I am content, when I find myself with the support of this great name.

By the adoption of the Constitution the people of the United States

constituted themselves _a Nation_, one and indivisible, with all the

unity and power of a nation. They were no longer a confederation,

subject to the disturbing pretensions, prejudices, and whims of

component parts; but they became a body politic, where every part

was subordinate to the Constitution, as every part of the natural

body is subordinate to the principle of life. The sovereignty of the

United States, where all are but parts of one vivifying whole, was the

controlling unit. The powers then and there conferred upon the nation

were supreme. And those very powers I now invoke, in the name of the

Union, and to the end that pretensions in the name of State Rights may

be overthrown.

* * * * *

I have thus presented a picture of these intolerable pretensions. But

they must be examined more minutely. They may be seen, _first_, in

their character as a monopoly, and, _secondly_, in their character as a

Usurpation under the Constitution of the United States. I need not say

that in each they are equally indefensible.

If you go back to the earliest days of English history, you find that

monopolies have from the beginning been odious, as contrary to the

ancient and fundamental laws of the realm. A writer who is often quoted

in the courts says: “All grants of this kind relating to any known

trade are made void by the Common Law, as being against the freedom of

trade, and discouraging labor and industry, and restraining persons

from getting an honest livelihood by a lawful employment, and putting

it in the power of particular persons to set what prices they please

on a commodity.”[87] But, without claiming that the present monopoly

is void at Common Law, it is enough to show its inconsistency with

the Constitution. Here I borrow Mr. Webster’s language in his famous

argument against the monopoly of steam navigation granted by the State

of New York:--

“Now I think it very reasonable to say that _the Constitution

never intended to leave with the States the power of granting_

monopolies either of trade or of navigation,--and therefore,

that, as to this, the commercial power is exclusive in

Congress.”[88]

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20) · 第 46 / 126 题