SHALL THE TREATY BE RATIFIED?

Such are obvious considerations of a general character. The interests

of the Pacific States, the extension of the national domain, the

extension of republican institutions, the foreclosure of adverse

British possession, and the amity of Russia,--these are the points we

have passed in review. Most of these, if not all, are calculated to

impress the public mind; but I can readily understand a difference of

opinion with regard to the urgency of negotiation at this hour. Some

may think that the purchase-money and the annual outlay that must

follow might have been postponed another decade, while Russia continued

in possession as trustee for our benefit; and yet some of the reasons

for the treaty do not seem to allow delay.

At all events, now that the treaty has been signed by plenipotentiaries

on each side duly empowered, it is difficult to see how we can refuse

to complete the purchase without putting to hazard the friendly

relations which happily subsist between the United States and Russia.

The overtures originally proceeded from us. After a delay of years, and

other intervening propositions, the bargain was at length concluded.

It is with nations as with individuals. A bargain once made must be

kept. Even if still open to consideration, it must not be lightly

abandoned. I am satisfied that the dishonoring of this treaty, after

what has passed, would be a serious responsibility for our country. As

an international question, it would be tried by the public opinion of

the world; and there are many who, not appreciating the requirement of

our Constitution by which a treaty must have “the advice and consent

of the Senate,” would regard its rejection as bad faith. There would

be jeers at us, and jeers at Russia also: at us for levity in making

overtures, and at Russia for levity in yielding to them. Had the Senate

been consulted in advance, before the treaty was signed or either power

publicly committed, as is often done on important occasions, it would

be under less constraint. On such a consultation there would have been

opportunity for all possible objections, and a large latitude for

reasonable discretion. Let me add, that, while forbearing objection

now, I hope that this treaty may not be drawn into a precedent, at

least in the independent manner of its negotiation. I would save to the

Senate an important power justly belonging to it.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 15 (of 20) · 第 18 / 123 题