CHAPTER XXV

1856

_Queen Victoria to Lord Panmure._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _5th January 1856_.

The Queen returns the drawings for the "Victoria Cross." She has

marked the one she approves with an X; she thinks, however, that it

might be a trifle smaller. The motto would be better "For Valour" than

"For the Brave," as this would lead to the inference that only those

are deemed brave who have got the Victoria Cross.

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _7th January 1856_.

The Queen has received Lord Clarendon's letter, and in answer to his

question expresses her opinion that Lord Cowley's presence at the

Council of War will be absolutely necessary.[1] She believes Lord

Clarendon to be agreed with her, that the value of a plan of military

campaign is entirely dependent upon the _general policy_ which the

Government intends to pursue. As none of our Commissioners at the

Council of War are in the least acquainted with the latter, they might

be drawn into plans which would not at all agree with it. Lord Cowley

would take that part of the question into his own hands, in which

it will be quite safe. The Queen thinks that it is of secondary

importance whether Count Walewski attends or not, but that the Emperor

cannot have the same need of his presence which we have of that of our

Ambassador.

[Footnote 1: A satisfactory and speedy conclusion of

hostilities appearing at this time far from probable, a

Council of War to settle the course of operations was, at the

Emperor's suggestion, summoned to meet at Paris. Lord Cowley,

Count Walewski, Prince Jerome Bonaparte, and others, were

present, besides Naval and Military representatives of the

Allies, among whom was the Duke of Cambridge.]

[Pageheading: POLICY OF CAVOUR]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _9th January 1856_.

The Queen has read Sir J. Hudson's[2] letter with much interest.

There is much truth in what Count Cavour says, and it must ever be our

object and our interest to see Sardinia independent and strong; as

a Liberal constitutional country, opposing a barrier alike to

unenlightened and absolute as well as revolutionary principles--and

this she has a right to expect us to support her in.

But _what_ she wants to obtain from Austria is not clear. She has no

right, however, to expect further assurances from us on wishes which

she seems even to be afraid to state distinctly.

It is clearly impossible to ask Austria to give up a portion of Italy

to her, if nothing has occurred to make this necessary to Austria. At

any rate Sardinia can have lost nothing, but on the contrary must

have gained by the position which she is placed in as an ally of the

Western Powers.

[Footnote 2: British Minister at Turin, and an enthusiastic

sympathiser with Cavour. The latter had complained to him that

if the Austrian proposals were accepted, and peace were made,

Sardinia could expect no realisation of her cherished hopes,

viz. Anglo-French support against Austria and against Papal

aggression, increased political consideration in Europe, and

the development of Constitutional Government.]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _11th January 1856_.

The Queen now returns the draft[3] to Lord Bloomfield, which she could

only write about in haste yesterday, as being of a nature not to be

sanctioned by her. It is quite natural and excusable that our patience

should at last be worn out by the miserable policy which Prussia is

pursuing, but it can never be our interest openly to quarrel with her.

This would be simply playing the game of Russia, who would thus be

relieved from all attacks upon her and see the theatre of the war

transferred to Germany; all other complications (which would arise

therefrom)--ruinous to the best interests of the Western Powers

as they would be--the Queen need not refer to. But when the draft

concludes with a declaration to Prussia that England "_considers her

neutrality as now at an end_," this is tantamount to a declaration of

_war!_ The late articles in our newspapers, and the language of Count

Walewski to Lord Cowley, make the Queen doubly anxious to warn the

Government not to let themselves be drawn on to such a policy.

[Footnote 3: The draft expressed disapproval of the silence

maintained by the Prussian Government towards England with

regard to the Austrian proposals, of the active measures

adopted to induce the German Powers not to take part with

Austria, as well as of the extended facilities afforded by

Prussia to Russia for carrying on the war.]

[Pageheading: LETTER FROM NAPOLEON III]

[Pageheading: THE EMPEROR AND PEACE]

_The Emperor of the French to Queen Victoria._

TUILERIES, _le 14 Janvier 1856_.

MADAME ET CHERE S[OE]UR,--Votre Majeste m'ayant permis de lui parler

a c[oe]ur ouvert toutes les fois que des circonstances graves se

presenteraient, je viens aujourd'hui profiter de la faveur qu'elle a

bien voulu m'accorder.

Je viens de recevoir aujourd'hui la nouvelle de la reponse de la

Russie a l'Ultimatum de Vienne, et avant d'avoir manifeste mon

impression a qui que ce soit, pas meme a Walewski, je viens la

communiquer a votre Majeste pour avoir son avis.

Je resume la question: La Russie accepte tout l'Ultimatum autrichien

sauf la rectification de frontiere de la Bessarabie, et sauf le

paragraphe relatif aux conditions _particulieres_ qu'elle declare ne

pas connaitre. De plus, profitant du succes de Kars, elle s'engage a

rendre cette forteresse et le territoire occupe en echange des points

que nous possedons en Crimee et ailleurs.

Dans quelle position allons-nous nous trouver? D'apres la convention,

l'Autriche est obligee de retirer son ambassadeur, et nous, nous

poursuivons la guerre! Mais dans quel but allons-nous demander a nos

deux pays de nouveaux sacrifices d'hommes et d'argent? Pour un interet

purement autrichien et pour une question qui ne consolide en rien

l'empire ottoman.

Cependant nous y sommes obliges et nous ne devons pas avoir l'air

de manquer a nos engagements. Nous serions donc places dans une

alternative bien triste si l'Autriche elle-meme ne semblait pas deja

nous inviter de ne point rompre toute negociation. Or en reflechissant

aujourd'hui a cette situation, je me disais: ne pourrait-on pas

repondre a l'Autriche ceci: La prise de Kars a tant soit peu change

nos situations; puisque la Russie consent a evacuer toute l'Asie

Mineure nous nous bornons a demander pour la Turquie, au lieu de la

rectification de frontiere, les places fortes formant _tete de pont_

sur le Danube, tels que Ismail et Kilia. Pour nous, nous demandons en

fait de conditions particulieres, l'engagement de ne point retablir

les forts des iles d'Aland et une amnistie pour les Tartares. Mon

sentiment est qu'a ces conditions-la la paix serait tres desirable;

car sans cela je ne puis pas m'empecher de redouter l'opinion publique

quand elle me dira: "Vous aviez obtenu le but reel de la guerre, Aland

etait tombe et ne pouvait plus se relever, Sebastopol avait eu le

meme sort, la flotte Russe etait aneantie, et la Russie promettait non

seulement de ne plus la faire reparaitre dans la Mer Noire, mais meme

de ne plus avoir d'arsenaux maritimes sur toutes ses rives; la Russie

abandonnait ses conquetes dans l'Asie Mineure, elle abandonnait son

protectorat dans les principautes, son action sur le cours du Danube,

son influence sur ces correligionnaires sujets du Sultan, etc.,

etc. Vous aviez obtenu tout cela non sans d'immenses sacrifices et

cependant vous allez les continuer, compromettre les finances de la

France, repandre ses tresors et son sang et pourquoi: pour obtenir

quelques landes de la Bessarabie!!!"

Voila, Madame, les reflexions qui me preoccupent; car autant je me

sens de force quand je crois etre dans le vrai pour inculquer mes

idees a mon pays et pour lui faire partager ma persuasion, autant je

me sentirais faible si je n'etais pas sur d'avoir raison ni de faire

mon devoir.

Mais ainsi que je l'ai dit en commencant a votre Majeste je n'ai

communique ma premiere impression qu'au Duc de Cambridge, et autour de

moi au contraire j'ai dit qu'il fallait continuer la guerre. J'espere

que votre Majeste accueillera avec bonte cette lettre ecrite a la

hate et qu'elle y verra une nouvelle preuve de mon desir de m'entendre

toujours avec elle avant de prendre une resolution. En remerciant

votre Majeste de l'aimable lettre que S.A.R. le Duc de Cambridge m'a

remise de sa part, je la prie de recevoir la nouvelle assurance de mes

sentiments de tendre et respectueux attachement avec lesquels je suis

de votre Majeste, le bon frere et ami,

NAPOLEON.

Je remercie bien le Prince Arthur de son bon souvenir.

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _15th January 1856_.

... The Queen will send her letter to the Emperor this evening for

transmission to Paris. She will enclose it _open_ to Lord Clarendon,

who will seal and send it after having read it.

The Queen cannot conceal from Lord Clarendon what _her own_ feelings

and wishes at this moment are. They _cannot_ be for peace _now_, for

she is _convinced_ that this country would _not_ stand in the eyes of

Europe as she _ought_, and as the Queen is convinced she _would_ after

_this_ year's campaign. The honour and glory of her dear Army is as

_near_ her heart as almost anything, and she cannot _bear_ the thought

that "the failure on the Redan" should be our _last fait d'Armes_, and

it would cost her more than words can express to conclude a peace with

_this_ as the end. However, what is best and wisest must be done.

The Queen cannot yet bring herself to believe that the Russians are at

all sincere, or that it will _now_ end in peace.

[Pageheading: THE QUEEN'S REPLY]

_Queen Victoria to the Emperor of the French._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _le 15 Janvier 1856_.

SIRE ET CHER FRERE,--La bonne et aimable lettre que je viens de

recevoir de la main de votre Majeste m'a cause un tres-vif plaisir.

J'y vois une preuve bien satisfaisante pour moi que vous avez apprecie

tous les avantages de ces epanchements sans reserve, et que votre

Majeste en sent comme moi le besoin dans les circonstances graves ou

nous sommes. Je sens aussi toute la responsabilite que votre confiance

m'impose, et c'est dans la crainte qu'une opinion formee et exprimee

par moi trop a la hate pourrait nuire a la decision finale a prendre

que je me vois obligee de differer pour le moment la reponse plus

detaillee sur les considerations que vous avez si clairement et si

consciencieusement developpees. Cependant, je ne veux point tarder de

vous remercier de votre lettre, et de vous soumettre de mon cote les

reflexions qui me sont venues en la lisant. La Reponse Russe ne nous

est pas encore arrivee; nous n'en connaissons pas exactement les

termes; par consequent, il serait imprudent de former une opinion

definitive sur la maniere d'y repondre, surtout comme le Prince

Gortschakoff parait avoir demande un nouveau delai du Gouvernement

Autrichien et de nouvelles instructions de St Petersbourg, et comme M.

de Bourqueney parait penser que la Russie n'a pas dit son dernier

mot. Nous pourrions donc perdre une chance d'avoir de meilleures

conditions, en montrant trop d'empressement a accueillir celles

offertes dans ce moment. Celles-ci arriveront peut-etre dans le

courant de la journee, ou demain, quand mon Cabinet sera reuni pour

les examiner. Nous sommes au 15; le 18 les relations diplomatiques

entre l'Autriche et la Russie doivent etre rompues; je crois que

notre position vis-a-vis de la Russie sera meilleure en discutant

ses propositions apres la rupture et apres en avoir vu les effets.

En attendant, rien ne sera plus utile a la cause de la paix que la

resolution que vous avez si sagement prise de dire a tous ceux qui

vous approchent qu'il faut continuer la guerre. Soyez bien sur que

dans l'opinion finale que je me formerai, votre position et votre

persuasion personnelle seront toujours presentes a mon esprit et

auront le plus grand poids.

[Pageheading: THE BRITISH ARMY]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _17th January 1856_.

The Queen returns the Duke of Cambridge's and Lord Cowley's letters,

which together with the account which Lord Clarendon gives of his

interview with M. de Persigny causes the Queen no little anxiety. If

negotiations on a vague basis are allowed to be begun, the Russian

negotiator is sure to find out that the French are ready to grant

anything....

However, whatever happens, one consolation the Queen ever will have,

which is--that with the one exception of that failure on the _Redan_,

her noble Army--in spite of every possible disadvantage which any army

could labour under, _has_ invariably been victorious, and the Russians

have always and everywhere been beaten excepting at Kars, where

_famine_ alone enabled them to succeed.

Let us therefore not be (as alas! we have often been) its detractors

by our croaking.

[Pageheading: POSITION OF THE EMPEROR]

_Viscount Palmerston to Queen Victoria._

PICCADILLY, _17th January 1856_.

Viscount Palmerston presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and

concludes that Lord Lansdowne informed your Majesty that the Cabinet,

after hearing from Lord Clarendon a statement of the course of

the recent negotiations as explained by the despatches which Lord

Clarendon read, came to the decision that no further step should be

taken, and no further communication should be made to the Government

of France on the matters at issue, until the final decision of the

Russian Government on the pure and simple adoption of the Austrian

ultimatum[4] should be known. Viscount Palmerston begs to congratulate

your Majesty upon the telegraphic message received this morning from

Sir Hamilton Seymour, announcing that the Russian Government has

adopted that Austrian ultimatum. So far so well, and the success which

has attended firmness and steadiness of purpose in regard to those

conditions may be looked upon as a tolerably sure indication that a

perseverance in the same course will bring the Russian Government to

consent to those remaining conditions which the Austrian Government

has not yet (as it says) made known to the Cabinet of Petersburg.

With regard to the letter of the Emperor of the French to your

Majesty, and the statements made to Lord Clarendon by the Count de

Persigny as to the difficulties of the Emperor's internal position

with respect to finance, and a general desire for peace throughout

the Nation, Viscount Palmerston expressed his opinion to the Cabinet

yesterday that all those representations were greatly exaggerated. He

is convinced that the Emperor of the French is perfectly master of his

own position, and that he can as to peace or war take the course which

he may determine to adopt.

The cabal of stock-jobbing politicians, by whom he is surrounded,

_must_ give way to him if he is firm. They have no standing place in

the confidence and respect of their fellow-countrymen, they represent

nothing but the Stock Exchange speculations in which they are engaged,

and the Emperor's throne would probably be stronger, rather than

weaker, if they were swept away, and better men put in their places.

And it is a very remarkable circumstance that at the very moment when

your Majesty and your Majesty's Government were being told that

the Emperor would be unable to go on with the war on account of the

difficulty of finding money, the French Government was putting forth

in the _Moniteur_ an official statement showing that they have a

reserve surplus of twenty-one millions sterling for defraying the

expenses of a campaign in the ensuing spring, without the necessity of

raising any fresh loan.

Viscount Palmerston fully concurs in the sentiment of regret expressed

by your Majesty to Lord Clarendon that the last action of the war in

which your Majesty's troops have been engaged, should, if peace be now

concluded, have been the repulse at the Redan; but however it may suit

national jealousy, which will always be found to exist on the other

side of the Channel, to dwell upon that check, yet your Majesty may

rely upon it that the Alma and Inkerman have left recollections which

will dwell in the memory of the living and not be forgotten in the

page of history; and although it would no doubt have been gratifying

to your Majesty and to the Nation that another summer should have

witnessed the destruction of Cronstadt by your Majesty's gallant Navy,

and the expulsion of the Russians from the countries south of the

Caucasus by your Majesty's brave Army, yet if peace _can_ now be

concluded on conditions honourable and secure, it would, as your

Majesty justly observes, not be right to continue the war for the

mere purpose of prospective victories. It will, however, be obviously

necessary to continue active preparations for war up to the moment

when a definite Treaty of Peace is signed, in order that the Russians

may not find it for their interest to break off negotiations when the

season for operations shall approach, emboldened by any relaxation

on the part of the Allies induced by too ready confidence in the good

faith of their adversary....

[Footnote 4: See _ante_, 19th November, 1855, note 91.]

[Pageheading: DUKE OF CAMBRIDGE AT PARIS]

_The Duke of Cambridge to Queen Victoria._

TUILERIES, _20th January 1856_.

MY DEAR COUSIN,--Your letters of the 14th and 18th have reached me,

and I am happy to find by them that you approve in conjunction with

the Government with what has been done by me and my colleagues whilst

at Paris.[5] I have given all the messages and carried out all the

instructions as contained in your letters, and I trust as far as

possible I have been enabled to do some good. On the other hand, I

cannot deny that the feelings universally expressed here as to the

prospects of a speedy peace are so different from those felt in

England, that it is extremely difficult to produce any impression in

the sense that we could wish it. France wishes for peace more than

anything else on earth, and this feeling does not confine itself

to Walewski or the Ministers--it extends itself to all classes. The

Emperor alone is reasonable and sensible in this respect, but his

position is a most painful one, and he feels it very much. The fact

is that public opinion is much more felt and more loudly expressed

in this country than anybody in England at all imagines. No doubt the

Emperor can do much that he wishes, but still he cannot go altogether

against a feeling which so loudly expresses itself on all occasions,

without thereby injuring his own position most seriously. I have

written to Clarendon very fully on this subject, and have explained to

him my reasons for wishing to return to England as soon as possible,

now that our military mission is concluded. It is essential that

I should see the members of the Government, and that I should

communicate to them the exact state of feeling here and the views of

the Emperor as to the mode of smoothing down all difficulties. This

can only be done by a personal interview on the part of somebody

thoroughly aware of the present position of affairs. Probably at this

moment I am in a better position to do this than anybody else, from

the peculiar circumstances in which I have been placed while here, and

it is this feeling which makes me desirous to return to England with

the least possible delay. It is my intention therefore to start

with my colleagues to-morrow, Monday night, for England, to which

arrangement the Emperor has given his sanction, and by which time he

will be prepared to tell me what he thinks had best be done, from his

view of the question. I think it my duty to communicate this to you,

and hope that you will give my resolution your sanction. I beg to

remain, my dear Cousin, your most dutiful Cousin,

GEORGE.

[Footnote 5: At the Council of War. See _ante_, 7th January, 1856,

note 1.]

[Pageheading: ENGLAND AND FRANCE]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _28th January 1856_.

The Queen sends a letter which she wishes Lord Clarendon to give to

General La Marmora.[6] We have been extremely pleased with him (indeed

he is a universal favourite) and found him so sensible, mild, and

right-minded, in all he says--and a valuable adviser to the King.

The Queen wishes _just_ to mention to Lord Clarendon that the Duke of

Cambridge told her that the Emperor had spoken to _him_ about what the

King of Sardinia had said relative to _Austria and France_, asking

the Duke whether such a thing had been said.[7] The Duke seems to have

answered as we could wish, and the Queen pretended _never_ to have

_heard_ the report, merely saying that as the proposed ultimatum

was then much talked of, it was very possible the King might

unintentionally have mistaken the observations of the Ministers and

ourselves as to our being _unable_ to _agree_, without great caution,

to what appeared to be _agreed_ on beforehand between _France_ and

_Austria_, and possibly _might_ have in his blunt way stated something

which alarmed the Emperor--but that she could not imagine it could be

anything else. There seems, however, really no _end_ to _cancans_ at

_Paris_; for the Duke of Cambridge seems to have shared the same fate.

The two atmospheres of France and England, as well as the Society, are

so different that people get to talk differently. It seems also that

the King got frightened lest he should at Paris be thought too liberal

in his _religious_ views (having been complimented for it) which he

was very proud of--and thought it necessary to tell the _Emperor_ he

was a _good Catholic_. This is not unnatural in his peculiar position.

When Lord Clarendon goes to Paris, he will be able to _silence_ any

further allusion to these idle stories which only lead to mischief,

and which even Lord Cowley seems to have made more of (as to his own

feelings upon them) than was necessary, but that is equally natural.

Speaking of his King--General La Marmora said: "Il ne dira jamais ce

qu'il ne pense pas, mais il dit quelquefois ce qui serait mieux qu'il

ne dit pas." He more than any other regrets the King's not having seen

more of the world, and says his journey had done him a _great_ deal of

good.

[Footnote 6: The Sardinian Commander had been attending the

Council of War at Paris.]

[Footnote 7: The King of Sardinia was reported to have told

the Emperor that the latter's loyalty to the Alliance was

questioned by Great Britain, and that it was conjectured in

London that he was in favour of co-operation with Austria

instead.]

[Pageheading: THE SPEECH FROM THE THRONE]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

_28th January 1856._

The Queen returns to Lord Palmerston the draft of the speech, which

she thinks _extremely well_ worded, and which she therefore trusts

will be (with the exception of those passages marked) as little

altered as possible. Lord John Russell used to say that as soon as

a speech was discussed in the Cabinet, it was so much _pruned_ and

altered as to lose all its force. The Queen must own that she is

_much_ alarmed at hearing that the _papers_ of the War Council were to

be printed and circulated amongst the Cabinet, as she fears that the

secrecy, which is so necessary, upon which the Emperor laid so _much

stress_, will be very difficult to be maintained. The Emperor's

opinion at least, the Queen hopes, will _not_ be printed or generally

circulated?

The Queen must again press for a very early decision on the subject.

If this is allowed to _drag_, it will appear, particularly to the

_Emperor_, as if we were not really in earnest, though we stickled so

much for our additional conditions, which might lessen the hopes

of peace. Of course the Government must not give any answer on this

subject--should Parliament be so indiscreet as to ask _what_ the

result of the deliberations of the Council of War has been.

_Queen Victoria to the King of the Belgians._

Windsor Castle, _29th January 1856_.

MY DEAREST UNCLE,--You will kindly forgive my letter being short, but

we are going to be present this morning at the wedding of Phipps's

daughter[8] with that handsome lame young officer whom you remember

at Osborne. It is quite an event at Windsor, and takes place in St

George's Chapel, which is very seldom the case.

Many thanks for your kind letter of the 25th, by which I am glad to

see that dear good Philip has arrived safe and well and brought back

_de bons souvenirs_. We shall always be _happy_ to see him.

The _peace negotiations_ occupy every one; _if_ Russia is _sincere_,

they will end most probably in peace; but _if_ she is _not_, the war

will be _carried_ on with _renewed vigour_. The recollection of last

year makes one _very distrustful_.

England's policy throughout has been the _same_, _singularly

unselfish_, and _solely_ actuated by the _desire_ of _seeing Europe

saved_ from the _arrogant_ and _dangerous pretensions_ of that

_barbarous power_ Russia--and of having _such safeguards_ established

for the _future_, which may ensure us against a _repetition_ of

similar _untoward events_.

I repeat now, what we have said from the beginning, and what I have

_repeated_ a _hundred_ times, _if Prussia_ and _Austria_ had held

_strong and decided_ language to _Russia in_ '53, we should _never_

have had _this war!_

Now I must conclude. With Albert's best love, ever your devoted Niece,

VICTORIA R.

[Footnote 8: Maria Henrietta Sophia, daughter of Sir Charles

Beaumont Phipps, K.C.B., Keeper of the Privy Purse, married

Captain Frederick Sayer, 23rd Royal Welsh Fusiliers.]

[Pageheading: MISS NIGHTINGALE]

_Queen Victoria to Miss Florence Nightingale._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _[January] 1856_.

DEAR MISS NIGHTINGALE,--You are, I know, well aware of the high sense

I entertain of the Christian devotion which you have displayed during

this great and bloody war, and I need hardly repeat to you how warm my

admiration is for your services, which are fully equal to those of my

dear and brave soldiers, whose sufferings you have had the _privilege_

of alleviating in so merciful a manner. I am, however, anxious of

marking my feelings in a manner which I trust will be agreeable to

you, and therefore send you with this letter a brooch, the form and

emblems of which commemorate your great and blessed work, and which,

I hope, you will wear as a mark of the high approbation of your

Sovereign![9]

It will be a very great satisfaction to me, when you return at last to

these shores, to make the acquaintance of one who has set so bright an

example to our sex. And with every prayer for the preservation of your

valuable health, believe me, always, yours sincerely,

VICTORIA R.

[Footnote 9: The presentation took place on the 29th of

January. The jewel resembled a badge rather than a brooch,

bearing a St George's Cross in red enamel, and the Royal

cypher surmounted by a crown in diamonds. The inscription

"Blessed are the Merciful" encircled the badge which also bore

the word "Crimea."]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _7th February 1856_.

With respect to Lord Clarendon's observation that he hopes that the

Queen "will approve of his upholding the Sardinians in the Conference

and in all other respects," she can only assure him that she is _most

sincerely_ anxious that he should do so, as the Queen has the greatest

respect for that noble little country, which, since it has possessed

an honest, straightforward as well as courageous King, has been a

bright example to all Continental States.

The Queen rejoices to hear that Count Cavour is coming to Paris.

The Queen hopes that the determination not to admit Prussia will be

adhered to.[10] She hears that Baron Beust[11] means to go to Paris

to represent the German Confederation; this should be prevented by all

means.

[Footnote 10: Prussia was not admitted to the sitting of the

Conference until a later stage.]

[Footnote 11: Prime Minister of Saxony.]

[Pageheading: BELGIAN NEUTRALITY]

_Queen Victoria to the King of the Belgians._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _13th February 1856_.

MY DEAREST UNCLE,--I had the happiness of receiving your kind letter

of the 8th on Saturday, and thank you much for it. I gave your kind

message to Colonel Phipps, who was much gratified by it. We came here

in wretched weather yesterday, leaving Mamma _still_ at Frogmore.

The Conferences will begin very shortly; Lord Clarendon starts for

Paris on Friday. _No_ one but him could undertake these difficult

negotiations. _No_ one can tell _what_ the result will be--and I will

say nothing, for I have _too strong_ personal feelings to speak upon

the subject.

With respect to your answer respecting your _neutrality_, and the

possibility of your being obliged to break it, I must repeat that I

see _no possibility_ or _eventuality_ that _could oblige_ you to do

so. _Belgium_ of its own accord bound itself to remain neutral, and

its very existence is _based_ upon that neutrality, which the other

Powers have guaranteed and are bound to maintain _if Belgium keeps_

her engagements. I cannot at all see HOW you could _even_ entertain

the question, for, as I just said, the _basis_ of the _existence_ of

Belgium is her _neutrality_.

The weather is so mild that we should almost hope Stockmar would start

soon. If _he_ can't come himself, he should send his son for a few

days, who could bring us any confidential communication from his

father, and could be the bearer of any from us. Something of this kind

is most necessary, for it is overwhelming to write to one another upon

so many details which require immediate answer....

With Albert's love, and ours to your young people, believe me, always,

your devoted Niece,

VICTORIA R.

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

_14th February 1856._

The Queen has seen in the reports of the House of Commons that a

return has been moved for of all the decorations of the Bath given

since the war. The Queen hopes the Government will not allow the House

of Commons so much further to trespass upon the prerogatives of

the Crown as now _virtually_ to take also the control over the

distribution of honours and rewards into their hands.

[Pageheading: TERMS OF PEACE]

_The King of the Belgians to Queen Victoria._

LAEKEN, _15th February 1856_.

MY DEAREST VICTORIA,--I have to thank you for your dear kind letter of

the 12th. Madame de Sevigne says, with great truth, that a letter to

be a good letter ought to be as if one heard the person speak; your

dear letters are always so, and you would therefore be praised by

Madame de Sevigne, and that very deservedly. Lord Clarendon is, Heaven

be praised, well calculated to bring matters to a happy conclusion. I

will try to make some impression on the mind of the Emperor Alexander,

his best policy will be the most honest. By all I can learn they

wish most sincerely the conclusion of this war. If on the side of the

Allies only the things which really protect the territories of

the present Turkish Empire are asked, the Russians ought not to

man[oe]uvre, but grant it, and the Allies also ought to be moderate.

You are very properly never to be contradicted, but there are a few

things to be remarked. This neutrality was in the real interest of

this country, but our good Congress here did _not_ wish it, and even

opposed it; it was _impose_ upon them. A neutrality to be respected

must be _protected_. France at all time in cases of general war can

put an end to it, by declaring to us _Vous devez etre avec nous ou

contre nous_. If we answer _Nous sommes neutres_, they will certainly

try to occupy us; then the case of self-defence arises and the claim

to be protected by the other powers....

My beloved Victoria, your devoted Uncle,

LEOPOLD R.

[Pageheading: THE CONFERENCE]

_Queen Victoria to the Emperor of the French._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _le 15 Fevrier 1856_.

SIRE ET CHER FRERE,--Mes Commissaires pour le Conseil de Guerre sont

a peine revenus de Paris et notre plan de campagne est a peine arrete,

que mes Plenipotentiaires pour la Conference de paix se mettent

en route pour assister sous les yeux de V.M. a l'[oe]uvre de la

pacification. Je n'ai pas besoin de vous recommander Lord Clarendon,

mais je ne veux pas le laisser partir sans le rendre porteur de

quelques mots de ma part.

Quoique bien convaincue qu'il ne pourra dans les discussions

prochaines s'elever de questions sur lesquelles il y aurait divergence

d'opinions entre nos deux Gouvernements, j'attache toutefois le plus

haut prix a ce que l'accord le plus parfait soit etabli avant que les

conferences ne soient ouvertes; et c'est dans ce but que j'ai charge

Lord Clarendon de se rendre a Paris quelques jours avant, afin qu'il

put rendre un compte exact des opinions de mon Gouvernement, et jouir

de l'avantage de connaitre _a fond_ la pensee de V.M.

J'eprouverai un sentiment d'intime satisfaction dans ce moment

critique, et je le regarderai comme une preuve toute particuliere

de votre amitie, si vous voulez permettre a Lord Clarendon de vous

exposer personnellement mes vues et d'entendre les Votres de Votre

proper bouche.

Les operations de nos armees et de nos flottes combinees, sous un

commandement divise, ont ete sujettes a d'enormes difficultes; mais

ces difficultes ont ete heureusement vaincues. Dans la Diplomatie

comme a la guerre, les Russes auront sur Nous le grand avantage de

l'unite de plan et d'action, et je les crois plus forts sur ce terrain

que sur le champ de bataille; mais a coup sur, nous y resterons

egalement victorieux, si nous reussissons a empecher l'ennemi de

diviser nos forces et de nous battre en detail.

Sans vouloir jeter un doute sur la sincerite de la Russie en acceptant

nos propositions, il est impossible d'avoir a ce sujet une conviction

pleine et entiere. J'ai tout lieu de croire cependant que nul effort

et nul stratageme ne seront negliges pour rompre, s'il etait possible,

ou au moins pour affaiblir notre alliance. Mais je repose a cet egard

dans la fermete de V.M. la meme confiance qui saura detruire

toutes ces esperances, que j'ai dans la mienne et dans celle de mes

Ministres. Cependant, on ne saurait attacher trop d'importance a

ce que cette commune fermete soit reconnue et appreciee des le

commencement des negociations, car de la dependra, j'en ai la

conviction, la solution, si nous devons obtenir une paix dont les

termes pourront etre consideres comme satisfaisants pour l'honneur de

la France et de l'Angleterre, et comme donnant une juste compensation

pour les enormes sacrifices que les deux pays ont faits. Une autre

consideration encore me porte a attacher le plus haut prix a cet

accord parfait, c'est que si, par son absence, nous etions entraines

dans une paix qui ne satisferait point la juste attente de nos

peuples, cela donnerait lieu a des plaintes et a des recriminations

qui ne pourraient manquer de fausser les relations amicales des deux

pays au lieu de les cimenter davantage comme mon c[oe]ur le desire

ardemment.

D'ailleurs, je ne doute pas un moment qu'une paix telle que la France

et l'Angleterre ont le droit de la demander sera bien certainement

obtenue par une determination inebranlable de ne point rabaisser les

demandes moderees que nous avons faites.

Vous excuserez, Sire, la longueur de cette lettre, mais il m'est si

doux de pouvoir epancher mes sentiments sur toutes ces questions si

importantes et si difficiles, avec une personne que je considere non

seulement comme un Allie fidele, mais comme un ami sur lequel je puis

compter en toute occasion, et qui, j'en suis sure, est anime envers

nous des memes sentiments.

Le Prince me charge de vous offrir ses hommages les plus affectueux,

et moi je me dis pour toujours, Sire et cher Frere, de V.M.I., la tres

affectionnee S[oe]ur et Amie,

VICTORIA R.

[Pageheading: THE CRIMEAN ENQUIRY]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _16th February 1856_.

The subject to which Lord Palmerston refers in his letter of last

night, and upon which the Cabinet is going to deliberate to-day, has

also caused the Queen much anxiety.

A Civil Commission is sent out by the Government to enquire into the

conduct of the officers in command in the Crimea; this is done without

any consultation with the Commander-in-Chief. They report to the

Government, inculpating several general officers and others in high

command; this report is not communicated to the military authorities,

nor to the persons affected by it, but is laid on the table of both

Houses of Parliament.[12] These officers then for the first time

find themselves accused under the authority of Government, and that

accusation communicated to the Legislature without ever having been

heard in answer or allowed an opportunity to defend themselves. It

is stated in both Houses by the Government that the officers may send

papers in reply if they choose! But who is to be the Judge on the

trial? The Press, of course, and the _Times_ at the head, have already

judged and condemned, and the House of Commons is now moving _in

default of another Judge_ to constitute its tribunal by a Committee of

Enquiry.

It is quite evident if matters are left so, and military officers of

the Queen's Army are to be judged as to the manner in which they have

discharged their military duties before an enemy by a Committee of the

House of Commons, the command of the Army is at once transferred from

the Crown to that Assembly.

This result is quite inevitable if the Government appear as accusers,

as they do by the report of their Commission, and then submit the

accusation for Parliament to deal with, without taking any steps of

their own!

The course suggested by Sir James Graham and alluded to by Lord

Palmerston, of following the precedent of the enquiry into the

Convention of Cintra,[13] appears therefore to the Queen to be the

only prudent one.

The Queen thinks it most unfair to the officers to publish their

statements beforehand, as these will not go before judges feeling

the weight of their responsibility, but before the newspapers who are

their sworn enemies and determined to effect their ruin, for which

they possess unlimited means.

The Queen wishes Lord Palmerston to read this letter to the Cabinet.

[Footnote 12: Sir John MacNeill and Colonel Tulloch had

been sent out to the Crimea early in 1855 to investigate the

breakdown of various military departments. They had issued a

preliminary report in the summer of 1855, and a final one in

January 1856, which was presented to Parliament. The officers

specially censured were Lord Lucan (who had been given the

command of a Regiment), Lord Cardigan, Inspector of Cavalry,

Sir Richard Airey, Quartermaster-General, and Colonel Gordon,

Deputy Quartermaster-General. Lord Panmure wrote on the 17th

of February that the Government recommended the appointment

of a Commission of Enquiry, consisting of General Sir Howard

Douglas and six other high military officers. The Commission

sat at Chelsea, and made its report in July, exonerating the

officers censured.]

[Footnote 13: The Convention of Cintra was concluded on

the 30th of August 1808. It was founded on the basis of an

armistice agreed upon between Sir Arthur Wellesley and General

Kellerman, on the day after the battle of Vimiera, and some of

its provisions were considered too favourable to the French. A

Board of Enquiry, under the presidency of Sir David Dundas,

in the first instance exculpated the British officers; but the

Government having instructed the members of the Board to give

their opinions individually, four were found to approve and

three to disapprove the armistice and convention.]

[Pageheading: THE EMPEROR'S CORDIALITY]

_The Earl of Clarendon to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _18th February 1856_.

Lord Clarendon presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and humbly

begs to say that he dined last night at the Tuileries, and had a

conversation of two hours with the Emperor, which was in all respects

satisfactory. On no occasion has Lord Clarendon heard the Emperor

express himself more warmly or with greater determination in favour

of the Alliance, and H.M. entirely concurred with Lord Clarendon, that

upon the perfect understanding between the two Governments, and the

conviction on the part of others that the Alliance was not to be

shaken, depended the facility with which negotiations might be

conducted, and the terms on which peace would be made. Lord Clarendon

spoke with the utmost frankness about the flattery that had been

and would continue to be addressed to His Majesty, and the contrast

perpetually drawn between England and France, to the disparagement of

the former, for the purpose of disturbing the relations between them;

but that your Majesty and your Majesty's Government had always treated

these tricks with contempt, because the confidence in the Emperor's

honour and loyalty was complete. Lord Clarendon dwelt particularly

upon the feelings of your Majesty and of the Prince on this subject,

and the pleasure it gave the Emperor was evident; and he desired Lord

Clarendon to say that your Majesty should never find such confidence

misplaced.

He promised Lord Clarendon that he would give Baron Brunnow and

Count Buol to understand that if they thought the Alliance could be

disturbed by them they would find themselves grievously mistaken, and

that it would be waste of time to try and alter any conditions upon

which he had agreed with the English Government.

The Emperor appeared to be much gratified by your Majesty's letter,

for the first thing he said to Lord Clarendon on coming into the room

before dinner was "_quelle charmante lettre vous m'avez apportee de

la Reine_," and then began upon the extraordinary clearness with which

your Majesty treated all matters of business, and the pleasure he

derived from every discussion of them with your Majesty....

The Empress was looking in great health and beauty. She was in the

highest spirits, and full of affectionate enquiry for your Majesty.

[Pageheading: OUDH]

[Pageheading: THE KING'S APPEAL]

_The Marquis of Dalhousie to Queen Victoria._

CALCUTTA, _19th February 1856_.

The Governor-General presents his most humble duty to your Majesty,

and has the honour of submitting to your Majesty a copy of a

Proclamation, whereby the Kingdom of Oudh has been placed exclusively

and permanently under the authority of your Majesty's Government.[14]

The various considerations, and the course of public events, which

led to this necessity, have long since been laid before your Majesty's

Government in great detail.

The Governor-General during the past summer communicated to the Home

Authorities his readiness to remain in India as long as he dared,

namely, for one additional month, until the 1st of March, for the

purpose of carrying into effect the proposed policy regarding Oudh--if

it was desired that he should do so.

The orders from the Home Government reached the Governor-General only

upon the 2nd of January, leaving barely two months for the assembling

of the military force which was necessary to provide against all

risks--for the negotiations with the King--and for the organisation of

the future Civil and Military Administration of Oudh.

Every preparation having been completed, the Resident at Lucknow

waited upon the King in person--communicated to him the resolution

which the British Government had taken--and tendered for his

acceptance a new Treaty, whereby the transfer of the Government of

Oudh would have been made a matter of amicable agreement.

The King wholly refused to sign any Treaty. He declared himself ready

to submit to the will of the British Government in all things. He bade

the Resident observe that every mark of power had already been laid

down by His Majesty's own orders--the guns at the palace gates were

dismounted, the guards bore no arms, and, though drawn up as usual in

the Court, they saluted the Resident with their hands only; while not

a weapon was worn by any officer in the Palace.

The King gave way to passionate bursts of grief and anger--implored

the intercession of the Resident in his behalf--and finally,

uncovering his head, he placed his turban in the Resident's hands.

This act--the deepest mark of humiliation and helplessness which a

native of the East can exhibit--became doubly touching and significant

when the head thus bared in supplication was one that had worn a royal

crown.

The Government, however, had already borne too long with the wrongs

inflicted by the sovereigns of Oudh upon their unhappy subjects. The

clamorous grief of the King could not be allowed to shut out the cry

of his people's misery. The King's appeal, therefore, could not be

listened to; and as His Majesty, at the end of the three days' space

which was allowed him for deliberation, still resolutely refused to

sign a Treaty, the territory of Oudh was taken possession of, by the

issue of the Proclamation which has now been respectfully submitted to

your Majesty.

It is the fourth kingdom in India which has passed under your

Majesty's sceptre during the last eight years.[15]

Perfect tranquillity has prevailed in Oudh since the event which

has just been narrated. General Outram writes that the populace of

Lucknow, more interested than any other community in the maintenance

of the native dynasty, already "appear to have forgotten they ever had

a King." In the districts the Proclamation has been heartily welcomed

by the middle and lower classes; while even the higher orders, who of

course lose much in a native state by the cessation of corruption and

tyranny, have shown no symptoms of dissatisfaction.

There seems every reason to hope and expect that the same complete

tranquillity will attend the further progress of our arrangements for

the future administration of Oudh....

The Governor-General has only further to report to your Majesty that

Lord Canning arrived at Madras on the 14th inst., and that he will

assume the Government of India on the last day of this month.

The Governor-General will report hereafter Lord Canning's arrival at

Fort William; and he has now the honour to subscribe himself, your

Majesty's most obedient, most humble and devoted Subject and Servant,

DALHOUSIE.

[Footnote 14: In a letter of the 13th, Mr Vernon Smith had

told the Queen that the Press rumours of "annexation" were

premature, and that the use of the word itself had been

avoided in Lord Canning's correspondence with the Court of

Directors.]

[Footnote 15: The earlier annexations were those of the Punjab

(1849), Pegu (1852), and Nagpur (1853); some minor additions

were also made under what was called the "doctrine of lapse."]

[Pageheading: PRELIMINARIES OF PEACE]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _27th February 1856_.

The Queen returns Lord Clarendon's letter.

The matter becomes very serious, and it would be a bad position for

us to be left quite alone in the Conference, which the Russians, the

Queen has every reason to believe, are anxiously striving to bring

about. In fact, well-informed persons pretend that this was the main

aim of Russia in accepting the Austrian ultimatum and going to Paris.

Would it not answer to take this line: to say to Russia, "You have

accepted the ultimatum, _pur et simple_, and have now again recognised

its stipulations as preliminaries of peace. You will, therefore, first

of all, have to execute them; you may then come to the question of

Kars and say you mean to keep it--then you will see that Europe, bound

to maintain the integrity of Turkey, will be obliged to go on with

the war, and it will be for you to consider whether you mean to go on

fighting for Kars; but at present this is not in question, as you are

only called upon to fulfil the engagements to which you have solemnly

pledged yourself"?

Perhaps Lord Palmerston will discuss this suggestion with his

colleagues to-night.

_Viscount Palmerston to Queen Victoria._

PICCADILLY, _27th February 1856_.

Viscount Palmerston presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and begs

to state that as the result of the deliberations of the Cabinet this

evening, the accompanying telegraphic message is proposed to be sent

to-morrow morning to Lord Clarendon. It is founded upon the substance

of your Majesty's memorandum of this afternoon. Viscount Palmerston

has taken another copy of this draft.

_Telegram to the Earl of Clarendon._

_28th February 1856_.

[_Enclosure._]

Your letter has been considered by the Cabinet.

Russia should be told that she cannot recede from the conditions

which she deliberately agreed to by a _pur et simple_ acceptance at

Petersburg, which she afterwards formally recorded in a protocol at

Vienna, and which she has within a few days solemnly converted into

preliminaries of peace.

Those engagements must be fulfilled, and those conditions must be

carried into execution.

As to Kars, Austria, France, and Great Britain have undertaken to

maintain the integrity of the Turkish Empire, and that integrity must

be maintained.

Russia received no equivalent for giving up the principalities which

she had occupied as a material pledge. She can receive none for giving

up Kars.

If Russia determines to carry on the war, rather than give up Kars,

things must take their course.

[Pageheading: TRANQUILLITY OF INDIA]

_The Marquis of Dalhousie to Queen Victoria._

GOVERNMENT HOUSE, _29th February 1856_.

Lord Dalhousie presents his most humble duty to your Majesty.

The guns are announcing from the ramparts of Fort William that Lord

Canning has arrived. In an hour's time he will have assumed the

Government of India. Lord Dalhousie will transfer it to him in a

state of perfect tranquillity. There is peace, within and without. And

although no prudent man will ever venture to predict the certainty

of continued peace in India, yet Lord Dalhousie is able to declare,

within reservation, that he knows of no quarter in which it is

probable that trouble will arise.[16]

Lord Dalhousie desires that his very last act, as Governor-General,

should be to submit to your Majesty a respectful expression of the

deep sense he entertains of your Majesty's constant approbation of

his public conduct while he has held the office of Governor-General

of India; together with a humble assurance of the heartfelt gratitude

with which he shall ever remember your Majesty's gracious favour

towards him through the eight long years during which he has borne the

ponderous burden he lays down to-day.

Lord Dalhousie begs permission to take leave of your Majesty, and has

the honour to subscribe himself, with deep devotion, your Majesty's

most obedient, most humble and faithful Subject and Servant,

DALHOUSIE.

[Footnote 16: It has been, however, freely alleged that the

failure to repress acts of insubordination in the administration

of Lord Dalhousie was a contributory, if not the direct, cause

of the events of 1857. See _post_, Introductory Note to Chapter

XXVI, and Walpole's _History of England from the Conclusion of

the Great War in 1815_, ch. xxvii., and authorities there

referred to.]

[Pageheading: LORD CLARENDON'S INSTRUCTIONS]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, [_? March_] _1856_.

The Queen returns these letters to Lord Palmerston. She entirely

concurs in Lord Palmerston's general views of the question, but at the

same time she thinks--as circumstances, which are beyond our control,

may so vary from day to day or even from hour to hour--that Lord

Clarendon should receive full powers to act according to what may

appear to him to be best and wisest at the time, even if it should not

be in strict accordance with what we originally contemplated and must

naturally wish. Such a power would certainly not be misplaced in Lord

Clarendon's hands; his firmness, and his sense of what this country

expects, are too well known to lead us to doubt of his permitting

anything but what would _really_ be for the best of this country, and

for the maintenance of the Alliance.

[Pageheading: THE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _6th March 1856_.

With reference to Lord Clarendon's letter, the Queen must say that

she, though _very reluctantly_, shares his opinion, that we have no

choice _now_ but to accept the peace, even if it is not all we could

desire, and if another campaign might have got us better terms. She

feels certain that the bad accounts of the French Army in the Crimea,

which appears to suffer _now_ all the misery which ours suffered last

year at the worst time of the siege, will more than ever indispose the

Emperor from risking a renewal of hostilities. It is affirmed that the

French have beyond 20,000 men in hospital!

If we are to have this peace, however, the Queen must again agree with

Lord Clarendon that we ought not _ourselves_ to depreciate it, as our

Press has done the deeds of our Army.

With regard to the principalities, it is the Queen's opinion that

nothing will oppose a barrier to Russia and her intrigues but

the arrangement which will satisfy the people themselves, viz. an

_hereditary monarchy_. The example of Egypt might perfectly well be

followed in Wallachia and Moldavia.

The subject of Poland would, in the Queen's opinion, be much better

left unintroduced into the present negotiations; we have no claim

arising out of this war to ask Russia to make concessions on that

head, which, moreover, would be treated by her as an internal question

not admitting of foreign interference.

The clause in the Treaty of Vienna about the Bonapartes is a dead

letter, as this very Treaty, now to be signed, will prove, and the

Emperor would act very unwisely to call for an alteration in which all

Powers who signed the original Treaty would claim to be consulted. We

have every interest not to bring about a European Congress _pour la

Revision des Traites_, which many people suspect the Emperor wishes to

turn the present Conference into.

The Queen wishes only to add that, should Prussia be asked to join in

the final Treaty on the ground of her having been a party to the July

Treaty, we should take care that it does not appear that this was

an act of courtesy of all the other Powers towards Prussia except

England, who need not be made to take additional unpopularity in

Germany upon herself.

_The Earl of Clarendon to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _18th March 1856._

Lord Clarendon presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and humbly

begs to say that the Emperor gave him to-day the most satisfactory

report of the Empress and the young Prince.[17] There appears to be

little or no fever now, and a great power of sleeping. The Emperor's

eyes filled with tears when he described the tortures of the Empress

and his own sensations. He said he hardly knew how to express his

gratitude for the interest which your Majesty had manifested for the

Empress, and for the letters which he had received from your Majesty

and the Prince.

The Prussian Plenipotentiaries[18] were admitted at the close of the

Conference this afternoon--all important matters under negotiation

having been concluded.

Count Walewski made an ineffectual attempt to make it appear by a

doubtful form of expression that Prussia had taken part throughout in

the negotiations. Lord Cowley and Lord Clarendon said that they wished

to show all courtesy to Prussia, but could not consent to sign what

was manifestly untrue....

[Footnote 17: The Prince Imperial, Napoleon Eugene Louis Jean

Joseph, was born on the 16th of March.]

[Footnote 18: Baron Manteuffel and Count Hatzfeldt.]

[Pageheading: THE PRINCESS ROYAL]

_Extract of a Letter from Mr Cobden to a Friend._[19]

MIDHURST, _20th March 1856._

... It is generally thought that the young Prince Frederic William

of Prussia is to be married to our Princess Royal. I was dining

_tete-a-tete_ with Mr Buchanan, the American Minister, a few days ago,

who had dined the day before at the Queen's table, and sat next to

the Princess Royal. He was in raptures about her, and said she was

the most charming girl he had ever met: "All life and spirit, full

of frolic and fun, with an excellent head, and a _heart as big as

a mountain_"--those were his words. Another friend of mine, Colonel

Fitzmayer, dined with the Queen last week, and in writing to me a

description of the company, he says, that when the Princess Royal

smiles, "it makes one feel as if additional light were thrown upon the

scene." So I should judge that this said Prince is a lucky fellow, and

I trust he will make a good husband. If not, although a man of peace,

I shall consider it a _casus belli_....

[Footnote 19: Submitted to the Queen.]

_The Earl of Clarendon to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _29th March 1856._

Lord Clarendon presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and humbly

begs to say that the Emperor sent General Ney to him this morning to

request that Lord Clarendon would convey the cordial thanks of the

Emperor to your Majesty for the _feu de joie_ fired by your Majesty's

troops in the Crimea upon the announcement of the birth of the Prince

Imperial.

Lord Clarendon was much embarrassed by a letter this morning from

Lord Palmerston, desiring that the signature of the Treaty should be

postponed till Monday, in case the Cabinet should have any amendments

to propose; and Lord Clarendon humbly hopes that your Majesty may not

be displeased at his not having acted upon this injunction, because

he had promised to sign the Treaty to-morrow in accordance with the

general wish of the Congress, notwithstanding that it was Sunday, and

he could not therefore go back from his engagement--every preparation

is made for illuminations, not alone at Paris, but throughout France,

as all the Prefects have been informed of the signature--the odium

that would have fallen [on] us all would have been extreme throughout

Europe it may be said, and it would have been regarded as a last

proof of our unwillingness to make peace. The friendly feeling of the

Congress towards the English P.P.'s[20] would have changed, and they

probably would have agreed to no amendments, requiring that all

the seven copies of the Treaty should be recopied. In short, Lord

Clarendon felt that he had no choice but to take upon himself the

responsibility of signing to-morrow; but he has suggested that Lord

Palmerston's private letter should be converted into a despatch,

in order that the sole and entire blame should rest with Lord

Clarendon....[21]

[Footnote 20: _I.e._, Plenipotentiaries.]

[Footnote 21: For the chief stipulations of the Treaty, see

_ante_, Introductory Note to Chapter XXV. In addition to the

actual Treaty, an important declaration was made as to the

rules of international maritime law, to be binding only on

the signatory powers, dealing with the following points:--

(_a_) Abolition of Privateering.

(_b_) Neutral flag to cover enemy's goods, other than

contraband of war.

(_c_) Neutral goods, other than contraband of war, under

enemy's flag, to be exempt from seizure.

(_d_) Blockades to be binding must be effective,

_i.e._ maintained by adequate marine force.]

[Pageheading: TERMS ARRIVED AT]

_Viscount Palmerston to Queen Victoria._

PICCADILLY, _30th March 1856._

Viscount Palmerston presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and in

submitting the accompanying letter from Lord Clarendon, he begs to

state that he informed Lord Clarendon by the messenger yesterday

evening that all he had done and agreed to was approved, and that he

might sign the Treaty to-day. It was to be signed at half-past twelve

this day.

Viscount Palmerston begs to congratulate your Majesty upon an

arrangement which effects a settlement that is satisfactory for the

present, and which will probably last for many years to come, of

questions full of danger to the best interests of Europe. Greater

and more brilliant successes by land and sea might probably have been

accomplished by the Allies if the war had continued, but any great

and important additional security against future aggressions by Russia

could only have been obtained by severing from Russia large portions

of her frontier territory, such as Finland, Poland, and Georgia; and

although by great military and financial efforts and sacrifices those

territories might for a time have been occupied, Russia must have been

reduced to the lowest state of internal distress, before her Emperor

could have been brought to put his name to a Treaty of Peace finally

surrendering his sovereignty over those extensive countries; and

to have continued the war long enough for these purposes would have

required greater endurance than was possessed by your Majesty's

Allies, and might possibly have exhausted the good-will of your

Majesty's own subjects....

[Pageheading: THE TREATY OF PARIS]

_The Earl of Clarendon to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _30th March 1856._

Lord Clarendon presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and humbly

begs to congratulate your Majesty upon the signature of peace this

afternoon. It is not to be doubted that another campaign must have

brought glory to your Majesty's arms, and would have enabled England

to impose different terms upon Russia, but setting aside the cost and

the horrors of war, in themselves evils of the greatest magnitude,

we cannot feel sure that victory might not have been purchased too

dearly--a continuation of the war would hardly have been possible

either with or without France--if we had dragged her on with us it

would have been most reluctantly on her part, her finances would have

suffered still more, she would have borne us ill-will, would have

acted feebly with us, and would on the first favourable occasion

have left us in the lurch. If we had continued the war single-handed,

France would feel that she had behaved shabbily to us, and would

_therefore_ have hated us all the more, and become our enemy sooner

than under any other circumstances; a coalition of Europe might then

have taken place against England, to which the United States would

but too gladly have adhered, and the consequence might have been most

serious.

Lord Clarendon would not make such an assertion lightly, but he feels

convinced that your Majesty may feel satisfied with the position now

occupied by England--six weeks ago it was a painful position here,

everybody was against us, our motives were suspected, and our policy

was denounced; but the universal feeling now is that we are the only

country able and ready, and willing, if necessary, to continue the

war; that we might have prevented peace, but that having announced

our readiness to make peace on honourable terms we have honestly and

unselfishly acted up to our word. It is well known, too, that the

conditions on which peace is made would have been different if England

had not been firm, and everybody is, of course, glad _even here_ that

peace should not have brought dishonour to France.

Lord Clarendon, therefore, ventures to hope that the language

in England with respect to the peace will not be apologetic or

dissatisfied. It would be unwise and undignified, and would invite

criticism if such language were held before the conditions are

publicly known.

[Pageheading: END OF THE WAR]

_Queen Victoria to the Earl of Clarendon._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _31st March 1856._

The Queen thanks Lord Clarendon much for his two letters of Saturday

and yesterday; and we congratulate _him_ on the success of his

_efforts_ in obtaining the Peace, for to him _alone_ it is due, and

also _to him alone_ is due the dignified position which the Queen's

beloved country holds, and which she owes to a straightforward,

steady, and unselfish policy throughout.

Much as the Queen disliked the idea of _Peace_, she has become

reconciled to it, by the conviction that France would either not have

continued the war, or continued it in such a manner that _no_ glory

could have been hoped for for us.

We have a striking proof of this in Pelissier not having obeyed the

Emperor's orders and never having thought of occupying Sak.[22] _This

really might_ be hinted to the Emperor....

The Queen finds Lord Palmerston very well pleased with the Peace,

though he struggled as long as he could for better conditions....

[Footnote 22: The word is so written in the original draft.

There was a place of the name near Old Fort in the Crimea,

but this is more probably an abbreviation for Sakatal in

Caucasia.]

_Queen Victoria to the King of the Belgians._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _1st April 1856_.

MY DEAREST UNCLE,--... _Peace is signed!_ But till the ratifications

have taken place its terms cannot be known. That so _good_ a Peace

_has_ been obtained, and that this country stands in the high position

she now does by _having_ made peace, but _not_ yielding to _unworthy_

and dishonourable terms, is _all_ owing to Lord Clarendon, whose

difficulties were immense, and who cannot be too highly praised.

May I beg to remind you to make enquiries, _quietly_, about the

young Prince of Orange[23]--as to his education, _entourage_, and

disposition? Pray also don't forget to try and let us have a _new_

Russian; it would be infinitely _better_.[24]

We were much grieved to hear the day before yesterday from Sommer

that poor Stockmar had had a relapse, but the illness is clearly of

a spasmodic nature and therefore _not_ at all dangerous, and the pain

had speedily left him, but of course left him again weaker, which is

most distressing.

Now with Albert's affectionate love and our reiterated _warmest_

thanks, in which Vicky is included, for your having so VERY kindly

come over for her Confirmation, believe me, ever, your devoted Niece

and Child,

VICTORIA R.

[Footnote 23: Prince William Nicholas, born 1840, elder son of

King William III. of Holland.]

[Footnote 24: The new Russian Ambassador was Count

Creptowitch.]

_Queen Victoria to the Emperor of the French._

PALAIS DE BUCKINGHAM, _le 3 Avril 1856_.

SIRE ET MON CHER FRERE,--V.M. me permettra de lui offrir toutes mes

felicitations a l'occasion de la paix qui a ete conclue sous vos

auspices, et peu de jours seulement apres l'heureux evenement qui vous

a donne un fils. Quoique partageant le sentiment de la pluspart de

mon peuple qui trouve que cette paix est peut-etre un peu precoce,

j'eprouve le besoin de vous dire que j'approuve hautement les termes

dans lesquels elle a ete concue, comme un resultat qui n'est pas

indigne des sacrifices que nous avons faits mutuellement pendant cette

juste guerre, et comme assurant autant que cela se peut, la stabilite

de l'equilibre Europeen....

Le Prince me charge de vous offrir ses hommages les plus affectueux,

et je me dis pour toujours, Sire et cher Frere, de V.M.I., la bien

affectionnee S[oe]ur et Amie,

VICTORIA R.

[Pageheading: HONOURS GRATEFULLY DECLINED]

_The Earl of Clarendon to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _6th April 1856_.

Lord Clarendon presents his humble duty to your Majesty....

Lord Clarendon humbly begs in Lord Cowley's name and his own most

gratefully to acknowledge the kind and gracious intention of your

Majesty to raise each of them a step in the Peerage, and they venture

to hope that your Majesty will not have been displeased at their

having respectfully declined this great distinction. Lord Cowley's

reason was his extreme poverty, and the feeling that an accession of

rank would only aggravate the inconvenience he already experiences

from being a Peer....

Lord Clarendon felt that courtesy titles to his younger sons would be

a positive injury to them in working for their bread, and he relied

upon your Majesty's unvarying kindness for appreciating his reluctance

to prefer himself to his children. He may, with entire truth, add that

the knowledge that your Majesty has approved of their conduct is ample

and abundant reward for Lord Cowley and himself. Lord Clarendon hopes

it is not presumptuous in him to say that he would not exchange your

Majesty's letters of approval for any public mark of your Majesty's

favour....

[Pageheading: LORD PALMERSTON AND THE GARTER]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _11th April 1856_.

Now that the moment for the ratification of the Treaty of Peace is

near at hand, the Queen wishes to delay no longer the expression

of her satisfaction as to the manner in which both the War has been

brought to a conclusion, and the honour and interests of this country

have been maintained by the Treaty of Peace, under the zealous and

able guidance of Lord Palmerston. She wishes as a public token of her

approval to bestow the Order of the Garter upon him. Should the two

vacant Ribbons already have been promised to the Peers whose names

Lord Palmerston has on a former occasion submitted to the Queen, there

could be no difficulty in his being named an extra Knight, not filling

up the next vacancy which may occur; this course was followed when

Lord Grey received the Garter from the hands of King William.

_Viscount Palmerston to Queen Victoria._

PICCADILLY, _11th April 1856_.

Viscount Palmerston presents his humble duty to your Majesty, and is

unable to express in words the gratification and thankfulness which he

feels upon the receipt of your Majesty's most gracious and unexpected

communication of this morning. The utmost of his ambition has been so

to perform the duties of the high position in which your Majesty has

been pleased to place him, as to prove himself not unworthy of the

confidence with which your Majesty has honoured him; and the knowledge

that your Majesty has found no reason to be dissatisfied with your

choice; and that his endeavour properly to discharge his duties to

your Majesty and the country have met with your Majesty's approval

would of itself be an ample reward for any labour or anxiety with

which the performance of those duties may have been attended, and,

therefore, the gracious communication which he has this morning

received from your Majesty will be preserved by him as in his eyes

still more valuable even than the high honour which it announces your

Majesty's intention to confer upon him.

That high and distinguished honour Viscount Palmerston will receive

with the greatest pride as a public mark of your Majesty's gracious

approbation, but he begs to be allowed to say that the task which he

and his colleagues have had to perform has been rendered comparatively

easy by the enlightened views which your Majesty has taken of all the

great affairs in which your Majesty's Empire has been engaged, and

by the firm and steady support which _in_ all these important

transactions your Majesty's servants have received from the Crown.

[Pageheading: SERVICE RETRENCHMENTS]

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _12th April 1856_.

The Queen returns the draft of Treaty, which she approves, and of

which she would wish to have a copy.

The Queen believes that the Cabinet are going to consider to-day the

amount of retrenchments which may be necessary in the Army and Navy.

She trusts and _expects_ that this will be done with great

_moderation_ and very _gradually_; and that the difficulties we have

had, and the sufferings which we have endured, may not be forgotten,

for to the miserable reductions of the last thirty years are entirely

owing our state of _helplessness_ when the War began; and it would

be unpardonable if we were to be found in a similar condition, when

another War--and _who_ can tell _how_ soon there may be one?--breaks

out.

We must _never_ for a moment forget the very peculiar state of France,

and _how entirely all there_ depends upon _one_ man's life.

We _ought_ and _must_ be prepared for every _eventuality_, and we have

splendid material in that magnificent little Army in the Crimea.

The Queen wishes Lord Palmerston to show this letter to the Cabinet.

[Pageheading: LETTER FROM THE EMPEROR]

_The Emperor of the French to Queen Victoria._

PARIS, _le 12 Avril 1856_.

MADAME ET TRES CHERE S[OE]UR,--Votre Majeste m'a fait grand plaisir en

me disant qu'elle etait satisfaite de la conclusion de la paix, car

ma constante preoccupation a ete, tout en desirant la fin d'une guerre

ruineuse, de n'agir que de concert avec le Gouvernement de votre

Majeste. Certes je concois bien qu'il ait ete desirable d'obtenir

encore de meilleurs resultats, mais etait-ce raisonnable d'en attendre

de la maniere dont la guerre avait ete engagee? J'avoue que je ne

le crois pas. La guerre avait ete trop lentement conduite par nos

generaux et nos amiraux et nous avions laisse le temps aux Russes de

se rendre presque imprenables a Cronstadt comme en Crimee. Je crois

donc que nous aurions paye trop cherement sous tous les rapports les

avantages que nous eussions pu obtenir. Je suis pour cette raison

heureux de la paix, mais je suis heureux surtout que notre Alliance

sorte intacte des conferences et qu'elle se montre a l'Europe aussi

solide que le premier jour de _notre union_. (Je prie le Prince Albert

de ne pas etre jaloux de cette expression.)

Nous avons appris avec la plus vive satisfaction que les projets que

votre Majeste avait concus pour le bonheur de la Princesse Royale

allaient bientot se realiser. On dit tant de bien du jeune Prince

Frederic Guillaume que je ne doute pas que votre charmante fille ne

soit heureuse. L'Imperatrice, qui attend avec impatience le moment de

pouvoir ecrire a votre Majeste, a ete bien touchee de votre aimable

lettre. Vers le commencement de Mai nous irons a St Cloud ou votre

souvenir nous y accompagne toujours, car ces lieux nous rappellent

le sejour de votre Majeste et nous faisons des v[oe]ux pour qu'un si

heureux evenement puisse se renouveler.

Je prie votre Majeste de me rappeler au souvenir du Prince Albert

et de recevoir avec bonte l'assurance des sentiments de respectueuse

amitie avec lesquels je suis, de votre Majeste, le devoue Frere et

Ami,

NAPOLEON.

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Hardinge._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _21st April 1856_.

The Queen has heard from Colonel Phipps that Lord Hardinge is most

anxious for her sanction to the paper submitted yesterday, if even as

merely a temporary measure, before the mail goes this evening, as all

the shipping at Balaklava is waiting for it. She hopes Lord Hardinge

will see how inconvenient and unpleasant it must be to the Queen to

have important matters submitted at such short notice that they cannot

even be discussed by her without detriment to the public service, and

trusts that she may not again be placed in a similar position. She has

now signed the paper, but _only_ as a temporary measure, and upon the

understanding that Lord Hardinge will submit to her, between this and

the next mail, the arrangements which are now wanting.

She has also signed the proposal about Canada, but must express her

conviction that General Le Marchant,[25] as Civil Governor of the

Colony, cannot possibly attend to the command of the Brigade, which

ought to have a distinct Commander. There may be Artillery in Canada,

but is it horsed? and in Batteries?

We are rapidly falling back into the old ways!

[Footnote 25: Sir John Gaspard Le Marchant, 1803-1874,

Lieutenant-Governor of Nova Scotia from 1852 to 1857.]

_Queen Victoria to the King of the Belgians._

BUCKINGHAM PALACE, _6th May 1856_.

MY DEAREST UNCLE,--Having returned late from a drive, I have but

little time to spare to thank you for your kind letter of the 2nd.

Last Thursday (1st) was our darling Arthur's sixth birthday, which he

enjoyed duly. On the 3rd we received Brunnow[26]--who was so nervous

and humble, and so _emu_ that he could hardly speak. He dines with us

to-night, and the dinner is given for him, being a _funny collection

of antagonistic elements_--Granville, Clarendon, Lansdowne, Aberdeen,

Graham, John Russell, Derby, and Malmesbury! "The Happy Family," I

call it.

The Opposition have taken the line of disapproving the Peace and

showing great hostility to Russia.

To-morrow we have a Levee, and on Thursday a ball in our fine new

room, which we open on that day; and on Friday there is a _Peace_ Fete

at the Crystal Palace. On Saturday we go out of town; and now I must

end, begging to be forgiven for so hurried a scrawl, but I had to

write a long letter and to _sit_ to Winterhalter. Ever your devoted

Niece,

VICTORIA R.

[Footnote 26: He had come to England, charged with a special

mission.]

[Pageheading: COLONIAL GOVERNORSHIPS]

_Queen Victoria to Mr Labouchere._

OSBORNE, _14th May 1856_.

The Queen has received Mr Labouchere's letter, and hastens to express

her opinion that Mr Wilson[27] would not be at all a proper person to

be Governor of so large and important a Colony as Victoria. It ought

to be a man of higher position and standing, and who could represent

his Sovereign adequately....

She wishes further to observe that Mr Labouchere should in future take

care that, while he tries to ascertain the feelings of people as to

their accepting the offer of a Colonial appointment, before he submits

them to the Queen, that these enquiries should be made in such a

manner as not to lead these persons to _expect_ the appointment,

else, if the _Queen_ does not approve of them, the whole odium of the

refusal will fall upon her. The best way, and the way in which similar

appointments are conducted in the other Offices, would be to mention

the names first to the Queen, and if she approves of them, to

ascertain the feelings of the respective candidates. This would avoid

all difficulties on the subject.

[Footnote 27: James Wilson, the founder of _The Economist_,

was at this time Financial Secretary to the Treasury. In 1859

he accepted the new office of Financial Member of the Council

of India, but died in the following year.]

_Queen Victoria to Mr Labouchere._

_14th May 1856_.

The Queen would quite approve of the selection of Sir H. Bulwer, Lord

Lyttelton, or Sir H. Barkly for Victoria. She is decidedly of opinion

that the Governor should be an Englishman and not a Colonist. Now that

self-Government has been established in the Colonies, the person of

the Governor is the only connection remaining with the Mother Country;

and if the Government were once filled from among the public men in

the Colonies, this would become a precedent most difficult to break

through again, and possibly paving the way for total separation.[28]

[Footnote 28: Sir Henry Bulwer declined. Sir Henry Barkly was

appointed.]

[Pageheading: NAVAL POLICY]

_Queen Victoria to Sir Charles Wood._

OSBORNE, _18th May 1856_.

The Queen has to thank Sir C. Wood for his long and clear statement

as to the present position of the Naval Force, which she quite

understands. She attaches the greatest importance to perfect faith

being kept with the sailors, and on that account was distressed to

hear of the misapprehension at Portsmouth the other day.

A good system for a Naval Reserve would be most important. The Queen

thinks a Commission, composed chiefly of _younger officers_ still

conversant with the _present_ feelings of our sailors, would best be

able to advise on the subject; the old Admirals are always and not

unnaturally somewhat behind their time.

With respect to the policy of not too rapidly reducing our naval

armaments, Sir C. Wood only anticipates the Queen's most anxious wish

on this subject, for we cannot tell what may not happen anywhere at

any moment; our relations with America are very unsettled, and our

Alliance with France _depends_ upon the life of one man. And it

is best to be prepared, for else you excite suspicion if you have

suddenly to make preparations without being _able_ to state for what

they are intended.

With regard to the Sailors' Homes, the Queen concurs in the advantage

of leaving them to private management; but the Government, having so

large a stake in the sailors' welfare, would act wisely and justly to

make a handsome donation to all of them at the present moment, taking

care that this should be used by the different establishments for

their permanent extension. Five thousand pounds amongst them would

be by no means an unreasonable sum to give as a token of the interest

taken in the well-being of these brave men when no immediate return in

shape of service was expected for it.

_Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._

OSBORNE, _21st May 1856_.

The Queen is very anxious about the fixing of our Peace establishment

both for the Army and Navy. Although Lord Hardinge's proposals are

before the Government already for some time, no proposal has yet been

submitted to the Queen; and on enquiry from Sir C. Wood, he stated

but two days ago that no reduction of the Navy was yet settled. On

the other hand, the Queen sees from the Chancellor of the Exchequer's

speech that he specifies the sums by which both Army and Navy

estimates are to be reduced. This _prejudges_ the whole question,

and will deprive the Government of all power freely to consider

these important questions. The Queen was, moreover, sorry to find

Mr Disraeli, Mr Gladstone, and Sir Francis Baring agreeing with the

doctrine of the _Times_ and Lord Grey that we ought _not_ to improve

our state of preparation for war; and if we had been better prepared

for the late war, we should have been still more disappointed.[29]

[Footnote 29: In the course of an elaborate reply, Lord

Palmerston stated that the country had never been in a better

condition of defence than at the present time, but he insisted

that the Militia, which from 1815 to 1832 had been allowed

to become extinct, must be maintained in an efficient

state--120,000 strong.]

[Pageheading: TITLE OF PRINCE CONSORT]

[Pageheading: PRECEDENCE OF PRINCE ALBERT]

_Memorandum by Queen Victoria._

WINDSOR CASTLE, _May 1856_.

The letters of Queen Victoria, vol. 3, 1854-1861 · 第 6 / 16 章