SELF PROPELLING VEHICLE.

No. 385,087. Patented June 26, 1888.

FIGURE 9.--ILLUSTRATION FROM U.S. patent 385087, issued to Carl Benz,

showing the horizontal plane of the flywheel, a feature utilized by the

Duryeas in their machine.]

The first contemporary record of any work on vehicles is a bill, dated

January 21, 1892, for a drawing made by George W. Howard & Company. This

drawing was made in the fall of 1891 by Charles A. Bartlett, a member of

the Howard firm and a neighbor of Charles Duryea, according to a

statement by Charles in the _Automobile Trade Journal_ of Jan. 10, 1925.

He was then also of the opinion that this drawing may not have had

anything to do with the carriage they were about to assemble, but a

notation found by Charles at a later date has led him to believe that it

possibly concerned a business type vehicle he had discussed with an

unidentified Mr. Snow.

By early 1892 Charles needed capital to finance his venture, an old

carriage to attach his inventions to, a place to work, and a mechanic to

do the work. On March 26, he stopped by the Smith Carriage Company and

looked over a selection of used buggies and phaetons. He finally decided

on a rather well-used ladies' phaeton which he purchased for $70. The

leather dash was in so deplorable a state it would have to be recovered

before the carriage went onto the road, and the leather fenders it once

possessed had previously been removed; yet the upholstery appeared to be

in satisfactory condition, and the candle lamps were intact.

[Illustration: FIGURE 10.--PHANTOM ILLUSTRATION of Benz' first automobile.

(From _Carl Benz, Father of the Automobile Industry_, by L. M. Fanning,

New York, 1955.)]

Two days later, Charles was able to interest Erwin F. Markham, of

Springfield, sufficiently to obtain his financial aid in the project. A

contract was drawn up between the two men, which stated that Mr.

Markham was to put up $1000 for which he received a five-tenths share of

the venture. When the $1000 had been used, he then had the option to

continue his aid until the project had been carried to a successful

climax, and retain his half share, or to refuse further funds and

relinquish four of his five-tenths interest in the business.[10] Had he

eventually chosen the latter, Charles would obviously have had to seek

assistance elsewhere.

[Illustration: FIGURE 11.--THE HOWARD & CO. BILL showing the first work

performed toward a motor vehicle. While this may not refer specifically

to the machine now in the museum, it is evidence of early work.]

[Illustration: FIGURE 12.--THE SHOP OF JOHN RUSSELL & SONS. It was on

the second floor of this building that Charles and Frank Duryea built

their first motor vehicle. (Courtesy of the _Springfield Union_.)]

That same day, March 28, Charles found working space and machinery

available at John W. Russell & Sons Company in Springfield.[11] The

Russells had recently completed a large government order of shells for

the famous dynamite guns later used on board the cruiser _Vesuvius_ in

the Spanish-American War, and this left an entire second floor,

approximately 35 × 85 feet, virtually unoccupied, according to an

affidavit of William J. Russell of April 30, 1926. Now ready to begin

the actual work, Charles hired his brother Frank to start construction.

Frank started about the first of April, receiving a raise of about 10

percent over the salary he had received at Ames. Before the vehicle was

completed a number of other men performed work on some of the parts,

among them William Deats who had been hired by Charles primarily to work

on bicycles in the same area, but who occasionally assisted on the

carriage. Russell Company records show time charged against Charles

Duryea by six other Russell employees: W. J. Russell, P. Colgan, C. E.

Merrick, T. Shea, L. J. Parmelee, and A. A. Poissant.

[Illustration: FIGURE 13.--J. FRANK DURYEA looking over the Russell shop

lathe on which he turned parts for the first Duryea vehicle. Photo taken

about 1944. (Courtesy of the _Springfield Union_.)]

It is Frank Duryea's remembrance that he started work on Monday, April

4. He first removed the body, with its springs, and placed it on a pair

of wooden horses where it remained until the summer of the following

year. The next step was to remove the rear axle and take it to a

blacksmith shop where the old axle spindles were cut off and welded to a

new drop-center axle. Following this the front axle spindles were

removed, the ends of the axle slotted, and a webbed, C-shaped piece

carrying the kingpin bearings was fitted into each slot, braced from

underneath by short brackets which were riveted and brazed in place. The

old spindles then were welded to the center of offset kingpins which in

turn were mounted in their bearings in a manner similar to that in which

the frame of the Columbia high-wheeled bicycle was mounted in its fork.

Arms welded to the lower end of the kingpins were connected by the tie

rods to an arm on the lower end of the vertical steering column, located

on the center of the axle.

[Illustration: FIGURE 14.--A PORTION of the Russell shop records showing

charges made against Charles Duryea during 1893-1894.]

While work on the running gear advanced, some progress was made in the

construction of the engine. Patterns for the castings were fabricated,

most of them by Charles Marshall on Taylor Street,[12] and castings were

poured. The body or main casting of the engine resembled a length of

cast-iron pipe: it had no bosses or lugs cast on, nor any water jacket,

for they thought the engine would be kept cool merely by being placed in

the open air. The front end of the engine was secured to the vehicle by

four bolts which passed through the halves of the bearings and onto four

projections on the open end of the engine. As the crankshaft of this

engine was retained in constructing the present engine, it is logical

to assume that the bearings were the same also. The head was cast as a

thick disc, with both intake and exhaust valves located therein, and was

bolted onto the flanged head end of the engine.

Inside the cylinder was the strange arrangement previously suggested by

C. E. Hawley. To the connecting rod was attached a rather ordinary

ringed piston, over which was fitted a free, ringless piston, machined

to fit closely the cylinder bore. This floating piston could move freely

a distance equal to the compression space. The intention was that on the

intake stroke, suction would open the intake valve, which had no

positive opening arrangement, and draw in the mixture which then was

compressed as in a regular Otto engine. Fired by the hot-tube ignition

system, the force of the explosion would drive both pistons down,

forcing the outer one tight against the head of the smaller one, and at

the end of the stroke the longer wall of the outer piston would strike

an arm projecting into the cylinder near the open end, moving forward

the exhaust valve rod to which the arm was attached, thus pushing open

the valve in the head.[13] On the exhaust stroke the unrestrained outer

piston moved all the way to the head, expelling all of the products of

combustion and pushing the exhaust valve shut again. With a bore of four

inches or less, this engine, Charles believed, should develop about

three horsepower and run at a speed between 350 to 400 revolutions per

minute.[14]

As no ignition system had yet been provided, they prepared a 4-1/2-inch

length of one-quarter inch iron pipe, closed at one end, and screwed the

open end into the head. Heating this tube with an alcohol burner would

cause ignition of the mixture when a portion of it was forced into the

heated tube toward the end of the compression stroke. No attempt was

made at this time to use the electrical make-and-break circuit used in

their second engine, as the free piston would have wrecked the igniter

parts on the exhaust stroke, and the push rod located on the end of the

piston would have prevented the piston from closing the exhaust valve.

After keying the flywheel to the lower end of the crankshaft, Charles

and Frank decided to make an attempt to run the engine. Carrying it

into a back room, probably during July or August, 1892, they blocked it

up on horses. A carburetor had not yet been constructed, so they

attempted to start the engine by spinning the flywheel by hand, at the

same time spraying gasoline through the intake valve with a perfume

atomizer previously purchased at a drugstore in the Massasoit House.

Repeated efforts of the two men to start the engine resulted in failure.

[Illustration: FIGURE 15.--CONJECTURAL drawing of the free-piston engine

used in the Museum vehicle prior to the present engine. (Drawing by A. A.

Balunek.)]

In the belief that the defects, whatever they might be, could be

remedied after the engine was installed, the Duryeas went ahead and

mounted the engine in the carriage. To do this they shortened the

original reach of the carriage, allowing the engine itself to become the

rear continuation of the reach. The four ears on the front, or open end

of the engine, were bolted to the centrally located frame, with the

bearing blocks in between. This frame, the same one now in the vehicle,

was constructed of two pieces of angle iron, riveted and brazed

together. Greater rigidity was obtained by a number of half-inch iron

rods running from the frame to both front and rear axles. Because of the

absence of any mounting brackets on the engine casting itself, a wooden

block with a trough on top to receive the body of the engine was fitted

between the engine and the axle, while two U-shaped rods secured it with

clip bars and nuts underneath.

Beneath the flywheel was mounted the friction transmission of Charles'

design. This consisted of a large drum, perhaps 12 inches in diameter,

equal in length to the diameter of the flywheel and keyed to a shaft

directly under the center of the crankshaft and parallel to the axles.

(Diameter of drum estimated by examination of existing features.) In

view of the four projections of the frame extending downward and just in

front of the jackshaft position, it is likely that these supported the

four jackshaft bearings. Being a bicycle manufacturer, Charles saw the

need for a differential or balance gear. Accordingly, he purchased from

the Pope Manufacturing Company a very light unit of the type formerly

used on Columbia tricycles, and installed it somewhere on the jackshaft.

A small sprocket on each end of the shaft carried a chain from the

larger sprockets clamped to the spokes of each rear wheel. The lower

surface of the flywheel had been machined so as to form a friction disc,

with a one-quarter inch depression 3 inches in diameter turned in the

center. The drum was positioned so that its upper surface was

one-quarter inch below the face of the flywheel. Hanging loosely around

the drum was an endless belt, one and one-half inches wide, first made

of rather soft rubber packing material. The belt lay on the drum surface

between the fingers of a shipper fork. While it lay under the 3-inch

depression in the center of the flywheel, the belt and the drum were at

rest, but when it was moved away from that depression the belt wedged

itself tightly between the drum and flywheel, the resulting friction

causing the drum to turn and setting the vehicle into motion. The

farther the belt was moved toward the outer edge of the wheel, the

faster the drum and the vehicle moved.

In September 1892, Charles, who had contracted with a Peoria, Illinois,

firm to have bicycle parts manufactured, decided to move to that city.

Departing on the 22d of September, he did not return to Springfield for

over two years, and thus was not able to participate in the completion

and testing of the carriage. At the time of his departure several units

on the carriage were incomplete. A carburetor had not been built, nor

had a satisfactory burner or belt-shifting device. Charles had

experimented with various shifting levers just before leaving

Springfield: however, as he reported later, he did not succeed in

designing a workable mechanism.[15] Frank Duryea, now left to finish the

work unassisted, continued the experiments with the belt shifter. He

finally worked out a fork mounted on a carriage that was supported by

two rods, each of which slid in two bearings. Although the short

distance between the two bearings caused the shifter carriage to bind

occasionally, the device was thought to be sufficient and was installed

just in front of the frame. Connected to a system of cables, arms, and

rods, possibly similar to the present cam-bar shifter, the shipper-fork

carriage was moved from side to side by raising or lowering the tiller.

[Illustration: FIGURE 16.--DRAWING of the carburetor used on both Duryea

engines, 1893-1894, showing sight feed on left and choke mechanism on

right. (Smithsonian photo 13455.)]

Turning now to an efficient burner for heating the ignition tube, Frank

started with an ordinary wick-type kerosene lamp with a small metal

tank. Wishing to use gasoline in the lamp, he found it necessary to

fabricate a number of burner units before he found a type that gave him

a clean blue flame. He then found the flame to be very sensitive to

drafts and easily extinguished, and devised a small shield or chimney to

afford it some protection.

Early in October, while still working with the burner, Frank developed a

severe headache. He felt the fumes of the lamp had probably caused it,

and went to his room in the home of a Mr. and Mrs. Patrick on Front

Street in Chicopee. After he noticed no improvement, a doctor's

examination showed he had typhoid fever, and on October 5 he was

admitted to the Springfield Hospital. Here he remained for one month,

being discharged on November 5. Returning to his room he was informed

that because of the fear that he might be a typhoid carrier, the

Patricks preferred him to find other lodgings. He readily accepted the

invitation of Mr. and Mrs. D. H. Nesbitt of Chicopee to take a room with

them. After several weeks recuperation in their home, he left

Springfield to visit his mother in Wyoming, Illinois.

After a restful visit at home Frank Duryea returned to Springfield and

finished the work on his burner. Now only the lack of a carburetor

prevented a trial of the vehicle. He recalls that he studied several

gasoline-engine catalogs and in one of them, a Fairbanks catalog he

believes,[16] he saw a design that seemed to suit his needs. He decided

to simplify the construction and operation of his carburetor and had a

small bronze casting made to form the body of it. Inside was a gasoline

chamber with two tapped openings, one to receive a pipe from the

2-gallon gasoline tank mounted above the engine, the other taking a pipe

to the overflow tank underneath the engine, thus maintaining the

gasoline level without the use of a float valve. This latter tank had a

hand pump on one end so that the overflow gasoline could at times be

pumped again into the main tank. Gasoline passed from the carburetor

chamber through a needle valve, adjusted by a knob on top, then through

a tiny tube that entered the pipe leading to the intake valve. It is not

certain whether this intake pipe was at first fitted with the choke

arrangement later used with the second engine.

Frank, hoping at last to be rewarded for his efforts by the sound of

explosions from the engine, was ready to give the carriage an indoor

trial. Standing astraddle of the reach and facing to the rear, he spun

the flywheel with both hands, taking care not to get his hands caught

between the wheel and the frame. His efforts were in vain, as there was

complete failure to obtain ignition. He then made a new ignition tube,

nearly twice as long as the original 4-1/2-inch tube, and turned down

its wall as thin as he thought safety allowed. The thinner wall did not

conduct the heat off so rapidly and thus kept the tube hot enough to

permit ignition. After this slight change, he was able to get a few

occasional explosions but he does not now believe that the engine ever

operated continuously. Each explosion was accompanied by a loud knock,

due, undoubtedly, to the movement of the free piston. Had the engine

operated continuously, it is likely that the action of the free piston

would have shortly wrecked the engine. Further efforts appeared

unwarranted until alterations could be made.

[Illustration: ALL AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES, ACCIDENTS AND OTHER CAUSES

BEYOND OUR CONTROL

Smithsonian Institution - United States National Museum - Bulletin 240 Contributions From the Museum of History and Technology Papers 34-44 on Science and Technology · 第 12 / 318 题