Meanwhile, although Napoleon at the head of nearly 400,000 men was

pressing onward rapidly to Madrid, in a few days to drive the members of

the supreme Junta fugitives to Badajos, the old system of

misrepresentation was kept up. Mr. Frere, the English plenipotentiary,

had been persuaded to share in the illusions of the Junta, and he wrote

peremptory letters, urging Moore to advance, and to rally the Spanish

armies around him behind the Tagus. But news had at length reached Moore

that those Spanish armies did not exist; the national excitement he had

been taught to expect was nowhere visible, and he presently heard that

the capital itself was in the hands of Napoleon. For 25,000 or 30,000

English soldiers to oppose the grand army with Napoleon at its head was

simply ridiculous; their retreat was a matter of necessity. But Moore

determined before retreating to relieve if possible the pressure upon

the south of Spain, by pushing forward against Soult and threatening the

French communications with France. In acting thus he judged that

Napoleon was far more likely to direct his efforts against the English

force than to spend his time in subduing the southern provinces, which

would easily fall into his hands afterwards. He therefore advanced

towards the Carrion river, where Soult had collected his army. The

measure succeeded. Napoleon heard of the advance on the 21st; dismissing

all thought of the Spaniards, he checked the further advance of his

troops, and turned all his attention to crushing the English. On receipt

of the news that Napoleon had left Madrid, Moore, who had been hoping to

strike a blow before the arrival of Napoleon, at once began his retreat.

He was closely followed by Soult, while Napoleon, forcing the passes of

the Guadarama, which were deep in snow, came up from the south upon his

flank. The retreat was attended with great difficulty. Moore's troops

were young, the subordination was not perfect, and the enemy pressed him

close; and at length, on the 1st of January, Napoleon and Soult formed a

junction at Astorga, and their combined army amounted to 70,000 men. In

ten days Napoleon had moved in the depth of winter 50,000 men across 200

miles of hostile country. But Moore's rapidity had spoilt the effect of

even this stupendous march; he had already passed Astorga.

[Sidenote: Napoleon leaves Spain.]

[Sidenote: Moore reaches Corunna. Jan. 10.]

There news reached the Emperor of the approaching declaration of war

from Austria, and he found it necessary to resign the command to Soult.

Some of his troops he took with him; but Soult himself, and Ney, who

supported him, still commanded upwards of 60,000 men, by whom the

pursuit was recommenced. Amid many scenes of disorder the English army

pursued its career towards Vigo, where it was expected that the fleet

would be ready to receive it. But information was brought that the

harbour was not fit for the embarkation of troops. The line of retreat

was therefore changed to Corunna. At Lugo, so close was the pursuit that

Moore thought it necessary to prepare for battle, and the troops, though

they had suffered much and become disorderly in retreat, at once showed

that their spirit was unbroken. To the number of 16,000 they formed

willingly and regularly in array of battle. But as the French did not

attack, and as the supplies would not permit of more than one great

battle, the army being now concentrated and encouraged, Moore marched

off at night, and resumed his course towards the sea. Although the

movement was executed in the midst of a heavy storm, and though so much

disorganization followed that the loss between Lugo and Betangos was

more than in all the former part of the retreat, from thence to Corunna,

the army being collected, marched in good order. As they approached the

port, to their horror they discovered that the fleet had not arrived.

Contrary winds were still detaining it at Vigo, "and the last consuming

exertion made by the army was rendered fruitless." Battle was after all

necessary. Large magazines of arms and ammunition left unappropriated

and undistributed by the Spanish authorities, though their armies were

in desperate want, were found and destroyed. The horses, many of them

already broken down, were put to death. Soult's army, almost as

exhausted by pursuit as Moore's by retreat, did not assemble till the

12th, but it was not till the 14th that the English transports arrived.

The cavalry, who had lost their horses, the sick, and fifty pieces of

artillery, were put on board, and preparations made for covering the

embarkation of the troops. The ridge on which Soult's army was drawn up

overlooked and commanded the position of the English, and some generals

were desirous even then of entering into negotiations to secure the safe

withdrawal of the army. Moore would not hear of it.

[Sidenote: Battle of Corunna. Jan. 16.]

It was determined that upon the evening of the 16th the embarkation

should take place, but about the middle of the day the French army began

the attack. Even in the last hour of retreat the English showed their

strength; the assaults of the French were repulsed on all sides, and

when night closed they were everywhere falling back in confusion. Moore

had fallen in the battle, and the command devolved on Hope. Had he known

that Soult's ammunition was nearly exhausted he would have continued the

strife, and the disaster of the French would have been complete. As it

was, he held it wiser to embark the English army during the night, an

operation which was performed successfully and without confusion. The

loss of the English was estimated at 800, that of the French at between

2000 and 3000. But though, no doubt, the battle of Corunna was an

English victory, it was advantageous only in allowing the army to be

withdrawn, and left the north-west provinces of Spain and the north of

Portugal open to the French. Sir John Moore, whose character as a

soldier had already been acknowledged, decoyed by false hopes and

misled by false information, had yet nobly succeeded in withdrawing for

a time the pressure of the French from the south of Spain, and in the

midst of overwhelming difficulties had saved the British army and closed

his career with a brilliant victory.

[Sidenote: Discouragement of the English ministry.]

[Sidenote: Beresford made commander of the Portuguese army.]

[Sidenote: Wellesley arrives. April 22, 1809.]

The Convention of Cintra and the retreat of Sir John Moore, the

greatness of which was not understood, discouraged the English ministry

with regard to its policy in the Peninsula. The cause of the Spaniards

was however so popular that it was not deemed advisable wholly to desert

them. For three months after the convention Portugal had been left a

prey to its own anarchy, but in December Sir John Cradock was sent out

to command the English troops. The armaments which had been sent to

Cadiz having failed to effect anything there, collected at Lisbon. The

Portuguese were at length wise enough to demand an English general for

their army, and Beresford was sent out to take the command, and thus

something like order was re-established. But Napoleon had commanded the

conquest of Portugal, the troops of Victor threatened it in the valley

of the Tagus, while Soult had entered it from the north and mastered

Oporto. Refusing to act with insufficient troops, and waiting for

reinforcements, Sir John Cradock had wisely taken the position to defend

Lisbon from the advance of Victor, and was stationed at Lumiar and

Sacavem just above Lisbon. It was in this position that Wellesley found

the English army when he came to take the command on the 22nd of April.

With his arrival begins what is properly called the Peninsula War, a war

which, by constantly sapping the strength of Napoleon, by exhibiting the

possibility of his defeat, and by showing him and his rule, in

opposition not to a government, but to a people, was to do more than

anything else to complete his final overthrow.

[Sidenote: Division of opinion in England.]

[Sidenote: Scandal of the Duke of York.]

But the English ministry, even while continuing the war, by no means

regarded it in this light. Their hopes were not unnaturally turned

rather to political coalitions in Europe and to expeditions which

appeared more directly to attack the heart of the French empire.

Moreover, political feeling in England was strongly excited. Though

there was a general desire for the continuation of the war, there was no

unanimity as to the means of carrying it on, or as to the people by whom

it should be carried on. Every disaster was exaggerated for political

purposes, every obstacle thrown in the way of ministerial action. Our

system of party government is not well suited either to great European

combinations (because the open hostility exhibited to the ministry of

necessity gives an appearance of uncertainty to our engagements) or to

the carrying on of war where secresy is necessary, and where reliance

upon those to whom the war is intrusted is required. In domestic affairs

its effect is different, and at this time the Opposition was doing good

service in bringing abuses to light and rendering salutary reforms

necessary. Early in the spring they found grounds for assaulting the

ministry in the conduct of the Duke of York, the commander-in-chief, who

was accused by a certain militia colonel, Wardle by name, of being

influenced by his mistress, Mrs. Clark, in his appointments, while her

favour was said to be procured by money. The scandal excited was great,

and the immoral details of the story were in everybody's mouth. The

inquiry made it evident that Mrs. Clark's influence had been used, but

it was not so clear that the Duke had ever himself acted otherwise than

conscientiously. The majorities in his favour, however, were so small,

that he felt it necessary to resign his office, and Sir David Dundas was

appointed in his place. Before long his accuser was himself sued by a

tradesman for the price of goods with which he had furnished a house for

Mrs. Clark. This gave such an air of malice to the charge, and displayed

Colonel Wardle's desire for purity in so strange a light, that it

greatly lessened the feeling against the Duke, who was before long

restored to his office.

[Sidenote: Charges against Lord Castlereagh, May.]

This quarrel, in addition to the case of Lord Melville, excited

attention as to the general purity of the administration. Considerable

sums of money, amounting to nearly £20,000,000, were unaccounted for.

Nor did a committee of inquiry, though it sent in its report, throw much

light on the matter. But in March the Chancellor of the Exchequer

brought in a Bill to prevent the sale and brokerage of office. Among

other matters, attention was drawn to patronage in India, and Lord

Castlereagh confessed to having purchased a seat in Parliament for a

friend by a gift of an Indian writership. Lord Castlereagh's frank

confession induced the House to resolve that no criminating resolution

was necessary. Again in May a fresh charge was brought involving Lord

Castlereagh and Mr. Perceval also. They were charged with procuring the

election of a certain Mr. Quintin Dick, and of afterwards influencing

his vote. They were acquitted by a large majority. None the less,

Romilly remarks in his Memoirs, "the decision of this night, coupled

with some that had lately taken place, will do more towards disposing

the nation in favour of a parliamentary reform than all the speeches

that have been or will be made in popular assemblies." This question of

parliamentary reform was now again beginning to occupy the public mind.

Though still commanding majorities, the Cabinet was not at one with

itself, and before the year was over the ministry had to be reorganized.

[Sidenote: Opposition to Napoleon in Germany. 1809.]

[Sidenote: Battle of Aspern. May 22, 1809.]

But meanwhile the war was proceeding in its course. The threatening news

from Austria which checked Napoleon in his pursuit of Moore proved true.

The cruelty and injustice of the attack upon Spain, and the spectacle of

a people in revolt, had strongly excited the feelings of Germany.

Earnest men of all ranks had enrolled themselves in the secret society

known as the Tugendbund, which was shortly to show its strength. The

same feeling of hostility to France had shown itself in irresistible

force in Austria, smarting under its repeated disgraces. There the Court

and Government put itself at the head of the movement, and the Archduke

Charles, who was regarded as a military genius, issued a proclamation

declaring that the liberty of Europe rested with the Austrian arms.

There was no regular coalition formed, but Austria felt that it could

rely upon the friendship of England (although still nominally at war

with it), of Prussia, where the popular feeling ran high, and probably

even of Russia. Armies numbering more than 200,000 men were set on foot,

and on the 9th of April Austria declared war against Bavaria, an ally of

France. The generals left in charge of Napoleon's army in Germany

somewhat mistook his orders, and the Archduke succeeded in forming a

partial concentration of his troops and occupying Ratisbon. The arrival

of the Emperor on the field soon changed the face of affairs. A series

of battles was fought; the left wing of Charles's army was separated

from the right, and his forward advance entirely frustrated by defeats

at Abendsberg (April 20), Eckmühl (April 21), and Ratisbon (April 22).

Napoleon again advanced to Vienna. But there he found the Archduke

Charles still fronting him upon the northern side of the Danube, and the

great bridge which crosses the river at Vienna broken down. Near that

city the course of the Danube is divided by an island called Lobau,

about three miles in length. Napoleon constructed bridges at the island,

and brought his army across them into the level called the Marchefeldt

on the northern side. There was fought the great battle of Aspern.

Victory declared for neither party, and Napoleon found himself in an

awkward situation, for the river had risen, and aided by the efforts of

the Austrians, had swept away the bridge, and he was thus cut off from

reinforcements. He contrived to get back to Lobau, and there awaited his

opportunity.

[Sidenote: Revolt of the Tyrolese.]

[Sidenote: Battle of Wagram. July 6, 1809.]

[Sidenote: Peace of Vienna. Oct. 14, 1809.]

His position was indeed precarious. The secret societies had shown

themselves, and a partisan insurrection had broken out under Colonel

Schill and the Duke of Brunswick in Saxony and Westphalia. It was

premature, and without much difficulty suppressed. The Tyrolese too,

headed by Andrew Hofer, an inn-keeper of the valley of Passeyr, had

burst into revolt; 25,000 Bavarians which marched to suppress them had

been beaten back. Again and again in the mountain passes they

encountered and defeated both the French and Bavarian troops. The revolt

was unsuppressed, when Napoleon determined to break from his difficult

position. In July, while pretending to build a massive bridge across the

river, he brought his army rapidly across it on a temporary structure.

The Archduke, who had expected to attack the French while crossing, had

now to fight another pitched battle, and two vast armies, numbering

together between 300,000 and 400,000 men, encountered each other upon

the tableland of Wagram. The French gained a hard-won victory. The

Archduke was pursued to Zmaim, in Moravia, and there an armistice was

made which ripened subsequently into the Peace of Vienna, signed on the

14th of October, by which fresh territory was torn from Austria for the

advantage of Bavaria, France, and Russia; the kingdom of Spain was

recognized; the insurgents of the Tyrol deserted, and a further pledge

for the maintenance of the Continental System given. The close of the

year was marked by a still further act of wickedness on the part of

Napoleon, and a stronger proof of how completely he had deserted the

principles of the Revolution. On the 6th of December he divorced his

wife Josephine, and entered into negotiations, which were completed the

following year, for his marriage with Maria Louisa, an Austrian

princess.

[Sidenote: The Walcheren expedition. July 1809.]

[Sidenote: Flushing taken. Aug. 15.]

The armistice of Zmaim was entered into on the 12th of July. On the 27th

of that month, the very day on which the news of the armistice reached

England, a great expedition left for the mouth of the Scheldt, for the

English ministry had not deceived the hopes of the Austrians, and were

determined to undertake what they hoped would prove a diversion in their

favour. For this purpose all the strength of England was to be employed.

40,000 soldiers were to be carried across in 400 transports under the

charge of no less than 245 ships of war. Yet, great as was the effort,

the commonest precautions were neglected. Although it was well known

that the climate of the islands at the mouth of the Scheldt was

pestiferous, the medical officers were not consulted, none of the proper

medicines were sent, and the force was accompanied, in spite of the

protest of the surgeon-general, by only one hospital ship. Moreover, the

pomp and publicity with which the expedition, which was intended to be

secret, was prepared deprived it of much of its value; and lastly, Court

and ministerial favour secured the command for Lord Chatham,

Master-General of the Ordnance, a man wholly unfitted for an important

command. At length, after much delay caused by the want of harmony

between the two branches of the service, the fleet set sail. It was the

opinion of the best officers of the army that Antwerp might have been at

once secured by a _coup de main_, yet it was determined to proceed more

regularly and with deliberation; and Flushing (which, as the dykes had

been cut, was regarded as impregnable) was taken in two days after the

arrangements for the attack had been completed. It was not till the 21st

of August that Lord Chatham began to think of moving towards Antwerp.

But, as by that time the enemy's squadron had been withdrawn up the

river to the city, and the intermediate fortresses had been so

strengthened as to render the advance difficult, absolutely nothing

further was even attempted. The army was kept lying in the

plague-stricken swamps of Walcheren. Fever began to make fearful

ravages. On the 29th Chatham wrote home that he could do no more--that

already 3000 of the troops were sick. By September 11,000 men were

stricken, and the great bulk of the army was ordered home. Lord Chatham,

taking with him as many of the sick as he could, accompanied it. 15,000

men were left to occupy the island. Though the fever still spread with

fearful rapidity, the only remedy supplied was a quantity of Thames

water, which was constantly sent out. The roofs of the huts had fallen

in, the men were removed to the churches, and the churches proved damp

and worse than the roofless huts. At last 100 bricklayers were sent from

England to repair the huts; the bricklayers were speedily themselves in

hospital. The death rate was now 200 or 300 a week; and so terrible was

the effect of the fever, that before the next June, of the 40,000 troops

sent out 35,000 had been in hospital. Nor did this great folly produce

the smallest effect on the general war. Even had the expedition not been

so delayed that the Austrian armistice was already signed when it

sailed, it could have done no good. Napoleon himself wrote of it,

"Before six weeks, of the 15,000 troops which are in the Isle of

Walcheren not 1500 will be left, the rest will be in hospital. The

expedition has been undertaken under false expectations and planned in

ignorance."

[Sidenote: Wellesley victorious in Portugal.]

While wasting their strength in this idle display, the ministry were

being taught, had they been willing to learn, where English forces might

have been wisely employed. In Portugal, Wellesley, on taking the

command, had marched against Soult in the north, had brought his army

across the Douro in face of the French, who were occupying Oporto, had

recaptured that city, and driven Soult to a desperate retreat. By

extraordinary vigour and good fortune, Soult, though there were traitors

in his camp, contrived to extricate his army, but Portugal was free. And

Wellesley, victorious in the north, and deceived by the constant false

information of the Spaniards as to the weakness of his enemies,

determined to turn his arms against the other French army which was

threatening Portugal in the valley of the Tagus. He was there to act

with the Spanish army under Cuesta, an old man of crabbed temper and of

great self-conceit. Victor's army fell back before the advancing English

from Talavera behind the Alberche river.

[Sidenote: Wellesley marches towards Madrid.]

By this march Madrid was threatened, and Joseph collected for its

defence the troops of Victor, Sebastiani, and his own guard, amounting

to about 50,000 men. As Wellesley had with him less than 20,000 English

troops, and as he could place no reliance upon the Spaniards of Cuesta

though they were nearly 40,000 in number, it was a bold resolve to march

against Victor. But Wellesley was ignorant of the extreme danger of his

movement. Constantly misinformed by the Spaniards, he believed Soult's

army in Castile and the plain of the Douro to consist of about 15,000

men; in reality it was more than 50,000 strong. With these it was

possible, collecting them at Salamanca, to cross the mountains

separating the plains of the Douro and the Tagus, to pass between

Wellesley's troops and Portugal, and thus placing him between two

armies, each virtually superior to his own, entirely ruin him. Ignorant

as yet of the character of the Spaniards, Wellesley could not believe

that he should be kept uninformed, nor could he believe that the Spanish

troops supplied to occupy the passes of the mountains, and restrain, or

at least check, Soult's movements, would give ground without striking a

blow; nor, before entering on his enterprise, could he have conceived

that his army would have been systematically kept without food. It is

nevertheless true that the greatest difficulty was found in procuring

rations, which often consisted merely of a few handfuls of grain, while

the Spanish troops were very fairly fed. Victor and the King had taken

up a position beyond the Alberche stream, a little river flowing from

the north into the Tagus above Talavera. Beyond that stream, Wellesley,

when he found how he was treated, positively refused to move. Beginning

to appreciate the character of the Spanish troops, he urged Cuesta not

to venture on a forward movement without him; but the obstinate old man

persisting in passing the Alberche, was roughly handled by Victor, and

only saved from the consequences of his rashness by English assistance.

[Sidenote: Battle of Talavera. July 28, 1809.]

A History of England, Period III. Constitutional Monarchy · 第 55 / 78 段