CHAPTER V.

REFLECTIONS ON THE SKIRMISH AT CROSS LANES.--BATTLE OF CARNIFEX

FERRY.

The occasion for the affair at Cross Lanes was brought about by a

series of blunders. The first blunder was committed by the officer who

ordered all the forces, with the exception of the Seventh Ohio, from a

position which enabled them to guard the ferries of the Gauley. If it

was deemed important to hold these ferries at all, it was certainly

advisable to retain a sufficient force to guard against surprise and

capture. But then, what would be considered a sufficient force? To

settle the question, it is necessary to take into account the size of

the army occupying the country, as well as the size of that of the

enemy. Neither army was large, and both were much scattered, scarcely

more than a brigade occupying one position. A regiment, therefore, may

perhaps be considered a sufficient force for an outpost.

The army in Western Virginia was at no time sufficiently large to

accomplish any thing, under the best generalship, beyond simply holding

the country, and preventing invasion; and it was only for the want of a

moderately sized army that the rebel general failed to drive back our

forces. But the rebel authorities had no men to spare for the purpose

of winning barren victories; so the armies of Western Virginia were

left to watch each other, with an occasional skirmish.

At the time the affair at Cross Lanes took place, our army occupied a

front of many miles, as did also the rebel army. It was quite

impossible to collect, in case of emergency, more than about six

thousand men. But, however it may be as to the first point, it is

clear, secondly, that the commanding officer at Cross Lanes committed

an error in not making a personal inspection of the grounds, adjacent

to the camp, immediately on his arrival. It is always considered highly

important that those in command should know precisely the ground their

commands are expected to defend, and not to trust to chance or a battle

to develop favorable points of defence or attack. By reason of this

want of knowledge, rumors as to the presence of the enemy in force

created uneasiness and alarm, which was entirely natural, although

without cause. While in this state of feeling, the commanding officer

sent dispatches to Generals Rosecrans and Cox, which created the

impression that their author was not to be trusted to hold these

ferries. Those generals attributed this alarm to a want of personal

courage, they being well informed as to the strength of the position at

Cross Lanes. It was not, however, a want of courage, but simply a

failure on his part to understand the real strength of the position, by

reason of not having visited it in person.

When the order to withdraw came, Colonel Tyler regretted it as much as

any one; for he had that day examined the position, and knew that he

could hold it against any force the enemy could bring to the attack.

But this knowledge was obtained too late: lying on his table was a

positive order to withdraw. Reason said hold the position; military

law, which was higher in authority, said abandon it; so the place was

evacuated. The third and irremediable error was committed in not

returning to Cross Lanes when ordered. If that had been done, the

consequences resulting from the withdrawal would have been entirely

checked. The order to return was given on Wednesday, with the

expectation that it would be acted upon as soon as Thursday morning;

but it was not until the Saturday noon following that the command

started. There was no reason for this delay. The regiment had marched

but eighteen miles in as many days, and could, without any injustice

being done it, have returned the day the order was given. Even had the

command moved as late as Friday, with dispatch, it would not have been

too late, as it seems to be well settled that Floyd did not cross over

any considerable body of troops until Saturday.

In the way of criticism on this affair, it has been said that, had a

spirited dash been made on the enemy on Saturday evening, the rebels

could have been driven across the river. I think this claim subject to

many doubts. In my opinion a reconnoissance should have been made that

night, instead of falling back to Panther Mountain. This would have

resulted in the discovery of their position and force, and thus given

the command an opportunity to take advantage of the night to withdraw.

Had this been done, the ferry might possibly have been reached.

The result of these blunders was the fighting of two engagements, with

a heavy Federal loss, while the enemy suffered less. One of these,

Carnifex Ferry, has been dignified with the name of battle, while the

other is considered but an affair.

After the repulse of the Seventh, Floyd intrenched himself on the bank

of the river, near the ferry. About two weeks later, "Rosecrans came

down with his legions," comprising about four thousand men. Approaching

the vicinity of the ferry, he threw forward General Benham's brigade,

with no design of bringing on an engagement, however; but the line

unwittingly advanced to within a short distance of the enemy's works,

when a sheet of flame shot along their entire line. The unequal contest

lasted five hours, when the Union forces withdrew, hungry and

supperless, with a loss of fourteen killed, and one hundred and four

wounded. The loss of the enemy was about twenty wounded.

The troops awoke in the morning to find the rebel works abandoned. Thus

ended the battle of Carnifex Ferry, no less a blunder than Cross Lanes.

General Benham was censured for having attacked their main works, when

he was ordered to make a reconnoissance only. But when it is understood

that the commanding general sent up reinforcements, the blame, if there

was any, attached itself to him.

The loss to the Seventh, at Cross Lanes, was one killed, twenty

wounded, and ninety-six taken prisoners. Several of these were

recaptured at Carnifex Ferry, when Rosecrans attacked Floyd. Among the

number was Lieutenant Cross, Company C. The loss to the enemy has never

been known. There is no doubt, however, that it was considerable. They

attacked in large numbers, confident of an easy victory, therefore very

little caution attended their movements. But instead of a flag of

truce, accompanied by an offer to surrender, they were met by a shower

of bullets, which must have told fearfully on their heavy columns. The

fact that they were thrown into such confusion as to permit our men to

escape, shows that they were too severely punished to follow up their

victory.

The force of Floyd has been variously estimated: some having placed it

as high as six thousand; while, in his official report of the

engagement at Carnifex Ferry, Floyd himself places it at only two

thousand. His force was probably four thousand, of all arms, with ten

pieces of artillery. This entire force must have been in the vicinity

at the time of the affair at Cross Lanes.

The following is an unofficial list of the loss in the regiment:

_Killed._--Captain John N. Dyer.

_Wounded._--Corporal Frank Dutton, N. J. Holly, Thomas Shepley, Thomas

J. Scoville, Sergeant H. G. Orton, Joseph W. Collins, B. Yeakins, Lewis

J. Jones, Thomas S. Curran, William Meriman, B. F. Gill, William S.

Reed, David M. Daily, Robert J. Furguson, James R. Greer, E. J.

Kreiger, Sergeant James Grebe, John W. Doll, William W. Ritiche, Fred.

W. Steinbauer.

The following is a list of those taken prisoners:

Sergeant W. W. Parmeter, Sergeant E. R. Stiles, Sergeant G. C. C.

Ketchum, Sergeant F. F. Wilcoxson, Sergeant Edward Bohn, Sergeant A.

Kolman, Sergeant E. W. Morey, Corporal C. F. Mack, Corporal J. G.

Turner, Corporal T. A. Mohler, Corporal S. M. Cole, Corporal E. C.

Palmer, Corporal Charles Bersett, Privates Albert Osborn, Charles

Weber, Alex. Parker, R. Bears, L. Warren, A. M. Halbert, H. Keiser, S.

B. Kingsbury, E. Kennedy, A. Hubbell, C. C. Quinn, C. Burrows, E.

Evans, W. H. Scott, C. H. Howard, Charles Carrol, T. B. Myers, George

Sweet, John Massa, J. F. Curtis, W. E. Bartlett, W. Cherry, John Bark,

John Hann, L. M. Blakesly, Z. Fox, J. Butler, F. S. Stillwell, G. W.

Downing, G. C. Newton, William Biggs, Mathew Merkle, J. Sheloy, H.

Huntoon, G. W. Williams, George C. Robinson, H. Wessenbock, J. C.

Rafferty, J. Snyder, W. W. Wheeler, C. Haskell, J. W. Finch, James

Johnson, H. Johnson, L. C. Logue, A. Scoville, P. Wildson, F. Boole,

John Miller, P. Jenkins, John Smith, J. Wolf, Theodore Burt, A.

Schwartz, G. A. Akerman, Charles Sahl, G. W. Thompson, F. Williams, M.

H. Whaley, Z. Larkins, T. Hebbig, Z. A. Fuig, F. A. Noble, J. Hettlick,

J. McCabe, L. Beles, E. R. Smith, F. A. Rubicon, John Smith, E. Smith,

H. Smith, D. N. K. Hubbard, H. Wood, Charles Ottinger, R. S. Beel, N.

D. Claghorn, H. Thompson, N. Freidenburg, M. Levullen, S. Gill, fifer.

The Seventh Regiment: A Record · 第 5 / 23 章