REPLY TO MINISTER GREY.

Made by J. Ramsay Macdonald, Member of Socialist Labor Party, in House

of Commons, Aug. 4.

I would have preferred to remain silent this afternoon, but

circumstances do not permit of it. I shall model what I have to say

upon the two speeches to which we have just listened. The right

honorable gentleman has delivered a speech the echoes of which will go

down in history. However much we may resist the conclusions to which we

have come, we have not been able to resist the moving character of his

appeal ["Hear, hear!"]

I think, however, he is wrong, and I think the Government for which he

speaks is wrong. I think the verdict of history will be that they are

wrong.

The effect of the right honorable gentleman's speech in this House will

not be its final effect. There may or may not be opportunities for us to

go into details, but I want to say to the House, and without

provocation, that if the right honorable gentleman had come here today

and told us that our country was in danger, then I do not care what

party he appealed to or to what class, we would be behind him. We would

vote him what money he wants, and we would go further, for we would

offer him ourselves--if the country was in danger. [Cries of "But it

is!"] He has not persuaded me that it is, and he has not persuaded

honorable friends with me that it is.

I am perfectly certain that when the light honorable gentleman's speech

gets into cold print tomorrow he will not persuade a large section of

the country. If the nation's honor were in danger we would be with them.

There has been no crime committed by statesmen of this character without

those statesmen appealing to the nation's honor.

We went into the Crimean war because of our honor; we rushed into the

South African war because of our honor, and the right honorable

gentleman is appealing to us today because of our honor.

If the right honorable gentleman would come to us and say that a small

European nationality like Belgium is in danger [cries of "It is

invaded!"] and would assure us that he is going to confine the conflict

to that quarter, then we will support him. But what is the use of

talking about going to the aid of Belgium when you are really going

into a European war which will not leave the map of Europe as it was

before.

The right honorable gentleman said nothing about Russia. We want to know

about that and try and find out what is going to happen after this is

all over. We are not going to go blindly into this conflict without

having at least some rough idea of what is going to happen afterward.

At all events, so far as France is concerned, we can say solemnly and

definitely that no such friendship as is described by the right

honorable gentleman between one nation and another can ever justify one

of those nations going into war on behalf of the other.

If France is really in danger, if as the result of all this we are going

to have the power, civilization and genius of France removed in European

history, let the right honorable gentleman say so. It is an absolutely

impossible conception.

So far as we are concerned, whatever attacks may be made upon us,

whatever may be said about us, we will take the action that he will take

by saying that this country ought to have remained neutral [Labor

cheers] because in the deepest parts of our hearts we believe that that

was right and that that alone was consistent with the honor of the

country and the traditions of the party that are now in office.

* * * * *

New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2 Who Began the War, and Why? · 第 210 / 211 题