If the public journals, in describing great eruptions, often state

the shape of Vesuvius to have undergone an entire change, and if

these assertions appear to be confirmed by picturesque views sketched

at Naples, the cause of the error consists in the outlines of the

margin of the crater having been confounded with those of the cones of

eruption accidentally formed in the middle of the crater on its floor

or bottom which has been upheaved by vapours. Such a cone of eruption,

consisting of loosely heaped-up rapilli and scoriæ, had in the course

of the years 1816-1818 gradually risen so as to be seen above the

south-eastern margin of the crater; and the eruption of the month of

February 1822 augmented it so much, that it even became from 100 to 110

(about 107 to 117 English) feet higher than the north-western margin

of the crater (the Rocca del Palo). This remarkable cone, which it

had become customary in Naples to regard as the true summit of the

mountain, fell in, with a dreadful noise, in the last eruption, on the

night of the 22d of October (1822): so that the floor of the crater,

which had been constantly accessible since 1811, is now 750 (almost

800 English) feet lower than the northern, and 200 (213 English)

feet lower than the southern edge of the volcano. Variations in the

form and relative position of the cones of eruption,--the openings

of which ought not to be confounded, as they often are, with the

crater of the volcano itself,--give to Vesuvius at different epochs

a different appearance, which would enable a person well acquainted

with the history of the volcano, on a mere inspection of Hackert’s

paintings in the palace of Portici, to tell from the outlines of the

summit, according as the northern or the southern side of the mountain

is represented as the highest, in what year the artist had taken the

sketch from which the picture was made.

In the last eruption, in the night of the 23d to the 24th of October,

twenty-four hours after the falling in of the great cone of scoriæ

which has been mentioned, and when the small but numerous currents of

lava had already flowed off, the fiery eruption of ashes and rapilli

commenced: it continued without intermission for twelve days, but was

greatest in the first four days. During this period the detonations in

the interior of the volcano were so violent that the mere concussion of

the air, (for no earthquake movement was perceived), rent the ceilings

of the rooms in the palace of Portici. In the neighbouring villages of

Resina, Torre del Greco, Torre del Annunziata, and Bosche Tre Case,

a remarkable phenomenon was witnessed. Throughout the whole of that

part of the country the air was so filled with ashes as to cause in

the middle of the day profound darkness, lasting for several hours:

lanterns were carried in the streets, as has so often been done at

Quito during the eruptions of Pichincha. The flight of the inhabitants

had never been more general: lava currents are regarded by those who

dwell near Vesuvius with less dread than an eruption of ashes, a

phenomenon which had never been known to such a degree in modern times;

and the obscure tradition of the manner in which the destruction of

Herculaneum, Pompeii, and Stabiæ took place, filled the imaginations of

men with appalling images.

The hot aqueous vapours which rose from the crater during the eruption

and spread themselves in the atmosphere, formed, in cooling, a dense

cloud, surrounding the column of fire and ashes, which rose to a height

of between nine and ten thousand feet. So sudden a condensation of

vapour, and even, as Gay-Lussac has shewn, the formation of the cloud

itself, augmented the electric tension. Flashes of forked lightning,

issuing from the column of ashes, darted in every direction; and the

rolling thunders were distinctly heard, and distinguished from the

sounds which proceeded from the interior of the volcano. In no other

eruption had the play of the electric forces formed so striking a

feature.

On the morning of the 26th of October, a surprising rumour prevailed,

to the effect that a torrent of boiling water was gushing from the

crater, and pouring down the slope of the cone of ashes. The learned

and zealous observer of the volcano, Monticelli, soon discovered that

this erroneous rumour had arisen from an optical illusion. The supposed

torrent of water was in reality a flow of dry ashes, which, being as

loose and moveable as shifting sands, issued in large quantities from

a crevice in the upper margin of the crater. The cultivated fields

had suffered much from a long-continued drought which had preceded

the eruption; towards its close the “volcanic thunder-storm” which

has been described produced an exceedingly violent and abundant fall

of rain. This phenomenon is associated in all climates with the close

of a volcanic eruption. As during the eruption the cone of ashes is

generally enveloped in cloud, and as it is in its immediate vicinity

that the rain is most violent, torrents of mud are seen to descend

from it in all directions, which the terrified husbandman imagines to

consist of waters which have risen from the interior of the volcano

and overflowed the crater; while geologists have erroneously thought

they recognised in them either sea-water or muddy products of the

volcano, “Eruptions boueuses,” or, in the language of some old French

systematists, products of an igneo-aqueous liquefaction.

Where, as is generally the case in the Andes, the summit of the

volcano rises into the region of perpetual snow, (even attaining,

in some cases, an elevation twice as great as that of Etna), the

melting of the snows renders such inundations as have been described

far more abundant and disastrous. The phenomena in question are

meteorologically connected with the eruptions of volcanos, and are

variously modified by the height of the mountain, the dimensions of

that part of it which is always covered with snow, and the extent and

degree to which the sides of the cone of cinders become heated; but

they are not to be regarded as volcanic phenomena properly so called.

Vast cavities also often exist on the slope or at the foot of volcanos

which, communicating through many channels with the mountain torrents,

form large subterranean lakes or reservoirs of water. When earthquake

shocks, which, in the Andes, usually precede all igneous eruptions,

convulse the entire mass of the volcano, these subterranean reservoirs

are opened, and there issue from them water, fishes, and tufaceous mud.

This is the singular phenomenon which brings to light an otherwise

unknown fish, the Pimelodes Cyclopum, called by the inhabitants of the

highlands of Quito “Preñadilla,” and which I described soon after my

return. When, on the night of the 19th of June, 1698, the summit of a

mountain situated to the north of Chimborazo, the Carguairazo, above

19000 English feet high, fell in, the country for nearly thirty English

geographical square miles round was covered with mud and fishes; and

seven years earlier a putrid fever, in the town of Ibarra, was ascribed

to a similar eruption of fish from the volcano of Imbaburu.

I recall these facts, because they throw some light on the difference

between the eruption of dry ashes and miry inundations of tufa and

trass, carrying with them wood, charcoal, and shells. The quantity

of ashes emitted by Vesuvius in the recent eruption, like every

thing connected with volcanos and other great natural phenomena of a

character to excite terror, has been exceedingly exaggerated in the

public papers; and two Neapolitan chemists, Vicenzo Pepe and Giuseppe

di Nobili, notwithstanding the statements of Monticelli and Covelli to

the contrary, even describe the ashes as containing silver and gold.

According to the results of my researches and inquiries, the thickness

of the bed of ashes formed by the twelve days’ shower was but little

above three feet, towards Bosche Tre Case, on the slope of the cone

where rapilli were mingled with them; and in the plain, from 15-1/2 to

19 inches at the utmost. Such measurements ought not to be taken in

places where the ashes have been heaped up by the action of wind, like

drifted snow or sand, or have accumulated from being carried thither by

water. The times are passed for seeking only the marvellous in volcanic

phenomena, in the manner of the ancients among whom Ctesias made the

ashes of Etna to be conveyed as far as the Indian peninsula. There are

in Mexico veins of gold and silver in trachytic porphyry; but in the

ashes of Vesuvius which I brought back with me, and which an excellent

chemist, Heinrich Rose, has examined at my request, no traces of either

gold or silver have been discovered.

Although the above mentioned results, which are quite in accordance

with the exact observations of Monticelli, differ much from the

accounts which have been current during the short interval which has

elapsed, it is nevertheless true that the eruption of ashes from

Vesuvius from the 24th to the 28th of last October (1822) is the most

memorable of any of which we possess an authentic account, since

that which occasioned the death of the elder Pliny. The quantity of

ashes is, perhaps, three times as great as has ever been seen to fall

since volcanic phenomena have been attentively observed in Italy. A

stratum of ashes, from 16 to 19 inches thick, appears at first sight

insignificant compared with the mass which we find covering Pompeii;

but, not to speak of the increase which that mass has probably received

by the effects of heavy rains and other causes during the centuries

which have since elapsed, and without renewing the animated debate

respecting the causes of the destruction of the Campanian towns,

and which, on the other side of the Alps, has been carried on with

a considerable degree of scepticism, it should here be recalled to

recollection that the eruptions of a volcano, at widely separated

epochs, do not well admit of comparison, as respects their intensity.

All inferences derived from analogy are inadequate where quantitative

relations are concerned; as the quantity of lava and ashes, the

height of the column of smoke, and the loudness or intensity of the

detonations.

From the geographical description of Strabo, and from an opinion given

by Vitruvius respecting the volcanic origin of pumice, we perceive

that, up to the year of the death of Vespasian, _i. e._ previous to the

eruption which overwhelmed Pompeii, Vesuvius had more the appearance of

an extinct volcano than of a Solfatara. When, after long repose, the

subterranean forces suddenly opened for themselves new channels, and

again broke through the beds of primitive and trachytic rocks, effects

must have been produced for which subsequent ones do not furnish a

standard. From the well-known letter in which the younger Pliny informs

Tacitus of his uncle’s death, it may be clearly seen that the renewal

of volcanic outbursts, or what might be called the revival of the

slumbering volcano, began with an eruption of ashes. The same thing

was observed at Jorullo when, in September 1759, the new volcano,

breaking through beds of syenite and trachyte, rose suddenly in the

plain. The country-people took flight on finding their huts strewed

with ashes which had been emitted from the everywhere opening ground.

In the ordinary periodical manifestations of volcanic activity, on the

contrary, the shower of ashes marks the termination of each particular

eruption. There is a passage in the letter of the younger Pliny which

shews clearly that, at a very early stage of the eruption, the dry

ashes which had fallen had reached a thickness of four or five feet,

without accumulation from drift or other extraneous cause. He writes,

in the course of his narrative, “the court which had to be crossed to

reach the room in which Pliny was taking his noon-day repose was so

filled with ashes and pumice, that, if he had longer delayed coming

forth, he would have found the passage stopped.” In an enclosed space

like a court, the action of wind in drifting the ashes can scarcely

have been very considerable.

I have interrupted my general comparative view of volcanos by a notice

of particular observations made on Vesuvius, partly on account of the

great interest excited by the recent eruption, and partly on account

of those recollections of the catastrophes of Pompeii and Herculaneum,

which are almost involuntarily recalled to our minds by the occurrence

of any considerable shower of ashes. I have recorded in a note the

measurements of height made by myself and others on Vesuvius and in its

vicinity.

We have hitherto been considering the structure and mode of action

of those volcanos which have a permanent communication with the

interior of the Earth by craters. The summits of such volcanos

consist of masses of trachyte and lava upheaved by elastic forces and

traversed by veins. The permanency of their action gives us reason

to infer great complexity of structure. They have, so to speak, an

individual character which remains unaltered for long periods of time.

Neighbouring mountains often present the greatest differences in their

products: leucitic and feldspathic lavas, obsidian with pumice, and

masses of basalt containing olivine. They belong to the most recent

terrestrial phænomena, breaking through almost all the sedimentary

strata, and their products and lava currents are of later origin

than our valleys. Their life, if I may permit myself to employ this

figurative mode of expression, depends on the manner and permanence

of their communications with the interior of the Earth. They often

continue for centuries in a state of repose, are then suddenly

rekindled, and end by becoming Solfataras, emitting aqueous vapours,

gases, and acids; sometimes, however, as in the case of the Peak of

Teneriffe, we find that their summit has already become a laboratory of

regenerated sulphur; while from the sides of the mountain there still

issue large torrents of lava, basaltic in the lower part, but towards

the upper part, where the pressure is less,[39] presenting the form of

obsidian with pumice.

Distinct from these volcanos provided with permanent craters, there

is another class of volcanic phenomena more rarely observed, but

particularly instructive to the geologist, as they recall the ancient

world or the earliest geological revolutions of our planet. Trachytic

mountains open suddenly, emit lava and ashes, and close again, perhaps

never to reopen. Thus it was with the gigantic mountain of Antisana in

the chain of the Andes, and with the Monte Epomeo in Ischia in 1302.

Sometimes such an outbreak has even taken place in plains: as in the

high plateau of Quito, in Iceland at a distance from Mount Hecla,

and in Eubœa in the Lelantine Fields. Many of the upheaved islands

belong to this class of transitory phænomena. In all these cases the

communication with the interior of the earth is not permanent, and

the action ceases as soon as the cleft or fissure forming a temporary

channel closes again. Veins or dykes of basalt, dolerite, and

porphyry, which in different parts of the earth traverse almost all

formations, and masses of syenite, augitic porphyry, and amygdaloid,

which characterise the recent transition and oldest sedimentary rocks,

have probably been formed in a similar manner. In the youth of our

planet, the substances of the interior being still fluid, penetrated

through the everywhere fissured crust of the globe, sometimes becoming

solidified in the form of rocky veins or dykes of granular texture, and

sometimes spreading out in broad sheets, and resembling superimposed

strata. The volcanic products or rocks transmitted to us from the

earlier ages of our planet have not flowed in narrow bands like the

lavas of the isolated conical volcanos of the present time. The

mixtures of augite, titaniferous iron, feldspar, and hornblende, may

have been the same at different epochs, sometimes approximating more to

basalt and sometimes to trachyte; and, (as we learn from the important

researches of Mitscherlich, and the analogy of artificial igneous

products) chemical substances may have united in definite proportions

in a crystalline form: in all cases we recognise that substances

similar in composition have arrived at the surface of the earth by

very different ways; either simply upheaved, or penetrating through

temporary fissures; and that breaking through the older rocks, (_i.

e._ the earlier oxydized crust of the globe), they have finally issued

as lava currents from conical mountains having a permanent crater. To

confound together phenomena so different is to throw the geological

study of volcanos and volcanic action back into the obscurity from

which, by the aid of numerous comparative observations and researches,

it has gradually began to emerge.

The question has often been propounded: What is it that burns in

volcanos,--What produces the heat which melts and fuses together earths

and metals? Modern chemical science has essayed to answer, that what

burns are the earths, the metals, the alkalies themselves; viz. the

metalloids of those substances. The solid and already-oxydised crust

of the globe separates the surrounding atmosphere, with the oxygen

which it contains, from the inflammable unoxydised substances in the

interior of our planet: when those metalloids come in contact with

the oxygen of the atmosphere there arises disengagement of heat.

The great and celebrated chemist who propounded this explanation of

volcanic phenomena soon himself relinquished it. Observations made

in mines and caverns in all climates, and which in concert with M.

Arago I have collected in a separate memoir, shew that, even at what

may be considered a very small depth, the temperature of the Earth is

much above the mean temperature of the atmosphere at the same place.

A fact so remarkable, and so generally confirmed, connects itself

with that which we learn from volcanic phenomena. The depth at which

the globe may be regarded as a molten mass has been calculated. The

primitive cause of this subterranean heat is, as in all planets,

the process of formation itself, the separation of the spherically

condensing mass from a cosmical gaseous fluid, and the cooling of the

terrestrial strata at different depths by the loss of heat parted

with by radiation. All volcanic phenomena are probably the result of

a communication either permanent or transient between the interior

and exterior of the globe. Elastic vapours press the molten oxydising

substances upwards through deep fissures. Volcanos might thus be termed

intermitting springs or fountains of earthy substances; _i. e._ of

the fluid mixture of metals, alkalis, and earths which solidify into

lava currents and flow softly and tranquilly, when being upheaved they

find a passage by which to escape. In a similar manner the Ancients

represented (according to Plato’s Phædon) all volcanic fiery currents

as streams flowing from the Pyriphlegethon.

To these considerations and views let me be permitted to add another

more bold. May we not find in this internal heat of our globe,--(a heat

indicated by thermometric experiments on the waters of springs rising

from different depths,[40] as well by our observations on volcanos),--a

cause which may explain one of the most wonderful phænomena with

which the study of fossils has made us acquainted? Tropical forms of

animals, and, in the vegetable kingdom, arborescent ferns, palms,

and bambusaceæ, are found buried in the cold regions of the North.

Everywhere the ancient world shews a distribution of organic forms at

variance with our present climates. To resolve so important a problem,

recourse has been had to several hypotheses; such as the approach of

a comet, a change in the obliquity of the Ecliptic, and a different

degree of intensity in the solar light. None of these explanations

are satisfactory at once to the astronomer, the physicist, and the

geologist. For my part I willingly leave the axis of the Earth in its

place, and suppose no change in the light of the solar disk (from whose

spots a celebrated astronomer was inclined to explain the favourable or

unfavourable harvests of particular years); I am disposed to recognise

that in each planet there exist, independently of its relations to

the central body of the system to which it belongs, and independently

of its astronomical position, various causes for the development of

heat;--processes of oxydation, precipitations and chemical changes in

the capacity of bodies, by increase of electro-magnetic intensity, and

communications opened between the internal and external portions of the

planet.

It may be that in the Ancient World, exhalations of heat issuing forth

through the many openings of the deeply fissured crust of the globe

may have favoured, perhaps for centuries, the growth of palms and

tree-ferns and the existence of animals requiring a high temperature,

over entire countries where now a very different climate prevails.

According to this view of things (a view already indicated by me in a

work entitled “Geological Essay on the Superposition of Rocks in both

Hemispheres”) the temperature of volcanos would be that of the interior

of the earth, and the same cause which, operating through volcanic

eruptions, now produces devastating effects, might in primeval ages

have clothed the deeply fissured rocks of the newly oxydised earth in

every zone with the most luxuriant vegetation.

If, with a view to explain the distribution of tropical forms whose

remains are now discovered buried in northern regions, it should be

assumed that the long-haired species of Elephant now found enclosed

in ice was originally indigenous in cold climates, and that forms

resembling the same leading type may, as in the case of lions and

lynxes, have been able to live in wholly different climates, still this

manner of solving the difficulty presented by fossil remains cannot be

extended so as to apply to vegetable productions. From reasons with

which the study of vegetable physiology makes us acquainted, Palms,

Musaceæ, and arborescent Monocotyledones, are incapable of supporting

the deprivation of their appendicular organs which would be caused by

the present temperature of our northern regions; and in the geological

problem which we have to examine, it appears to me difficult to

separate vegetable and animal remains from each other. The same mode of

explanation ought to comprehend both.

I have permitted myself at the conclusion of the present discussion

to connect with facts collected in different and widely separated

countries some uncertain and hypothetical conjectures. The

philosophical study of Nature rises beyond the requirements of a simple

description of Nature: it does not consist in a sterile accumulation of

isolated facts. It may sometimes be permitted to the active and curious

mind of man to stretch forward from the present to the still obscure

future; to divine that which cannot yet be clearly known; and thus to

take pleasure in the ancient myths of geology reproduced in our own

days in new and varied forms.

ANNOTATIONS AND ADDITIONS.

[38] p. 226.--“_A more complete determination of the height of all

parts of the margin of the crater._”

Oltmanns, my astronomical fellow labourer, of whom, alas! science

has been early deprived, re-calculated the barometric measurements

of Vesuvius referred to in the preceding memoir (of the 22d and 25th

of November and of the 1st of December, 1822), and has compared the

results with the measurements which have been communicated to me in

manuscript by Lord Minto, Visconti, Monticelli, Brioschi, and Poulett

Scrope.

A. _Rocca del Palo, the highest and northern margin of the Crater of

Vesuvius._

Toises. Eng. ft.

Saussure, barometric measurement computed in

1773, probably by Deluc’s formula 609 3894

Poli, 1794, barometric 606 3875

Breislak, 1794, barometric (but, like Poli, the formula

employed uncertain) 613 3920

Gay-Lussac, Leopold von Buch, and Humboldt, 1805,

barometric, computed by Laplace’s formula, as

are also all the barometric results which follow 603 3856

Brioschi, 1810, trigonometric 638 4080

Visconti, 1816, trigonometric 622 3977

Lord Minto, 1822, barometric, often repeated 621 3971

Poulett Scrope, 1822, barometric, somewhat uncertain

from the proportion between the diameters

of the tube and cistern being unknown 604 3862

Monticelli and Covelli, 1822 624 3990

Humboldt, 1822 629 4022

Most probable result 317 toises, or 2027 English feet, above the

Hermitage; or 625 toises, or 3996 English feet, above the level of the

sea.

Aspects of nature, in different lands and different climates (Vol. 2 of 2) with scientific elucidations · 第 15 / 22 段