SPACE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR WAR

A natural outgrowth of the military and prestige facets of space

exploration is the question of whether this activity, in time, will

replace the forces which have historically driven nations into armed

conflict.

Any number of social scientists and historians have speculated that this

might occur. The theory is that the conquest of space may prove to be

the moral equivalent of war by substituting for certain material and

psychological needs usually supplied through war; that the absorption of

energies, resources, imagination, and aggressiveness in pursuit of the

space adventure may become an effective way of maintaining peace.

Put another way, nations might become "extroverted" to the point where

their urge to overcome the unknown would dwarf their historic desires

for power, wealth, and recognition--attributes which have so often led

to war in the past.

The fact that the United Nations, late in 1959, agreed to set up a

permanent Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space attests to the

hopes and potential of such a development.

Of course, whether this condition will actually develop is anybody's

guess. But in a world where brute force is becoming increasingly

dangerous and catastrophic, the bare possibility of such a result should

not be ignored by those who may be contemplating the values of space

exploration. It could be the highest value of them all.

[Illustration: FIGURE 5.--Today's assembly lines for

automobiles and aircraft are being supplemented by the growing

astronautics industry, here shown turning out capsules for manned space

flight.]

The Practical Values of Space Exploration Report of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, Eighty-Sixth Congress, Second Session · 第 29 / 56 题