CHAPTER XII

DISCONTENT

§ 1

HER first periodic “supervision” by Razounov took place early in the

New Year, and once again coincided with an engagement of Razounov to

play Chopin at the Bockley Hippodrome.

He puffed serenely at a cigarette while she played the Kreutzer Sonata.

At the end he said:

“Nicely, oh yais, quite nicely.... And thees ees--let me see--thees ees

Mees--Mees--”

“Weston,” put in Verreker.

“Ah, yais, ... plays quite nicely, eh? ... A leetle more technique,

and--more--more--what ees the word?--characterization, eh?”

Verreker nodded.

But Catherine was disappointed. For it was perfectly evident not only

that Razounov had failed to recognize her, but that her name when told

him had recalled nothing in his mind.

§ 2

At her next lesson with Verreker she said: “Razounov didn’t remember

me, apparently----”

Verreker replied quite casually: “Oh no, why should he?”

She coloured slightly.

“Well,” she said, with some acerbity, “considering he took the trouble

to send for me after hearing me play at that club concert, I think he

might at least----”

Verreker faced her suddenly.

“What’s that?” he said.

“What’s _what_?”

“What you’ve just been talking about. I don’t understand in the

least.... You say he heard you at a concert?”

“Well, I presume so, anyway. What remarkably short memories you musical

people have! Razounov apparently heard me at the concert, and sent me a

message to come and see him the next day. You ought to remember that:

it was you yourself who brought it. You tracked me down to the Forest

Hotel.”

“Yes, yes. I remember that.... But the concert?”

She was becoming more and more sarcastic as his mystification increased.

“Oh yes, the concert. I played Liszt’s Concert Etude in A flat (the one

you don’t like). As I remarked before, presumably Razounov heard me, or

else why should he send for me to----”

“I am afraid you have presumed falsely,” he interrupted. (She shivered

at the stateliness of the phrasing: it reminded her of “I know of no

reason at all.”) “Razounov could not possibly have heard you play. He

never attends local concerts. Besides, he must have been on at the

Hippo----”

“Then why did he send for me?” she cried shrilly.

He scratched his chin reflectively. She hated him for that gesture.

“I believe--I think he _did_ tell me once.... I fancy it was

something rather unusual. Somebody--I can’t tell you who, because I

believe I’m pledged to secrecy--wrote to Razounov offering to pay for a

course of lessons for you. His name was to be kept out of it. I mean,

the name of the person.”

He frowned irritably at the slip of his tongue, and still more at the

rash correction which had given prominence to it.

“A man?” she ejaculated.

“I can’t tell you that.”

“I know it was. Because you said ‘his.’”

“Then why did you ask me?”

She swung round on the stool and clasped her hands below her knees. Her

eyes were fiercely bright.

“What are Razounov’s fees?” she said quietly.

“Three guineas a lesson.”

“And yours?”

“For purposes of musical instruction I am Razounov. He only supervises.

It is a fortunate arrangement, because I am a much better teacher than

he.”

She looked at him a little amazed. For the first time she caught

herself admiring him. She admired the calm, straightforward,

unqualified way he had said that he was a much better teacher than

Razounov. It was not conceit. She was glad he knew how to appraise

himself. She admired him for not being afraid to do so. In her eyes

was the message: “So you too have found out that overmodesty is not a

virtue? So have I.”

But it was impossible to remark upon it. She plunged into the financial

side of the question.

“So somebody has been paying three guineas a week for me?” (And she

thought: “Whoever is it?”)

“Certainly. You don’t imagine Razounov would give lessons for nothing,

do you?”

“That is to say, _you_ wouldn’t give lessons for nothing, isn’t

it?”

“Certainly. I am not a philanthropist. I have other interests besides

music. Music is only my way of getting a living. I never even reduce my

fees except--except--well----”

“Yes?--except when?”

He turned away his head as he replied: “Except in cases where the pupil

has no money yet supreme musical genius.”

She flared up passionately.

“Look here,” she said, “why d’you keep on rubbing it in? How do you

know I shan’t be a great pianist? I say, how do you know? I tell you,

I don’t believe you. You wait; you’ll see me at the top before long.

And then you’ll have to eat your words. You’re got a good opinion of

yourself, haven’t you? Well, so have I. See? ... And I tell you I

_will_ get to the top! I’ll show you you’re wrong! See?”

“I hope you will,” he said quietly. And added: “I’m glad my criticism

doesn’t discourage you. It isn’t meant to.”

To which she was on the point of replying: “But it _has_

discouraged me. There have been times when----” She did not say that.

There came a pause. Then she reverted to the financial side of the

business.

“So somebody’s already paid nearly a hundred pounds for me.”

“Sixty, I believe. The last quarter has not been paid yet.”

(And then the idea came to her immediately--George Trant!)

“Aren’t your fees payable in advance?” she asked sharply.

“As a general rule, yes.”

“Then why did you make an exception in my case?”

“Because I know the person fairly well, and am confident of being paid

soon. That’s all.”

“Is it?”

“Certainly,” he replied brusquely. “If your anonymous benefactor

doesn’t pay up within the next couple of months the arrangement between

you and me will terminate on the first of March. As I said before, I am

not a philanthropist.”

“Obviously not.”

“I hope it is obvious. I have often been mistaken for one.”

“Curious! I can scarcely believe it.... Have you the address of my

anonymous benefactor?”

“I dare say I have it somewhere about. Why?”

“Because I want you to write and tell him something.”

“Indeed? And what am I to tell him?”

“Tell him he needn’t trouble to pay the last quarter’s fees. I will pay

them myself.”

“I hope you can easily spare the money----”

“Of course I can. I shouldn’t offer to pay if I couldn’t. I’m not a

philanthropist.”

“Very well, then. I will write and tell him what you say.”

Pause. He was beginning to look rather annoyed.

“And there’s just one other thing,” she said, putting on her hat ready

for departure.

“What’s that?”

“Our arrangement will not terminate on the first of March. I shall

continue and pay myself.”

“As you wish....” He shrugged his shoulders.

And she thought as she went out: “That was a neat stroke for me. But

it’s going to be confoundedly expensive....”

§ 3

Henceforward Catherine assumed that George was her anonymous

benefactor. His inability to pay the last quarter’s fees synchronized

with his encounter with the Bishop’s Stortford magistrates, resulting

in a bill, including costs and all expenses, of nearly twenty-five

pounds. Undoubtedly it was George who was financing her. And the

question arose: Why? And the only possible answer was that this

quixotic and expensive undertaking was done out of love for her.

Catherine did not particularly like it. She was not even vaguely

grateful. She almost thought: He had no right to do it without asking

me. And if he had asked me I shouldn’t have let him. Anyway, it was

done behind my back. Treating me like a little child that doesn’t know

what is best for itself....

At times she became violently angry with him for his absolute silence.

Does he intend to carry the secret with him to the grave? she asked

herself. The absurd ease with which he parried any attempts to entangle

him in a confession intensely annoyed her. “I don’t believe he intends

ever to tell me,” she thought. “And if I’m ever a well-known pianist

he’ll congratulate himself in secret by thinking: ‘_I_ started

her. _I_ gave her her first chance. She’d have been nothing but

for me. _And she doesn’t know it_!’” The thought of George’s

romantic self-satisfaction at such a juncture oppressed her strangely.

There was also the subtle disappointment of discovering that Razounov

had not “found” her as great pianists are supposed to “find” promising

talent. But she was becoming accustomed to the shattering of her

idealist creations. Besides, she was at this time deriving a good deal

of hard satisfaction from her rapid and steady advancement, and no

amount of retrospective disillusionment could cast a shadow across the

future. Only she was annoyed at the quixotism of George Trant.

One evening she asked him point-blank:

“Did you pay for my first quarter’s lessons with Razounov?”

She expected the blow by its very suddenness would tell. He started

very slightly.

“Me?” he said, in a tone of bewilderment which, if not genuine, was at

least consummate acting. “Me?--I don’t understand. What do you----”

“Well, somebody did,” she replied curtly, annoyed that her blow had

been parried. “And I thought it might be you.”

“Good heavens, no!” he said, and at that moment she did not know

whether to believe him or not.

§ 4

He had been clever up to then. Afterwards he became too clever. One of

those periodic spasms of brilliance overwhelmed him.

The next morning she received a letter, typewritten, plain paper and

envelope, with the non-committal postmark: London, W. It ran:

The person who has undertaken the expenses of Miss Weston’s musical

training wishes it to be understood that he desires to remain

anonymous. Should he be questioned on the point by anyone he will

feel himself justified in adopting any attitude, even one involving

departures from the truth, which seems to him best calculated to

preserve the anonymity he so earnestly desires. Hence it is obvious

that enquiry, however persistent, can elicit no reliable information.

When Catherine read this she laughed outright. The absurdity, the

sublime ridiculousness of the thing tickled her. She knew now beyond

all doubt that it was George Trant. For this note had “George Trant”

written all over it. Only he could have devised something so inanely

clever and at the same time so incredibly stupid.

The fact of its being posted only three hours after their interview

of the evening before was enough to convince her. He must have gone

home direct, written it (he had a typewriter at home, she knew), and

gone up to London, W., immediately to catch the eleven o’clock post.

She pondered on his choice of London, W. Probably he thought a London

postmark would be least likely to give a clue. E.C., the most common,

would suggest Leadenhall Street, so he chose W. That, probably, was his

line of argument.

It was not a bad joke, she agreed. Yet if he acted upon it she could

conceive herself getting angry....

§ 5

Her opinion of George went up somewhat after the receipt of this

letter. She was immensely struck by its absurdity, yet she had to

admit that in addition to being a joke it was quite a clever joke. For

several weeks she did not mention the affair, and he too avoided all

reference to it. Then she began again to be annoyed at his silence.

Besides, she was immensely curious to know what his attitude would be.

The full flavour of the joke had yet to be tasted.

An incident--trivial in itself--lowered her opinion of him incalculably.

She had gone for her usual weekly lesson from Verreker. It was

springtime, and “Claremont” was being painted, both inside and out. The

music-room in which she took her lessons was crowded with furniture

from other rooms, and for the first time she saw the evidences of

Verreker’s labours apart from the world of music. Large book-cases had

been dumped anyhow against the walls, and tables littered with papers

filled up the usually spacious centre of the room. The piano had been

pulled into a corner. She had several minutes to wait, and spent the

time perusing the titles on his bookshelves. There was a fairly large

collection of modern novels, including most of the works of Wells,

Bennett, Conrad, Hardy, Chesterton and others; complete sets of the

works of Shaw and Ibsen, most of the plays of Galsworthy, Granville

Barker and Henry Arthur Jones; and some hundreds of miscellaneous

French novels. A complete bookcase was occupied by works on economics

and economic history--she read the names of Cunningham, Ashley,

Maitland, Vinogradoff, Seebohm and Money. Then there was a shelf

entirely devoted to Government Blue-Book publications, Reports of

Commissions, quarterly and monthly reviews, loose-leaf binders full to

bursting with documents, and such like. It was a very impressive array.

She was conscious of her own extreme ignorance. Scarcely anything that

was here had she read. She was not particularly fond of reading....

On the table near his desk she saw a yellow-backed copy of Ibsen’s

_Ghosts_....

One result of their frequent bickering was that their conversation had

acquired a good deal of familiarity....

“Rather a muddle,” he commented, as she was preparing to go after the

lesson. He waved a hand comprehensively round the room.

“You’ve a lot of books,” she said.

“Yes; and I read them.” (As much as to say: “If you had a lot of books

you wouldn’t read them.” In other words, a purely gratuitous insult.

But she ignored it.)

“Reading _Ghosts_?” she remarked, taking up the yellow-backed book

from the table.

“Re-reading it,” he corrected.

Something erratic and perfectly incomprehensible prompted her next

utterance.

“Absolute biological nightmare,” she said casually. (It was something

she had once heard George say.)

He looked at her queerly.

“Have you read it?”

“No,” she said, and blushed. She knew his next question would be, “Then

how do you know?” so she added: “I once heard somebody say that about

it.” She plunged further in sheer desperation. “Don’t _you_ think

it’s rather a biological nightmare?” she persisted, with passionate

eagerness, as much as to say: “Please don’t make a fool of me. Please

let the matter pass this once.”

“I confess,” he replied coldly, “it never appeared to me in that,

light.... But, of course ...”

(Truly he was a master of stately phrasing!)

Naturally she regarded it as George’s fault primarily. It was clear she

had overestimated George’s critical faculties....

§ 6

She was so annoyed with George on the way home that she arrived at the

astonishing decision: I will not marry him....

That evening, under the trees of the Bockley High Road, she produced

the typewritten anonymous letter and asked him point-blank: “Did you

write this?”

“No,” he said immediately.

“Did you type it, then?” (It showed her mean opinion of him that she

judged him capable of such a quibble.)

“No.”

“Do you know its contents?”

“How should I?”

“Then please read it.” She handed it to him.

“If you like,” he said, and read it. “Well?” he remarked, after doing

so.

“How am I to know if you are telling the truth?”

“You have only my word.”

“But, according to the letter, you may be telling me a lie.”

“That is presuming that I wrote it.”

“And you didn’t?”

“No.”

Pause. Then suddenly she stopped and faced him defiantly.

“I don’t believe you!” she snapped.

“Well----”

“Look here. You _did_ write this thing. Tell the truth. Own up

to it. It’s very clever and all that, but it shouldn’t be kept up

seriously like this. I’m certain you wrote that letter.”

“You don’t take my word for it?”

“Not in this case.”

“In other words, I’m a liar. Eh?”

“I suppose it comes to that.”

“Well, you’re very polite, I must say. Perhaps you’ve a few more things

you’d like to say about me?”

“Don’t try to be sarcastic. But there is one thing if you really want

to know.”

“What’s that?”

She paused, and then hurled it at him with terrible effect.

“I don’t love you a bit.... Not a tiny bit....”

She saw him whiten. It was thrilling to see how he kept his emotion

under control. She almost admired him in that moment.

“Is that so?” he said heavily.

“Yes.”

He bit his lip fiercely.

“Then our engagement, I presume, is--is dissolved?”

“Presumably.... Here’s your ring.”

Here occurred a touch of bathos. She tried to get the ring off her

finger, but it would not pass the first joint.

“Let me try,” he said humbly, and the episode became almost farcical.

It came off after a little coaxing. But the dramatic possibilities of

the incident had been ruined.

“Well,” he said stiffly, “I suppose that’s all. It’s your doing, not

mine. You’re breaking up our prospects without the least shadow of

reason.”

It did seem to her an incredibly wanton thing that she was doing.

And at this particular moment, if he had uttered her name slowly and

passionately she would have burst into tears and been reconciled to

him. But he missed the opportunity.

“I shall return your letters,” he continued coldly. (There were not

many of them, she reflected.)

“Good-bye,” she said.

They shook hands. And she thought: “Fancy having been kissed every

night for months and months and suddenly turning to a handshake!” That,

more than anything, perhaps, indicated to her the full significance of

what had happened. That and the peculiar sensation of chilliness round

her finger where the ring had been.

As she turned into Gifford Road she asked herself seriously the

question: “What has come over me? Am I mad? ...”

§ 7

More than once during the next few weeks she wished for a

reconciliation with George. It was not so much a desire for him as a

sense of despair at being once more wholly alone and adrift. Now she

was back again where she was when she first came to Gifford Road. With

redoubled energy she laboured at her music, and soon the idea of a

recital in a London concert hall began to dance attractively in her

vision. She extended her reputation by playing in other suburbs; she

thought even of setting up as a private teacher of the pianoforte. With

the surplus earnings of a few months she bought an upright piano of

decent tone and installed it in the basement sitting-room at Gifford

Road.

George wrote to her once, a long letter of mingled pleading and

expostulation. He mentioned that he had not yet told his parents what

had happened, so that if she desired to change her mind it would be

easy to do so. He laid stress on the difficulty he should find in

giving Helen and his father and mother an adequate explanation of their

separation.

After the receipt of this letter Catherine ceased her vague misgivings.

She replied immediately in a letter, short by comparison with his,

whose every sentence was the result of careful excogitation:

It is no good thinking of our ever becoming engaged again, because

if we did we should soon quarrel. We simply aren’t made for one

another, and however kind and sympathetic we try to be there’ll always

be something lacking that sooner or later we shan’t be able to do

without....

I am bound to confess that the idea of marriage with you always struck

me as fantastic and improbable. I never, I believe, considered it

seriously. I knew something would happen to put an end to our plans....

... Of course I am in the wrong. You have been very kind to me and

from the ordinary point of view you would doubtless have made a very

good husband. You are quite entitled to consider yourself shabbily

treated. I am wholly in the wrong. But I am not going to make myself

everlastingly unhappy just to put myself in the right. And whether

you would have made me a good husband or not, I should certainly have

made you a bad wife. I am a peculiar person, and I would never marry

a man just because he would make a good husband.... Surely you don’t

imagine I am going to marry you just to let you out of the difficulty

of explaining things at home? ... A thing like that proves at once the

complete misunderstanding that exists between us two.... You must tell

your parents and Helen exactly what has happened, viz. that I have

jilted you. If you were a woman you could claim a few hundred pounds

damages for breach of promise.... Tell them I have jilted you because

I could not bear the thought of marrying you. Blame me entirely: I

am heartless and a flirt, cruel, treacherous and anything else you

like. Only I am not such a fool as to marry somebody I don’t want to

marry....

Don’t imagine I am in love with somebody else. At present I am not

in love with anybody. At one time I thought I was in love with you,

but I am doubtful if it ever was so really. I think it was just that

you hypnotized me by being in love with me yourself. I mean, I was so

interested in your experience....

I don’t ask you to forgive me. Because forgiving won’t make any

difference. I may have done right or I may have done wrong, but I have

done what I would do over again if I had to. There is no repentance

in me. It is idle to pretend I am sorry. I am extraordinarily glad to

have got out of a difficult position....

This letter, by the way, is the first sincere letter I have ever

written to you. I do not mean that the others were all insincere: I

mean that, compared with this one for truth and sincerity, the others

were simply--nothing....

As to my present attitude towards you I will be offensively

straightforward. I do not like you. That ought to convince you finally

of the uselessness of answering this letter....

§ 8

A cold May day, so chilly that a fire seemed the most welcome thing on

earth. Seven in the evening, and it was the last lesson of the quarter.

When she reached “Claremont,” Verreker was not there. He had been up

to the City, and a slight accident outside Liverpool Street Station

had delayed the trains. The maid showed her into the music-room and

left her alone. She sat in one of the big chairs by the fire and felt

astonishingly miserable. The room had regained its normal condition;

the surplus furniture, the books, papers, writing-desk, etc., had

been taken away: but a grandfather clock that had not originally been

there now occupied a permanent position in the corner. The embers were

burning low, and shadows were darkening all around: the black and white

vista of piano keys straggled obscurely in the background; the clock

was ticking sleepily away. Far into the dim distance of the ceiling

loomed the polished splendour of the raised sound-board....

Why did she feel miserable?

It was something in her soul.

She got up and sat down at the piano.

With no discoverable motive she commenced to play the piece that she

now knew was Chopin’s Black Note Etude (in G flat). It was the one she

had heard years ago when she stood in the scented dusk of the Ridgeway

in front of the house with the corner bay-window. Since then she had

learned it thoroughly and played it many times on concert platforms.

But as she played it now it sounded new, or rather, it sounded as if

she had heard it only once before, and that was many years ago in the

summer twilight. All between was a gap, a void which only the Chopin

Etude could bridge....

(In her strange mood she was playing it most abominably, by the way.)

She paused in the middle. Her eyes were like dark gems amidst the red

glory of her hair.

“I’m not in love with _any person_,” she told herself with

incredible calmness. “I’m not in love with anybody in the world. But

I’m in love with _Something_. Some Thing! Very deeply, very

passionately, I am. And I don’t know what it is.... I keep finding

it and losing it again. But it’s in this”--she started the first few

bars of the Chopin piece--“it’s all everywhere in that. I knew it was

there when I stood and listened to it years ago. Oh, it’s there. And

I’ve heard and seen it in other places, too. But as yet it’s been only

a _thing_.... But some day, maybe, I’ll tack it on to somebody

living, and then ... God help me! ...”

Her fingers flew over the keys, and the great octaves began to sing out

in the left hand.

“I’ll have to be careful,” she went on in thought--“careful, or else

some day I’ll go mad.... But it’s there, whatever it is.... Something

that’s in that and that’s in me as well, and they’re nearly tearing me

to shreds to get closer to one another. That’s how it feels.... And

I told him I wasn’t in love with _anybody_ ... But _if_ I

should catch a glimpse of this something in any living being! Nothing

should ever keep us apart! Nothing could! Neither life nor death--nor

miles--nor anything.”

She let her hands fall down the keyboard in a great culminating Niagara

of octaves. Two chords like the blare of trumpets, and ...

The door opened and Verreker entered.

She paused with her hands poised on the keys.

“Well,” he began cheerily, “it’s the last lesson of the quarter, isn’t

it?”

“Yes,” she said quietly.

He was warming his hands in front of the fire.

“Confoundedly cold for May,” he remarked parenthetically. “You’ve been

taking lessons of me for a year now, haven’t you?”

“Just over a year.”

He stood with his back to the fire.

“Well,” he continued, “you’ve not done badly. In fact, you’ve--you’ve

improved--er--quite--er--beyond my expectations. I admit that.”

It was the biggest compliment he had ever paid her. Pleasure surged in

her blood. She flushed.

“And,” he went on, “I don’t want to go on taking your money when you’re

no longer likely to benefit much. As a matter of fact, you’ve come to

a point at which my lessons are no longer worth three guineas each to

you. You can teach yourself as well as I can teach you. I’ve led you

out to the open sea, and now the time’s come for--for dropping the

pilot. See?”

She nodded.

“So I don’t recommend you to have another quarter with me. I think it

would be money wasted.”

She nodded.

“Of course I shall be glad to help you in any way I can if you need it.”

She nodded.

“And if you ever wish me to give you advice on any point of theory or

technique I shall be pleased to do so.”

She nodded.

Pause.

“... I’ve just been up to town to get some new music in manuscript from

a new author. It’s quite good stuff and very modern. I’ll run it over

if you’d care to hear it.”

“Thanks,” she said, and vacated the stool....

When he had finished it was almost too dark to see the music. She was

standing at the side of the piano with her face in the shadows.

“Play ‘Jeux d’Eaux,’” she said softly.

He began....

Catherine herself · 第 12 / 24 章