XXXVII--MEDIATE COMPARISON

A few pages further on Whately gives a totally different account of

reasoning, without being aware of his inconsistency.

'Every syllogism has three, and only three terms: viz. the

middle term and the two terms (or extremes, as they are

commonly called) of the Conclusion or Question. Of these,

first, the subject of the conclusion is called the _minor_

term; second, its predicate, the _major_ term; and third, the

_middle_ term, (called by the older logicians "Argumentum") is

that with which each of them is separately compared, in order

to judge of their agreement or disagreement with each other.

If therefore there were two middle terms, the extremes or

terms of conclusion not being both compared to the same, could

not be conclusively compared to each other.'[21]

Here reasoning is made to consist in comparing two things by

reference to a third which both resemble. There is not a word about

classification, which is declared just before--in loud capitals--to be

the universal principle of reasoning!

Reformed Logic A System Based on Berkeley's Philosophy with an Entirely New Method of Dialectic · 第 83 / 94 题