I heard he still kept the same hotel where I slept in 1792.

When we reached it I found him grown grey, however, with suffering and

persecution. He received me with unfeigned pleasure, few Englishmen

had hitherto passed, and the sight of a countryman rejoiced his heart.

He told me that during the time of Terror, Dounne,[1] the Conventional

Deputy, took up his quarters in his hotel, and fared sumptuously upon

the fat of the land. In a very short time this representative of the

people contrived to absorb a vast quantity of wine, particularly port,

for which he had a great relish, and for none of this did he ever pay

one farthing.

One day after dinner he sent for Parker and inquired whether he had

any more port. The latter replied that unfortunately his stock was

exhausted. At this the Citizen Deputy expressed great regret. Two

hours later, he ordered, in consequence, poor Parker into arrest, and

sent him to a prison in Paris, without permitting him to make any

arrangements respecting his family concerns, or even to take leave of

his family.

He remained eighteen months in jail, cut off from his friends and

relations, while his house and property were completely at the mercy of

the Jacobins.

[Sidenote: JOURNEY TO AMIENS]

He has now returned to try his fortune once more at Boulogne, and I

sincerely hope English travellers will encourage a countryman, who is

highly deserving of their patronage.

I traversed after dinner several streets of the town. I found a great

number of private houses, convents and monasteries utterly demolished

and reduced to piles of ruins, giving the town the appearance of having

experienced a long and severe siege. I thought (for I forgot for a

moment the enlightened age of Reason) that all this devastation was the

result of the late bombardment of Lord Nelson. But I was in error. Only

one bomb fell into the town, and did no mischief.

The ruins everywhere visible were formerly the habitations of suspected

persons and religious and charitable foundations destroyed by the

Jacobins, when they overthrew what they were pleased to call prejudice

and superstition. Some of these buildings were remarkably handsome,

and it might have been supposed could have served for the use of the

public, but when the waters of bitterness overflow, destruction is

general and indiscriminate.

During the bombardment of the town, the French naval officers, among

whom was Jerome Bonaparte, brother of the First Consul, messed every

day at Parker’s. In contradistinction to the Deputy of the Convention,

they conducted themselves with the greatest liberality to this

Englishman during their residence.

Jerome put up at Parker’s by the express desire of his elder brother.

The inhabitants and the French officers scouted the idea of a

French invasion of England, and wondered that the bravest and most

distinguished admiral of the British Fleet should have been sent to

oppose an inconsiderable flotilla moored in Boulogne waters.

“Your countrymen,” they said, “are very brave, but you are a mercantile

nation, and merchants are always nervous. This town, as well as Calais

and Dunkerque were, before the war, filled by English refugees, persons

who sought shelter from the pursuit of their creditors.”

Considering the extraordinary severity of the English law of debtor

and creditor, I cannot avoid looking upon these with some slight

approbation, as affording to the unfortunate and improvident the means

of becoming careful and honest! and more advantageous resorts for the

debtor than the wood of America among rattlesnakes and savages.

So far, since the Peace, few persons of this description have arrived

at Boulogne, though many are expected.

To give any account of the present state of commerce here is quite out

of my power. I doubt if the town can be said to possess any. Formerly

the fishing was prosperous, and much shipbuilding was undertaken and

a smart smuggler’s trade carried on with the seaports on the opposite

side of the water.

It had been my intention to have slept at Montreuil-sur-Mer, a distance

of four posts or about twenty-three miles from Boulogne, but my

companion was so exhausted that we settled to pass the night at Samur,

the nearest post town. Although we were obliged to lodge at a miserable

inn, nothing could exceed the kind attention of the people who owned

it, they had but milk and coffee to give us, which were but slender

supports for persons just recovered from sea-sickness, and seven hours

had elapsed since dinner. However, as we had provided ourselves at

Calais with a fowl and two bottles of burgundy we were thus enabled to

make an excellent supper; the milk and coffee I poured into a bowl and

gave with a big French roll to a miserable creature at the gate. The

manner in which they were received and devoured absolutely confounded

me, for I had never seen the like in old France.

[Sidenote: JOURNEY TO AMIENS]

The next day we proceeded to Cormont, about five miles and a half,

where we changed horses, and from thence to Montreuil, situated on a

steep mountain and formerly a strong fortress.

Before the Revolution there was here an English convent, and a number

of English families, but the convent has been demolished, and the town

altogether abandoned by our people.

I entered into a political dialogue with two very respectable persons

whom I found at the inn, and asked them what was their opinion of the

Peace and their present Government. They expressed themselves content

with both. They observed that no man who had witnessed such scenes as

they had done could avoid rejoicing at an event which promised repose

to France.

The blood which had been spilt within and without their country had

sickened the French people with the very name of war. Then followed

the old and trite remark, that if England and France could join in a

cordial union they might _command the whole world_ and retain it

in a state of permanent peace. In their opinion the Peace was in favour

of England, and when I enumerated the names of the different colonies

we had restored to France they laughed at me and said, “You have taken

away our commerce, and what have we taken from you?”

They expressed themselves satisfied with the present Government, and

avowed that any Government which maintained order was preferable to

a state of anarchy. They assured me that they had witnessed scenes

which could not be described. They said, “We lived in times when no

man could trust his neighbour, much less speak his thoughts. A brother

could not confide in a brother.” Then I observed, “You have doubtless

had the guillotine permanent in your town?” “No, sir, it has never

been erected here, but many of our fellow townsmen were imprisoned

and executed at Arras.” “By Joseph Le Bon?” “The same.” “What induced

your people to destroy the Convent?” “With many fear of death,

with others because it was the fashion.” While we were engaged in

conversation, a person brought in a hare and a leveret, for which our

hostess paid ten sous. On my observing that provisions must, to judge

from this price, be extremely cheap in France, it was quickly proved

to me that any articles of necessity were inordinately dear; bread

I found was a halfpenny a pound dearer than in England. Our horses

being now harnessed, or rather corded, we took our leave, but we had

literally to penetrate through a column of beggars before we mounted

the carriage. They were mostly boys between fourteen and seventeen

years of age, and their number was three-and-twenty. I requested the

person with whom I had been conversing to explain why at eleven o’clock

in the morning these lads were not at work. He answered that they

had no work, and were in an utter state of indigence, their parents

not having the means of providing them with subsistence. On which I

observed that they might find ample occupation in the pursuits of

agriculture and husbandry, and asked if it was not highly injurious to

the community to suffer their boys not to be brought up to a trade.

He then whispered that while the Noblesse resided in the country, and

the Monasteries existed, vast numbers found employment, and those

who were out of a place were assisted by a charity of the religious

orders, but that since their destruction, the land had devolved in

other hands, and often to proprietors who were in Paris and never lived

on their estate. “It is evident,” said I, “that these poor people are

punished for their folly.” A fact he fully admitted. He mentioned that

the parents of these children were the persons now employed in the

business of agriculture, and that as for trades all those who were not

requisitioned for the armies were only too glad for the sake of bread

to serve different tradesmen and perform the duties formerly fulfilled

by boys, but, he added, “all in good time. These lads will be in the

next conscription, and then they will be provided for.” I thanked him

for his description, and after distributing a little money among these

children, I resumed my journey, pondering on the reversed order of

social life.

[Sidenote: JOURNEY TO AMIENS]

The Revolution, which was brought about ostensibly for the benefit of

the lower classes of society, has sunk them to a degree of degradation

and misfortune to which they never were reduced under the ancient

monarchy. They have been disinherited, stripped and deprived of every

resource for existence, except defeats of arms and the fleeting spoil

of vanquished nations. In the sententious language of Montesquieu,

“With an hundred thousand arms they have overthrown everything, while

with an hundred thousand feet they have crawled like insects.” This

reversion of social order must destroy sentiments of moral obligation.

Boys of fifteen beg for charity while their fathers and mothers toil in

the field! Full-grown men are engaged in avocations peculiar to youth.

A life of habitual indolence is encouraged in those who should be

toiling for those who gave them birth. From this they will shortly be

transplanted to the armies, without having been taught one occupation

by which they might obtain a livelihood when the period of service has

expired.

What is to be expected of such young men on their return as citizens?

They will be a dead stock on the community--a load on their friends, an

incumbrance to themselves, they who have been taught no other trade but

to handle a firelock, to parade and plunder--will merely be the terror

of peaceful citizens, and the Government will find the only mode of

disposing of them to send them back to the army.

Thus an immense permanent military establishment will result, and

will consist of an army which is the reservoir of the indolent and

profligate, who must be supported by the speculations of the merchant

and the labours of the farmer. This is in itself far more pernicious

than the _corvées_, the abolishment of which was one of the pleas

for the extirpation of the aristocracy.

To foreign nations the possession by France of such an immense force

ready to burst upon them at a single word of command must be an object

of terror and alarm. And in self-defence they too must maintain

powerful armies in the centre of Europe, in the midst of a profound and

general peace.

If an estimate is made of the many hundred thousand hands thus

withdrawn from the pursuits of agriculture, manufactures, and commerce,

some idea may be formed of the loss which huge standing armies cause to

the community at large.

Such arguments are, however, vain while the vast military establishment

of France is upheld.

Necessity compels every nation in Europe to provide for its own

security. The military force of France is justly pleaded as a reason

for maintaining a strong standing army in our island. How much more

reason have continental nations to adopt a similar precaution, for they

do not possess our advantage of being separated from France by a ditch?

A man who proposed the reduction of the English army at the present

time would be esteemed a madman. The continental powers are only

pursuing a system forced upon them by imperious necessity.

Nevertheless, much is to be hoped from the versatile and ingenious

character of the French people. A Frenchman can turn himself to

occupations which would never enter the brain of an Englishman or

German, and it is a common adage that if a Frenchman be turned adrift

and penniless on the wide world he will thrive and prosper.

If the situation of the nations on the continent be contrasted with

that of our happy country, we shall perceive that Great Britain enjoys

a decided advantage. All our soldiers and most of our sailors, before

their entrance into the Navy or Army, have been previously educated

to some industrial pursuit. Hence after a long war they rejoice in

returning to their former pursuits, and the country has nothing to

apprehend from them. They resume their former relations to society, and

every species of trade and manufacture is open to them.

The present Government should seriously reflect upon these undoubted

facts if the First Consul is sincerely desirous of peace.

These reflections have led me out of my road to Nampont (a post and a

half from Montreuil). Here we changed horses and proceeded to Bernay,

where we again changed.

[Sidenote: JOURNEY TO AMIENS]

The weather was favourable and we hastened on, hoping to reach Amiens

before dark. Nouviou was our next stage, whence we traversed a flat and

unpleasant tract of country to Abbeville.

We passed a pretty château surrounded by trees. It belonged to a

Monsieur de St. Quentin, who, having emigrated, found himself deprived

of his property, which was purchased for a trifling sum from the

Republican Government by a merchant of Abbeville.

Since the proscription of emigrants has been removed by the First

Consul, Monsieur de St. Quentin has returned to France. He now resides

at a little village, formerly belonging to him, within sight of the

mansion which was once his. None of his property has been restored to

him, and no allowance so far granted by the State, he therefore lives

in a forlorn state of poverty. Our postillion had lived twelve years

with M. de St. Quentin in the capacity of a gardener. He pointed to a

young plantation and said, sadly, “All those trees were planted by me.”

Love of country must be a predominant passion in the mind of a man who

after twelve years’ exile is content to reside in it in penury, and

endure the mortification of being constantly within view of his former

property. We dined at Reichord’s hotel, were well entertained, and the

charges reasonable. But our meal was rendered uncomfortable on account

of the crowd of beggars who were looking through the window and craving

charity. As fast as one crowd was dismissed another advanced upon their

heels. A gentleman who was there declared he counted over a hundred

persons. The city of Abbeville is old and wretchedly built, many of the

houses being made of wood there is a gloomy aspect in every part of it.

Before the Revolution it was celebrated for its damasks, and the vast

establishment of Vau Robois, established by Louis XIV., gave employment

to over 4000 persons; but this industry perished in the Revolution.

Before the war the population of Abbeville was computed at 22,000, it

is now reduced to less than 18,000 souls.

Ally-le-haut Clocher was our next stopping-place--the only circumstance

worthy of notice there was a red cap on the top of the church steeple,

a mark of Jacobinism; during the nine miles traversed between Abbeville

and this place we never remarked one cheerful prospect or one well

cultivated lot of ground. At Flixecourt stood a tree of Liberty, the

first we had noticed since our arrival in France. From this place we

proceeded to Picquigny, where we again changed horses and thence to

Amiens, a stage of nine miles. It was late when we arrived, and to our

misfortune (as you will learn later) I mistook the house to which I

had been recommended. By the light of the lantern I read _Pollet_

instead of _La Poste_, and in consequence drove to Madame Pollet’s

inn, “Le Lion d’Or.”

Before I close this letter I will make a few observations on the

general face of the country and the state of agriculture. The soil is

good, but cultivation is deplorable.

There are scarcely any enclosures, trees have been ruthlessly cut down,

and the hills completely stripped of timber. I saw neither cattle nor

sheep pasturing.

[Sidenote: DESCRIPTION OF AMIENS]

Nothing can exceed the wretchedness of the implements of husbandry

employed but the wretched appearance of the persons using them. Women

at the plough and young girls driving a team give but an indifferent

idea of the progress of agriculture under the Republic. There are no

farmhouses dispersed over the fields. The farmers reside together in

remote villages, a circumstance calculated to retard the business of

cultivation. The interiors of the houses are filthy, the farmyards

in the utmost disorder, and the miserable condition of the cattle

sufficiently bespeaks the poverty of their owner. Meat of all kinds is

poor and unnutritious, but the poultry is excellent. The wine is sour

and worse than vinegar and water, and even in the great inns where I

paid a high price for so-called burgundy and bordeaux, I never drank

one glass of even _tolerable wine_ (Chantilly excepted) between

Calais and the capital.

Between Montreuil and Flixecourt we were greatly diverted at the sight

of two women ploughing with three asses, although this confirms the

opinion upon which I have always insisted, but not ludicrously, that

if we in England made more use of asses in husbandry advantage might

be derived to the community and a saving to the farmer. If instead of

harassing and ill-treating these useful animals we gave them a little

more consequence in the society of brutes and raised them from the

condition of slaves to servants, they would possess more spirit and

energy and be more tractable.

The asses at the plough looked plump and sleek and performed their work

apparently as well as horses. After having seen a goat at the plough

I think no one should be surprised that I plead the cause of the poor

ass, besides I acknowledge myself to be the friend of asses.

V

DESCRIPTION OF AMIENS, AND HAPPY RELEASE

FROM THE “LION D’OR”

At the time we arrived at the inn, the people of the town were just

leaving the theatre, which overflowed on account of a new piece having

been represented that night. A Frenchman would rather be called a knave

than be accused of a want of _goût_. Hence the theatres are always

crowded at the representation of a new piece (whatever may be the

celebrity of the author, or even if he enjoy no celebrity at all).

In England, at a first representation, the house is seldom half filled,

except by friends of the author, who is either bowing to the manager or

quaking in the green room, waiting for the sentence of the critics in

the pit.

In France, every man fancies himself a born critic, and makes a point

of attending the theatre to form part of the general tribunal.

The author generally stations himself in the most distinguished part of

the theatre, where, with all the assurance of certain success, he bows

to the pit, gallery, and the ladies. If the piece succeeds he carries

himself high, and confesses that his countrymen are the only men of

taste in the world. But should the play unhappily be damned (a not

unfrequent circumstance) his deportment changes, he clenches his fists,

gives a horrible and ghastly smile, and swears the audience are a gang

of _f-- canaille, scélérats, bandits_, and to crown all, “_Des

gens de mauvais goût_.” When he has reached this climax of epithets

he rushes furiously from the theatre.

It happened that on the night of our arrival at Amiens a very good

piece had been presented to the public. But my inclinations (a proof of

_mauvais goût_) were directed to a good supper.

In order to give a proper notion of the dexterity of Madame Pollet,

hostess of the “Lion d’Or,” I must describe our mode of living in her

house.

We were shown into a large room, containing four chairs, a small round

table, and a chest of drawers. In a corner stood a dome bedstead,

prettily hung with blue silk curtains, the bed covered by a blue silk

counterpane. It is a nasty custom in France to eat and drink in one’s

bedroom at an inn. I ordered supper for two persons.

In a quarter of an hour the following dishes were served in succession.

A jowl of salmon (the largest and fattest I ever saw), two of the

finest soles I ever beheld, a partridge, a pigeon, a hashed hare,

a fowl, bouillie beef, spinach, and other vegetables--a bottle of

Picardy beer, a bottle of champagne, and one bottle of Volnay wine. The

unceasing procession of viands surpassed the scene at Barataria.

[Sidenote: DESCRIPTION OF AMIENS]

My wife ate scarcely anything, but I was hungry and took courage. No

sooner had I despatched my quota of a dish when another followed, and

another and another.

I do believe it would have continued all night if nature, being

entirely exhausted, had not obliged me to cry mercy.

Having successfully begged for quarter and forbidden any dessert, I

retired for the night, having desired to see the Cathedral in the

morning. It must not be imagined that I attacked every dish as it

advanced--I made a hearty supper on a bit of salmon, part of a sole and

some hashed hare; the rest of the feast went down untouched.

In the morning we went to see the Cathedral--one of the finest

monuments of the piety of ancient days. It has escaped in some measure

the onslaughts of Revolutionaries, though its decorations have been

grievously mutilated. At the principal portal all the heads of the

saints have been struck off, and the sculptured groups representing

Scripture history have been so disfigured as to be rendered ridiculous.

The admirable marble statue of the weeping child has received

considerable injury, but the beautiful chapels on each side of the

choir are in an excellent state of preservation, as well as the marble

statues over the altars.

Nothing is missing from them but the gold and silver candlesticks

and the rich ornaments of the church; even the bones of the tutelary

saint have been unmolested, although the immense box of silver in

which they were deposited has been seized. The grand altar-piece of

the Cathedral, which spreads across the whole breadth of the church

and rises majestically towards the top, has outlived the fury which

threatened its destruction; a circumstance which must be ascribed

solely to the spirit and good sense of the citizens of Amiens. For

when the Revolutionary army from Paris had commenced a general sack of

the Cathedral and were demolishing its ornaments, the National Guard

of Amiens arrived with its drums beating; a pitched battle ensued in

the aisles, which did not finish till the _sans culottes_ were

driven out of the Cathedral; the citizens afterwards mounted guard over

the minster and saved it from the common ruin a ruffianly horde had

involved S. Denys and half of the finest churches in France.

Bishop Evrard began to build this edifice in the year 1220, during

the reign of Philip Augustus. Three architects superintended the

work--Robert de Luzarche, Thomas de Cormont, and Maître Renoult. In

three years the foundations were laid, a marvellously rapid work when

their solidity and extent are considered. The Cathedral is built on

irregular ground, and required very deep foundations.

Upon the death of Evrard, his successor, Godfroi d’Eu, continued the

building, and during the fourteen years he held the episcopal see piles

were raised and the Cathedral completed as far as the arched roof.

Arnold d’Amiens succeeded Godfroi, and he was followed by Gerard of

Couchy and Alexander of Neuilly; and under their successor, Bernard

of Abbeville, the work was completed in 1260, forty years after the

foundation stone was laid. This last ecclesiastic adorned the Cathedral

with an immense pointed window, which now ornaments the central part

of the choir. Beneath it may still be read the following inscription:

“_Bernardus Epis. me dedit anno MCCLIX._”

Nothing can now exceed the gloomy appearance of this church, shorn of

all its former decorations. When we entered there were not more than

six old women and a veteran soldier of artillery at their matins, all

shivering with cold and hunger. When we associated this circumstance

with the absence and former persecution of all ministers of religion,

it gave a chilly aspect to the whole scene and damped all those

emotions of the soul which arise from contemplating a vast edifice

formerly consecrated to piety.

[Sidenote: DESCRIPTION OF AMIENS]

On our return we viewed the ruins of a building, once the palace of

Henry IV., situated at the back of the “Lion d’Or.” It is surprising

that the Revolutionary army, in its rage for destruction, left this

vestige of royalty untouched. But the fury of the Jacobins seems to

have been directed principally against the sculptured heads of saints,

for none of the houses in the Close, formerly the Canons’ residences,

have been destroyed. They became national property, but they remain

until this day without a purchaser. I have been informed that it is the

intention of the First Consul to revive the discipline of the Cathedral

and restore these houses to the Chapter. A Bishop has been already

nominated; but as the Episcopal Palace has been destroyed, a proper

house will be provided for him at the expense of the Government.

When a person is travelling in the French Republic, if he arrives at

any town which has been a theatre of Revolutionary carnage, he will

have no difficulty in collecting anecdotes (should he desire it), some

pathetic, some ludicrous, and some horribly jocose, together with many

entertaining lies.

France still bleeds at every pore--she is a vast mourning family, clad

in sackcloth. It is impossible at this time for a contemplative mind to

be gay in France. At every footstep the merciless and sanguinary route

of fanatical barbarians disgust the sight and sicken humanity--on all

sides ruins obtrude themselves on the eye and compel the question, “For

what and for whom are all this havoc and desolation?”

It was in this city that that execrable villain, Joseph Le Bon met his

well-earned doom. He was executed among the curses and yells of that

very populace who a few weeks previously had received him with shouts

of approval and loaded him with caresses.

When he first reached Amiens a poor harmless priest fell under his

displeasure. Le Bon issued an order for the arrest of the ecclesiastic,

who sought refuge in the woods. This roused the fury of the vindictive

tyrant, who wrote instantly to the Committee of Public Safety,

declaring he had discovered a great conspiracy, and that an agent of

Pitt had fled to the woods, but he was about to adopt vigorous measures

to bring the criminal to justice.

The _générale_ was beaten, the tocsin sounded, and all armed

citizens were ordered to scour the woods and seize upon the agent

of Pitt. On the ensuing day the poor priest, exhausted with fatigue,

hunted like a wild beast and utterly famished, returned to the city

and surrendered himself to his tormentors. He was at once carried

before the Revolutionary Tribunal. He was asked his name, and had no

sooner replied than the jury, without hearing indictment or evidence,

pronounced him guilty, and he was sentenced to death. Being remanded to

the prison he spent the night in prayer. When the Gens d’armes arrived

the next morning to take him to the place of execution they found him

resigned and courageous. Fortified by his religious sentiments and

conscious innocence, he proclaimed that he preferred death to living

in a society in which every spark of justice was extinguished. The

time was come, he said, when good men should no longer desire to live,

and he would show his fellow-citizens in how calm a manner an innocent

man could die. He refused to get into the cart, and with a steady

step and cheerful countenance, surrounded by the Sbirri of Le Bon and

the miscreants who delight in bloodshed, he walked to the scaffold,

which he mounted with joy. But even in the moment of death the bloody

tyrant continued to torment him, he desired the execution to be delayed

until his women appeared at the window of an opposite house; and when

these unfeeling wretches, with a ferocity which disgraced their sex,

waved their handkerchiefs as a symptom of exultation, the fatal knife

was permitted to fall and the victim released from a world which was

unworthy of him.

[Sidenote: DESCRIPTION OF AMIENS]

I have described this melancholy event in order to contrast it with

Le Bon’s own behaviour at the place of execution. The night before he

suffered excruciating agonies of mind. At intervals he attempted to

destroy himself, but fear and hope withheld his hand. He was heard to

give loud shrieks, yells of rage, disappointment, terror and despair.

When he was brought out of the prison to be seated in the cart, the

shout that rent the air cannot be described--a person who was present

assured me that the howls of cannibals were nothing compared to it.

The populace spat upon him; they asked him, as it was a fine day why

he did not walk to the guillotine, as the priest had done a few weeks

previously, and die like a man? He was goaded with a thousand terrible

questions; and as the procession moved women and children danced in the

streets, clapping their hands, and reproaching him with a number of

bitter recollections.

Le Bon was convulsed with passion, and sometimes he cried; but when

he reached the scaffold he gave a horrible cry, which drew peals of

laughter from the spectators. He had to be lifted out of the cart, fear

had paralysed his strength; during the short period before the knife

descended a hundred mocking voices wished him _bon voyage_ and a

happy meeting with his friends in hell. Thus amidst curses did this

ferocious monster expire.

Amiens exhibits nothing new or interesting since the Revolution. The

shag and plush manufactories and the manufactory of woollen stuffs and

goats’ hair continue, but have suffered severely by the events of the

last ten years. Trade is still dull, but it is hoped it will soon be

rendered more brisk by the return of peace.

On our return to the “Lion d’Or” we were charged seven pounds eight

shillings sterling money of the Kingdom of Great Britain for a supper

in the Republic of France! I ordered horses, resolving never to set

foot again in a house where I had been so egregiously cheated. Just

before I stepped into the carriage Madame Pollet made her appearance

and exclaimed, “Êtes-vous content, monsieur?”

I promised to let my countrymen know what good cheer they might expect

at her house, not forgetting the reasonableness of her charges. I have

now fulfilled my promises.

France in eighteen hundred and two · 第 16 / 173 题