The Borghese family came originally from Siena. When the Spaniard took

that heroic and beautiful city, Philip II handed her over to the Grand

Duke of Tuscany, and many Sienese families emigrated, rather than

submit to the rule of the Medici. Camillo Borghese, the father of Paul

V, emigrated to Rome, where his son Camillo, the future pontiff, was

born. This was in 1552, Julius III being then Pope. Camillo’s career

began in the law, as has been the case with so many of those who have

risen to the See of St. Peter. He studied in Perugia and Padua; was

sent on a mission to Spain, and, proving successful there, was given

the Red Hat in 1596 by Clement VIII, he being at that time forty-four

years of age. Living as cardinal, quietly and unobtrusively among his

books and documents, he had seemed to Peter Aldobrandini, who was the

all-powerful nephew of Clement VIII, the very man to carry on Clement’s

steady policy of restoring the French influence at Rome and of keeping

his own family in power. The Aldobrandini had left Florence from hatred

of the Medici, as the Borghese had left Siena, and Peter felt that in

the case of Camillo Borghese he could rely upon feelings similar to his

own to back up the coalition of himself and France against Spain. With

the premature death of Leo XI all the complicated machinery of the

conclave had had to be put in motion once again, and in this second

conclave the nephew of Clement VIII was the most powerful of the forces

at work. He threw his influence for Cardinal Borghese, and Paul V

undoubtedly owed his election to that fact. Peter Aldobrandini had been

a very great papal nephew, indeed, and he expected from the Borghese

pontiff a proper recognition of his services. Even with the keenest

sense of humor in the world, Cardinal Aldobrandini would have found it

hard not to feel resentment when he learned that Cardinal Borghese,

now Paul V, considered his unsought-for election to the papal chair

entirely due to the direct intervention of the Holy Spirit, and that

in consequence he owed nothing whatever to earthly aid. It was because

Paul V carried this idea so far on the one hand, and on the other

poured such lavish favors upon his own kin, that he won for himself the

name of “the Grand Ingrate.” Looking upon himself as divinely appointed

in a marked and special degree, the quiet, unassuming cardinal became

the opinionated and inflexible pontiff. He administered the papal

power, temporal and spiritual, with the arrogance of a despot, the

intolerance of an inquisitor, and the formality of the jurist. During

the sixteen years of his pontificate he succeeded in rousing bitter

hostility on all sides. The aged Grand Duke of Tuscany, who had lived

through nine pontificates and had known both Sixtus V and Clement VIII,

complained that this Pope judged of the world as he would of one of

the towns belonging to the papal territory where everything was done

according to the letter of the law, and went on to say that in this

respect there would soon have to be a change. The year before his

election the gunpowder plot had fanned England into a white heat of

patriotism, and a new oath of allegiance was required by Parliament.

Paul V was the Pope who forbade the English Catholics to take it. He

also was the Pope who so mishandled the Gallican Church that he forced

the States General of 1614 to declare that the King of France held

his power from God alone; and, finally, it was Paul V who spent the

first two years of his pontificate in such a quarrel with Venice as

threatened to involve all Christendom. The Republic so unflinchingly

endured excommunication and interdict that the Pope even thought of

subduing her by arms. He was brought to his senses only by the fear

that Venice in her extremity might call Protestant powers to her aid

and thus bring confusion and disaster not only upon Italy but upon all

Catholic countries. In this grave crisis France took it upon herself to

mediate, and the dispute was finally settled, but with little honor to

the papacy. It was a Venetian ambassador who has recorded of Clement

VIII that when he found he could not reform Florence without great

trouble he reformed his own mind. But Paul V did not, like the wise

Clement VIII, “look to his predecessors” when in difficulties. Paul

V had certainly no cause to love the Venetians, and it is one of the

quaint tricks of history that his magnificent fountain on the Janiculum

was at last finished by a Venetian Pope.

Although the Fontanone was built in the seventeenth century, its

most interesting associations are connected with modern Rome. It is

pre-eminently the fountain of the Risorgimento, for the last stand in

Garibaldi’s three months’ defense of the Roman Republic was made upon

the terraces surrounding this water, and it was just above here that

the worst fighting occurred.

The second stage of the siege consisted of the nine days’ defense of

the Aurelian wall, behind which Garibaldi was intrenched.

This bit of wall runs northwest and southeast on the eastern slope of

the hill, and within the walls of Pope Urban VIII. At its northern

end it is at about an equal distance from the Fontanone and the

Porta San Pancrazio. When this defense broke down, the French troops

entered the city through a breach in the Urban walls to the southwest

of the fountain. The narrow lane leading from this point to Porta

San Pancrazio was soon choked with the dead and dying. The Italians

and French fought hand to hand in the darkness, along the road in

front of the Villa Aurelia, that road which is to-day so quiet and so

clean! During the previous eight days bursting shells from the French

batteries erected on the walls and near the Villa Corsini and the

Convent of San Pancrazio had wrought far-reaching havoc.

The Church of San Pietro in Montorio was used by Garibaldi as a

hospital, but its roof had collapsed, and on the slopes above it all

the great villas were in ruins. To the northwest of the fountain,

just above the Porta San Pancrazio, the Villa Savorelli (now the

Villa Aurelia and the present home of the American Academy) stood up

against the sky, a mere shell of blackened walls. Outside the porta,

the Vascello lay in masses of crumbled masonry, although Medici still

held it for Garibaldi. Farther up the hill, over the spot now occupied

by the triumphal arch, towered the remains of the magnificent Villa

Corsini; before it the body of Masina, still lying where the young

lancer had fallen after his last wild charge up the villa steps. Amid

the general devastation the Fontanone stood unscathed. Its splendid

stream of water flowed unpolluted, and it fulfilled the noblest

functions of a fountain during the heat and carnage of that Roman June.

To those who are familiar with the story of the heroic “Defense” a

visit to Paul V’s great fountain on the Janiculum is not a bit of

sight-seeing--it has become a pilgrimage.

MONTE CAVALLO

[Illustration]

MONTE CAVALLO

The fountain of the Monte Cavallo is overshadowed both literally and

figuratively by the size and importance of the objects which surround

it. Without it the obelisk, which forms its background, and the great

groups of the Dioscuri, which flank it on either side, would be

sufficiently imposing and significant, either separately or together,

to form the central decoration of the Piazza of Monte Cavallo, or of

any piazza in any city; but the fountain is not entirely superfluous.

Its magnificent jet of water, thrown upward between the heads of the

rearing horses and swept hither and thither at the will of the wind,

binds together the otherwise disjointed and inharmonious group.

This fountain is not the first one to be erected on Monte Cavallo,

but the first fountain was as subservient as the present one to the

colossal groups which have given the name “Cavallo” to this entire

district. The Dioscuri were once a part of a kind of open-air museum

which, during the earliest days of the papacy, existed on the slope

of the Quirinal Hill. Gregory XIII had them removed to the Capitol,

but when Sixtus V had purchased from the heirs of Cardinal Caraffa the

site and the partly erected buildings of the Quirinal, he brought them

back again and subjected them to a thorough restoration, using for this

purpose the material from the base of one of them.

There has existed a villa on this spot antedating Pope Sixtus V’s time

by many years. It had been called the Villa d’Este, but it should not

be confused with the Villa d’Este, at Tivoli, although it was built by

the same Cardinal Ippolito of that family.

Sixtus V was extremely fond of this portion of the city and with

Fontana’s assistance he created the magnificent palace and surroundings

which ever since his day have been associated with sovereign power in

Rome. Fontana enlarged the piazza before the palace in order to make it

“commodious for consistories,” and he also lowered the grade in order

to bring hither the Acqua Felice.

There must have been many discussions between Pope Sixtus V and his

architect with regard to the fountain on the Quirinal. Everything

that Sixtus V did he did thoroughly and magnificently, and it was

quite natural that he should desire a splendid fountain before his own

palace, considering that it was he himself who had made it possible,

by the introduction of the Acqua Felice, to have a fountain in that

place at all. A rare old engraving shows that the fountain, as at first

planned, resembled the Fountain of the Moses. In it the Dioscuri occupy

the niches as does the Moses in the fountain on the Viminal. This plan

was happily abandoned. The great classic figures were erected as they

stand to-day in front of the palace, and Fontana placed between the two

groups, in the same position as the fountain of the present day, the

conventional large basin and central vase which is to be seen in the

old engravings of the seventeenth century. It was certainly neither a

very original nor a very interesting design and it must have relied

for its effect entirely upon the copious supply of water which was

described by Evelyn in 1644 as “two great rivers.”

It is difficult to say when this old fountain of Fontana’s disappeared.

It was probably removed either at the time when Antinori erected the

obelisk for Pius VI or in the following pontificate when the same

architect suggested to Pius VII the idea of replacing it by the present

granite basin. This basin had stood since 1594 in the Campo Vaccino,

the mediæval name for the ruins of the Roman Forum. It had been placed

there during the pontificate of Clement VIII (Aldobrandini) by the city

magistrates on a piece of ground given to them by Cardinal Farnese,

near the three columns of Castor and Pollux and the Church of S.

Maria Liberatrice. They had provided a high travertine base for it,

and it was fed from three jets of the Acqua Felice, which, some eight

or nine years previously, had been brought to Rome by Sixtus V. The

basin was used as a watering-trough for cattle, and by the time Pius

VII rescued it the travertine base had entirely disappeared under the

gradually rising level of the Campo Vaccino--that strange composite

mass of rubbish, earth, and ruins which, up to the second half of the

nineteenth century, covered the old Forum floor to a depth of more than

twenty feet. The basin measures twenty-three metres in circumference,

and when it was thus sunk in the ground it became a pleasant pool

through which the carters walked their horses to refresh them on a warm

and dusty day. The removal of this basin was actually accomplished in

1818, when the architect Raphael Stern (who built for Pius VII the

Bracchio Nuovo) designed the present fountain of Monte Cavallo. He sank

the basin in the pavement between the horse-tamers and erected in the

middle of it a second basin which rests upon a travertine base. The

water of the fountain rises in a copious jet from the centre of the

second basin to a height somewhat below the heads of the horses and,

returning on itself, falls in a generous overflow into the lower basin.

[Illustration: The Fountain of Monte Cavallo.]

To some, the chief interest of this composite group of obelisk,

statuary, and fountain centres in this lower basin, for it is none

other than the granite tazza into which Marforio once poured the water

from his urn, far, far back in the days of Charlemagne, and no one

knows for how many years before that.

The obelisk which forms the centre of this group of antiquities now

clustered together in the Monte Cavallo is one of a pair which flanked

the entrance to the Mausoleum of Augustus. Its mate was erected by

Sixtus V and Domenico Fontana near the Church of S. Maria Maggiore.

Pius VI and Pius VII were the two Popes whose pontificates coincide

with the era of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic conquests.

Their unhappy stories are bound up with the history of the Quirinal

Palace, which fronts upon the Monte Cavallo; and they form a pitiful

contrast to the life of that masterful old Pontiff Sixtus V, in

whose reign the history of the palace and the modern piazza begins.

Sixtus, having destroyed, for no reason now known, the old mediæval

papal palace of the Lateran, decided to rebuild it to suit himself,

but found, as the new building progressed, that it was too cold and

uncomfortable for a residence. So the Lateran, which had been the

papal palace since the seventh century, holding its own against the

magnificence and enormous size of the Vatican, was gradually abandoned

as a residence, and Sixtus established himself in the Quirinal.

Sixtus V, for all his detestation of classic statuary, must have shared

with his people the profound respect and admiration always aroused by

the Dioscuri. These colossal groups were among the few rare works of

antiquity which were cherished by the semi-barbarous Romans of the

Middle Ages, and the web of fable spun about them during those dark

years proves the hold they had over the superstitious imagination of

the times. “Nothing is beyond question” about them, says Lanciani,

except that they once adorned the temple which the Emperor Aurelian

built to the sun on his return from the conquest of Palmyra in 272.

This most magnificent of all Roman temples, to quote the same great

modern authority, became a quarry for building materials, even as early

as the sixth century. The Emperor Justinian is said to have taken some

porphyry columns from it to adorn the Church of St. Sophia in his new

capital of Constantinople. The Dioscuri must have been discovered later

in the Baths of Constantine. The relative positions of the horses and

their tamers were ascertained from antique coins. Modern authorities

are of the opinion that they are Roman copies of Greek originals, and

they are counted among the great inheritances from imperial Rome.

It is curious to trace the working of the mediæval intelligence,

groping its way through mysticism and allegory to find some

explanation for the undeniable impression made by these heroic figures

upon the minds of all who behold them. The attempt to read into them

some abstruse ethical meaning was abandoned long ago, and the world of

to-day accepts the Dioscuri frankly for what they are, admiring, with

a wonder not unmixed with despair, the unreclaimable art of ancient

Greece.

“Ye too marvellous Twain, that erect on the Monte Cavallo

Stand by your rearing steeds in the grace of your motionless movement,

Stand with upstretched arms and tranquil, regardant faces,

Stand as instinct with life, in the might of immutable manhood--

Oh, ye mighty and strange--ye ancient divine ones of Hellas!”

Whatever may have been the lot of the Dioscuri in the unaccounted-for

days of the past, since Sixtus V placed them here they have been in

the very thick of Roman political life. Around and about them have

surged some of the worst mobs of modern Roman history; and under their

“tranquil, regardant faces” crowds of peaceful, expectant citizens

have gathered from time to time during the last two centuries of papal

government. Here they have waited during papal elections to watch for

the smoke from the chimney of the Quirinal which should indicate to the

outside world that no choice had yet been made by the Conclave, since

the cardinals were burning the ballots. Here they have received the

blessing of the newly elected Pope, which was given from the balcony of

the window over the entrance.

Sixtus V died in the Quirinal Palace. His pontificate had lasted but

five years, and it remains to this day one of the most memorable

periods in the development and power of Rome. Never had Pope done

more for his people; yet, when he came to die, the Romans had

already forgotten the benefits of his pontificate and remembered

only the severities. They recalled the fact that this Sixtus who was

dying as the head of Christendom had been born a poor gardener’s

son. Such dramatic contrasts exercise great sway over the Roman

mind--superstition and fancy played with the story, and strange rumors

drifted about concerning an unholy bargain which Sixtus was said to

have made for power. Here, before the palace which he had built, the

silent crowds gathered to await his end; and when, as the old pontiff

drew his last breath, that terrific thunderstorm broke over the

Quirinal, men shuddered and fled, saying and believing that the Prince

of Darkness had come in person for the soul of the monk whom he had

made Pope. Kindly old Sixtus! It was well that he could not know how

the poor whom he had always remembered would remember him!

Across the Monte Cavallo, to pause before the balcony of the Quirinal,

came in 1840 that extraordinary funeral cortège which carried the body

of Lady Gwendolin Talbot, Princess Borghese, to be laid in the Borghese

chapel in S. Maria Maggiore. At seven in the evening of October 30,

by torchlight, amid a silence so profound that the low prayers of the

priests were distinctly audible, the procession moved slowly along the

three-quarters of a league from the Borghese Palace to the church of S.

Maria Maggiore. Soldiers with reversed arms, mounted dragoons, mourning

carriages, religious societies, priests, prelates, and all the Roman

poor, comprised the train. The funeral car was drawn, not by horses

but by forty Romans dressed in deep mourning. Flowers were thrown upon

the bier from the palaces along the Corso, and when the procession

reached Monte Cavallo and paused before the Quirinal, from the balcony

over the entrance Pope Gregory XVI gave his final blessing to the

beautiful young princess, dead at twenty-two, and saint if ever there

has been one. All the poor of Rome felt that they had lost a friend and

benefactress, the like of whom would not come again. Later, when Prince

Borghese wished to know the names of those who had drawn the funeral

car, he was only told that they were Romans!

Up the slopes of Monte Cavallo in February, 1798, came with their

tricolored cockades the soldiers of the French Revolutionary Army.

They entered the Quirinal and called upon Pope Pius VI to renounce the

temporal power. The eighteenth-century pontiff calmly refused to comply

with this preposterous demand. That refusal lost him the tiara and

brought about his death eighteen months later in a French fortress.

Rome was metamorphosed into a republic, but this obscuration of the

papal power was only temporary. When Pius VI died, at Valence, in

August, 1799, the cardinals held their Conclave at Venice, and on March

14, 1804, elected Pius VII (Chiaramonti, 1804–1823), who returned to

Rome the following July. This was the Pope who, after many misgivings,

consented to crown Napoleon. Five years later, when the Emperor

proceeded to annex the Papal States to his empire, this was the Pope

who excommunicated him.

Few of St. Peter’s successors have been called upon to suffer and

to dare more than the good and gentle Pius VII. His Italian nature

comprehended to an unusual degree the strange character of Napoleon,

enduring with perfect composure the Emperor’s outbursts of histrionic

rage, and daring to bring him back to business by the single word,

“comedian.” He braved no less calmly Napoleon’s genuine anger at the

bull of excommunication, and refused to cancel it. Consequently, on the

night of July 5, 1809, the Emperor’s soldiers broke into the Quirinal

and took the Pope prisoner. For a moment, standing under the stars

which looked down upon Monte Cavallo, Pius VII blessed his sleeping

city, and then was hurried away from Rome to that wandering exile,

depicted in the frescoes of the Vatican Library, which was only brought

to an end by Napoleon’s fall. Then the States of the Church were

restored to the papacy, and the Quirinal Palace once more received the

aged pontiff.

In the quiet sunset of his days, which outlasted by two years the

life of the great conqueror, the Pope had time to erect the fountain

of Monte Cavallo, and to begin or continue the architectural and

archæological projects connected with his name.

In that brief halcyon period immediately following Pius IX’s election

to the Holy See, in 1846, the Quirinal Palace and the Monte Cavallo

were in a state of unwonted and constant activity. Pius played with

all his heart the rôle of the liberal Pope, both he and the Romans

mistaking his amiable disposition for liberal political convictions.

Day after day the Romans thronged the space before the palace, waiting

for their idol, who was sure to appear some time on the balcony over

the entrance. Standing there in his white robe, his dark eyes glowing

with sympathetic emotion, he would bless the people with uplifted hand

and in the most moving and beautiful of voices. If the hour was late,

he might add the injunction to go home to bed! The attitude of the Pope

and people at this time is epitomized in the story of the ragged little

boy who one day found himself in the Quirinal Gardens face to face with

the Holy Father. Dazed and enraptured, he poured forth the pitiful

tale of his hardships to the handsome and compassionate countenance

bending over him, and the wonderful voice comforted him with promises

of redress--promises which both pontiff and child believed in

passionately.

There is about this period of Pius IX’s life, with its visits to the

prisons, its charities and public appearances, a strange atmosphere of

unreality. A factitious glamour blinded the popular mind, and the Pope

lived upon pious and ideal illusions--as Marie Antoinette had played at

simplicity and a return to Nature on the eve of the Revolution.

When the golden charm was broken by the outbreak of the Revolution in

Palermo and the murder of Pellegrino Rossi in Rome, the frightened

pontiff, turning from an angry people, whom in the nature of things

he could not possibly satisfy, appealed to the most reactionary of

all the Italian powers, the King of Naples, or “Bomba.” Then the

Quirinal witnessed the last act which the papacy was to play within

its precincts. The Pope and one attendant escaped from the palace by

a small side door in the garden wall and fled across the frontier to

Gaeta, on Neapolitan territory. He carried with him the pyx which

Pius VII had carried when he also had quitted the Quirinal in haste

thirty-nine years before; but, unlike Pius VII, Pius IX never returned

thither. When he came back to Rome the Vatican received him.

The Quirinal, the third one of the papal palaces, has become a symbol

of the actual sovereignty of Rome, and, in 1871, it passed with the

temporal power from Pope Pius IX to Victor Emmanuel II, King of Italy.

The cardinals’ coaches no longer drive about the fountain of Pius VII.

The consistories are held in the Vatican; and on the Monte Cavallo the

Bersaglieri have superseded the papal Zouaves. Over the Quirinal the

pontifical yellow and white has given way to the green and white and

red of United Italy. “Old things are passed away. Behold, all things

have become new”--once again in the city of eternal change.

[Illustration]

APPENDIX

INSCRIPTIONS IN PIAZZA DI SPAGNA ON THE SPANISH STEPS

I

D.      O.      M.

MAGNIFICAM HANC SPECTATOR QVAM MIRARIS SCALAM

VT COMMODAM AC ORNAMENTVM NON EXIGVVM

REGIO COENOBIO IPSIQ. VRBI ALLATVRAM

ANIMO CONCEPIT LEGATAQ. SVPREMIS IN TABVLIS PECVNIA

VNDE SVMPTVS SVPPEDITARENTVR CONSTRVI MANDAVIT

NOBILIS GALLVS STEPHANVS GVEFFIER

QVI REGIO IN MINISTERIO DIV PLVRES APVD PONTIFICES

ALIOSQVE SVBLIMES PRINCIPES EGREGIE VERSATVS

ROMAE VIVERE DESIIT XXX. IVNII MDCLXI.

OPVS AVTEM VARIO RERVM INTERVENTV

PRIMVM SVB CLEMENTE XI

CVM MVLTI PROPONERENTVR MODVLI ET FORMAE

IN DELIBERATIONE POSITVM

DEINDE SVB INNOCENTIO XIII. STABILITVM

ET R. P. BERTRANDI MONSINAT TOLOSATIS

ORD. MINIMORVM S. FRANCISCI DE PAVLA CORRECTORIS GENLIS

FIDEI CVRAEQ. COMMISSVM AC INCHOATVM

TANDEM BENEDICTO XIII FELICITER SEDENTE

CONFECTVM ABSOLVTVMQVE EST

ANNO JVBILEI MDCCXXV

II

D.      O.      M.

SEDENTE BENEDICTO XIII

PONT. MAX.

LUDOVICO XV

IN GALLIIS REGNANTE

EIVSQ. APVD SANCTAM SEDEM

NEGOTIIS PRÆPOSITO

MELCHIORE S. R. ECCLESIÆ

CARDINALI DE POLIGNAC

ARCHIEPISCOPO AVSCITANO

AD SACRÆ ÆDIS ALMÆQVE VRBIS

ORNAMENTVM

AC CIVIVM COMMODVM

MARMOREA SCALA

DIGNO TANTIS AVSPICIIS OPERE

ABSOLVTA

ANNO DOMINI MDCCXXV

TRANSLATION OF ABOVE

I

O spectator, this magnificent stairway which you gaze at in wonder,

that it might afford convenience and no small ornament to the city,

the noble Frenchman Etienne Guéffier conceived in his mind, and, money

having been left in his will whence to defray expenses, ordered it to

be built. He conducted himself with distinction in the service of the

King at the courts of several pontiffs and other sublime princes, and

died in Rome the thirtieth of June, 1661.

The work, however, was interrupted by a variety of things, and first

in the reign of Clement XI there were placed before a council many

plans and designs. It was decided upon under Clement XI, and, being

intrusted to the faithful care of the Reverend Father Bertrand Monsinat

of Toulouse, corrector generalis of the lesser order of St. Francis de

Paul, was begun, and finally, Benedict XIII blessedly seated upon the

papal chair, was brought to an end in the year of jubilee, 1725.

II

Benedict XIII sitting in the papal chair as Pontifex Maximus; Louis XV

reigning in France; Melchior de Polignac, Cardinal of the Holy Roman

Church, and Archbishop of Aquitaine, being his minister at the sacred

see; these marble steps, in a manner worthy of such auspices, for the

ornamentation of the sacred temple (the church above) and the beloved

city, and for the convenience of the citizens, were completed in the

year of our Lord, 1725.

FOOTNOTES

Fountains of Papal Rome · 第 12 / 13 段