When England engaged in the war a campaign had already been fought to

the entire disadvantage of the allies. The close of the year 1792 had

seen the retirement of the allies from French soil, the battle of

Jemmappes, and the occupation of Belgium and Savoy. The accession of

England, Spain and Holland to the coalition so far invigorated it that

its members believed that a campaign of a few months would complete

their work; for dangers surrounded the French Convention on all sides.

Dumouriez, a member of the Girondin party, displeased with the conduct

of the Jacobin Convention, was meditating defection; the excesses of the

governing party in Paris had aroused all the slumbering loyalty of

France; La Vendée was in arms for constitutional monarchy and the

Catholic religion; and both at Lyons and Toulon the reaction was for the

moment triumphant. Dumouriez' treason had an immediate effect. Directly

upon the declaration of war he invaded Holland, but seeking rather

popularity with his army and the prestige of victory than the success of

the plans of Government, he turned aside from Holland, and risked a

battle at Neerwinden on the Gheet, in which he suffered a complete

defeat from the Prince of Saxe-Coburg; and thus as a defeated general,

and without his army, he gave himself up to the Austrians. His defeat

and defection allowed the allies to advance along the whole frontier.

But their movements were dilatory; instead of marching upon Paris they

wasted their time in taking Mayence, Condé, and Valenciennes; they even

committed the mistake of binding the captured troops to refrain from war

only against themselves; they were therefore available to suppress the

insurrection in La Vendée, and the troops hitherto employed there could

be sent to the eastern frontier. The same want of energy continually

marked the progress of the allies. The Prussians and Austrians were in

fact too jealous of each other, and too much bent upon their interests

nearer home to act with vigour. Time was again wasted in sieges. While

the Austrians sat down before Cambrai, the Duke of York with the English

troops besieged Dunkirk. Their communications were kept open by the

Dutch at Menin and Hoondschoote. But the French army, under the vigorous

management of the Jacobins, and guided by the military genius of Carnot,

was no longer to be trifled with; Houchard fell upon the weak position

of the Dutch, and York was driven to a disastrous defeat with the loss

of all his artillery. The success was indeed only momentary; a panic

seized the French troops, and they fell back to Lille, thus affording

the allies an opportunity of advancing to the attack of the fortress of

Maubeuge, which closed the road to Paris; but Jourdan, who had succeeded

Houchard, now put in practice Carnot's principles. Hastily gathering

50,000 men, he fell upon half that number of Austrians, and completely

defeated them at Wattigny. Success had also attended the French against

the Prussians on the Upper Rhine. There, too, the terrible rigour of the

new Government had restored the aspect of affairs. St. Just and Lebas

had appeared as conventional commissioners in Alsace, bringing terror

with them. The beaten armies were supplied and organized. Two young

generals of the revolutionary school, Hoche and Pichegru, were placed in

command, and the tide of victory was turned; the Prussians had to fall

back, compromising the advanced position of the Austrians, and before

the close of the year the French army, which had begun the campaign with

a series of disasters, found itself victorious along the whole frontier

line.

[Sidenote: and against the royalists in France.]

The Convention had also been successful in its wars in the interior of

France. After six weeks of bombardment, on the 9th of October, Lyons

yielded, without conditions, to be given up to the fearful cruelty of

Collot d'Herbois; and the victorious troops hurried southwards to

besiege Toulon, which had placed itself in the hands of the English, and

had admitted the allied fleet to its roadstead. The genius of Bonaparte

is said to have secured its capture. He saw that one fort called the

Equilette commanded the roadstead, and that its possession would oblige

the English, who were the soul of the defence, to withdraw. The capture

of the fort answered his expectation; Lord Hood, without making terms

for the inhabitants, collected such of the royalists as could crowd on

board his ships, and sailed away, having first set fire to all the

stores, and to forty ships of war which were in the harbour (Aug. 27,

1793). The insurrection of La Vendée had also been suppressed. Intrusted

at first to ignorant men, with no claim to command except the strength

of their revolutionary principles, the Convention troops had been

everywhere defeated. But when Kleber was put in practical command the

course of victory changed. Terribly defeated, and with all their chiefs

of importance mortally wounded, the insurgents determined to try the

fortune of war upon the other side of the Loire. They marched northwards

towards Laval, defeated their pursuers, and had they made common cause

with the Bretons might still have been successful. But trusting to help

from England, which never came, they undertook a fruitless assault upon

Granville in Normandy. Thinking themselves betrayed, and longing for

their homes, the ill-organized mass of peasants insisted on being led

southwards: even then there was some life in them. They defeated the

republican General Rossignol and threw him back upon Rennes; but failing

in an attack upon Angers, they marched pointlessly towards Le Mans. They

were there received with terrible slaughter by Westermann, Kleber and

Marçeau; 18,000 men, women and children were killed, and the rest fled,

pursued by the pitiless Westermann. The fugitives reached the Loire,

fought one final battle at Savenay near its mouth, where they were all,

with the exception of some eight or ten thousand men, either put to

death or captured.

[Sidenote: Pitt's difficulty in keeping up the coalition.]

Thus revolutionary France had proved itself no contemptible enemy to the

united troops of Europe, and established its rule unquestioned in

France. It was plain that all hope of an easy subjugation of France was

over, and it was with the greatest difficulty that Pitt was able to keep

the coalition together; the eyes of Prussia were eagerly bent upon

Poland, an easier prey than France. Of increase of territory England had

no hope; the war had been forced on her, and was honestly a war of

opinion. But any cessation of her efforts would have placed her in a

worse position than when the war began, and Pitt and the upper classes

of England were not blind to the fact that the occupation of the

continental nations in the great war afforded England immense advantages

both at sea and in the colonies; it was worth making great efforts to

gain the undisputed mastery of the sea both in commerce and in arms. Nor

did the large sums of money, raised chiefly by way of loan, appear so

ruinous as they really were. The effect of large loans is to increase

the wealth of the capitalist at the expense of the working man; nor, as

the chief weight of the accumulating taxation falls on posterity, does

it become immediately evident. Thus supplied with almost unlimited

means, Pitt succeeded in keeping up the coalition, taking into English

pay, it is almost true to say, the whole of the Prussian army, and doing

nearly as much for the Austrians.

[Sidenote: Continued success of the French in 1794.]

[Sidenote: The French capture Amsterdam and the Dutch fleet. 1795.]

Pitt's energy was equalled by that of France, and the Convention had the

additional advantage of being free from constitutional rules. Vast

conscriptions filled their armies, forced requisitions supplied them

with arms and equipments. It was with the army of the North, 160,000

strong, under Pichegru, that the English had most to do. On each side

the armies were divided into three divisions, and the duty of marching

with 100,000 men on Paris was intrusted to Coburg. Defeated in the

centre, the French had met with unexpected success on the left,

Clairfait, the Austrian general, having been twice beaten at Moucron and

at Courtray. Upon this, Pichegru almost destroyed his centre to

strengthen his wings, and the threefold manœuvres became twofold. The

key of the campaign was the possession of the Sambre; the Austrians lay

in an advancing angle with their left upon that river from Mons to

Charleroi. If the French could cross the Sambre they would be virtually

in the rear of the Austrians. To this point, therefore, the

Commissioners of the Convention, St. Just and Lebas, repaired, and

attempted to inspire the troops with something of their own enthusiasm.

Again and again the French were driven back. But Carnot's plan of

massing troops was at length employed; the greater part of the army,

which under Jourdan had been facing the Prussians on the Moselle, was

turned northward, and Jourdan took command of 100,000, well known as the

army of the Sambre and Meuse, just as the Commissioners had been driven

back for the fifth time behind the river. After a sixth failure, the

Commissioners insisting upon a seventh effort, the river was

successfully crossed, and on the heights of Fleurus a battle was fought

in which, though it was not completed, the Austrians were practically

defeated. Step by step the English and the Austrians retired, the one

towards Holland, the other towards the Rhine. By July the English were

behind Breda, the Austrians beyond the Meuse. Want of supplies checked

the French advance for a few weeks, but by October the English were

driven into the corner between the Yssel and the Rhine, and the army of

the Sambre and Meuse had captured Cologne and Coblenz. The occupation of

Belgium by the French compelled the Prussians further south also to fall

behind the Rhine, the left bank of which was thus in possession of the

French army from Basle to the sea. Even south of that point successes

had been won. The Sardinian position of Saorgio had been turned, and the

passes of the Alps were opened to the French, who were thus in a

position to invade Italy on the one hand and Holland on the other. The

lateness of the season, and the wretched state of the equipment and

commissariat, might have induced the French to be satisfied with these

conquests, and few armies would have thought of facing an unusually

severe winter shoeless and in rags, for to such a plight had the bad

management of the Revolutionary Government brought them. But to this

army of enthusiasts the winter was but a useful ally for the conquest of

Holland, where a strong feeling in their favour already existed among

that large section of the people, who had seen with anger their

attempted Revolution of 1787 suppressed by the arms of Prussia, and to

whom the Government of the Stadtholder was very distasteful. The failure

of the preceding campaign had obliged Pitt to insist upon the recall of

the Duke of York, much to the King's displeasure, and Pichegru now found

himself opposed to General Walmoden, the Hanoverian commander. But of

opposition there was really none. The lines of the three great rivers,

the Meuse, the Waal and the Lech, were abandoned without a fight, and

crossed by the French, either upon the ice or by means of pontoons; and

finally Walmoden left Holland to its fate, and retreated across the

Yssel and the Ems to embark his army safely in Bremen. The Stadtholder

had already fled from the Hague and taken refuge in England. Amsterdam

was occupied by the French without difficulty, the ragged regiments

waiting patiently in the bitter snow in the streets of the rich city

till their quarters were arranged for them without the least attempt at

disorder. A striking finish was put to the campaign by the capture of

the Dutch fleet in the Texel. The ships were ice-bound, and fell into

the hands of a regiment of cavalry, who galloped across the ice to

secure them. Holland was at once erected into a republic upon the French

model.

[Sidenote: Indirect advantages gained by England.]

[Sidenote: Defeat of the French fleet. June 1, 1794.]

But in spite of these continual reverses of the allies, in spite of the

perpetual failure of the British arms in the Low Countries, Pitt had not

been mistaken in the indirect advantages which the war would give him.

The conflagration at Toulon had inflicted an almost irreparable loss

upon the French fleet. In Corsica the veteran patriot Paoli had aroused

the feeling of his countrymen against France. Nelson and Hood, with 1000

British soldiers serving as marines in their ships, had taken Bastia,

which was regarded as almost impregnable, and the people of Corsica had

begged King George to accept their crown. While thus in the

Mediterranean English supremacy had been established, a still greater

success had attended her fleet off the coast of France. By immense

exertions a powerful and well-equipped fleet of twenty-six ships had

been assembled by Bon St. André and placed under the command of Villaret

Joyeuse. It left the harbour of Brest for the purpose of convoying a

large fleet laden with flour from America. The English Channel fleet,

under Lord Howe, sailed to meet it. In number of ships and weight of

metal the English fleet was somewhat inferior, but the Revolution had

stripped the French marine of its best officers, who had habitually been

supplied by Brittany, now royalist in its tendencies. Bon St. André,

originally a Calvinistic clergyman, had all the fearful energy belonging

to the Conventional Commissioners, but little of the skill of a seaman,

yet he frequently overruled the commands of Villaret Joyeuse. Thus, when

the fleets met upon the 1st of June, the French were unable to prevent

Admiral Howe from repeating Rodney's well-known manœuvre of breaking

the line. The defeat of the French was complete; several ships went

down, and five line of battle-ships remained as English prizes.

[Sidenote: Prussia, Spain and Holland leave the coalition.]

Upon the Continent, however, success had been wholly on the side of the

French; the campaign of 1794 and the winter of 1795 had added Belgium,

Holland, the left bank of the Rhine, part of Piedmont, Catalonia, and

Navarre, to their dominions. The coalition began at once to fall to

pieces. As it was plain that there was no further hope of a military

promenade to Paris or of territory to be gained at an easy price, the

King of Prussia, who had been only kept up to the mark by enormous

subsidies from England, made his peace with the French. It was the

pressure of England alone which had driven Spain and Holland into the

war. Although Pitt had procured a change of ministry in Spain in

accordance with his own views, and the substitution of Godoy for

Miranda, the Spanish Government now awoke to its true interests. All the

advantages of a maritime war of necessity fell to the lot of the

English, and Spain saw herself aiding in the destruction of the only

efficient rival to the English upon the sea, and thus in fact rendering

certain her own insignificance on that element. The Spanish Government

was therefore willing to treat. Holland, completely conquered, and with

half its population preferring the French rule to that of the Prince of

Orange, who had been forced upon the country, obtained peace by giving

up its chief fortresses, paying a large indemnity, and making an

offensive alliance with France against England, by which thirty ships of

war were placed at the disposal of the French. Many of the smaller

states both of Germany and Italy declared themselves neutral. England

was thus practically left without allies, with the single exception of

Austria, which was only induced to continue its engagements by a subsidy

of four millions and a half. This series of treaties was completed in

the course of the year 1795, chiefly by Barthélemy at Basle; the treaty

with Tuscany, Feb. 9; with Holland [at the Hague], May 15; with Prussia,

April 5; and with Spain, July 14.

The campaign of the following year, 1795, was confined to the Rhine,

where Pichegru commanded the army of the Rhine and Moselle, Jourdan that

of the Sambre and Meuse. Pichegru was meditating treachery, and lay idle

opposite the Black Forest till the advance of Jourdan from the North to

co-operate with him for the purpose of retaking Mayence forced him into

action. He took Mannheim, and might have taken Heidelberg, but he

wilfully resigned this advantage, and fell back in disorder upon the

lines of Weissembourg, where he signed an armistice with the Austrians

preparatory to joining them. His retreat had compelled that of Jourdan

also.

[Sidenote: Insurrection of La Vendée.]

The English meanwhile had engaged in a lukewarm way in an expedition

which, had it been carried out with vigour, might have changed the face

of affairs. After the great destruction of the Vendéan army at Savenay,

the war continued to smoulder both in La Vendée itself and in Brittany.

But north of the Loire it assumed a somewhat different character; the

open, simple and heroic devotion of the Vendéan peasantry, who had

followed their priests, gentry, and leaders of their own rank to battle,

was wanting, and the hostilities of Brittany assumed rather the form of

brigandage than warfare. The country was infested with small bands, who

kept up connection with one another by means of private signals, but who

seldom appeared in large numbers, and worked chiefly by night-surprises

and by rapid and secret cutting off of detached posts. The chief man of

the Chouans, as the Breton insurgents were called, was Cormatin. But

certain men of higher rank were also among them; the chief of these was

Count Joseph de Puisaye, a man of considerable energy and ability, who

had been a member of the National Assembly. De Puisaye saw that

irregular warfare could produce but little effect, and desired to obtain

assistance from England, where the Government was supposed to be ready

to assist any endeavour against the French Republic; an impression kept

alive by the rumours, probably much exaggerated, spread by agents who

were constantly passing and repassing through the Channel Islands

between France and England.

[Sidenote: Expedition from England planned.]

[Sidenote: Destruction of the expedition to Quiberon.]

In the autumn of 1794 De Puisaye betook himself to England and laid his

plans before Pitt. It was suggested that 10,000 British troops should be

joined with the corps of emigrants, and should land in Brittany and

seize Rennes, and thence push forward at once over Normandy, Maine and

Poitou. It was thought advisable that a prince of the blood should

either accompany the expedition or shortly appear upon the scene, and

the Count of Artois was selected for the purpose. Lord Moira, favourably

known in the American War as Lord Rawdon, was to take command of the

English troops. But though speed and secresy were of the first

necessity, the expedition hung fire, and news of it reached the ears of

the French Government. The reason for this delay was partly jealousy and

disunion among the emigrants themselves, partly Pitt's mistrust of the

readiness of the French to join him, and his knowledge of the danger of

relying on the assertions of sanguine exiles, and partly the discovery

of the feeling existing among the royalists themselves in La Vendée and

Brittany against the introduction of any large foreign army; for the

belief seems to have been prevalent that Pitt's objects were selfish,

and that an English army would be rather a danger than an assistance. It

is at all events certain that the royalists in Paris, in their dislike

that the reaction should be brought about by any means but their own,

did their best to injure the expedition. The consequences of the delay

were serious. In spite of considerable sums of money sent from England,

and a good deal more much cheaper money, consisting of forged assignats,

which were exported largely, in the spring of 1795 the skill of Hoche

and Canclaux, the generals opposed to the insurgents, and the very

favourable terms offered by the Convention, induced the chiefs both of

the Vendéans and of the Chouans to accept an amnesty. The terms offered

were certainly unusually tempting. A large indemnity of several millions

of francs was to be given to the people to repay them for their losses;

the houses that had been burnt were to be rebuilt; ten millions were to

be given to the chiefs to take up the bonds that had been issued in

their names during the insurrection; Charette was to be allowed to keep

up 2000 men in the pay of the Government, freedom of religion was to be

granted, and there were to be no requisitions in La Vendée for five

years. The agreement was made as solemn as possible. The first to accept

it was Charette, with whom the treaty was signed with great pomp in the

city of Nantes in February. Subsequently, in April, Stofflet gave in his

adhesion to the same arrangement, and finally the Chouans did the same.

It seemed a proof of their sincerity that they gave up into the hands of

the Commissioner of the Convention nearly a million of forged assignats,

which they had received from the English fleet round the coast; but on

the part of the insurgents it appears that this treaty was illusory,

forced upon them by the delay of the English. It was used however as an

additional ground for refusing large assistance, and it was an army of

emigrants only, with a considerable quantity of stores and money, which

in July of 1795 at length set sail from England. Even then the plan of

De Puisaye was overruled for the worse. For the sake of a good roadstead

for the English fleet, it was arranged that the landing should be upon

the peninsula of Quiberon, close to Carnac, instead of in the north of

Brittany; and again, apparently in mistrust of De Puisaye's partisan

system of warfare, it was thought necessary to give him as second in

command a royalist emigrant of the name of D'Hervilly, a red tape

soldier, who had displayed considerable courage on the 10th of August,

but who was a very bad man for the present irregular warfare. It even

seemed doubtful whether his authority did not supersede De Puisaye's,

and after Quiberon was reached, it was thought necessary to send an

appeal to England to settle this weighty question. Meanwhile, after two

days of delay, the troops were landed at Carnac. They were received with

an enthusiasm so riotous and irregular, that the commander's love of

discipline received a severe shock, and he ceased to trust his wild

allies. However, in three days they were joined by some 10,000 men, and

De Puisaye was eager to rush forward and raise the whole of the

neighbouring country, but the answer from England had not yet been

received, and the troops waited on in inactivity. At length something

was done. A small fort called Port Penthièvre covers the little isthmus

which joins the peninsula of Quiberon to the shore. D'Hervilly proceeded

to bring up all his artillery, but before his operations were completed,

De Puisaye and a few hundred Chouans had gained possession of the place

without difficulty. With his regular troops in the peninsula and holding

the fort, and with his Chouans spread along the mainland, De Puisaye was

compelled to remain inactive. All the jealousies which existed among the

royalists burst out, and even worse than that, time was allowed for

General Hoche to increase his 5000 troops, which might easily have been

routed, to double that number. He suddenly attacked the invaders, and

drove the whole mass, Chouans, emigrants, and all, to the narrow

confined peninsula. Their efforts to break loose were unavailing; fresh

emigrant troops under Sombreuil came from England. De Puisaye's

authority was confirmed, but it was too late. Some republican troops

taken in Fort Penthièvre had been admitted to the emigrant ranks. They

entered into treacherous correspondence with Hoche's army, and by their

assistance the fort was recaptured. The exit from their peninsula was

thus entirely closed to them, the enemy's cannon was placed along the

corresponding shore, and swept the isthmus and the roadstead, while the

republican troops, advancing from the fort, drove the invaders backward

into the corner of the tongue of land. They were literally driven into

the sea. The scene was a fearful one. Many in despair threw themselves

upon their own swords, many tried to reach the boats of the fleet, and

were a ready mark for the republican musketry. Some thought themselves

fortunate in reaching fishing-boats which were hovering about the coast,

but in zeal for their own preservation the boatmen lopped off their

hands and suffered them to sink. Some 900, with De Puisaye at their

head, reached the English squadron and were saved. About 700, under De

Sombreuil, made, as they thought, terms with General Humbert, but the

conditions were only verbal, and included, as the French asserted

probably with truth, a reference to the Convention. The reactionaries in

power were glad of the chance of freeing themselves of the charge of

favouring the royalists. Orders were given that the law against

emigrants taken in arms should be carried out to the letter. The

prisoners were brought out in batches and shot upon the seashore till

700 of them had been killed. After this the fate of the insurgents was

sealed. In the following year (1796) the Count of Artois again appeared

upon the coast, and Charette and Stofflet were again in arms, but the

Count of Artois was content to remain in idleness at L'Ile Dieu, and

Hoche succeeded in the difficult work of at once conquering and

conciliating all that remained of the insurrection. Charette and

Stofflet were both captured and shot.

[Sidenote: Confidence of the English in Pitt.]

A History of England, Period III. Constitutional Monarchy · 第 41 / 78 段