D. Dryander, Ober-Hof-und Domprediger, Berlin.

Dr. Freiherr von der Goltz, Generalfeldmarschall, Berlin.

Von Gwinner, Direktor der Deutschen Bank, Berlin.

Prof. Dr. von Harnack, Berlin.

Fürst von Hatzfeldt, Herzog zu Trachenberg.

Dr. Heineken, Direktor des Norddeutschen Lloyds, Bremen.

Fürst Henckel von Donnersmarck.

Dr. Kaempf, Praesident des Reichstags, Berlin.

Prof. Dr. Eugen Kühnemann, Breslau.

Prof. Dr. Lamprecht, Leipsic.

Dr. Theodor Lewald, Direktor im Reichsamt des Innern, Berlin.

Franz von Mendelssohn, Praesident der Handelskammer, Berlin.

Fürst Münster-Derneburg, Mitglied des Herrenhauses.

Graf von Oppersdorff, Mitglied des Herrenhauses und des Reichstags,

Berlin.

Graf von Posadowsky-Wehner.

Dr. Walther Rathenau, Berlin.

Viktor Herzog von Ratibor.

Dr. Schmidt, Ministerialdirektor, Berlin.

Prof. Dr. von Schmoller, Berlin.

Graf von Schwerin-Löwitz, Praesident des Hauses der Abgeordneten.

Wilhelm von Siemens, Berlin.

Friedrich Fürst zu Solms-Baruth.

Max Warburg, Hamburg.

Siegfried Wagner, Baireuth.

* * * * *

Try to realize, every one of you, what we are going through! Only a few

weeks ago all of us were peacefully following our several vocations. The

peasant was gathering in this Summer's plentiful crop, the factory hand

was working with accustomed vigor. Not one human being among us dreamed

of war. We are a nation that wishes to lead a quiet and industrious

life. This need hardly be stated to you Americans. You, of all others,

know the temper of the German who lives within your gates. Our love of

peace is so strong that it is not regarded by us in the light of a

virtue, we simply know it to be an inborn and integral portion of

ourselves. Since the foundation of the German Empire in the year 1871,

we, living in the centre of Europe, have given an example of

tranquillity and peace, never once seeking to profit by any momentary

difficulties of our neighbors. Our commercial extension, our financial

rise in the world, is far removed from any love of adventure, it is the

fruit of painstaking and plodding labor.

We are not credited with this temper, because we are insufficiently

known. Our situation and our way of thinking are not easily grasped.

Every one is aware that we have produced great philosophers and poets,

we have preached the gospel of humanity with impassioned zeal. America

fully appreciates Goethe and Kant, looks upon them as cornerstones of

elevated culture. Do you really believe that we have changed our

natures, that our souls can be satisfied with military drill and servile

obedience? We are soldiers because we have to be soldiers, because

otherwise Germany and German civilization would be swept away from the

face of the earth. It has cost us long and weary struggles to attain our

independence, and we know full well that, in order to preserve it, we

must not content ourselves with building schools and factories, we must

look to our garrisons and forts. We and all our soldiers have remained,

however, the same lovers of music and lovers of exalted thought. We have

retained our old devotion to all peaceable sciences and arts; as all the

world knows, we work in the foremost rank of all those who strive to

advance the exchange of commodities, who further useful technical

knowledge. But we have been forced to become a nation of soldiers in

order to be free. And we are bound to follow our Kaiser, because he

symbolizes and represents the unity of our nation. Today, knowing no

distinction of party, no difference of opinion, we rally around him,

willing to shed the last drop of our blood. For though it takes a great

deal to rouse us Germans, when once aroused our feelings run deep and

strong. Every one is filled with this passion, with the soldier's ardor.

But when the waters of the deluge shall have subsided, gladly will we

return to the plow and to the anvil.

It deeply distresses us to see two highly civilized nations, England and

France, joining the onslaught of autocratic Russia. That this could

happen will remain one of the anomalies of history. It is not our fault;

we firmly believed in the desirability of the great nations working

together, we peaceably came to terms with France and England in sundry

difficult African questions. There was no cause for war between Western

Europe and us, no reason why Western Europe should feel itself

constrained to further the power of the Czar.

The Czar, as an individual, is most certainly not the instigator of the

unspeakable horrors that are now inundating Europe. But he bears before

God and posterity the responsibility of having allowed himself to be

terrorized by an unscrupulous military clique.

Ever since the weight of the crown has pressed upon him, he has been the

tool of others. He did not desire the brutalities in Finland, he did not

approve of the iniquities of the Jewish pogroms, but his hand was too

weak to stop the fury of the reactionary party. Why would he not permit

Austria to pacify her southern frontier? It was inconceivable that

Austria should calmly see her heir apparent murdered. How could she? All

the nationalities under her rule realized the impossibility of tamely

allowing Servia's only too evident and successful intrigues to be

carried on under her very eyes. The Austrians could not allow their

venerable and sorely stricken monarch to be wounded and insulted any

longer. This reasonable and honorable sentiment on the part of Austria

has caused Russia to put itself forward as the patron of Servia, as the

enemy of European thought and civilization.

Russia has an important mission to fulfill in its own country and in

Asia. It would do better in its own interest to leave the rest of the

world in peace. But the die is cast, and all nations must decide whether

they wish to further us by sentiments and by deeds, or the government of

the Czar. This is the real significance of this appalling struggle, all

the rest is immaterial. Russia's attitude alone has forced us to go to

war with France and with their great ally.

The German Nation is serious and conscientious. Never would a German

Government dare to contemplate a war for the sake of dynastic interest,

or for the sake of glory. This would be against the entire bent of our

character. Firmly believing in the justice of our cause, all parties,

the Conservatives and the Clericals, the Liberals and the Socialists,

have joined hands. All disputes are forgotten, one duty exists for all,

the duty of defending our country and vanquishing the enemy.

Will not this calm, self-reliant and unanimous readiness to sacrifice

all, to die or to win, appeal to other nations and force them to

understand our real character and the situation in which we are placed?

The war has severed us from the rest of the world, all our cable

communications are destroyed. But the winds will carry the mighty voice

of justice even across the ocean. We trust in God, we have confidence in

the judgment of right-minded men. And through the roar of battle, we

call to you all. Do not believe the mischievous lies that our enemies

are spreading about! We do not know if victory will be ours, the Lord

alone knows. We have not chosen our path, we must continue doing our

duty, even to the very end. We bear the misery of war, the death of our

sons, believing in Germany, believing in duty.

And we know that Germany cannot be wiped from the face of the earth.

* * * * *

[05]

"Athenwood," Newport, R.I.,

Sept. 17, 1914.

Today I have received from Germany a pamphlet entitled "Truth About

Germany, Facts About the War." The correctness and completeness of

its statements are vouched for by thirty-four persons, whose names

are recorded therein as members of an Honorary Committee. I know

personally seventeen of these thirty-four persons, and have known

them for years, some of them intimately. With six of them I have

labored as a colleague in university work. I have been introduced

into their homes, have broken bread at their tables and have

conversed with them long and often upon the problems of life and

culture. They are among the greatest thinkers, moralists and

philanthropists of the age. They are the salt of the earth! The

great theologian Harnack, the sound and accomplished political

scientist and economist von Schmoller, the distinguished

philologian von Wilamowitz, the well-known historian Lamprecht, the

profound statesman von Posadowsky, the brilliant diplomatist von

Bülow, the great financier von Gwinner, the great promoter of trade

and commerce Ballin, the great inventor Siemens, the brilliant

preacher of the Gospel Dryander, the indispensable Director in the

Ministry of Education Schmidt. Two of them are, in a sense, our own

countrywomen, the Baroness Speck von Sternburg and Frau

Staats-minister von Trott zu Solz. The latter is the granddaughter

of our own John Jay. I have known her, her mother and her

grandfather. No statement was ever issued which was vouched for by

more solid, intelligent, and conscientious people. Its correctness,

completeness and veracity cannot be doubted. As I read it the

emotions which it arouses make both speech and sight difficult. I

wish it might come into the hands of every man, woman, and child in

the United States.

(Signed) JOHN W. BURGESS,

Ex-Dean Faculties of Political Science, Philosophy, Pure Science

and Fine Arts, Columbia University; Roosevelt Professor of American

History and Institutions at Friedrich Wilhelms University, Berlin,

1906; Visiting American Professor at Austrian Universities,

1914-15.

Under the head of "An Anti-British Pamphlet," The London Times of Aug.

23, 1914, noted as follows:

The Vossischezeitung gives extracts from a brochure issued under

the auspices of a committee of such prominent Germans as Prince

Bülow, Herr Ballin, Dr. von Gwinner, and Field Marshal von der

Goltz, for the purpose of "opening the eyes" of the United States

regarding the causes of the present war. Copies of this pamphlet

are being given to all Americans returning home from Germany. One

chapter, headed "Neutrality by Grace of England," scoffs at the

idea of England today being the defender of neutral States and

declares that it was England who in 1911 was ready to land 160,000

men at Antwerp to help the French against the Germans.

As to who will ultimately win in the war, the pamphlet asks whether

it will be the striving nation, the young strength, or the old

peoples, France and England, with their flagging civilization in

alliance with Muscovite retrogression.

* * * * *

New York Times Current History: The European War from the Beginning to March 1915, Vol 1, No. 2 Who Began the War, and Why? · 第 68 / 211 题