Aurelian had no sooner secured the person and provinces of Tetricus,

than he turned his arms against Zenobia, the celebrated queen of Palmyra

and the East. Modern Europe has produced several illustrious women who

have sustained with glory the weight of empire; nor is our own age

destitute of such distinguished characters. But if we except the

doubtful achievements of Semiramis, Zenobia is perhaps the only female

whose superior genius broke through the servile indolence imposed on her

sex by the climate and manners of Asia. She claimed her descent from the

Macedonian kings of Egypt, equaled in beauty her ancestor Cleopatra, and

far surpassed that princess in chastity and valor. Zenobia was esteemed

the most lovely as well as the most heroic of her sex. She was of a dark

complexion (for in speaking of a lady these trifles become important).

Her teeth were of a pearly whiteness, and her large black eyes sparkled

with uncommon fire, tempered by the most attractive sweetness. Her voice

was strong and harmonious. Her manly understanding was strengthened and

adorned by study. She was not ignorant of the Latin tongue, but

possessed in equal perfection the Greek, the Syriac, and the Egyptian

languages. She had drawn up for her own use an epitome of Oriental

history, and familiarly compared the beauties of Homer and Plato under

the tuition of the sublime Longinus.

This accomplished woman gave her hand to Odenathus, who, from a private

station, raised himself to the dominion of the East. She soon became the

friend and companion of a hero. In the intervals of war, Odenathus

passionately delighted in the exercise of hunting; he pursued with ardor

the wild beasts of the desert,--lions, panthers, and bears; and the

ardor of Zenobia in that dangerous amusement was not inferior to his

own. She had inured her constitution to fatigue, disdained the use of a

covered carriage, generally appeared on horseback in a military habit,

and sometimes marched several miles on foot at the head of the troops.

The success of Odenathus was in a great measure ascribed to her

incomparable prudence and fortitude. Their splendid victories over the

Great King, whom they twice pursued as far as the gates of Ctesiphon,

laid the foundations of their united fame and power. The armies which

they commanded, and the provinces which they had saved, acknowledged

not any other sovereigns than their invincible chiefs. The Senate and

people of Rome revered a stranger who had avenged their captive emperor,

and even the insensible son of Valerian accepted Odenathus for his

legitimate colleague.

After a successful expedition against the Gothic plunderers of Asia, the

Palmyrenian prince returned to the city of Emesa in Syria. Invincible in

war, he was there cut off by domestic treason; and his favorite

amusement of hunting was the cause, or at least the occasion, of his

death. His nephew Maeonius presumed to dart his javelin before that of

his uncle; and though admonished of his error, repeated the same

insolence. As a monarch and as a sportsman, Odenathus was provoked, took

away his horse, a mark of ignominy among the barbarians, and chastised

the rash youth by a short confinement. The offense was soon forgot, but

the punishment was remembered; and Maeonius, with a few daring

associates, assassinated his uncle in the midst of a great

entertainment. Herod, the son of Odenathus, though not of Zenobia, a

young man of a soft and effeminate temper, was killed with his father.

But Maeonius obtained only the pleasure of revenge by this bloody deed.

He had scarcely time to assume the title of Augustus, before he was

sacrificed by Zenobia to the memory of her husband.

With the assistance of his most faithful friends, she immediately filled

the vacant throne, and governed with manly counsels Palmyra, Syria, and

the East, above five years. By the death of Odenathus, that authority

was at an end which the Senate had granted him only as a personal

distinction; but his martial widow, disdaining both the Senate and

Gallienus, obliged one of the Roman generals who was sent against her to

retreat into Europe, with the loss of his army and his reputation.

Instead of the little passions which so frequently perplex a female

reign, the steady administration of Zenobia was guided by the most

judicious maxims of policy. If it was expedient to pardon, she could

calm her resentment; if it was necessary to punish, she could impose

silence on the voice of pity. Her strict economy was accused of avarice;

yet on every proper occasion she appeared magnificent and liberal. The

neighboring States of Arabia, Armenia, and Persia dreaded her enmity and

solicited her alliance. To the dominions of Odenathus, which extended

from the Euphrates to the frontiers of Bithynia, his widow added the

inheritance of her ancestors, the populous and fertile kingdom of

Egypt. The Emperor Claudius acknowledged her merit, and was content that

while _he_ pursued the Gothic war, _she_ should assert the dignity of

the Empire in the East. The conduct however of Zenobia was attended with

some ambiguity, nor is it unlikely that she had conceived the design of

erecting an independent and hostile monarchy. She blended with the

popular manners of Roman princes the stately pomp of the courts of Asia,

and exacted from her subjects the same adoration that was paid to the

successors of Cyrus. She bestowed on her three sons a Latin education,

and often showed them to the troops adorned with the imperial purple.

For herself she reserved the diadem, with the splendid but doubtful

title of Queen of the East.

When Aurelian passed over into Asia against an adversary whose sex alone

could render her an object of contempt, his presence restored obedience

to the province of Bithynia, already shaken by the arms and intrigues of

Zenobia. Advancing at the head of his legions, he accepted the

submission of Ancyra, and was admitted into Tyana, after an obstinate

siege, by the help of a perfidious citizen. The generous though fierce

temper of Aurelian abandoned the traitor to the rage of the soldiers: a

superstitious reverence induced him to treat with lenity the countrymen

of Apollonius the philosopher. Antioch was deserted on his approach,

till the Emperor, by his salutary edicts, recalled the fugitives, and

granted a general pardon to all who from necessity rather than choice

had been engaged in the service of the Palmyrenian Queen. The unexpected

mildness of such a conduct reconciled the minds of the Syrians, and as

far as the gates of Emesa the wishes of the people seconded the terror

of his arms.

Zenobia would have ill deserved her reputation, had she indolently

permitted the Emperor of the West to approach within a hundred miles of

her capital. The fate of the East was decided in two great battles, so

similar in almost every circumstance that we can scarcely distinguish

them from each other, except by observing that the first was fought near

Antioch and the second near Emesa. In both the Queen of Palmyra animated

the armies by her presence, and devolved the execution of her orders on

Zabdas, who had already signalized his military talents by the conquest

of Egypt. The numerous forces of Zenobia consisted for the most part of

light archers, and of heavy cavalry clothed in complete steel. The

Moorish and Illyrian horse of Aurelian were unable to sustain the

ponderous charge of their antagonists. They fled in real or affected

disorder, engaged the Palmyrenians in a laborious pursuit, harassed them

by a desultory combat, and at length discomfited this impenetrable but

unwieldy body of cavalry. The light infantry, in the mean time, when

they had exhausted their quivers, remaining without protection against a

closer onset, exposed their naked sides to the swords of the legions.

Aurelian had chosen these veteran troops, who were usually stationed on

the Upper Danube, and whose valor had been severely tried in the

Alemannic war. After the defeat of Emesa, Zenobia found it impossible to

collect a third army. As far as the frontier of Egypt, the nations

subject to her empire had joined the standard of the conqueror, who

detached Probus, the bravest of his generals, to possess himself of the

Egyptian provinces. Palmyra was the last resource of the widow of

Odenathus. She retired within the walls of her capital, made every

preparation for a vigorous resistance, and declared, with the

intrepidity of a heroine, that the last moment of her reign and of her

life should be the same.

Amid the barren deserts of Arabia, a few cultivated spots rise like

islands out of the sandy ocean. Even the name of Tadmor, or Palmyra, by

its signification in the Syriac as well as in the Latin language,

denoted the multitude of palm-trees which afforded shade and verdure to

that temperate region. The air was pure, and the soil, watered by some

invaluable springs, was capable of producing fruits as well as corn.

A place possessed of such singular advantages, and situated at a

convenient distance between the Gulf of Persia and the Mediterranean,[C]

was soon frequented by the caravans which conveyed to the nations of

Europe a considerable part of the rich commodities of India. Palmyra

insensibly increased into an opulent and independent city, and

connecting the Roman and the Parthian monarchies by the mutual benefits

of commerce, was suffered to observe a humble neutrality, till at length

after the victories of Trajan the little republic sunk into the bosom of

Rome, and flourished more than one hundred and fifty years in the

subordinate though honorable rank of a colony. It was during that

peaceful period, if we may judge from a few remaining inscriptions, that

the wealthy Palmyrenians constructed those temples, palaces, and

porticos of Grecian architecture whose ruins, scattered over an extent

of several miles, have deserved the curiosity of our travelers. The

elevation of Odenathus and Zenobia appeared to reflect new splendor on

their country, and Palmyra for a while stood forth the rival of Rome:

but the competition was fatal, and ages of prosperity were sacrificed to

a moment of glory.

[C] Five hundred and thirty-seven miles from Seleucia, two

hundred and three from the nearest coast of Syria, according

to Pliny.

In his march over the sandy desert between Emesa and Palmyra, the

Emperor Aurelian was perpetually harassed by the Arabs; nor could he

always defend his army, and especially his baggage, from those flying

troops of active and daring robbers who watched the moment of surprise

and eluded the slow pursuit of the legions. The siege of Palmyra was an

object far more difficult and important, and the Emperor, who with

incessant vigor pressed the attacks in person, was himself wounded with

a dart. "The Roman people," says Aurelian, in an original letter, "speak

with contempt of the war which I am waging against a woman. They are

ignorant both of the character and of the power of Zenobia. It is

impossible to enumerate her warlike preparations of stones, of arrows,

and of every species of missile weapons. Every part of the walls is

provided with two or three _balistae_, and artificial fires are thrown

from her military engines. The fear of punishment has armed her with a

desperate courage. Yet still I trust in the protecting deities of Rome,

who have hitherto been favorable to all my undertakings." Doubtful,

however, of the protection of the gods and of the event of the siege,

Aurelian judged it more prudent to offer terms of an advantageous

capitulation: to the Queen, a splendid retreat; to the citizens, their

ancient privileges. His proposals were obstinately rejected, and the

refusal was accompanied with insult.

The firmness of Zenobia was supported by the hope that in a very short

time famine would compel the Roman army to repass the desert, and by the

reasonable expectation that the kings of the East, and particularly the

Persian monarch, would arm in the defense of their most natural ally.

But fortune and the perseverance of Aurelian overcame every obstacle.

The death of Sapor, which happened about this time, distracted the

counsels of Persia, and the inconsiderable succors that attempted to

relieve Palmyra were easily intercepted either by the arms or the

liberality of the Emperor. From every part of Syria a regular succession

of convoys safely arrived in the camp, which was increased by the return

of Probus with his victorious troops from the conquest of Egypt. It was

then that Zenobia resolved to fly. She mounted the fleetest of her

dromedaries, and had already reached the banks of the Euphrates, about

sixty miles from Palmyra, when she was overtaken by the pursuit of

Aurelian's light horse, seized, and brought back a captive to the feet

of the Emperor. Her capital soon afterwards surrendered, and was treated

with unexpected lenity. The arms, horses, and camels, with an immense

treasure of gold, silver, silk, and precious stones, were all delivered

to the conqueror, who, leaving only a garrison of six hundred archers,

returned to Emesa and employed some time in the distribution of rewards

and punishments at the end of so memorable a war, which restored to the

obedience of Rome those provinces that had renounced their allegiance

since the captivity of Valerian.

When the Syrian Queen was brought into the presence of Aurelian he

sternly asked her, How she had presumed to rise in arms against the

emperors of Rome! The answer of Zenobia was a prudent mixture of respect

and firmness: "Because I disdained to consider as Roman emperors an

Aureolus or a Gallienus. You alone I acknowledge as my conqueror and my

sovereign." But as female fortitude is commonly artificial, so it is

seldom steady or consistent. The courage of Zenobia deserted her in the

hour of trial; she trembled at the angry clamors of the soldiers, who

called aloud for her immediate execution, forgot the generous despair of

Cleopatra which she had proposed as her model, and ignominiously

purchased life by the sacrifice of her fame and her friends. It was to

their counsels, which governed the weakness of her sex, that she imputed

the guilt of her obstinate resistance; it was on their heads that she

directed the vengeance of the cruel Aurelian. The fame of Longinus, who

was included among the numerous and perhaps innocent victims of her

fear, will survive that of the Queen who betrayed or the tyrant who

condemned him. Genius and learning were incapable of moving a fierce

unlettered soldier, but they had served to elevate and harmonize the

soul of Longinus. Without uttering a complaint he calmly followed the

executioner, pitying his unhappy mistress, and bestowing comfort on his

afflicted friends....

But, however in the treatment of his unfortunate rivals Aurelian might

indulge his pride, he behaved towards them with a generous clemency

which was seldom exercised by the ancient conquerors. Princes who

without success had defended their throne or freedom, were frequently

strangled in prison as soon as the triumphal pomp ascended the Capitol.

These usurpers, whom their defeat had convicted of the crime of treason,

were permitted to spend their lives in affluence and honorable repose.

The Emperor presented Zenobia with an elegant villa at Tibur, or Tivoli,

about twenty miles from the capital; the Syrian queen insensibly sunk

into a Roman matron, her daughters married into noble families, and her

race was not yet extinct in the fifth century.

FOUNDATION OF CONSTANTINOPLE

We are at present qualified to view the advantageous position of

Constantinople, which appears to have been formed by nature for the

centre and capital of a great monarchy. Situated in the forty-first

degree of latitude, the imperial city commanded from her seven hills the

opposite shores of Europe and Asia; the climate was healthy and

temperate, the soil fertile, the harbor secure and capacious; and the

approach on the side of the continent was of small extent and easy

defense. The Bosphorus and the Hellespont may be considered as the two

gates of Constantinople; and the prince who possessed those important

passages could always shut them against a naval enemy and open them to

the fleets of commerce. The preservation of the eastern provinces may in

some degree be ascribed to the policy of Constantine, as the barbarians

of the Euxine, who in the preceding age had poured their armaments into

the heart of the Mediterranean, soon desisted from the exercise of

piracy, and despaired of forcing this insurmountable barrier. When the

gates of the Hellespont and Bosphorus were shut, the capital still

enjoyed within their spacious inclosure every production which could

supply the wants or gratify the luxury of its numerous inhabitants. The

sea-coasts of Thrace and Bithynia, which languish under the weight of

Turkish oppression, still exhibit a rich prospect of vineyards, of

gardens, and of plentiful harvests; and the Propontis has ever been

renowned for an inexhaustible store of the most exquisite fish, that are

taken in their stated seasons without skill and almost without labor.

But when the passages of the straits were thrown open for trade, they

alternately admitted the natural and artificial riches of the North and

South, of the Euxine and of the Mediterranean. Whatever rude commodities

were collected in the forests of Germany and Scythia, as far as the

sources of the Tanais and the Borysthenes; whatsoever was manufactured

by the skill of Europe or Asia; the corn of Egypt, and the gems and

spices of the farthest India, were brought by the varying winds into the

port of Constantinople, which for many ages attracted the commerce of

the ancient world.

The prospect of beauty, of safety, and of wealth, united in a single

spot, was sufficient to justify the choice of Constantine. But as some

decent mixture of prodigy and fable has in every age been supposed to

reflect a becoming majesty on the origin of great cities, the Emperor

was desirous of ascribing his resolution, not so much to the uncertain

counsels of human policy as to the infallible and eternal decrees of

Divine wisdom. In one of his laws he has been careful to instruct

posterity that in obedience to the commands of God he laid the

everlasting foundations of Constantinople: and though he has not

condescended to relate in what manner the celestial inspiration was

communicated to his mind, the defect of his modest silence has been

liberally supplied by the ingenuity of succeeding writers, who describe

the nocturnal vision which appeared to the fancy of Constantine as he

slept within the walls of Byzantium. The tutelar genius of the city, a

venerable matron sinking under the weight of years and infirmities, was

suddenly transformed into a blooming maid, whom his own hands adorned

with all the symbols of imperial greatness. The monarch awoke,

interpreted the auspicious omen, and obeyed without hesitation the will

of Heaven. The day which gave birth to a city or colony was celebrated

by the Romans with such ceremonies as had been ordained by a generous

superstition; and though Constantine might omit some rites which savored

too strongly of their pagan origin, yet he was anxious to leave a deep

impression of hope and respect on the minds of the spectators. On foot,

with a lance in his hand, the Emperor himself led the solemn procession,

and directed the line which was traced as the boundary of the destined

capital; till the growing circumference was observed with astonishment

by the assistants, who at length ventured to observe that he had already

exceeded the most ample measure of a great city. "I shall still

advance," replied Constantine, "till HE, the invisible guide who marches

before me, thinks proper to stop." Without presuming to investigate the

nature or motives of this extraordinary conductor, we shall content

ourselves with the more humble task of describing the extent and limits

of Constantinople.

In the actual state of the city, the palace and gardens of the Seraglio

occupy the eastern promontory, the first of the seven hills, and cover

about one hundred and fifty acres of our own measure. The seat of

Turkish jealousy and despotism is erected on the foundations of a

Grecian republic; but it may be supposed that the Byzantines were

tempted by the conveniency of the harbor to extend their habitations on

that side beyond the modern limits of the Seraglio. The new walls of

Constantine stretched from the port to the Propontis across the enlarged

breadth of the triangle, at a distance of fifteen stadia from the

ancient fortification; and with the city of Byzantium they inclosed five

of the seven hills which, to the eyes of those who approach

Constantinople, appear to rise above each other in beautiful order.

About a century after the death of the founder, the new buildings,

extending on one side up the harbor and on the other along the

Propontis, already covered the narrow ridge of the sixth and the broad

summit of the seventh hill. The necessity of protecting those suburbs

from the incessant inroads of the barbarians engaged the younger

Theodosius to surround his capital with an adequate and permanent

inclosure of walls. From the eastern promontory to the Golden Gate, the

extreme length of Constantinople was about three Roman miles; the

circumference measured between ten and eleven, and the surface might be

computed as equal to about two thousand English acres. It is impossible

to justify the vain and credulous exaggerations of modern travelers, who

have sometimes stretched the limits of Constantinople over the adjacent

villages of the European, and even of the Asiatic coast. But the suburbs

of Pera and Galata, though situate beyond the harbor, may deserve to be

considered as a part of the city; and this addition may perhaps

authorize the measure of a Byzantine historian, who assigns sixteen

Greek (about fourteen Roman) miles for the circumference of his native

city. Such an extent may not seem unworthy of an imperial residence. Yet

Constantinople must yield to Babylon and Thebes, to ancient Rome, to

London, and even to Paris.

The master of the Roman world, who aspired to erect an eternal monument

of the glories of his reign, could employ in the prosecution of that

great work the wealth, the labor, and all that yet remained of the

genius of obedient millions. Some estimate may be formed of the expense

bestowed with imperial liberality on the foundation of Constantinople,

by the allowance of about two millions five hundred thousand pounds for

the construction of the walls, the porticos, and the aqueducts. The

forests that overshadowed the shores of the Euxine, and the celebrated

quarries of white marble in the little island of Proconnesus, supplied

an inexhaustible stock of materials, ready to be conveyed, by the

convenience of a short water carriage, to the harbor of Byzantium. A

multitude of laborers and artificers urged the conclusion of the work

with incessant toil; but the impatience of Constantine soon discovered

that, in the decline of the arts, the skill as well as numbers of his

architects bore a very unequal proportion to the greatness of his

designs. The magistrates of the most distant provinces were therefore

directed to institute schools, to appoint professors, and by the hopes

of rewards and privileges to engage in the study and practice of

architecture a sufficient number of ingenious youths who had received a

liberal education. The buildings of the new city were executed by such

artificers as the reign of Constantine could afford; but they were

decorated by the hands of the most celebrated masters of the age of

Pericles and Alexander. To revive the genius of Phidias and Lysippus

surpassed indeed the power of a Roman emperor; but the immortal

productions which they had bequeathed to posterity were exposed without

defense to the rapacious vanity of a despot. By his commands the cities

of Greece and Asia were despoiled of their most valuable ornaments. The

trophies of memorable wars, the objects of religious veneration, the

most finished statues of the gods and heroes, of the sages and poets of

ancient times, contributed to the splendid triumph of Constantinople,

and gave occasion to the remark of the historian Cedrenus, who observes

with some enthusiasm that nothing seemed wanting except the souls of the

illustrious men whom these admirable monuments were intended to

represent. But it is not in the city of Constantine, nor in the

declining period of an empire, when the human mind was depressed by

civil and religious slavery, that we should seek for the souls of Homer

and of Demosthenes.

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16 · 第 3 / 35 段