade themselves that
they have clear positive comprehensive ideas of infinity, it is fit
they enjoy their privilege: and I should be very glad (with some others
that I know, who acknowledge they have none such) to be better informed
by their communication. For I have been hitherto apt to think that the
great and inextricable difficulties which perpetually involve all
discourses concerning infinity,—whether of space, duration, or
divisibility, have been the certain marks of a defect in our ideas of
infinity, and the disproportion the nature thereof has to the
comprehension of our narrow capacities. For, whilst men talk and
dispute of infinite space or duration, as if they had as complete and
positive ideas of them as they have of the names they use for them, or
as they have of a yard, or an hour, or any other determinate quantity;
it is no wonder if the incomprehensible nature of the thing they
discourse of, or reason about, leads them into perplexities and
contradictions, and their minds be overlaid by an object too large and
mighty to be surveyed and managed by them.
22. All these are modes of Ideas got from Sensation and Reflection.
If I have dwelt pretty long on the consideration of duration, space,
and number, and what arises from the contemplation of them,—Infinity,
it is possibly no more than the matter requires; there being few simple
ideas whose MODES give more exercise to the thoughts of men than those
do. I pretend not to treat of them in their full latitude. It suffices
to my design to show how the mind receives them, such as they are, from
sensation and reflection; and how even the idea we have of infinity,
how remote soever it may seem to be from any object of sense, or
operation of our mind, has, nevertheless, as all our other ideas, its
original there. Some mathematicians perhaps, of advanced speculations,
may have other ways to introduce into their minds ideas of infinity.
But this hinders not but that they themselves, as well as all other
men, got the first ideas which they had of infinity from sensation and
reflection, in the method we have here set down.