RETALIATION, AND TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR.

SPEECHES IN THE SENATE, ON A JOINT RESOLUTION ADVISING RETALIATION,

JANUARY 24 AND 29, 1865.

January 18th, Mr. Howard, of Michigan, from the Committee on

Military Affairs, reported the following joint resolution.

“JOINT RESOLUTION, advising Retaliation for the Cruel

Treatment of Prisoners by the Insurgents.

“_Whereas_ it has come to the knowledge of Congress

that great numbers of our soldiers, who have fallen as

prisoners of war into the hands of the insurgents, have

been subjected to treatment unexampled for cruelty in the

history of civilized war, and finding its parallels only

in the conduct of savage tribes,--a treatment resulting

in the death of multitudes by the slow, but designed,

process of starvation, and by mortal diseases occasioned

by insufficient and unhealthy food, by wanton exposure of

their persons to the inclemency of the weather, and by

deliberate assassination of innocent and unoffending men,

and the murder in cold blood of prisoners after surrender;

and whereas a continuance of these barbarities, in contempt

of the laws of war, and in disregard of the remonstrances

of the national authorities, has presented to us the

alternative of suffering our brave soldiers thus to be

destroyed, or to apply the principle of retaliation for

their protection; Therefore,

“_Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled_, That

in the judgment of Congress it has become justifiable and

necessary that the President should, in order to prevent

the continuance and recurrence of such barbarities, and

to insure the observance by the insurgents of the laws of

civilized war, resort at once to measures of retaliation;

that in our opinion such retaliation ought to be inflicted

upon the insurgent officers now in our hands, or hereafter

to fall into our hands, as prisoners; that such officers

ought to be subjected to like treatment practised towards

our officers or soldiers in the hands of the insurgents,

in respect to quantity and quality of food, clothing,

fuel, medicine, medical attendance, personal exposure,

or other mode of dealing with them; that, with a view

to the same ends, the insurgent prisoners in our hands

ought to be placed under the control and in the keeping

of officers and men who have themselves been prisoners

in the hands of the insurgents, and have thus acquired a

knowledge of their mode of treating Union prisoners; that

explicit instructions ought to be given to the forces

having the charge of such insurgent prisoners, requiring

them to carry out strictly and promptly the principles of

this resolution in every case, until the President, having

received satisfactory information of the abandonment by the

insurgents of such barbarous practices, shall revoke or

modify said instructions. Congress do not, however, intend

by this resolution to limit or restrict the power of the

President to the modes or principles of retaliation herein

mentioned, but only to advise a resort to them as demanded

by the occasion.”

January 23d, Mr. Wade, of Ohio, moved to proceed with its

consideration, when the following passage occurred.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 12 (of 20) · 第 32 / 126 题