CHAPTER II.

_The Leprosy._

A most severe disease, to which the bodies of the Jews were very

subject, was the Leprosy. Its signs recorded in the holy scriptures

are chiefly these. Pimples arose in the skin; the hair was turned

white; the plague (or sore) in sight was deeper than the skin, when

the disease had been of long standing; a white tumour appeared in the

skin, in which there was quick flesh; the foul eruptions gained ground

daily, and at length covered the whole surface of the body. And the

evil is said to infect, not only the human body, but also the cloaths

and garments, nay (what may seem strange) utensils made of skins or

furs, and even the very walls of the houses. Wherefore there are

precepts laid down for cleansing these also, as well as the lepers.

Medical authors are of different opinions concerning the contagion of

this disease. And whereas neither the Arabian nor Greek physicians,

who have treated largely of the leprosy, have given the least hint of

this extraordinary force of it, whereby it may infect cloaths and

walls of houses; the Rabbin doctors dispute, whether that which seized

the Jews, was not intirely different from the common leprosy; and they

all affirm, that _there never appeared in the World, a leprosy of

cloaths and houses, except only in Judea, and among the sole people of

Israel_.

For my part, I shall now freely propose, what I think most probable on

the subject. One kind of contagion is more subtile than another; for

there is a sort, which is taken into the body by the very breath; such

as I have elsewhere said to exist in the plague, small pox, and other

malignant fevers. But there is another sort, which infects by contact

alone; either internal, as the venom of the venereal disease; or

external, as that of the itch, which is conveyed into the body by

rubbing against cloaths, whether woollen or linnen. Wherefore the

leprosy, which is a species of the itch, may pass into a sound man in

this last manner; perhaps also by cohabitation; as Fracastorius has

observed, that _a consumption is contagious, and is contracted by

living with a phthisical person, by the gliding of the corrupted and

putrefied juices_ of the sick _into the lungs of the sound man_.[47]

And _Aretæus_ is of the same opinion with regard to the Elephantiasis,

a disease nearly allied to the Leprosy: for he gives this caution,

"That it is not less dangerous to converse and live with persons

affected with this distemper, than with those infected with the

plague; because the contagion is communicated by the inspired[48]

air."

[47] _De morbis contagiosis. Lib. ii. Cap. ix._

[48] _De causis diuturnorum morborum, et de curationibus

eorundem, Lib. ii. Cap. xiii._

But here occurs a considerable difficulty. For Moses says, "If in the

leprosy there be observed a white tumour in the skin, and it have

turned the hair white in it, and there be quick flesh within the

tumour; it is an old leprosy in the skin of his flesh. But if the

leprosy spread broad in the skin, and cover the whole skin of the

diseased from his head even to his feet, the person shall be

pronounced[49] clean." But the difficulty contained in this passage

will vanish, if we suppose, as it manifestly appears to me, that it

points out two different species of the disease; the one in which the

eroded skin was ulcerated, so that the quick flesh appeared

underneath; the other, which spread on the surface of the skin only in

the form of rough scales. And from this difference it happened, that

the former species was, and the latter was not, contagious. For these

scales, being dry and light like bran, do not penetrate into the skin;

whereas the purulent matter issuing from the ulcers infects the

surface of the body. But concerning the differences of cuticular

diseases, I heartily recommend to the reader's perusal, what Johannes

Manardus, equally valuable for his medical knowledge and the purity of

his Latin, has written upon the subject.[50]

[49] _Levit. Chap. xiii. v. 10 &c._

[50] _Epist. Medicinal. Lib. vii. Epist. ii._

There is no time, in which this disease was not known; but it was

always more severe in Syria and Egypt, as they are hotter countries,

than in Greece and other parts of Europe; and it is even at this day

frequent in those regions. For I have been assured by travellers, that

there are two hospitals for the leprous alone in Damascus. And there

is a fountain at Edessa, in which great numbers of people affected

with this cuticular foulness wash daily, as was the ancient custom.

Moreover we read the principal signs, which occur in the description

of the Mosaic leprosy, excepting only the infection of the cloaths and

houses (of which by and by) recorded by the Greek Physicians.

Hippocrates himself calls the [Greek: leukê] or white leprosy [Greek:

Phoinikiê nousos] the Phoenician disease.[51] For that the word

[Greek: phthinikê] ought to be read [Greek: Phoinikiê], appears

manifestly from Galen in his _Explicatio linguarum Hippocratis_; where

he says that [Greek: phoinikê nousos] is a disease which is _frequent

in Phoenicia and other eastern regions_.[52] In the foregoing chapter I

said that the Leprosy (Leuce) and the Elephantiasis, were diseases of

great affinity:[53] in confirmation of which notion the same Galen

observes, that the one sometimes changes into the other.[54] Now these

two distempers are no where better described than by Celsus, who lived

about the time of Augustus Cæsar, and having collected the works of

the principal Greek writers in physic and surgery, digested them into

order, and turned them into elegant Latin with great judgment. Thus

he describes the leprous diseases. _Three are three species of the_

Vitiligo. _It is named_ [Greek: alphos], _when it is of a white

colour, with some degree of roughness, and is not continuous, but

appears as if some little drops were dispersed here and there;

sometimes it spreads wider, but with certain intermissions or

discontinuities. The_ [Greek: melas] _differs from this in colour,

because it is black, and like a shadow, but in other circumstances

they agree. The_ [Greek: leukê] _has some similitude with the_ [Greek:

alphos], _but it has more of the white, and runs in deeper: and in it

the hairs are white, and like down. All these spread themselves, but

in some persons quicker, in others slower. The_ Alphos _and_ Melas

_come on, and go off some people at different times; but the_ Leuce

_does not easily quit the patient, whom it has seized.[55] But in the

Elephantiasis_, says the same author, _the whole body is so affected,

that the very bones may be said to be injured. The surface of the body

has a number of spots and tumors on it; and their redness is by

degrees changed into a dusky or blackish colour. The surface of the

skin is unequally thick and thin, hard and soft; and is scaley and

rough: the body is emaciated; the mouth, legs and feet swell. When the

disease is inveterate, the nails on the fingers and toes are hidden by

the swelling._[56] And the accounts left us by the Arabian physicians,

agree with these descriptions. Avicenna, the chief of them, says that

_the Leprosy is a sort of universal cancer of the whole body_.[57]

Wherefore it plainly appears from all that has been said, that the

Syrian Leprosy did not differ in nature, but in degree only, from the

Grecian, which was there called [Greek: leukê]; and that this same

disease had an affinity with the Elephantiasis, sometimes among the

Greeks, but very much among the Arabs. For the climate and manner of

living, very much aggravates all cuticular diseases.

[51] _Prorrhetic. Lib. ii. sub finem._

[52] [Greek: Hê kata Phoinikên, ki kata ta alla anatolika

merê pleonazousa.]

[53] _Pag. 15._

[54] _De simpl. medicam. facult. Lib. xi._

[55] _De medicina, Lib. v. Cap. xxviii. §. 19._

[56] _Lib. iii. Cap. xxv._

[57] _Canon, Lib. iv. Fen. 3. Tract. 3. Cap. i._

Now with regard to the infection of the cloaths, it has been found by

most certain experiments, not only in the plague, and some other

malignant eruptive fevers, as the small pox and measles, but even in

the common itch; that the infection, once received into all sorts of

furs or skins, woollen, linnen, and silk, remains a long time in them,

and thence passes into human bodies. Wherefore it is easy to conceive,

that the leprous miasmata might pass from such materials into the

bodies of those, who either wore or handled them, and, like seeds

sown, produce the disease peculiar to them. For it is well known,

that the surface of the body, let it appear ever so soft and smooth,

is not only full of pores, but also of little furrows, and therefore

is a proper nest for receiving and cherishing the minute, but very

active, particles exhaling from infected bodies. But I have treated

this subject in a more extensive manner in my _Discourse on the

Plague_.[58] And these seeds of contagion are soon mixed with an acrid

and salt humor, derived from the blood; which as it naturally ought,

partly to have turned into nutriment, and partly to have perspired

through the skin, it now lodges, and corrodes the little scales of the

cuticle; and these becoming dry and white, sometimes even as white as

snow, are separated from the skin, and fall off like bran. Now, altho'

this disease is very uncommon in our colder climate; yet I have seen

one remarkable case of it, in a countryman, whose whole body was so

miserably seized by it, that his skin was shining as if covered with

snow: and as the furfuraceous scales were daily rubbed off, the flesh

appeared quick or raw underneath. This wretch had constantly lived in

a swampy place, and was obliged to support himself with bad diet and

foul water.

[58] _Chap. i._

But it is much more difficult to account for the infection of the

houses. For it seems hardly possible in nature, that the leprous spots

should grow and spread on dry walls, made of solid materials. But upon

a serious consideration of the different substances employed in

building the walls of houses, such as stones, lime, bituminous earth,

hair of animals, and other such things mix'd together; I thought it

probable, that they may by a kind of fermentation, produce those

_hollow greenish or reddish strokes in sight lower than the wall_ (or

within the surface)[59] which, as they in some measure resembled the

leprous scabs on the human body, were named the _Leprosy in a house_.

For bodies of different natures, very easily effervesce upon being

blended together. Wherefore we may reasonably suppose that this

moisture or mouldiness, gradually coming forth and spreading on the

walls, might prove very prejudicial to the inhabitants, by its

stinking and unwholesome smell, without having recourse to any

contagious quality in it. And somewhat analogous to this is pretty

frequently observable in our own houses; where, when the walls are

plaistered with bad mortar, the calcarious and nitrose salts sweat out

upon their surface, of a colour almost as white as snow. The power of

inspecting their houses was invested in the priests; who, when they

observed this foulness, gave orders first to have the walls of the

house scraped all around; and afterwards, if it continued to break

out, to pull down the house, and carry the materials out of the city

into an unclean place.

[59] _Levit. Chap. xiv. v. 37._

I am well aware, that all this is related, as if God himself had

struck the house with this plague. But it is well known, that that way

of speaking is not uncommon in the jewish history; as in unexpected

evils and dreadful calamities, which are sometimes said to be done by

the hand of God, tho' they may be produced by natural causes. Nor can

I be easily induced to believe, with some divines, that God, who

commanded his people to be always free from every sort of

uncleanness, would vouchsafe to work a miracle, in order to inflict

this most filthy punishment on any person. Thus much is indubitable,

that the precepts of the mosaic law were constituted particularly, to

avert the people from idolatry and false religion, and at the same

time to keep them clear of all uncleanness.[60] To this end conspired

the prohibition of eating blood, carrion, or animals that died

spontaneously, swines flesh, and that of several other creatures.[61]

For all these meats yield a gross nutriment, which is improper and

prejudicial in diseases of the skin.

[60] _Mos. Maimonid. More Navochim, Part. iii. Cap. xxxiii.

et xlviii._

[61] _Levit. Chap. xi. et xvii._

But in order to close these theological researches with somewhat

medical, I am convinced from experience, that there is not a better

medicine known against this filthy disease, than the _tincture of

Cantharides_ of the _London Dispensatory_. Its remarkable virtue in

this case, is owing to the diuretic quality of these flies. For there

is a great harmony between the kidneys and glands of the skin, so that

the humors brought on the latter, easily find a way thro' the former,

and are carried off by urine: and on the other hand, when the kidneys

have failed in the performance of their functions, an urinous humor

sometimes perspires thro' the cuticular pores. But such cathartics are

to be interposed at proper intervals, as are most proper for

evacuating thick and acrid humors.

Medica Sacra Or, A Commentary on the Most Remarkable Diseases Mentioned in the Holy Scriptures · 第 2 / 15 章