CHAPTER LXXVI

PREXY

I promised early in this book to consider how it happens that so many

college presidents are men who do not always tell the truth. We have now

seen far enough into the inside of colleges to understand the reason.

The president of a college or university is the great reconciler of

irreconcilabilities; he is the chemist who mixes oil and water, the high

priest who makes peace between God and Mammon, the circus-rider who

stands on two horses going in opposite directions; and all these things

not by choice, but ex-officio and of inescapable necessity. The college

president is a man who procures money from the rich, and uses it for the

spreading of knowledge; in fulfilling which two functions he places

himself, not merely in the line of fire of the warring forces of the

class struggle, but between the incompatible elements of human nature

itself—between greed and service, between hate and love, between body

and spirit.

Consider the rich, how they become so. Either they or their ancestors

before them have taken from others, and that which they have taken, the

others have lost. The very essence of their richness is that there are

many poor. If all were rich, there would be no sense in wealth, no power

in it, for there would be none willing to serve. It is plain to anyone

who can think that richness means possessing material things, and

excluding others from possession thereof. Of such is the kingdom of

Mammon.

And of what is the kingdom of God? In the region of the mind the

situation is exactly the opposite; the wealth of one is the wealth of

all, and the highest joy of possession is that the thing possessed may

be shared by all and be of benefit to all, with no diminution to anyone.

I am trying here to write a useful book; my pleasure is in communicating

to you what I believe to be truth, and exactly proportionate to my

success in spreading this truth is my own gratification. This applies to

Shakespeare writing a play, it applies to Beethoven composing a

symphony, it applies to Newton discovering a natural law; each gives

something which all mankind may enjoy forever, and no one’s pleasure in

“As You Like It,” or in the “Fifth Symphony,” or in an understanding of

the movements of the planets, is any less because at the same time

millions of other people are having that same pleasure.

This fact determines the attitude to life of the true scientist, the

scholar and the lover of the arts; it is as different from the attitude

of the trader, the speculator and the exploiter as black is different

from white, or night from day. There can be no greater irreconcilability

conceivable to the human mind. But now comes a new species of superman,

whose function it is to make peace between these two forces, to persuade

the lion of commerce and the lamb of learning to lie down in the same

pasture together! The name of this great American enchanter is PREXY.

How does he do it? I am moved to be blunt, and say in plain English that

he does it by being the most universal faker and the most variegated

prevaricator that has yet appeared in the civilized world. He does it by

making his entire being a conglomeration of hypocrisies and

stultifications, so that by the time he has been in office a year or two

he has told so many different kinds of falsehoods and made so many

different kinds of pretenses to so many different people, that he has

lost all understanding of what truth is, or how a man could speak it.

The college needs money. Colleges always need money, because college

students get three times as much as they pay for, and the hope of

getting social prestige, to enable them to live easy lives, brings

constantly increasing crowds each year to the college gates. So “prexy”

seeks out possible donors; “prospects,” as they are called in the slang

of mendication. He cannot go to them directly and ask for money; the man

who tries methods so crude is speedily eliminated from the list of

college presidents. The successful one is the possessor of what is

called “tact”; that is to say, he understands the weaknesses of human

nature, he is an expert in the predatory psychology, a hunter who knows

how to pierce the tough and scaly hides of old commercial monsters who

have spent a lifetime watching people trying to get their money away

from them, and have managed hitherto to resist all threats and

blandishments.

The college president has to meet these plutocratic monsters socially;

he has to be “human” to them—that is to say, he has to pretend to be

interested in them, to admire them and their ways of life. He has to

flatter their vanities, invite them to meals and find out what they like

to eat, hold their overcoats and escort them to the motorcar, be

gracious to their wives and a bit flirtatious to their daughters. After

he thinks he has sufficiently gained their confidence, he begins a

careful approach, to make these monsters realize the indispensability of

propaganda to every ruling class. There is a battle of ideas going on in

the world, dangerous notions are clamoring for attention, class hatreds

and jealousies are raising their hideous hydra heads. What safety can

there be for vested interests, unless they make it their business to see

that the new generation is taught respect for the property clauses of

the Constitution? There is no department of human thought into which

this struggle with new ideas does not penetrate, there is nothing that

universities do or teach that cannot be related, in the eloquence of

college presidents hunting money, to the cause of law and order and safe

and sane stagnation.

On that basis the college president does his “vamping”; and having got

the necessary papers signed and witnessed before a notary, he gets a

bath and a shave, and puts on clean clothes, and draws a deep breath,

and expands his chest, and confronts the world with a proclamation of

magnificent devotion to the service of truth and the welfare of mankind.

These millions which he has just collected from the aged oil dinosaur,

or steel megatherium, or beef pterodactyl, or whatever the beast may

be—these millions he is now going to spend in a free and absolutely

disinterested pursuit of understanding, with utter loyalty to scientific

facts wherever they may lead, with complete trust in democracy and the

wisdom of the people, with reverent humility before the God of Truth and

Justice and Love. This that I am pronouncing you will immediately

recognize as a standard commencement oration; delivered in the presence

of a hundred plutocrats in decent frock-coats, and five hundred faculty

members in caps and gowns, and a graduating class of a thousand young

people; published next morning to the extent of four columns in all

local newspapers, and relayed by the Associated Press to the extent of

half a column to thirteen hundred morning newspapers throughout the

United States. In the course of my trip among the colleges I was talking

with a certain eminent scientist, and I spoke of the tragedy and horror

that had befallen mankind through the failure of Woodrow Wilson to mean

any of his golden words. “My God!” said the scientist. “Didn’t you know

what all that was? Haven’t you been hearing that kind of thing for

thirty years? Didn’t you know that those speeches of Woodrow’s were

commencement orations?”

It makes no difference whether the college president is dealing

personally with the interlocking directorate, as in privately endowed

institutions, or whether he deals with the politicians who run the

government machine for these same plutocrats. As a matter of fact, the

college president who represents the so-called public institutions is in

the more humiliating position of the two; for the free lance man has an

open field, he can get himself invited to dinner-parties, and always has

the hope that some day he may run into a politer plutocrat; but the

president of a state university has no choice, he has to deal with the

“boss” whom he finds in power. He will be snubbed and insulted until the

tears run down his cheeks; and then he will go back to his deans and his

kitchen cabinet and explain what it is that the political machine

demands—the expulsion of this or that professor, the support of the

university for this candidate or that bit of graft; and the president

and his cabinet will work out the proper set of lies to tell to the

discharged professor, or to the plundered public, or to both.

Thus the college president spends his time running back and forth

between Mammon and God, known in the academic vocabulary as Business and

Learning. He pleads with the business man to make a little more

allowance for the eccentricities of the scholar; explaining the absurd

notion which men of learning have that they owe loyalty to truth and

public welfare. He points out that if the college comes to be known as a

mere tool of special privilege it loses all its dignity and authority;

it is absolutely necessary that it should maintain a pretense of

disinterestedness, it should appear to the public as a shrine of wisdom

and piety. He points out that Professor So-and-So has managed to secure

great prestige throughout the state, and if he is unceremoniously fired

it will make a terrific scandal, and perhaps cause other faculty members

to resign, and other famous scientists to stay away from the

institution.

The president says this at a dinner-party in the home of his grand duke;

and next morning he hurries off to argue with the recalcitrant

professor. He points out the humiliating need of funds—just now when the

professor’s own salary is so entirely inadequate. He begs the professor

to realize the president’s own position, the crudity of business men who

hold the purse-strings, and have no understanding of academic dignity.

He pleads for just a little discretion, just a little time—just a little

anything that will moderate the clash between greed and service, the

incompatibility of hate and love.

Either he succeeds in his purpose of persuading the professor to be less

a scientist, a citizen, and a man of honor, or else he decides, in

conference with his kitchen cabinet, that a way must be found to get rid

of this unreasonable marplot. He and his cabinet now start a campaign of

intrigue against the professor; they set going rumors calculated to

damage his prestige; they contrive traps into which to snare him; or

they wait until in the war between greed and service he gives utterance

to some plain human emotion—whereupon they find him guilty of

“indiscretion,” and announce to the public that he has shown himself to

be lacking in that “judicious” attitude of mind which is essential to

those occupying academic positions. Or perhaps they find that they have

too many men in that department; or they decide to combine the

departments of literature and obstetrics. They have a thousand different

devices, scores of which I have shown you in action. Always they tell

the professor—with their right hands upon the Bible they swear it to the

public and to the newspapers—that it is purely “an administrative

matter,” there is no question of academic freedom involved, and everyone

in their institution lives, moves and has his being in the single-minded

love of truth.

I have on my desk a letter from a Harvard professor, who tells me that

my chapters on that institution are interesting, but he thinks I

attribute too much cunning to the objects of my indignation. “These

conforming preachers and editors and teachers are more of the genus

Babbitt than of the genus Machiavelli.” This is a question of

psychology, which only the Maker of the creatures can decide. In any

case it matters little, because my purpose here is not to apportion

blame, but to point out social peril, and it matters not whether social

traitors know what they are doing—the effect of their action remains

equally destructive to society. I have called the American college and

university a ruling-class munition-factory for the manufacture of high

explosive shells and gas bombs to be used in the service of intrenched

greed and cruelty. The college president is the man who runs this

indispensable institution; and he is not one of the military leaders who

sit in swivel chairs in city offices, he is one who sallies forth in

person at the head of his armies, bravely hurling commencement bombs and

Fourth of July torpedoes.

The college president is a human radio, a walking broadcasting station,

a combination of encyclopedia and megaphone. He is that man whose

profession it is to know everything; in his one mind is summed up

ex-officio all the knowledge of all the specialties. He tells his

professors what to teach, and how to teach it, and has little birds and

whispering galleries and telepathic mediums to advise him if they obey.

He is a human card-index, an information service bureau concerning the

reputations of professors in all other institutions, and of promising

undergraduates and Ph.D. candidates, and just what they are worth, and

how much less they can be hired for. Or, if he does not possess all this

knowledge, he possesses a perfectly satisfactory substitute—the ability

to look as if he possessed it, and to act as if he possessed it. Such is

the advantage of being an autocrat; criticism does not affect you, and

whether you are right or whether you are wrong is the same thing.

The college president has acquired enormous prestige in American

capitalist society; he is a priest of the new god of science, and

newspapers and purveyors of “public opinion” unite in exalting him. He

receives the salary of a plutocrat, and arrogates to himself the

prestige and precedence that go with it. He lives on terms of equality

with business emperors and financial dukes, and conveys their will to

mankind, and perpetuates their ideals and prejudices in the coming

generation. It is a new aristocracy which has arisen among us, and they

all stand together, they and their henchmen and courtiers, against

whatever forces may threaten. I have shown how they have invented a new

set of titles of nobility, which they sell for cash, or use to exalt

their patrons and overawe you and me. We shall find it worth while to

turn over the pages of “Who’s Who in America,” and see what these mighty

ones of the earth think of one another, and what they do to flatter one

another’s pride, and to keep their own order in the public eye.

“I do not give degrees to scientists,” said Wheeler of California. “I

give them to statesmen and college presidents”; which means that these

gentry have a system of “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.”

Wheeler managed to get scratched no less than twelve times during his

life, Eliot of Harvard eleven times, Shanklin of Wesleyan eleven times,

Smith of Pennsylvania twenty times, Lowell of Harvard twenty times,

Nicholas Miraculous twenty-five times. Descending in the scale of

plutocratic importance we find Angell of Yale with nine honorary

degrees, Faunce of Brown with nine, Schurman of Cornell eight, Judson of

Chicago seven, Day of Syracuse seven, Burton of Michigan six, Goodnow of

Johns Hopkins five. Jordan of Stanford got only four—you remember that

our icthyologist and race-horse expert was tainted with pacifism and

democracy!

You remember also the mushrooms and toadstools, and the absurdities we

discovered at these places. I look up the present and recent heads of

these institutions, and there is scarcely one who has not been able to

get his back scratched. I find Crawford of Allegheny with seven degrees,

Thompson of Ohio State with five, Mitchell of Delaware with three,

Wishart of Wooster with three, Few of Trinity with three, Garfield of

Williams with five, Conwell of Temple with two, Hixson of Allegheny with

two, Brooks of Baylor with one, Buchtel of Denver with one, Parsons of

Marietta with one, Goodnight of Bethany with one, Montgomery of

Muskingum with one. Also, it is interesting to note, you will find all

these presidents of little toad stools duly recorded in “Who’s Who.” You

may look in that volume for the best minds in our country, the men who

are serving as pioneers of social justice and democracy, and three times

out of four you will not find their names, or, when you do find them,

they are relegated, like the present writer, to a back volume. But all

presidents of colleges, no matter how insignificant or absurd, take rank

with senators and cabinet members and ambassadors and supreme court

judges and admirals and generals, and go into every volume ex officio.

The Goose-step: A Study of American Education · 第 76 / 93 章