A wonderfully encouraging evidence to my mind that the labor and

thoughtfulness of good men in behalf of Africa is not in vain may

be found in the vast army of carriers now employed in the transport

of European goods to Stanley Pool, past the cataract region. Ocean

steamers ascend the Lower Congo for over a hundred miles, and

discharge their miscellaneous cargoes at Mataddi. The loads for

transport overland are of sixty and seventy pounds weight. As they are

discharged by the ships, they are stacked in warehouses until the human

burden-bearers demand their freight. These apply in companies from ten

to two hundred strong, under their respective headmen. The price for

carrying a man’s load from Mataddi to the Pool is a sovereign’s worth

of barter stuffs, according to each carrier’s personal selection. The

distance of portage between the two points is about 230 miles, and is

performed in between fifteen and twenty days. Though a trying work for

natives unaccustomed to it, the Bakongo, who have been carriers for

generations, handle their burdens with ease. Travellers passing up

and down the road might expect to see a track travelled by so many

thousands marked by skeletons and littered with human bones. I have

never seen any such sinister objects along the route, nor have I ever

heard of any having been met with by later travellers. The way-bill,

with lists of the loads intrusted with the caravan, is given to the

headman, and all further care of them on the part of the consigners and

consignees ceases, until the loads arrive at their destination, and are

checked by the receiving officer, who then hands the signed receipt

which entitles the caravan to the stipulated payment. Frequently

there are burdens of baggage, ivory, rubber, etc., awaiting transport

down river, in which case they are re-engaged at the same rates for

Mataddi, and both checks are cashed at the main depot. Within less

than six weeks each carrier has gained two sovereign’s worth of trade

goods, which he conveys to his home for the benefit of his family,

or to store up until he possesses sufficient means to engage in trade

independently, or purchase some property he has long desired.

[Illustration: A SLAVER]

In 1884, when I left the Congo, the total number of carriers thus

employed did not exceed 300. But such has been the rapid progress

of events, and the favor with which the carrier profession has been

regarded by the natives, that the total number of carriers furnished by

an area of not more than 30,000 square miles is now about 75,000. Yet

this immense army is wholly insufficient to transport the vast quantity

of material discharged every month from the ships.

It was calculated by the promoters of the Congo Railway, now in process

of construction, that one train a week would be sufficient for some

years for the necessities of the upper Congo, but the crowded magazines

of Mataddi and the increasing demands for transport prove that a daily

train will scarcely suffice. I have lately received a large supply of

photographs of the railway cuttings and bridge-work, and one glance at

them shows the serious nature of the undertaking. The engineers are

still engaged in the rocky defiles, slowly laboring up the slopes to

gain the altitude of the ancient plateau. Fifteen miles of the track,

I have been told, are in running order, and the embankments extend

for twenty-five miles farther. When the rails have been laid thus

far, the progress will be much more rapid, and the engineers will be

able to state with precision how long a time must elapse before its

completion. It is scarcely necessary to add that the arrival of the

railway at Stanley Pool will insure the salvation of two-thirds of the

Congo basin. After that, attention will have to be drawn to Stanley

Falls, 1100 miles higher, and a railway of thirty-two miles in length

will enable us to pass the series of cataracts in that region, and to

command the river for about 1700 miles of its course.[1]

[1] Last December (1891) the foreign population of the Congo State was

as follows:

Belgians, 338; British, 72; Italians, 63; Portuguese, 56; Dutch, 47;

Swedes, 35; Danes, 32; French, 18; other nationalities, 83. Total, 744.

Their professions are as follows:

State officials, 271; merchants and clerks, 175; consuls, 2; doctors,

4; missionaries, 80; captains and sailors, 43; engineers, 12; artisans,

157. Total, 744.

We must not omit to mention that while Livingstone was making his

terrible disclosures respecting the havoc wrought by the slave-trader

in east central Africa, Sir Samuel Baker was striving to effect in

north central Africa what has been so successfully accomplished in

the Congo State. During his expedition for the discovery of the

Albert Nyanza, his explorations led him through one of the principal

man-hunting regions, wherein murder and spoliation were the constant

occupations of powerful bands from Egypt and Nubia. These revelations

were followed by diplomatic pressure upon the Khedive Ismail, and

through the personal influence of an august personage he was finally

induced to delegate to Sir Samuel the task of arresting the destructive

careers of the slavers in the region of the upper Nile. In his book

_Ismailïa_ we have the record of his operations by himself. The firman

issued to him was to the effect that he “was to subdue to the Khedive’s

authority the countries to the south of Gondokoro, to suppress the

slave trade, to introduce a system of regular commerce, to open to

navigation the great lakes of the equator, and to establish a chain of

military stations and commercial depots throughout central Africa.”

This mission began in 1869, and continued until 1874.

On Baker’s retirement from the command of the equatorial Soudan the

work was intrusted to Colonel C. G. Gordon--commonly known as Chinese

Gordon. Where Baker had broken ground, Gordon was to build; what his

predecessor had commenced, Gordon was to perfect and to complete. If

energy, determination, and self-sacrifice received their due, then had

Gordon surely won for the Soudan that peace and security which it was

his dear object to obtain for it. But slaving was an old institution

in this part of the world. Every habit and custom of the people had

some connection with it. They had always been divided from prehistoric

time into enslavers and enslaved. How could two Englishmen, accompanied

by only a handful of officers, removed 2000 miles from their base of

supplies, change the nature of a race within a few years? Though much

wrong had been avenged, many thousands of slaves released, many a

slaver’s camp scattered, and many striking examples made to terrify the

evil-doers, the region was wide and long; and though within reach of

the Nile waters there was a faint promise of improvement, elsewhere,

at Kordofan, Darfoor, and Sennaar, the trade flourished. After three

years of wonderful work, Gordon resigned. A short time afterwards,

however, he resumed his task, with the powers of a dictator, over a

region covering 1,100,000 square miles. But the personal courage,

energy, and devotion of one man opposed to a race can effect but

little. His peculiar qualities shone forth conspicuously. He underwent

the same trials as formerly. He signalized his detestation of the

slavers by severe punishments, by summary dismissals of implicated

pashas and mudirs, by disbandment of the suspected soldiery; but the

land still suffered from waste, the roads in the interior were still

being strewn with bones, and after another period of three years he

again resigned.

Then followed a revulsion. The Khedivial government reverted to the

old order of things, Gordon’s decrees were rescinded, the dismissed

officers were reinstated, venality and oppression and demoralization

replaced justice and equity and righteousness, until the sum of the

enormities was so great that it provoked the great revolution in the

Soudan. Then ended the attempt to suppress slavery in north central

Africa. All traces of the work of Baker and Gordon have long ago been

completely obliterated.

Attention has been given of late to Morocco. This near neighbor of

England is just twenty years behind Zanzibar. The sentiments which the

English people expressed at the Mansion House and Stafford House in

regard to the slave trade at Zanzibar in 1873-4 are remarkably like

those which are uttered to-day respecting Morocco. But it will require

something more than diplomatic missions to the court of the Sultan to

suppress the Moorish slave trade. Sir John D. Hay, who during his long

stay in that country won the titles of the “Mussulman’s Friend” and

“Counsellor of the Throne,” was accustomed to make periodical journeys

to the Moorish court, and the Sultan used to meet his representations

with promises of reform and amendment, but as soon as he set out on

his return to Tangier, the native officials would set themselves to

undo the good caused by Sir John’s visit. Sir William Kirby Green, his

successor, was also successful in eliciting assurances that the trade

would be stopped, and now Sir Charles Euan-Smith lately paid a visit,

but unfortunately the results have been _nil_. It is doubtful whether

England alone can induce the Sultan and his ministers to press the

needed reforms in the face of national opposition, or that anything

less than the concerted action of England, France, Germany, and Spain

can succeed. A demonstration by England alone, without the cordial

assent of the other powers, would doubtless be regarded as a step

towards annexation rather than as an expression of the hostility of

the British nation to the slave trade. But meantime the importation

of negroes from the Nigritian basin and southwestern Soudan into the

public slave markets of Morocco will continue until for very shame

it will irritate Europe into taking more decided steps in the name

of humanity to force the ever-maundering authorities to decree the

abolition of the slave trade, and to carry the decree into immediate

effect. It is surely high time that the “China of the West,” as it has

been called, should be made to feel that its present condition is a

standing reproach to Europe. While the heart of Africa responds to the

civilizing influences moving from the east and the west and the south,

Morocco remains stupidly indifferent and inert, a pitiful example of

senility and decay.

The remaining portion of North Africa which still fosters slavery is

Tripoli. The occupation of Tunis by France has diverted such traffic

in slaves as it maintained to its neighbor. Though the watchfulness

of the Mediterranean cruisers renders the trade a precarious one, the

small lateen boats are frequently able to sail from such ports as

Benghazi, Derna, Solum, etc., with living freight, along the coast to

Asia Minor. In the interior, which is inaccessible to travellers, owing

to the fanaticism of the Senoussi sect, caravans from Darfoor and Wadai

bring large numbers of slaves for the supply of Tripolitan families

and Senouissian sanctuaries. The country is of course under Turkish

authority, and vizirial letters and firmans have been frequently issued

since 1848 forbidding the importation of slaves and all traffic in

them, but we might as well expect the Bedouins of Arabia to cease their

nomadic life at the bidding of the Pasha of Haleb as the fanatical

Mussulmans of the Fezzan to abstain from slavery at the mere command of

the Governor of Tripoli.

The descent of the Congo to the Atlantic in 1877 suggested to King

Leopold the foundation of a state. The Berlin Conference was a

consequence of the success attained by the King. The partition of

Southwest Africa among France, Portugal and Belgium inspired the

Germans to seek territorial possessions in the Dark Continent, and the

movement of Germany excited Great Britain to action, and thus public

attention was once more diverted to eastern Africa.

[Illustration: BOY SLAVE]

From the Abyssinian frontier as far as the Portuguese possessions, and

stretching inland to a line which may roughly be said to be about east

longitude 30°, was an area covering about 1,500,000 square miles which

belonged to no power. It was agreed that it should be divided into

three spheres of influence. The Germans fixed upon the southernmost,

the Italians upon the most northern; the British chose the central.

Each power contracted to confine its operations within its own sphere,

and to proceed to organize and administer it as opportunity offered

upon a civilized basis. There was no intention to launch out into any

enterprise of conquest, but each power proposed to make its title good

by renting or leasing tracts within its sphere from the native princes

or tribal chiefs, by making treaties with them for the sovereignty

of their lands, in return for annual subsidies and protection from

violence, meanwhile being certain of immunity from all interference or

opposition from its neighbor.

The Germans were the earliest to commence work. Through the agency of

a company they made a treaty with the Sultan of Zanzibar for his long

strip of coast land, undertaking to pay him a certain sum per annum for

the right of collecting the customs. But the imprudent conduct of the

officers, their imperious and peremptory manner of proceeding, impelled

the Arabs to attempt to drive them from the coast. At Kilwa, Dar

Salaam, Bagamoyo, and Saadani the officers of the German company were

attacked; some had to fly, others were massacred, and innocent British

missionaries returning home after a long residence in the interior were

waylaid and murdered by the excited natives; and the first attempts

of German colonization ended disastrously. Naturally the imperial

German government could not brook this humiliation, and Major Wissmann,

a well-known explorer, was appointed with full powers to suppress

the revolt. Within two years the Arabs were crushed, but the German

position in East Africa became completely changed in consequence. It

had been originally proposed to hold the East African coast by lease

from the Sultan, with the view of including the Hinterland as far as

Lake Tanganika within the sphere of their colonizing operations when

results would permit; but the Germans now claimed nearly the whole

of the east coast and east central Africa. This led in 1890 to the

Anglo-German Convention, by which the German frontier was drawn south

of latitude 1° S., across the Victoria Nyanza, thence east to the

Indian Ocean, skirting the northern base of Kilima-Njaro to Wanga, a

few miles south of the port of Mombasa. The British territory extended

north from Wanga on the sea as far as the mouth of the Juba River, a

distance of about 450 miles, thence inland as far as the Congo State.

These two great divisions of Africa, now converted into British and

German territory, included the major part of the area wherein the slave

trade of the east central part of the continent so long flourished.

The countries west of Lake Nyassa, extending westward to Portuguese

territory and south to the Zambezi, conceded to the great South African

Company, absorbed the remainder of the slavery area. These last are

under the control of a British commissioner, Mr. H. H. Johnston, to

whom is granted an annual subsidy of £10,000 from the South African

Company, and who, with the aid of two British gunboats now on their way

to Lake Nyassa, must shortly succeed in closing the interior of Africa

in that direction to all slave caravans.

Since the Anglo-German Convention the Germans have shown themselves

ready and willing to do their part towards the suppression of the

slave trade in the same thorough manner that they met the rising

of the Arabs. The coast towns are fortified and garrisoned; they

are marking their advance towards Lake Tanganika by the erection of

military stations; severe regulations have been issued against the

importation of arms and gunpowder; the Reichstag has been unstinted

in its supplies of money; an experienced administrator, Baron von

Soden, has been appointed an imperial commissioner, and scores of

qualified subordinates assist him. The Belgian Antislavery Society is

sending a steamer, _viâ_ the Congo, Kasai, Sankuru, and Lumami, to

Lake Tanganika as a cruiser for that lake; the German Catholic African

Society is sending another steamer, in charge of Major von Wissman,

_viâ_ the Zambezi, Shiré, Lake Nyassa, and Stevenson Road to Tanganika.

These two steamers will effectually prevent slaves being transported

across the lake from the eastern part of the Congo State. In German

East Africa itself slave hunts have ceased for many years; but it is

traversed in several places by slave caravans, principally from the

southwest and west. These routes will now be closed by the cruisers

on Lakes Nyassa and Tanganika, and the stations along the Stevenson

Road. Henceforward we need have no concern about that part of Africa.

The northern boundaries, a thousand miles in length, are not so well

guarded, though the Germans are engaged in the transport of a steamer

to Lake Victoria, and possess three stations along the southwestern

shores; but between Lakes Tanganika and Victoria is a broad tract of

country which will no doubt have to be watched, lest the slavers,

finding this unguarded, may unite in making this a pathway to the coast.

These strategic efforts to the west and southwest of German East

Africa, and the continuous upward advance of the stations and

flotillas of King Leopold towards the east, limit the operations

of the slave-traders to that narrowing and untravelled area lying

between Stanley Falls and Lake Tanganika, and will have the effect of

determining the Arabs to seek outlets eastward through British East

Africa, which, in its present state, is most backward in fulfilling

the objects of united Europe. Were it not for the condition that

British East Africa is in to-day we could say that the slave trade in

equatorial Africa was completely extinguished, and we could almost

point to the period wherein even slavery would be extirpated.

The partition of Africa among the European powers, as will have been

seen, was the first effective blow dealt to the slave trade in inner

Africa. The east coast, whence a few years ago the slavers marched

in battalions to scatter over the wide interior of the continent for

pillage and devastation, is to-day guarded by garrisons of German

and British troops. The island of Zanzibar, where they were equipped

for their murderous enterprises, is under the British flag. Trading

steamers run up and down the coast; the Tana and Juba rivers are

being navigated by British steamers; two lines of stations secure

communications inland for 300 miles from the sea. Major von Wissman

is advancing upon Lake Tanganika; Herr Boorchert is marching upon

Lake Victoria; Captain Williams is holding Uganda. These results have

followed very rapidly the political partition of the continent.

The final blow has been given by the act of the Brussels Antislavery

Conference, lately ratified by the powers, wherein modern civilization

has fully declared its opinions upon the question of slavery, and no

single power will dare remain indifferent to them, under penalty of

obloquy and shame.

The first article of the Brussels act is as follows:

“The powers declare that the most effective means for counteracting

the slave trade in the interior of Africa are the following:

“1. Progressive organization of the administration; judicial,

religious, and military services in the African territories placed

under the sovereignty or protectorate of civilized nations.

“2. The gradual establishment in the interior by the responsible power

in each territory of strongly occupied stations in such a way as to

make their protective or repressive action effectively felt in the

territories devastated by man-hunters.

“3. The construction of roads, and, in particular, of railways

connecting the advanced stations with the coast, and presenting easy

access to the inland waters and to the upper reaches of streams and

rivers which are broken by rapids and cataracts, so as to substitute

economical and speedy means of transport for the present means of

portage by men.

“4. Establishment of steamboats on the inland navigable waters and on

the lakes, supported by fortified posts established on the banks.

“5. Establishment of telegraphic lines, assuring the communication of

the posts and stations with the coast and with administrative centres.

“6. Organization of expeditious and flying columns to keep up the

communication of the stations with each other and with the coast, to

support repressive action, and to assume the security of roadways.

“7. Restriction of the importation of fire-arms.”

The above articles concern three powers especially, Great Britain,

Germany, and the Congo State, so far as regards the efficient

counteraction of the slave trade. In examining them one by one, we find

that Great Britain, which in the past was foremost in the cause of the

slave, has done and is doing least to carry out the measures suggested

by the great Antislavery Conference. We must also admit that as regards

furthering the good cause, France is a long way ahead of England.

The Congo State devotes her annual subsidies of £120,000 and the export

tax of £30,000 wholly to the task of securing her territory against the

malign influences of the slave trade, and elevating it to the rank of

self-protecting states.

The German government undertakes the sure guardianship of its vast

African territory as an imperial possession, so as to render it

inaccessible to the slave-hunter, and free from the terrors, the

disturbances, the internecinal wars, and the distractions arising from

the presence or visits of slavers. It has spent already large sums of

money, and finds no difficulty in obtaining from Parliament the sums

requisite for the defence and the thorough control and management of

the territory as a colonial possession. So far the expenses, I think,

have averaged over £100,000 annually.

The French government devotes £60,000 annually for the protection and

administration of its Gaboon and Congo territory. These two objects

include in brief all that the Antislavery Conference deemed necessary,

for with due protection and efficient administration there can be no

room for slave hunting or trading.

Now the question comes, what has England done in the extensive and

valuable territory in East Africa which fell to her share as per

Anglo-German agreement signed July 1, 1890? The answer must be that she

has done less than the least of all those concerned in the extirpation

of the slave trade.

The Germans have crushed the slave-traders, have built fortified

stations in the interior, have supplied their portion of the east coast

with a powerful flotilla of steamers, are engaged in transporting

cruisers to the three great lakes on their borders, have surveyed and

are extending surveys for several railways in the interior, have not

lost time in discovering ways of evading the territorial wants, but

have set about to supply these wants as indicated by the International

Conference of Brussels; and were we able to obtain an instantaneous

photograph of the present movements of the Germans throughout their

territory, we should know how to fully appreciate the hearty spirit

with which they are performing their duties.

And were we able to glance in the same way as to what is occurring on

British soil, we should be struck by the earnestness of the Germans as

compared with the British.

[Illustration: AN ARAB]

Both governments started with delegating their authority to chartered

companies. On the part of the Germans, however, the imprudence of their

agents imperilled their possessions, and the imperial government set

itself the task of reducing malcontentism to order, and settling the

difficulties in its own masterful manner, and is engaged in providing

against their recurrence before surrendering the territory again to the

influences of the company.

The British East African Company, on the other hand, has been

comparatively free to commence its commercial operations, undisturbed

by armed opposition of aborigines or of Arab and Swahili residents.

The welcome given to it has been almost universally cordial. The

susceptibilities of the Arabs were not wounded, and the aborigines

gratefully recognized that the new-comers were not hostile to them.

Concessions were obtained at a fair price, and on payment of the

stipulated value the company entered into possession, and became, with

the consent of all concerned, masters of the British East African

territory--a territory far more ample than what the founders of the

company had hoped for at first.

Had the British East African Company confined its transactions and

operations to the coast, it is well known that the returns would have

been most lucrative, for over and above the expenditure we see by their

reports that there would have been a yearly net gain of over £6000

available for dividend, which by this time would have been trebled.

Slavery and the slave trade in Africa · 第 2 / 3 段