There was an actor in Greece of great celebrity, superior to

Produced by Juliet Sutherland and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

LIBRARY OF THE

WORLD'S BEST LITERATURE

ANCIENT AND MODERN

CHARLES DUDLEY WARNER

EDITOR

HAMILTON WRIGHT MABIE LUCIA GILBERT RUNKLE

GEORGE HENRY WARNER

ASSOCIATE EDITORS

Connoisseur Edition

VOL. XVI.

NEW YORK

THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY

Connoisseur Edition

LIMITED TO FIVE HUNDRED COPIES IN HALF RUSSIA

_No_. ..........

Copyright, 1896, by

R. S. PEALE AND J. A. HILL

_All rights reserved_

THE ADVISORY COUNCIL

CRAWFORD H. TOY, A. M., LL. D.,

Professor of Hebrew, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, Cambridge, Mass.

THOMAS R. LOUNSBURY, LL. D., L. H. D.,

Professor of English in the Sheffield Scientific School of

YALE UNIVERSITY, New Haven, Conn.

WILLIAM M. SLOANE, PH. D., L. H. D.,

Professor of History and Political Science,

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, Princeton, N. J.

BRANDER MATTHEWS, A. M., LL. B.,

Professor of Literature, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, New York City.

JAMES B. ANGELL, LL. D.,

President of the UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, Ann Arbor, Mich.

WILLARD FISKE, A. M., PH. D.,

Late Professor of the Germanic and Scandinavian Languages

and Literatures, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Ithaca, N. Y.

EDWARD S. HOLDEN, A. M., LL. D.,

Director of the Lick Observatory, and Astronomer,

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Berkeley, Cal.

ALCEE FORTIER, LIT. D.,

Professor of the Romance Languages,

TULANE UNIVERSITY, New Orleans, La.

WILLIAM P. TRENT, M. A.,

Dean of the Department of Arts and Sciences, and Professor of

English and History, UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH, Sewanee, Tenn.

PAUL SHOREY, PH. D.,

Professor of Greek and Latin Literature,

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, Chicago, Ill.

WILLIAM T. HARRIS, LL. D.,

United States Commissioner of Education,

BUREAU OF EDUCATION, Washington, D. C.

MAURICE FRANCIS EGAN, A. M., LL. D.,

Professor of Literature in the

CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, Washington, D. C.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOL. XVI

LIVED PAGE

AULUS GELLIUS Second Century A.D. 6253

From 'Attic Nights': Origin, and Plan of the Book;

The Vestal Virgins; The Secrets of the Senate;

Plutarch and his Slave; Discussion on One of

Solon's Laws; The Nature of Sight; Earliest

Libraries; Realistic Acting; The Athlete's End

GESTA ROMANORUM 6261

Theodosius the Emperoure

Moralite

Ancelmus the Emperour

Moralite

How an Anchoress was Tempted by the Devil

EDWARD GIBBON 1737-1794 6271

BY W. E. H. LECKY

Zenobia

Foundation of Constantinople

Character of Constantine

Death of Julian

Fall of Rome

Silk

Mahomet's Death and Character

The Alexandrian Library

Final Ruin of Rome

All from the 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

WILLIAM SCHWENCK GILBERT 1836- 6333

Captain Reece

The Yarn of the Nancy Bell

The Bishop of Rum-ti-foo

Gentle Alice Brown

The Captain and the Mermaids

All from the 'Bab Ballads'

RICHARD WATSON GILDER 1844- 6347

Two Songs from 'The New Day'

"Rose-Dark the Solemn Sunset"

The Celestial Passion

Non Sine Dolore

On the Life Mask of Abraham Lincoln

From 'The Great Remembrance'

GIUSEPPE GIUSTI 1809-1850 6355

Lullaby ('Gingillino')

The Steam Guillotine

WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE 1809- 6359

Macaulay ('Gleanings of Past Years')

EDWIN LAWRENCE GODKIN 1831- 6373

The Duty of Criticism in a Democracy ('Problems of

Modern Democracy')

GOETHE 1749-1832 6385

BY EDWARD DOWDEN

From 'Faust,' Shelley's Translation

Scenes from 'Faust', Bayard Taylor's Translation

Mignon's Love and Longing ('Wilhelm Meister's Apprenticeship')

Wilhelm Meister's Introduction to Shakespeare (same)

Wilhelm Meister's Analysis of Hamlet (same)

The Indenture (same)

The Harper's Songs (same)

Mignon's Song (same)

Philina's Song (same)

Prometheus

Wanderer's Night Songs

The Elfin-King

From 'The Wanderer's Storm Song'

The Godlike

Solitude

Ergo Bibamus!

Alexis and Dora

Maxims and Reflections

Nature

NIKOLAI VASILIEVITCH GOGOL 1809-1852 6455

BY ISABEL F. HAPGOOD

From 'The Inspector'

Old-Fashioned Gentry ('Mirgorod')

CARLO GOLDONI 1707-1793 6475

BY WILLIAM CRANSTON LAWTON

First Love and Parting ('Memoirs of Carlo Goldoni')

The Origin of Masks in the Italian Comedy (same)

Purists and Pedantry (same)

A Poet's Old Age (same)

The Cafe

MEIR AARON GOLDSCHMIDT 1819-1887 6493

Assar and Mirjam ('Love Stories from Many Countries')

OLIVER GOLDSMITH 1728-1774 6501

BY CHARLES MILLS GAYLEY

The Vicar's Family Become Ambitious ('The Vicar of Wakefield')

New Misfortunes: But Offenses are Easily Pardoned Where

There is Love at Bottom (same)

Pictures from 'The Deserted Village'

Contrasted National Types ('The Traveller')

IVAN ALEKSANDROVITCH GONCHAROF 1812- 6533

BY NATHAN HASKELL DOLE

Oblomof

THE BROTHERS DE GONCOURT 6549

Edmond 1822-1896

Jules 1830-1870

Two Famous Men ('Journal of the De Goncourts')

The Suicide ('Sister Philomene')

The Awakening ('Renee Mauperin')

EDMUND GOSSE 1849- 6565

February in Rome

Desiderium

Lying in the Grass

RUDOLF VON GOTTSCHALL 1823- 6571

Heinrich Heine ('Portraits and Studies')

JOHN GOWER 1325?-1408 6579

Petronella ('Confessio Amantis')

ULYSSES S. GRANT 1822-1885 6593

BY HAMLIN GARLAND

Early Life ('Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant')

Grant's Courtship (same)

A Texan Experience (same)

The Surrender of General Lee (same)

HENRY GRATTAN 1746-1820 6615

On the Character of Chatham

Of the Injustice of Disqualification of Catholics

(Speech in Parliament)

On the Downfall of Bonaparte (Speech in Parliament)

THOMAS GRAY 1716-1771 6623

BY GEORGE PARSONS LATHROP

Elegy Written in a Country Church-yard

Ode on the Spring

On a Distant Prospect of Eton College

The Bard

THE GREEK ANTHOLOGY 6637

BY TALCOTT WILLIAMS

On the Athenian Dead at Plataea (Simonides); On the

Lacedaemonian Dead at Plataea (Simonides); On a

Sleeping Satyr (Plato); A Poet's Epitaph (Simmias

of Thebes); Worship in Spring (Theaetetus); Spring

on the Coast (Leonidas of Tarentum); A Young Hero's

Epitaph (Dioscorides); Love (Posidippus); Sorrow's

Barren Grave (Heracleitus); To a Coy Maiden

(Asclepiades); The Emptied Quiver (Mnesalcus);

The Tale of Troy (Alpheus); Heaven Hath its Stars

(Marcus Argentarius); Pan of the Sea-Cliff

(Archias); Anacreon's Grave (Antipater of Sidon);

Rest at Noon (Meleager); "In the Spring a Young

Man's Fancy" (Meleager); Meleager's Own Epitaph

(Meleager); Epilogue (Philodemus); Doctor and

Divinity (Nicarchus); Love's Immortality (Strato);

As the Flowers of the Field (Strato); Summer

Sailing (Antiphilus); The Great Mysteries

(Crinagoras); To Priapus of the Shore (Maecius); The

Common Lot (Ammianus); "To-morrow, and To-morrow"

(Macedonius); The Palace Garden (Arabius); The

Young Wife (Julianus AEgyptius); A Nameless Grave

(Paulus Silentiarius); Resignation (Joannes

Barbucallus); The House of the Righteous

(Macedonius); Love's Ferriage (Agathias); On a

Fowler (Isidorus) Anonymous: Youth and Riches; The

Singing Reed; First Love again Remembered; Slave

and Philosopher; Good-by to Childhood; Wishing;

Hope and Experience; The Service of God; The Pure

in Heart; The Water of Purity; Rose and Thorn;

A Life's Wandering

FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS

VOLUME XVI

PAGE

The Alexander Romance (Colored Plate) Frontispiece

Gibbon (Portrait) 6271

Ruined Rome (Photograph) 6316

Gladstone (Portrait) 6359

Goethe (Portrait) 6385

"Faust and Margaret in Prison" (Photogravure) 6408

"The Bride's Toilet" (Photogravure) 6466

Goldoni (Portrait) 6475

Goldsmith (Portrait) 6501

Grant (Portrait) 6593

Gray (Portrait) 6623

"Stoke Poges Church and Churchyard" (Photogravure) 6626

VIGNETTE PORTRAITS

Gilbert Goncharof

Gilder De Goncourt

Giusti Gottschall

Godkin Gower

Gogol Grattan

Goldschmidt

AULUS GELLIUS

(SECOND CENTURY A. D.)

Perhaps Gellius's 'Attic Nights' may claim especial mention here, as one

of the earliest extant forerunners of this 'Library.' In the original

preface (given first among the citations), Gellius explains very clearly

the origin and scope of his work. It is not, however, a mere scrap-book.

There is original matter in many chapters. In particular, an ethical or

philosophic excerpt has often been framed in a little scene,--doubtless

imaginary,--and cast in the form of a dialogue. We get, even, pleasant

glimpses of autobiography from time to time. The author is not, however,

a deep or forceful character, on the whole. His heart is mostly set on

trifles.

Yet Gellius has been an assiduous student, both in Greece and Italy; and

his book gives us an agreeable, probably an adequate, view of the fields

which are included in the general culture of his time. Despite its

title, the work is chiefly Roman. In history, biography, antiquities,

grammar, literary criticism, his materials and authors are prevailingly

Latin. He is perhaps most widely known and quoted on early Roman life

and usages. Thus, one of his chapters gives a mass of curious

information as to the choice of the Vestal Virgins. We are also largely

indebted to him for citations from lost authors. We have already quoted

under Ennius the sketch, in eighteen hexameters, of a scholar-soldier,

believed to be a genial self-portraiture. These lines are the finest

specimen we have of the 'Annales.' Similarly, under Cato, we have quoted

the chief fragment of the great Censor's Roman history. For both these

treasures we must thank Gellius. Indeed, throughout the wide fields of

Roman antiquities, history of literature, grammar, etc., we have to

depend chiefly upon various late Latin scrap-books and compilations,

most of which are not even made up at first hand from creative classical

authors. To Gellius, also, the imposing array of writers so constantly

named by him was evidently known chiefly through compendiums and

handbooks. It is suspicious, for instance, that he hardly quotes a poet

within a century of his own time. Repetitions, contradictions, etc., are

numerous.

Despite its twenty "books" and nearly four hundred (short) chapters, the

work is not only light and readable for the most part, but quite modest

in total bulk: five hundred and fifty pages in the small page and

generous type of Hertz's Teubner text. There is an English translation

by Rev. W. Beloe, first printed in 1795, from which we quote below.

Professor Nettleship's (in his 'Essays in Latin Literature') has no

literary quality, but gives a careful analysis of Gellius's subjects and

probable sources. There is a revival of interest in this author in

recent years. We decidedly recommend Hertz's attractive volume to any

Latin student who wishes to browse beyond the narrow classical limits.

FROM 'ATTIC NIGHTS'

ORIGIN AND PLAN OF THE BOOK

More pleasing works than the present may certainly be found: my object

in writing this was to provide my children, as well as myself, with that

kind of amusement in which they might properly relax and indulge

themselves at the intervals from more important business. I have

preserved the same accidental arrangement which I had before used in

making the collection. Whatever book came into my hand, whether it was

Greek or Latin, or whatever I heard that was either worthy of being

recorded or agreeable to my fancy, I wrote down without distinction and

without order. These things I treasured up to aid my memory, as it were

by a store-house of learning; so that when I wanted to refer to any

particular circumstance or word which I had at the moment forgotten, and

the books from which they were taken happened not to be at hand, I could

easily find and apply it. Thus the same irregularity will appear in

these commentaries as existed in the original annotations, which were

concisely written down without any method or arrangement in the course

of what I at different times had heard or read. As these observations at

first constituted my business and my amusement through many long winter

nights which I spent in Attica, I have given them the name of 'Attic

Nights.' ... It is an old proverb, "A jay has no concern with music, nor

a hog with perfumes:" but that the ill-humor and invidiousness of

certain ill-taught people may be still more exasperated, I shall borrow

a few verses from a chorus of Aristophanes; and what he, a man of most

exquisite humor, proposed as a law to the spectators of his play, I also

recommend to the readers of this volume, that the vulgar and unhallowed

herd, who are averse to the sports of the Muses, may not touch nor even

approach it. The verses are these:--

Silent be they, and far from hence remove,

By scenes like ours not likely to improve,

Who never paid the honored Muse her rights,

Who senseless live in wild, impure delights;

I bid them once, I bid them twice begone,

I bid them thrice, in still a louder tone:

Far hence depart, whilst ye with dance and song

Our solemn feast, our tuneful nights prolong.

THE VESTAL VIRGINS

The writers on the subject of taking a Vestal Virgin, of whom Labeo

Antistius is the most elaborate, have asserted that no one could be

taken who was less than six or more than ten years old. Neither could

she be taken unless both her father and mother were alive, if she had

any defect of voice or hearing, or indeed any personal blemish, or if

she herself or father had been made free; or if under the protection of

her grandfather, her father being alive; if one or both of her parents

were in actual servitude, or employed in mean occupations. She whose

sister was in this character might plead exemption, as might she whose

father was flamen, augur, one of the fifteen who had care of the sacred

books, or one of the seventeen who regulated the sacred feasts, or a

priest of Mars. Exemption was also granted to her who was betrothed to a

pontiff, and to the daughter of the sacred trumpeter. Capito Ateius has

also observed that the daughter of a man was ineligible who had no

establishment in Italy, and that his daughter might be excused who had

three children. But as soon as a Vestal Virgin is taken, conducted to

the vestibule of Vesta, and delivered to the pontiffs, she is from that

moment removed from her father's authority, without any form of

emancipation or loss of rank, and has also the right of making her will.

No more ancient records remain concerning the form and ceremony of

taking a virgin, except that the first virgin was taken by King Numa.

But we find a Papian law which provides that at the will of the supreme

pontiff twenty virgins should be chosen from the people; that these

should draw lots in the public assembly; and that the supreme pontiff

might take her whose lot it was, to become the servant of Vesta. But

this drawing of lots by the Papian law does not now seem necessary; for

if any person of ingenuous birth goes to the pontiff and offers his

daughter for this ministry, if she may be accepted without any violation

of what the ceremonies of religion enjoin, the Senate dispenses with the

Papian law. Moreover, a virgin is said to be taken, because she is taken

by the hand of the high priest from that parent under whose authority

she is, and led away as a captive in war. In the first book of Fabius

Pictor, we have the form of words which the supreme pontiff is to repeat

when he takes a virgin. It is this:--

"I take thee, beloved, as a priestess of Vesta, to perform religious

service, to discharge those duties with respect to the whole body of the

Roman people which the law most wisely requires of a priestess of

Vesta."

It is also said in those commentaries of Labeo which he wrote on the

Twelve Tables:--

"No Vestal Virgin can be heiress to any intestate person of either sex.

Such effects are said to belong to the public. It is inquired by what

right this is done?" When taken she is called _amata_, or beloved, by

the high priest; because Amata is said to have been the name of her who

was first taken.

THE SECRETS OF THE SENATE

It was formerly usual for the senators of Rome to enter the Senate-house

accompanied by their sons who had taken the praetexta. When something of

superior importance was discussed in the Senate, and the further

consideration adjourned to the day following, it was resolved that no

one should divulge the subject of their debates till it should be

formally decreed. The mother of the young Papirius, who had accompanied

his father to the Senate-house, inquired of her son what the senators

had been doing. The youth replied that he had been enjoined silence, and

was not at liberty to say. The woman became more anxious to know; the

secretness of the thing, and the silence of the youth, did but inflame

her curiosity. She therefore urged him with more vehement earnestness.

The young man, on the importunity of his mother, determined on a

humorous and pleasant fallacy: he said it was discussed in the Senate,

which would be most beneficial to the State--for one man to have two

wives, or for one woman to have two husbands. As soon as she heard this

she was much agitated, and leaving her house in great trepidation, went

to tell the other matrons what she had learned. The next day a troop of

matrons went to the Senate-house, and with tears and entreaties implored

that one woman might be suffered to have two husbands, rather than one

man to have two wives. The senators on entering the house were

astonished, and wondered what this intemperate proceeding of the women,

and their petition, could mean. The young Papirius, advancing to the

midst of the Senate, explained the pressing importunity of his mother,

his answer, and the matter as it was. The Senate, delighted with the

honor and ingenuity of the youth, made a decree that from that time no

youth should be suffered to enter the Senate with his father, this

Papirius alone excepted.

PLUTARCH AND HIS SLAVE

Plutarch once ordered a slave, who was an impudent and worthless fellow,

but who had paid some attention to books and philosophical disputations,

to be stripped (I know not for what fault) and whipped. As soon as his

punishment began, he averred that he did not deserve to be beaten; that

he had been guilty of no offense or crime. As they went on whipping him,

he called out louder, not with any cry of suffering or complaint, but

gravely reproaching his master. Such behavior, he said, was unworthy of

Plutarch; that anger disgraced a philosopher; that he had often disputed

on the mischiefs of anger; that he had written a very excellent book

about not giving place to anger; but that whatever he had said in that

book was now contradicted by the furious and ungovernable anger with

which he had now ordered him to be severely beaten. Plutarch then

replied with deliberate calmness:--"But why, rascal, do I now seem to

you to be in anger? Is it from my countenance, my voice, my color, or my

words, that you conceive me to be angry? I cannot think that my eyes

betray any ferocity, nor is my countenance disturbed or my voice

boisterous; neither do I foam at the mouth, nor are my cheeks red; nor

do I say anything indecent or to be repented of; nor do I tremble or

seem greatly agitated. These, though you may not know it, are the usual

signs of anger." Then, turning to the person who was whipping him:

"Whilst this man and I," said he, "are disputing, do you go on with your

employment."

DISCUSSION ON ONE OF SOLON'S LAWS

In those very ancient laws of Solon which were inscribed at Athens on

wooden tables, and which, from veneration to him, the Athenians, to

render eternal, had sanctioned with punishments and religious oaths,

Aristotle relates there was one to this effect: If in any tumultuous

dissension a sedition should ensue, and the people divide themselves

into two parties, and from this irritation of their minds both sides

should take arms and fight; then he who in this unfortunate period of

civil discord should join himself to neither party, but should

individually withdraw himself from the common calamity of the city,

should be deprived of his house, his family and fortunes, and be driven

into exile from his country. When I had read this law of Solon, who was

eminent for his wisdom, I was at first impressed with great

astonishment, wondering for what reason he should think those men

deserving of punishment who withdrew themselves from sedition and a

civil war. Then a person who had profoundly and carefully examined the

use and purport of this law, affirmed that it was calculated not to

increase but terminate sedition; and indeed it really is so, for if all

the more respectable, who were at first unable to check sedition, and

could not overawe the divided and infatuated people, join themselves to

one part or other, it will happen that when they are divided on both

sides, and each party begins to be ruled and moderated by them, as men

of superior influence, harmony will by their means be sooner restored

and confirmed; for whilst they regulate and temper their own parties

respectively, they would rather see their opponents conciliated than

destroyed. Favorinus the philosopher was of opinion that the same thing

ought to be done in the disputes of brothers and of friends: that they

who are benevolently inclined to both sides, but have little influence

in restoring harmony, from being considered as doubtful friends, should

decidedly take one part or other; by which act they will obtain more

effectual power in restoring harmony to both. At present, says he, the

friends of both think they do well by leaving and deserting both, thus

giving them up to malignant or sordid lawyers, who inflame their

resentments and disputes from animosity or from avarice.

THE NATURE OF SIGHT

I have remarked various opinions among philosophers concerning the

causes of sight and the nature of vision. The Stoics affirm the causes

of sight to be an emission of radii from the eyes against those things

which are capable of being seen, with an expansion at the same time of

the air. But Epicurus thinks that there proceed from all bodies certain

images of the bodies themselves, and that these impress themselves upon

the eyes, and that thence arises the sense of sight. Plato is of opinion

that a species of fire and light issues from the eyes, and that this,

being united and continued either with the light of the sun or the light

of some other fire, by its own, added to the external force, enables us

to see whatever it meets and illuminates.

But on these things it is not worth while to trifle further; and I recur

to an opinion of the Neoptolemus of Ennius, whom I have before

mentioned: he thinks that we should taste of philosophy, but not plunge

in it over head and ears.

EARLIEST LIBRARIES

Pisistratus the tyrant is said to have been the first who supplied books

of the liberal sciences at Athens for public use. Afterwards the

Athenians themselves with great care and pains increased their number;

but all this multitude of books, Xerxes, when he obtained possession of

Athens and burned the whole of the city except the citadel, seized and

carried away to Persia. But King Seleucus, who was called Nicanor, many

years afterwards, was careful that all of them should be again carried

back to Athens.

A prodigious number of books were in succeeding times collected by the

Ptolemies in Egypt, to the amount of near seven hundred thousand

volumes. But in the first Alexandrine war the whole library, during the

plunder of the city, was destroyed by fire; not by any concerted design,

but accidentally by the auxiliary soldiers.

REALISTIC ACTING

There was an actor in Greece of great celebrity, superior to the rest in

the grace and harmony of his voice and action. His name, it is said, was

Polus, and he acted in the tragedies of the more eminent poets, with

great knowledge and accuracy. This Polus lost by death his only and

beloved son. When he had sufficiently indulged his natural grief, he

returned to his employment. Being at this time to act the 'Electra' of

Sophocles at Athens, it was his part to carry an urn as containing the

bones of Orestes. The argument of the fable is so imagined that Electra,

who is presumed to carry the relics of her brother, laments and

commiserates his end, who is believed to have died a violent death.

Polus, therefore, clad in the mourning habit of Electra, took from the

tomb the bones and urn of his son, and as if embracing Orestes, filled

the place, not with the image and imitation, but with the sighs and

lamentations of unfeigned sorrow. Therefore, when a fable seemed to be

represented, real grief was displayed.

THE ATHLETE'S END

Milo of Crotona, a celebrated wrestler, who as is recorded was crowned

in the fiftieth Olympiad, met with a lamentable and extraordinary death.

When, now an old man, he had desisted from his athletic art and was

journeying alone in the woody parts of Italy, he saw an oak very near

the roadside, gaping in the middle of the trunk, with its branches

extended: willing, I suppose, to try what strength he had left, he put

his fingers into the fissure of the tree, and attempted to pluck aside

and separate the oak, and did actually tear and divide it in the middle;

but when the oak was thus split in two, and he relaxed his hold as

having accomplished his intention, upon a cessation of the force it

returned to its natural position, and left the man, when it united, with

his hands confined, to be torn by wild beasts.

Translation of Rev. W. Beloe.

GESTA ROMANORUM

What are the 'Gesta Romanorum'? The most curious and interesting of all

collections of popular tales. Negatively, one thing they are not: that

is, they are not _Deeds of the Romans_, the acts of the heirs of the

Caesars. All such allusions are the purest fantasy. The great "citee of

Rome," and some oddly dubbed emperor thereof, indeed the entire

background, are in truth as unhistorical and imaginary as the tale

itself.

Such stories are very old. So far back did they spring that it would be

idle to conjecture their origin. In the centuries long before Caxton,

the centuries before manuscript-writing filled up the leisure hours of

the monks, the 'Gesta,' both in the Orient and in the Occident, were

brought forth. Plain, direct, and unvarnished, they are the form in

which the men of ideas of those rude times approached and entertained,

by accounts of human joy and woe, their brother men of action. Every

race of historic importance, from the eastern Turanians to the western

Celts, has produced such legends. Sometimes they delight the lover of

folk-lore; sometimes they belong to the Dryasdust antiquarian. But our

'Gesta,' with their directness and naivete, with their occasional beauty

of diction and fine touches of sympathy and imagination,--even with

their Northern lack of grace,--are properly a part of literature. In

these 'Deeds' is found the plot or ground-plan of such master works as

'King Lear' and the 'Merchant of Venice,' and the first cast of material

refined by Chaucer, Gower, Lydgate, Schiller, and other writers.

Among the people in mediaeval times such tales evidently passed from

mouth to mouth. They were the common food of fancy and delight to our

forefathers, as they gathered round the fire in stormy weather. Their

recital enlivened the women's unnumbered hours of spinning, weaving, and

embroidery. As the short days of the year came on, there must have been

calls for 'The Knights of Baldak and Lombardy,' 'The Three Caskets,' or

'The White and Black Daughters,' as nowadays we go to our book-shelves

for the stories that the race still loves, and ungraciously enjoy the

silent telling.

Such folk-stories as those in the 'Gesta' are in the main made of, must

have passed from district to district and even from nation to nation, by

many channels,--chief among them the constant wanderings of monks and

minstrels,--becoming the common heritage of many peoples, and passing

from secular to sacerdotal use. The mediaeval Church, with the acuteness

that characterized it, seized on the pretty tales, and adding to them

the moralizing which a crude system of ethics enjoined, carried its

spoils to the pulpit. Even the fables of pagan AEsop were thus employed.

In the twelfth century the ecclesiastical forces were appropriating to

their use whatever secular rights and possessions came within their

grasp. A common ardor permitted and sustained this aggrandizement, and

the devotion that founded and swelled the mendicant orders of Francis

and Dominic, and led the populace to carry with prayers and

psalm-singing the stones of which great cathedrals were built, readily

gave their hearth-tales to illustrate texts and inculcate doctrines. A

habit of interpreting moral and religious precepts by allegory led to

the far-fetched, sometimes droll, and always naive "moralities" which

commonly follow each one of the 'Gesta.' The more popular the tale, the

more easily it held the attention; and the priests with telling

directness brought home the moral to the simple-minded. The innocent

joys and sad offenses of humanity interpreted the Church's whole system

of theology, and the stories, committed to writing by the priests, were

thus preserved.

The secular tales must have been used in the pulpit for some time before

their systematic collection was undertaken. The zeal for compiling

probably reached its height in the age of Pierre Bercheure, who died in

1362. To Bercheure, prior of the Benedictine Convent of St. Eloi at

Paris, the collection of 'Gesta Romanorum' has been ascribed. A German

scholar, however, Herr Oesterley, who published in 1872 the result of an

investigation of one hundred and sixty-five manuscripts, asserts that

the 'Gesta' were originally compiled towards the end of the thirteenth

century in England, from which country they were taken to the Continent,

there undergoing various alterations. "The popularity of the original

'Gesta,'" says Sir F. Madden, "not only on the Continent but among the

English clergy, appears to have induced some person, apparently in the

reign of Richard the Second, to undertake a similar compilation in this

country." The 'Anglo-Latin Gesta' is the immediate original of the early

English translation from which the following stories are taken, with

slight verbal changes.

The word _Gesta_, in mediaeval Latin, means notable or historic act or

exploit. The Church, drawing all power, consequence, and grace from

Rome, naturally looked back to the Roman empire for historic examples.

In this fact we find the reason of the name. The tales betray an entire

ignorance of history. In one, for example, a statue is raised to Julius

Caesar twenty-two years after the founding of Rome; while in another,

Socrates, Alexander, and the Emperor Claudius are living together in

Rome.

It is a pleasant picture which such legends bring before our eyes. The

old parish church of England, which with its yards is a common

meeting-place for the people's fairs and wakes, and even for their

beer-brewing; the simple rustics forming the congregation; the tonsured

head of the priest rising above the pulpit,--a monk from the neighboring

abbey, who earns his brown bread and ale and venison by endeavors to

move the moral sentiments which lie at the root of the Anglo-Saxon

character and beneath the apparent stolidity of each yokel. Many of the

tales are unfit for reproduction in our more mincing times. The

faithlessness of wives--with no reference whatever to the faithlessness

of husbands--is a favorite theme with these ancient cenobites.

It is possible, Herr Oesterley thinks, that the conjecture of Francis

Douce may be true, and the 'Gesta' may after all have been compiled in

Germany. But the bulk of the evidence goes to prove an English origin.

The earliest editions were published at Utrecht and at Cologne. The

English translation, from the text of the Latin of the reign of Richard

II., was first printed by Wynkyn de Worde between 1510 and 1515. In 1577

Richard Robinson published a revised edition of Wynkyn de Worde's. The

work became again popular, and between 1648 and 1703 at least eight

issues were sold. An English translation by Charles Swan from the Latin

text was first published in 1824, and reissued under the editorship of

Thomas Wright in 1872 as a part of Bohn's Library.

THEODOSIUS THE EMPEROURE[A]

Theodosius reigned a wise emperour in the cite of Rome, and mighty he

was of power; the which emperoure had three doughters. So it liked to

this emperour to knowe which of his doughters loved him best; and then

he said to the eldest doughter, "How much lovest thou me?" "Forsoth,"

quoth she, "more than I do myself." "Therefore," quoth he, "thou shalt

be heighly advanced;" and married her to a riche and mighty kyng. Then

he came to the second, and said to her, "Doughter, how muche lovest thou

me?" "As muche forsoth," she said, "as I do myself." So the emperoure

married her to a duke. And then he said to the third doughter, "How much

lovest thou me?" "Forsoth," quoth she, "as muche as ye be worthy, and no

more." Then said the emperoure, "Doughter, since thou lovest me no more,

thou shalt not be married so richely as thy sisters be." And then he

married her to an earl.

[A] The story of King Lear and his three daughters.

After this it happened that the emperour held battle against the Kyng of

Egipt, and the kyng drove the emperour oute of the empire, in so muche

that the emperour had no place to abide inne. So he wrote lettres

ensealed with his ryng to his first doughter that said that she loved

him more than her self, for to pray her of succoring in that great need,

bycause he was put out of his empire. And when the doughter had red

these lettres she told it to the kyng her husband. Then quoth the kyng,

"It is good that we succor him in his need. I shall," quoth he, "gather

an host and help him in all that I can or may; and that will not be done

withoute great costage." "Yea," quoth she, "it were sufficiant if that

we would graunt him V knyghtes to be fellowship with him while he is

oute of his empire." And so it was done indeed; and the doughter wrote

again to the fader that other help might he not have, but V knyghtes of

the kynges to be in his fellowship, at the coste of the kyng her

husband.

And when the emperour heard this he was hevy in his hert and said,

"Alas! alas! all my trust was in her; for she said she loved me more

than herself, and therefore I advanced her so high."

Then he wrote to the second, that said she loved him as much as her

self. And when she had herd his lettres she shewed his erand to her

husband, and gave him in counsel that he should find him mete and drink

and clothing, honestly as for the state of such a lord, during tyme of

his nede; and when this was graunted she wrote lettres agein to hir

fadir.

The Emperour was hevy with this answere, and said, "Since my two

doughters have thus grieved me, in sooth I shall prove the third."

And so he wrote to the third that she loved him as muche as he was

worthy; and prayed her of succor in his nede, and told her the answere

of her two sisters. So the third doughter, when she considered the

mischief of her fader, she told her husbond in this fourme: "My

worshipful lord, do succor me now in this great nede; my fadir is put

out of his empire and his heritage." Then spake he, "What were thy will

I did thereto?" "That ye gather a great host," quoth she, "and help him

to fight against his enemys." "I shall fulfill thy will," said the earl;

and gathered a greate hoste and wente with the emperour at his owne

costage to the battle, and had the victorye, and set the emperour again

in his heritage.

And then said the emperour, "Blessed be the hour I gat my yonest

doughter! I loved her lesse than any of the others, and now in my nede

she hath succored me, and the others have failed me, and therefore after

my deth she shall have mine empire." And so it was done in dede; for

after the deth of the emperour the youngest doughter reigned in his

sted, and ended peacefully.

MORALITE

Dere Frendis, this emperour may be called each worldly man, the which

hath three doughters. The first doughter, that saith, "I love my fadir

more than my self," is the worlde, whom a man loveth so well that he

expendeth all his life about it; but what tyme he shall be in nede of

deth, scarcely if the world will for all his love give him five

knyghtes, _scil._ v. boards for a coffin to lay his body inne in the

sepulcre. The second doughter, that loveth her fader as muche as her

selfe, is thy wife or thy children or thy kin, the whiche will haply

find thee in thy nede to the tyme that thou be put in the erthe. And the

third doughter, that loveth thee as muche as thou art worthy, is our

Lord God, whom we love too little. But if we come to him in tyme of oure

nede with a clene hert and mynd, withoute doute we shall have help of

him against the Kyng of Egipt, _scil._ the Devil; and he shall set us in

our owne heritage, _scil._ the kyngdome of heven. _Ad quod nos_ [etc.].

ANCELMUS THE EMPEROUR[B]

Ancelmus reigned emperour in the cite of Rome, and he wedded to wife

the Kinges doughter of Jerusalem, the which was a faire woman and long

dwelte in his company.

[B] The story of the three caskets in 'The Merchant of

Venice.'

... Happing in a certaine evening as he walked after his supper in a

fair green, and thought of all the worlde, and especially that he had no

heir, and how that the Kinge of Naples strongly therefore noyed [harmed]

him each year; and so whenne it was night he went to bed and took a

sleep and dreamed this: He saw the firmament in its most clearnesse, and

more clear than it was wont to be, and the moon was more pale; and on a

parte of the moon was a faire-colored bird, and beside her stood two

beasts, the which nourished the bird with their heat and breath. After

this came divers beasts and birds flying, and they sang so sweetly that

the emperour was with the song awaked.

Thenne on the morrow the emperoure had great marvel of his sweven

[dream], and called to him divinours [soothsayers] and lords of all the

empire, and saide to them, "Deere frendes, telleth me what is the

interpretation of my sweven, and I shall reward you; and but if ye do,

ye shall be dead." And then they saide, "Lord, show to us this dream,

and we shall tell thee the interpretation of it." And then the emperour

told them as is saide before, from beginning to ending. And then they

were glad, and with a great gladnesse spake to him and saide, "Sir, this

was a good sweven. For the firmament that thou sawe so clear is the

empire, the which henceforth shall be in prosperity; the pale moon is

the empresse.... The little bird is the faire son whom the empresse

shall bryng forth, when time cometh; the two beasts been riche men and

wise men that shall be obedient to thy childe; the other beasts been

other folke, that never made homage and nowe shall be subject to thy

sone; the birds that sang so sweetly is the empire of Rome, that shall

joy of thy child's birth: and sir, this is the interpretacion of your

dream."

When the empresse heard this she was glad enough; and soon she bare a

faire sone, and thereof was made much joy. And when the King of Naples

heard that, he thought to himselfe: "I have longe time holden war

against the emperour, and it may not be but that it will be told to his

son, when that he cometh to his full age, howe that I have fought all my

life against his fader. Yea," thought he, "he is now a child, and it is

good that I procure for peace, that I may have rest of him when he is in

his best and I in my worste."

So he wrote lettres to the emperour for peace to be had; and the

emperour seeing that he did that more for cause of dread than of love,

he sent him worde again, and saide that he would make him surety of

peace, with condition that he would be in his servitude and yield him

homage all his life, each year. Thenne the kyng called his counsel and

asked of them what was best to do; and the lordes of his kyngdom saide

that it was goode to follow the emperour in his will:--"In the first ye

aske of him surety of peace; to that we say thus: Thou hast a doughter

and he hath a son; let matrimony be made between them, and so there

shall be good sikernesse [sureness]; also it is good to make him homage

and yield him rents." Thenne the kyng sent word to the emperour and

saide that he would fulfill his will in all points, and give his

doughter to his son in wife, if that it were pleasing to him.

This answer liked well the emperour. So lettres were made of this

covenaunt; and he made a shippe to be adeyned [prepared], to lead his

doughter with a certain of knightes and ladies to the emperour to be

married with his sone. And whenne they were in the shippe and hadde far

passed from the lande, there rose up a great horrible tempest, and

drowned all that were in the ship, except the maid. Thenne the maide set

all her hope strongly in God; and at the last the tempest ceased; but

then followed strongly a great whale to devoure this maid. And whenne

she saw that, she muche dreaded; and when the night come, the maid,

dreading that the whale would have swallowed the ship, smote fire at a

stone, and had great plenty of fire; and as long as the fire lasted the

whale durst come not near, but about cock's crow the mayde, for great

vexacion that she had with the tempest, fell asleep, and in her sleep

the fire went out; and when it was out the whale came nigh and swallowed

both the ship and the mayde. And when the mayde felt that she was in the

womb of a whale, she smote and made great fire, and grievously wounded

the whale with a little knife, in so much that the whale drew to the

land and died; for that is the kind to draw to the land when he shall

die.

And in this time there was an earl named Pirius, and he walked in his

disport by the sea, and afore him he sawe the whale come toward the

land. He gathered great help and strength of men; and with diverse

instruments they smote the whale in every part of him. And when the

damsell heard the great strokes she cried with an high voice and saide,

"Gentle sirs, have pity on me, for I am the doughter of a king, and a

mayde have been since I was born." Whenne the earl heard this he

marveled greatly, and opened the whale and took oute the damsell. Thenne

the maide tolde by order how that she was a kyng's doughter, and how she

lost her goods in the sea, and how she should be married to the son of

the emperour. And when the earl heard these words he was glad, and helde

the maide with him a great while, till tyme that she was well comforted;

and then he sent her solemnly to the emperour. And whenne he saw her

coming, and heard that she had tribulacions in the sea, he had great

compassion for her in his heart, and saide to her, "Goode damsell, thou

hast suffered muche anger for the love of my son; nevertheless, if that

thou be worthy to have him I shall soon prove."

The emperour had made III. vessells, and the first was of clean [pure]

golde and full of precious stones outwarde, and within full of dead

bones; and it had a superscription in these words: _They that choose me

shall find in me that they deserve._ The second vessell was all of clean

silver, and full of worms: and outwarde it had this superscription:

_They that choose me shall find in me that nature and kind desireth._

And the third vessell was of lead and within was full of precious

stones, and without was set this scripture [inscription]: _They that

choose me shall find in me that God hath disposed._ These III. vessells

tooke the emperour and showed the maide, saying, "Lo! deer damsell, here

are three worthy vessellys, and if thou choose [the] one of these

wherein is profit and right to be chosen, then thou shalt have my son to

husband; and if thou choose that that is not profitable to thee nor to

no other, forsooth, thenne thou shalt not have him."

Whenne the doughter heard this and saw the three vessells, she lifted up

her eyes to God and saide:--"Thou, Lord, that knowest all things, graunt

me thy grace now in the need of this time, _scil._ that I may choose at

this time, wherethrough [through which] I may joy the son of the

emperour and have him to husband." Thenne she beheld the first vessell

that was so subtly [cunningly] made, and read the superscription; and

thenne she thought, "What have I deserved for to have so precious a

vessell? and though it be never so gay without, I know not how foul it

is within;" so she tolde the emperour that she would by no way choose

that. Thenne she looked to the second, that was of silver, and read the

superscription; and thenne she said, "My nature and kind asketh but

delectation of the flesh, forsooth, sir," quoth she; "and I refuse

this." Thenne she looked to the third, that was of lead, and read the

superscription, and then she, saide, "In sooth, God disposed never evil;

forsooth, that which God hath disposed will I take and choose."

And when the emperour sawe that he saide, "Goode damesell, open now that

vessell and see what thou hast found." And when it was opened it was

full of gold and precious stones. And thenne the emperour saide to her

again, "Damesell, thou hast wisely chosen and won my son to thine

husband." So the day was set of their bridal, and great joy was made;

and the son reigned after the decease of the fadir, the which made faire

ende. _Ad quod nos perducat!_ Amen.

MORALITE

Deere frendis, this emperour is the Father of Heaven, the whiche made

man ere he tooke flesh. The empress that conceived was the blessed

Virgin, that conceived by the annunciation of the angel. The firmament

was set in his most clearnesse, _scil._ the world was lighted in all its

parts by the concepcion of the empress Our Lady.... The little bird that

passed from the side of the moon is our Lord Jesus Christ, that was born

at midnight and lapped [wrapped] in clothes and set in the crib. The two

beasts are the oxen and the asses. The beasts that come from far parts

are the herds [shepherds] to whom the angels saide, _Ecce annuncio vobis

gaudium magnum_,--"Lo! I shew you a great joy." The birds that sang so

sweetly are angels of heaven, that sang _Gloria in excelsis Deo_. The

king that held such war is mankind, that was contrary to God while that

it was in power of the Devil; but when our Lord Jesus Christ was born,

then mankind inclined to God, and sent for peace to be had, when he took

baptism and saide that he gave him to God and forsook the Devil. Now the

king gave his doughter to the son of the emperour, _scil._ each one of

us ought to give to God our soul in matrimony; for he is ready to

receive her to his spouse [etc.].

HOW AN ANCHORESS WAS TEMPTED BY THE DEVIL

Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16 · 第 1 / 35 段