But the Berlin Conference of 1884-5 expressly stipulated (Article VI.)

that all powers exercising sovereign rights or having influence in

the said territories (shall) undertake to watch over the preservation

of the native races and the amelioration of the moral and material

conditions of their existence, and to co-operate in the suppression of

slavery, and, above all, of the slave trade; (that) they will protect

and encourage all institutions and enterprises, religions, etc.,

re-established or organized, which tend to educate the natives; and

in Article XXXV. it is stipulated that the power which in future takes

possession of a territory, or assumes a protectorate, recognizes the

obligation to insure in the territories occupied by it on the coasts of

the African continent the existence of an adequate authority to enforce

respect for acquired rights.

Therefore the back-land of British East Africa could not remain the

theatre of slave raids, or unclaimed.

It devolved upon the occupants of the sea-frontage to exercise their

sovereign rights, and in the due exercise of these to watch over the

native races of the back-lands, and to co-operate for the suppression

of slavery and the slave trade. It was incumbent upon them also to

protect and encourage the Christian missions, without distinction

of nationality or creed, which were established in Uganda--the most

important because most populous and most promising of these back-lands.

And to insure its acquired right to those countries it was necessary

that the British company should be represented by adequate authority

there, otherwise it would be in the power of any person, society, or

power to bar its claim to them by actual occupation.

Following the declarations of the powers at the Berlin Conference

in 1885 is the act of assembled civilization at Brussels in 1890,

emphasizing and reiterating the conditions upon which sovereignty shall

be recognized. They point out in detail what ought, what indeed must

be done. They say that the responsible power _ought_--which is almost

equivalent to _must_ in this case--to organize administration, justice,

and the religious and the military services, to establish strongly

occupied stations, to make roads, particularly railroads, for the sake

of easy access to the inland waters, to inaugurate steamer service on

the lakes, erect telegraphic lines, and restrict the importation of

fire-arms.

The British East African Company as a commercial company is unable

with its own means to meet these conditions. What it can it will, and

its ability is limited to a sacrifice of all the dividends available

from its commercial operations on the coast for the benefit of the

whole territory, and subscribing a few more thousands of pounds to

postpone retreat. Yet as the delegate of the British government

the company is bound not to neglect the interior. It is pledged to

insure the protection of British subjects in Uganda, to protect the

Waganda from internecine and factional wars, to place steamers on

Lake Victoria for the protection of the lake coasts, and to prevent

the wholesale importation of fire-arms. But in the attempt to do what

Europe expects to be done the company has been involved in an expense

which has been disastrous to its interests. It has established adequate

authority in Uganda, but the maintenance of the communication between

Uganda and the coast is absolutely ruinous. It has to pay £300, or

thereabouts, the ton for freight. Thus, to send 150,000 rounds of

ammunition, which is equal to twelve tons, costs £3600. To send the

cloth currency required for purchase of native provisions for the force

costs £12,000. Add the cost of conveyance of miscellaneous baggage,

European provisions and medicines, tools, utensils, tents, besides the

first cost of these articles and the pay of the men, and we at once

see that £40,000 per annum is but a small estimate of the expense thus

entailed upon the company. Meantime the transportation of steamers to

Lake Victoria, the erection of stations connecting the lake with the

sea, and many other equally pressing duties, are utterly out of the

question. The directors understand too well what is needed, but they

are helpless. We must accept the will for the deed.

This much, however, is clear: Europe will not hold the British East

African Company, but England, responsible for not suppressing the

slave trade and slave hunt. The agreement with Europe was not made

by the company, but by Great Britain through her official and duly

appointed representatives. When her official representatives signed the

act of the Brussels Antislavery Conference, they undertook in the name

of Great Britain the important responsibilities and duties specified

within the act. The representatives of all Europe and the United States

were witnesses to the signing of the act. To repudiate the obligations

so publicly entered into would be too shameful, and if the majority in

Parliament represents the will of the people there is every reason to

think that the railway to the Victoria Nyanza, which is necessary for

carrying into effect the suggestions of the Antislavery Conference,

will be constructed.

I have been often asked what trade will be benefited by this railway

to the Nyanza, or what can be obtained from the interior of Africa to

compensate for the expense--say £2,000,000--of building the railway.

There is no necessity for me to refer to the commercial aspect of the

question in such an article as this, but there are some compensating

advantages specially relating to my subject-matter which may be

mentioned.

First. England will prove to Europe and the world that she is second to

no other power in the fulfilment of her obligations, moral or material.

Second. She will prove that she does not mean to be excelled by

Germany, France, or Belgium in the suppression of the slave trade and

the man hunt, nor is averse to do justice to the Africans whom she has

taken under her wing.

Third. She will prove that the people on British territory shall not be

the last to enjoy the mercies and privileges conceded to the negroes

by civilization, that the preservation of the native races and their

moral and material welfare are as dear to England as to any other

power, that the lives of her missionaries shall not be sacrificed in

vain, that the labors of her explorers are duly appreciated, that she

is not deaf to the voices of her greatest and best, and, in brief--to

use the words uttered lately by one of her ministers--she will prove

that “her vaunted philanthropy is not a sham, and her professed love of

humanity not mere hypocrisy.”

The objective point for the British East African Company, for the

people and government of Great Britain, is the Victoria Nyanza, with

1400 miles of coast-line. So far as the British as a slavery-hating

nation are concerned, their duties are simply shifted from the ocean

coast to the Nyanza coast, 500 miles inland. The slave-trader has

disappeared from the east coast almost entirely, and is to be found now

on the lake coasts of the Victoria, or within British territory. The

ocean cruiser can follow him no farther; but the lake cruiser must

not only debar the guilty slave-dhow from the privilege of floating on

the principal fountain of the Nile, but she must assist to restrict

the importation of fire-arms from German territory, from the byways of

Arab traffic, from the unguarded west; she must prevent the flight of

fugitives and rebels and offenders from British territory; she must

protect the missionaries and British subjects in their peaceful passage

to and fro across the lake; she must teach the millions on the lake

shores that the white ensign waving from her masthead is a guarantee of

freedom, life, and peace.

To make these great benefits possible, the Victorian lake must be

connected with the Indian Ocean by a railway. That narrow iron track

will command effectively 150,000 square miles of British territory.

It is the one remedy for the present disgraceful condition of British

East Africa. It will enable the company to devote the thousands now

spent wastefully upon porterage to stimulating legitimate traffic, and

to employ its immense caravans in more remunerative work than starving

and perishing on British soil; to grace the surroundings of its many

stations with cornfields and gardens; to promote life, interest, and

intellect, instead of being stupefied by increasing loss of brave men

and honest money. It will create trade in the natural productions of

the land, instead of letting Arabs traffic in the producers. Clarkson

long ago said that legitimate trade would kill the slave traffic;

Buxton repeated it. Wherever honest trade has been instituted and

fairly tried, as in the southern part of the United States, in Jamaica

and Brazil, as in Sierra Leone and Lagos, in Old Calabar, in Egypt and

the lower Congo, always and everywhere it has been proved that lawful

commerce is a great blessing to a land by the peace it brings, by its

power of creating scores of little channels for thrifty industry, by

the force of attraction it possesses to draw the marketable products

into the general mart. And this is what will surely happen upon the

completion of the Victoria Nyanza Railway, for the slave trade and

slavery will then be rendered impossible in British African territory.

THE END

Transcriber’s Notes

Page 37: “peformed this feat of strength” changed to “performed this

feat of strength”

Page 38: “undertaken to peform” changed to “undertaken to perform”

Page 76: “over and above the expediture” changed to “over and above the

expenditure”

Slavery and the slave trade in Africa · 第 3 / 3 段