CHAPTER XIII.

ELECTIONEERING, POLITICAL WARFARE, AND PARLIAMENTARY REFORM UNDER

WILLIAM IV., 1830-32.

The last parliament of George IV.’s reign met November 14, 1826.

Towards the close of the session, as is shadowed in Doyle’s early

cartoons, the nation was tiring of the Tories, and the unpopular and

somewhat antiquated Wellington Ministry found the country in distress

and clamorous for retrenchment, to each of which complaints the rigid

disciplinarian in chief command turned a deaf and unsympathetic

ear. Towards the middle of the year 1830 the king’s condition was

threatening, and with his impending decease the close of the session

was anticipated. The situation is pictorially summed up in one of HB’s

sketches as the “Present State of Public Feeling Partially Illustrated”

(May 28, 1830). The views entertained by various individuals upon the

king’s illness are illustrated in their persons: a dandy regrets the

postponement of routs and balls, a speculator complains of the dulness

of the funds, a merchant finds business at a standstill, while a lady

of fashion is resigned to the will of Providence by the opportune

reflection that should the king die there would be the gayer prospect

of a queen and Court--an advantageous exchange for a sovereign shrouded

from his subjects. John Bull good-naturedly declares he hopes George

may recover, “he was such a fine princely fellow!” But the part of this

picture which applies most pertinently to the subject in hand is found

in a member of the Tory Government, who is reflecting “That should

there be a change in the ministry--then I must walk out. That would

be very inconvenient at the present. I wish most sincerely His Majesty

won’t die yet!” while another M.P. is filled with apprehension: “There

will he a dissolution of parliament, and I shall lose my seat, and with

it all chance of preferment. Oh, I pray God to preserve His Majesty’s

life these many years.” Swiftly indeed, and somewhat unexpectedly too,

came the end of the king’s reign and the inauguration of a more liberal

_régime_.

The next day appeared HB’s version of the “Mourning Journal--Alas! Poor

Yorick” (May 29, 1830), showing the Duke of Cumberland and Lord Eldon

as mutes in attendance on the (to them) melancholy occasion of their

chief’s decease. “The Magic Mirror, or a Peep into Futurity” (June

8, 1830), shows a magician favouring John Bull with the prospect he

might anticipate: the youthful Princess Victoria becoming the point of

contention on the one hand between her mother, the Duchess of Kent,

and her uncle, Prince Leopold, of Liberal proclivities, and the Tory

pressure of her uncle, the Duke of Cumberland, assisted by the Duke of

Wellington, on the other.

While the dissolution was impending, Doyle indicated the revival of

Whig prospects, “The Gheber worshiping the Rising Sun” (July 6, 1830)

shows Mr. (afterwards Lord) Brougham paying his devotions to “William

IV. Rex,” the head of the king on the gold coin, known as “a coronation

medal,” rising over the waters, and taking the place of the orb of day.

Parliament dissolved on July 24th. Owing to some intrigues of the old

campaigner at this emergency, the Duke of Wellington was made to appear

as “A Detected Trespasser,” ordered off the slopes of Windsor by “John

Bull, Ranger:” “Halloa, you sir; keep off the grass (see anecdote,

_Times_, July 19th).”

Another pictorial version of strategies in high life is entitled

“Anticipation; or, Queen Sarah’s visit to Bushy” (July 27, 1830). At

the door of the Lodge at Bushy, where resided the Duke and Duchess

of Clarence, is the carriage of Lady Jersey, with attendants in her

handsome liveries. One of her footmen is imparting the unwelcome

intelligence, “Duchess not at home, my lady.” The Duke of Wellington,

who is on horseback at the other side of the carriage, is consoling

Lady Jersey’s disappointment: “Never mind, never mind, I’ll get you

a key to what is going on here thro’ my dear little St. James’s

Marchioness.” The duchess’s footman, in the royal livery, cannot fathom

the intrigue: “I wonder what brings her down here now? I have been in

this place these twelve years, and never saw her here before!”

[Illustration: Henry Brougham.

King William IV.

THE GHEBER WORSHIPING THE RISING SUN. JULY 6, 1830. BY J. DOYLE (HB).]

What unknown marvels might be anticipated from the combinations of

party, is hinted in the “_Un_-Holy Alliance, or An Ominous Conjunction”

(July 29, 1830), showing the Duke of Cumberland and Lords Durham,

Grey, and Eldon in close confabulation. “Old Bags,” as the whilom lord

chancellor was irreverently christened, is characteristically “laying

down the law,” for the enlightenment of his comrades in this strangely

assorted quartette.

A general and somewhat conventional satire on the possible conduct of

candidates before, upon, and after their return, appeared among the

“Election Squibs and Crackers for 1830,” “Look on this Picture, and

on that.” “General Election--dedicated to Electors in General--the

difference between one hour after the return, and one month after.”

The voter represented is evidently a prosperous mechanic; he wears the

colours of the newly elected one in his hat, and is thus addressed by

the member he has contributed to return: “My worthy, my best friend,

it will be my constant study to comply with your wishes--how can I

serve you? Let me see you often; pray come to the Hall; we shall be

so happy to see you.” This overcoloured state of things is strangely

altered within a month; the candidate is now a full member, and is

evidently studying his own interests to the exclusion of those of his

constituents; in his hand is a peremptory Government “whip,” thus

worded: “Ministers wishing to pass the measure, your vote will be

required.” The legislation in question appears to threaten the welfare

of his late enthusiastic supporter, who has ventured to interview his

member on the momentous topic: “Sir, there is a Bill about to pass

that will quite ruin our trade, and bring our families to beggary. I

hope, sir, you will use your influence to throw it out.” The member

now wears an indignant expression: “You are an impudent fellow! I

don’t know you, and, if I did, do you suppose I should be dictated

to, fellow?” This plate was executed by William Heath, and issued by

T. McLean, of the Haymarket. Perhaps the most notable feature is an

announcement that “Election caricatures can be executed for gentlemen

in three hours.” This advertisement, appended to the caricature in

question, is curious. Of course, for a not-extravagant consideration,

intending candidates could secure the playful services of William Heath

for rendering ridiculous or contemptible the persons and principles of

their antagonists, and for the exaltation of their own.

LOOK ON THIS PICTURE--AND ON THAT.

[Illustration: Before the Election.]

[Illustration: After the Election.]

ELECTION SQUIBS AND CRACKERS FOR 1830. BY W. HEATH.

[_Page 346._]

Political satirists, happily for themselves, as a rule (with one or

two exceptions, such as Sayer and HB) have soared above mere party

distinctions; and though it may at first sight strike the observer

as indicating a looseness of principles--rather, say, a freedom from

prejudices--that each gifted artist seems to lash and laugh at both

sides alternately to the best of his abilities, some allowance must be

made for the impartiality which enables these latter-day Juvenals to

detect the foibles of either faction. As a rule, it may be assumed the

old generation of famous caricaturists, taking Gillray, Rowlandson, and

George Cruikshank as the most eminent exponents, rather leaned to the

popular side of any given question; but, inclination apart, they were

just as capable of glorifying “the powers that be,” and of “dusting

the jackets” of the would-be reformers. Of this trio, Cruikshank

particularly prided himself, as he has himself recorded, upon espousing

the side of right against palpable wrong, and of championing the weak

against the strong. But, in spite of this pleasing illusion, his

caricatures are equally trenchant on either side--to-day the Regent is

demolished, to-morrow his unfortunate wife is held up to opprobrium,

with happy nonchalance and impartiality. In fact, it may be said of

Gillray, as the specimens of his ability in this direction sufficiently

demonstrate, that his pictorial satires against Pitt and the Tories

were equalled only by his satires directed against Fox and the Whigs,

or the youthful Burdett and the Radical reformers of his earlier day.

Apropos of the same general elections, we find our old friends,

Sir Francis Burdett and his whilom preceptor and champion, William

Cobbett, of _Political Register_ repute, engaged in what the artist

delineates as “A _Character_-istic Dialogue” (September 2, 1830).

“Peter Porcupine,” having parliamentary aspirations, is applying to

his ancient pupil and ally for a voucher: “Being much in want of a

character, I make bold, Sir Francis, to ask you for one; it appearing

that your benevolence in this way embraces all sorts of criminals,

you cannot consistently refuse me!” Burdett, in spite of this touching

reference to his exertions on behalf of the prisoner inmates of

Coldbath Fields, is turning a haughty front to the applicant: “I cannot

do anything for you; your character is already _Registered_.” With the

reformed parliament, Cobbett was returned for Oldham. In the House he

disappointed expectations, and was regarded as somewhat in the light of

a failure.

[Illustration: WILLIAM COBBETT--“PETER PORCUPINE.” BY J. GILLRAY.]

The usual changes of seats had taken place in the course of the

elections, and it was hinted that the Wellington-Peel Administration

might find it expedient to increase its strength by the infusion of

new blood, with a view to the “power-to-add-to-their-numbers” policy.

The chiefs still in office are shown by Doyle as visiting “The Noodle

Bazaar” (September 9, 1830, Q. and HB delt.). Reviewing the files

of various assorted “bustoes,” Wellington, using his eye-glass, is

observing to his colleague, “Peel, I am in great want of a few good

heads to place in our Cabinet before the opening of the new House

in October, and I see some here which I think would answer, if they

could be had on reasonable terms.” Peel, alive to the results of the

elections, is replying, “I perceive that the places of some have been

changed, and their value raised since I last saw them, and pray observe

the strange mixture of heads upon the _upper shelf_.” The Peers who,

according to the notification below them, “May be had separately or

together,” occupy the upper shelf, and below is a cabinet of busts for

sale, ready assorted. The shelved lords offer a motley choice: Lords

Grey, Eldon, Holland, Lansdowne, the Duke of Cumberland, etc.,--all

statesmen out of work. Below the upper shelf is a platform on which

is an assorted ready-made ministry (of busts) arranged in a regular

order. “This group is to be sold in one lot. Every head has its price

marked on it.” The respective busts represent Huskisson (president of

the Board of Trade), Grant (colonies), Palmerston (foreign secretary),

Melbourne (home secretary), etc. On a pedestal marked “Yorkshire, to

wit,” is the brazen bust of Henry Brougham, the plinth with the word

“Rolls” struck out in favour of “Chancery.” The bust of Hume in marble

stands on a square and massive pediment, marked “Middlesex.” O’Connell

is below in clay; he is thus ticketed: “This head won’t be sold--(until

it be bought).” A row of lesser men on a shelf in the distance bears

the advertisement, “These small busts may be had remarkably cheap.”

The bust of Charles X. is just upset; while, on a high plinth, marked

“The People’s Choice--a French pattern of inestimable value,” stands

his successor, Louis Philippe. The Dey of Algiers is also thrown aside,

while Lords Manners, Redesdale, and Sidmouth are among the “antiques,”

obsolete patterns, and “oddments.”

The proverbial independence of John Bull’s character is playfully

called in question (September 10, 1830), the national prototype being

represented (not for the first or last time) as “The man wot is easily

led by the nose.” The _Times_ is the potential leading organ to which

John Bull is attached in the way described; he is exclaiming, in

happy delusion, “What a glorious thing it is to enjoy the liberty and

independence of an Englishman!”

The displacement of the Wellington-Peel Cabinet followed a little

later on. We next see the Duke of Cumberland surrendering office:

“Resignation and Fortitude; or, the Gold Stick.” The king is seated

busied in State affairs, the ex-Gold Stick, handing in the wand of

office, is remarking, “I have now only to cut my stick and be off!”

William IV., still pen in hand, replies briefly, “Thank ye, brother,

thank ye,” being evidently reconciled both to his situation and the

enormous sacrifice involved.

Incidentally we find a reference to the general election which was then

engaging public attention; Doyle has ingeniously given a novel turn to

his view of one of the candidates, by introducing a comparison with a

performer who was also enjoying popular notice, “The Rival Candidates”

(August 9, 1830). There are two hustings erected, and the crowd of free

and independent electors is filling the intervening space. The satire

is evidently aimed at Sir Alexander Grant, who, standing in front of

his committee, is pointing, with a self-satisfied air, to his chin, of

which Doyle has made the most. His rival is Michel Boai, “the musical

wonder,” a Tyrolese performer, who “played tunes on his chin” by sheer

muscular force. He is shown hammering his nether jaw with his fists,

and giving a specimen of his chin-proficiency, supported by another

minstrel with a small violin. Boai’s performance has won the sympathies

and suffrages of his audience, who have with one accord turned their

backs upon Sir A. Grant, and are applauding the new musical marvel.

Boai’s agent is skilfully “working the oracle” while drawing attention

to the rival booth:--

“The hon^{ble} Gentleman opposite has certainly a most

extraordinary chin, and when he places his claims to your

suffrages upon that broad and ample basis, it must be GRANTed

that he rests his hopes upon some foundation; but, Gentlemen,

the Candidate whom I propose to you possesses such transcendent

superiority in this important feature that I feel BOAIed

up with confidence, when I claim for him your triumphant

preference (cheers); and, Gentlemen, permit me to add that, in

the event of his return, which I now consider certain (cheers),

few orators in the hon: House will command more attention, or

be listened to with so much pleasure.”

That the interests of the Wellington Cabinet were in jeopardy is

pictorially conveyed. “The Unsuccessful Appeal” (September 25, 1830)

shows John Bull arm-in-arm with the king, while Wellington is pointing

to a distant movement amongst the crowd, and asking Mr. Bull’s

protection against his political foes. “My good old friend, I want

your assistance against these fellows, who are about to unite for the

purpose of overpowering me by numbers.” The inimical confederates are

Brougham and Lords Holland, Durham, Grey, etc., on the one side, who

are fraternizing with Lord Eldon, the Duke of Cumberland, and others,

on the other. Johnny is thus responding to the old campaigner’s

appeal:--

“I should be sorry to see you defeated by such an unholy

alliance after all the battles we have fought and won together;

but the fact is, I feel so oppressed with the glory of so many

victories, that I must beg to be excused from interfering any

more for the present in the disputes of others. There are,

however, plenty of clever fellows to be had, who are able and

willing enough to assist you, but when you again meet with

such, let me advise you not to be too ready to quarrel with

them!”

William IV. is quite at one with his friend, the last

speaker--“Whatever you say, John, I will agree to; for _your_ will is

_my_ pleasure.”

Before the new parliament assembled, the Cabinet received some

damaging assaults from the press. The nature of this concealed warfare

is explained by HB in his sketch of “A Masked Battery” (October 4,

1830). The assailant is Henry Brougham: in his legal guise, entrenched

behind the “Result of the General Election,” with the _Edinburgh

Review_ for a screen, he is bespattering his opponents, the beleaguered

“Ins,” with ink. The Tory Cabinet is suffering severely: Wellington

is to the front, trying to ward off the shower from Brougham’s

inkstand-battery; in his hand is a damaging attack on paper,--“The

Duke of Wellington and the Whigs.” Sir Robert Peel is endeavouring

to shelter himself behind his chief. Lords Bathurst, Ellenborough,

Lyndhurst, and Aberdeen are all suffering from the assault.

When the House met, we get a prospect of the prime minister reviewing

his forces--“A Cabinet Picture” (November 5, 1830). Wellington, with

his colleagues, Lords Aberdeen, Lyndhurst, Bathurst, Rosslyn, Melville,

and others, whom the chief is thus addressing:--

“Having been obliged to recognize the King of the French,

we must, as a set-off--acknowledge our friend Miguel. The

Belgians--poor people!--not knowing how to take care of

themselves, must be protected from the evils of independence!

So much for foreign affairs, now for domestic. I say that

our present system is the very perfection of systems, and

consequently admits of no improvement; I will go further,

and say that, while I have power, no species of reform shall

take place! and now--having said it--if Peel will but manage

the new Police, Hardinge Ireland, Goulburn [Chancellor of the

Exchequer] abstain from projects of finance, and Ellenborough

hold his tongue, we may manage to keep our seats for another

session.”

After the elections it was evident that things out-of-doors were moving

antagonistically to the interests of the Wellington Cabinet, but the

“Old Campaigner” still hoped by stratagem to keep in power, although

resolute in asserting that while he kept office no species of reform

should take place. The premier’s optimist confidence “that his ministry

might keep their places for another session” is shown to be misplaced,

for the defeat of his ministry was clearly foreshadowed: “Guy Fawkes,

or the Anniversary of the Popish Plot” (November 9, 1830), shows that

destruction was abroad; and this cartoon is a late exemplification of

the old British institution of burning in effigy a minister when out

of favour. The political Guy is, of course, Wellington, the hero of

a hundred fights, reproduced in straw, tied to a rickety chair, and

is gaily borne to the bonfire by a rejoicing mob of statesmen, his

political antagonists. Lord Lansdowne leads the way, with a blazing

torch to fire the fatal pyre; the bearers are the Duke of Cumberland

and Prince George (Duke of Cambridge), Lords Holland, Sidmouth, Eldon,

etc.; Aberdeen, Stanhope, and the Duke of Newcastle bring up the rear

in a high state of exaltation;--these were the peers who “sapped the

Tory defences.”

Wellington was evidently losing popularity, and the lustre he gained

in the field was being clouded in the Cabinet; John Bull has to come

to his rescue against the rabble, and the valiant captain is once more

shown sheltered under the king’s mantle. It appears the lord mayor’s

banquet was threatened with a hostile demonstration, and the city

magistrate, “Don Key,” was thrown into a deadly state of apprehension

by the alleged prospect of being received with “cold indifference.”

This cartoon is entitled “The False Alarm; or, Much Ado about Nothing.”

The Wellington tenure of power was doomed, and, like Cæsar’s, his fatal

stab was to come from the hand of a colleague, on the inopportune

revival of the Eastern Question. “Scene from the suppressed Tragedy,

entitled the Turco-Greek Conspiracy,” shows the minister (wearing

his well-earned laurels) done to death by the Peers at the foot of

Canning’s statue in the forum; the Senators being armed with deadly

speeches wherewith to accomplish this tragic immolation. “Et tu Brute”

are the hero’s closing words addressed to his past comrade, Lord

Londonderry, who is giving the _coup de grâce_.

W. Heath, who was employed by McLean at the time Doyle’s sketches were

making their appearance, has given many versions of events during

George IV.’s somewhat oppressive reign. At the close of 1830, with

the advent to the throne of a more constitutionally-minded sovereign,

the artist sums up the dismissal of a Cabinet whose actions he had

frequently criticized from a pictorially satirical point of view. In

the version of “His Honour the Beadle Driving the Wagabonds Out of the

Parish,” November 28, 1830, Heath has impressed Sir David Wilkie’s

well-known picture of “The Parish Beadle” into the service of parody.

King William IV., as the Bumble of the situation, is making a clean

sweep of the relics of the past reign: “Come, be off: no hangers

behind--out with you all! I’ll let you see I represent the aristocracy

of the parish!” John Bull, who may be considered to have generally

endorsed his friend William’s policy with hearty goodwill, is giving

his approval: “That’s right, Master Beadle, do your duty and clear the

parish of the varments; they’ve been a pest ever since they’ve been

here.” The chancellor Lyndhurst, Lord Ellenborough, Goulburn (late

chancellor of the exchequer), and the rest, are making a hasty retreat.

Peel, dragging his “new police” monkey attached to a string, is hardly

reconciled to his banishment from office: “Vell, ve did all ve could to

kick up a row afore ve vent!” Wellington, as the “hurdy-gurdy” woman,

dressed in the faded splendours of an old soldier’s coat, is making all

the noise of which the instrument is capable while retreating with his

face to the foe.

The results of the general election of 1830 culminated within a month

of the reassembling of parliament in the substitution of a Whig for a

Tory ministry, and William IV.’s tenure of the throne was inaugurated

by the early adoption of that liberal progress which developed into

the larger measure of reform within two years, the most memorable act

of his reign. Doyle shows the ensuing distribution of offices, and

sketches one of the intrigues for place--Henry Brougham, as “The

Coquet,” being tempted by Lord Grey to a political allegiance, and

courted on the woolsack with the bait of the chancellor’s wig. After

the preliminary skirmishing and cementing of necessary alliances,

the end was short, sharp, and decisive, and is embodied by HB with

his customary point and felicity, as “Examples of the Laconic Style”

(November 26, 1830). The king is “standing at attention;” he has

sent for Lord Grey. “Your conditions?” The coming premier answers,

“Retrenchment, Reform, and Peace.” “Done!” says the king, holding

out his hand on the bargain. The Duke of Wellington, on the left,

is stepping off the scene, while John Bull, to the right, is not

reluctantly giving his late commander the order, “Right about face,

march!”

[Illustration: Lord Chancellor Lyndhurst.

Scarlett.

Lord Ellenborough.

Goulburn, Chancellor of Exchequer.

Duke of Wellington.

Sir Robert Peel.

William IV.

John Bull.

HIS HONOUR THE BEADLE (WILLIAM IV.) DRIVING THE WAGABONDS OUT OF THE

PARISH. NOV. 28, 1830. By W. HEATH.

[_Page 354._]

With the advent of the powerful Whig party came such sweeping reforms

that minds accustomed to the old order of things began to take fright.

It seemed that national institutions, and those fabled landmarks, “The

bulwarks of the constitution,” bid fair to be swept away within six

months, and another appeal to the constituencies was imminent. The

Tory views of the new order of things were embodied by Doyle (April 4,

1831) in “A Very Prophetical and Pathetical Allegory,” in which it was

foreshadowed that the institutions of the country could not survive

reform, but must succumb within ten years. This vision conjures up a

deserted cemetery, wherein, in woeful anticipation, is erected the tomb

of departed greatness: “Here lyeth the British Constitution, which,

after a rapid decline of ten years, departed this world, 1841.--I was

well; wishing to be better, here I am. _Sic transit gloria mundi._” The

Duke of Wellington, as a widowed and ancient crony in deep sables, is

shedding a tear, and depositing a wreath on the family vault, which is

presumed to contain such honoured dust.

The gloomy forebodings of the Tories are further illustrated with much

spirit in the guise of an expected game of “Leap-Frog down Constitution

Hill,” April 13, 1831, in which the Whigs are flying over the heads of

the opposition. On Constitution Hill stand Burdett, O’Connell, Hunt,

and other advanced politicians, crying, “Go it, my boys; we shall soon

have it our own way;” the game is proceeding swimmingly down the slope.

Lord King has brought down an archbishop--the head of the Church; Lord

Althorp is sweeping down the judges; Lord Lansdowne has upset Lord

Eldon; Lord Durham directs the tall Duke of Cumberland to stoop his

head; Lord Brougham, in his chancellor’s robes, has alighted on the

shoulders of the Duke of Wellington; William IV. has “tucked in his

head” and “made a back” for Lord Grey; but the premier, in his flying

leap, has failed to clear the crown, which is sent spinning. “D----n it,”

says the king, “didn’t you tell me you wouldn’t touch the Crown?”

The coming appeal to the country was preceded by the usual political

meetings; this circumstance is made the subject of a felicitous parody,

“_Anticipated_ Radical Meeting” (April 20, 1831). In one of Hunt’s

Matchless (Blacking) carts stands the glib-tongued Radical in the full

tide of his harangue; “Hunt, the Matchless Reformer,” is surrounded

by the Tory party; the opposition consists of the ex-ministers, and

includes Sugden, Peel, Horace Twiss, Wetherell, Goulburn, Ellenborough,

Wellington, Aberdeen, and others, who are ironically welcoming and

encouraging the oration. Hunt’s speech is thus reported:--

“Will the Bill, I ask, do away with places and pensions?

(Cheers.) Will it abolish tithes and taxes? (Cheers.) In a

word, will it make the poor rich and happy? (Great cheering.)

No! It will do none of these! therefore I say this Bill is all

a delusion! (Tremendous cheering and waving of hats.)”

Old Eldon, mounted on the shoulders of his ally, the Duke of

Cumberland, is vociferously calling for “One cheer more!”

The House dissolved on the 22nd of April, and the fresh elections

took place in May. The nature of John Bull’s complaint and

the respective views of the rival practitioners who were

called in for consultation are set forth by HB (May 2, 1831) as

“Hoo-Loo-Choo--_alias_ John Bull and the Doctors.” The national

prototype is seated in an arm-chair; his huge corporation seems to have

become utterly unwieldy and inconvenient; he occupies the centre of

the picture. His doctors “in and out of place,” are on the respective

sides. John Bull is addressing Lord Grey:--

[Illustration: Sir F. Burdett.

Lord Durham.

Duke of Cumberland.

Lord Holland.

Lord Althorp

on a Judge.

Lord King

on the Bishop.

Lord Brougham (Lord Chancellor).

Duke of Wellington.

The King (William IV.)

Lord Grey.

LEAP-FROG DOWN CONSTITUTION HILL. APRIL 13, 1831. BY J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 356._

“With such vehement force and might

Lord King drove all before,

The Bill went through ’twixt Philpotts’ legs

And turn’d him fairly o’er.”]

[Illustration: Lord J. Russell.

Lord Althorp.

Lord Grey.

John Bull.

Sir Robert Peel.

Duke of Wellington.

HOO-LOO-CHOO, _alias_ JOHN BULL AND THE DOCTORS. MAY 2,

1831.

[_Page 357._]

“I can’t say that my bodily health was ever better, or that I ever felt

stronger, tho’ to be sure I am not growing younger; but then every one

is telling me how deformed I am grown of late, and this tumour--which I

have had from my infancy--is all a mass of Corruption.”

Grey, while indicating his colleagues, Althorp and Russell, says in

reply, “This deformity is quite inconsistent, believe me, with the

nature of your Constitution, and therefore must be got rid of. I will

undertake, with your approbation, to remove it, and my assistant,

Doctor Russell here, will prepare you for the operation.”

Russell is observing, “I once thought that a case of this description

ought to be treated with great caution, and even wrote, as well as

talked, a great deal about it, but now I am quite of a different

opinion. I think there is nothing like cutting away thro’ thick and

thin!”

Sir Robert Peel, one of the dismissed doctors, on mature consideration,

is inclined to question his past policy: “Yet I begin to think we

could have done better, when we found him determined to think that his

Constitution was impaired, to have tried, just in the way of soothing,

a gentle alternative course.”

Dr. Wellington is still of his old opinion: “I say that the man has

no defect in his Constitution, and that what they call Corruption is

necessary to his existence; but now, because he would not believe me,

but chose rather to submit to the experiments of those rash operators,

Wharncliffe, who is a sensible man, lays all the blame on me.”

The lively proceedings while the returns were preparing were fittingly

epitomized by HB as “May Day” (May 4, 1831), setting forth as a

“Jack-in-the-Green” performance the new revels of the revisers of the

constitution. The king occupies the green, which is topped by a crown,

and bears the word “Reform;” the face of William IV. is peeping through

the aperture. Earl Grey is “My Lord;” Sir Francis Burdett is almost

equally conspicuous. Hobhouse, Hume, and O’Connell are making a good

deal of rough music with shovels, and Russell has the Pandean pipes and

big drum, on which he is vigorously performing. Lord Brougham, as “My

Lady,” is going round with the ladle; he is interrogated by the Duke

of Cumberland and Lord Eldon as to the “Man in the Green.” The Duke of

Gloucester and Lord Londonderry, among the audience, are regarding “My

Lady” with suspicion.

The second portion of the new tactics is developed as “Leap-Frog on

a Level; or, Going Headlong to the Devil” (May 6, 1831). The turn of

the Reformers has come, and the Radicals are making them submit to

the same process as they lately inflicted on the Tories. Carlile is

rolling over a churchman to the place of torment, having leaped a

trifle too far; the Evil One, as he declares in person, “has come to

end your games.” “The Devil you are,” says the author of the tracts.

Sir Francis Burdett is unwillingly giving a back, “Have I stooped for

this?” His old ally, “Porcupine” Cobbett, is leaping heavily on to the

baronet’s shoulders, “My turn now, old Glory.” Grey is staggering while

Hunt is “overing” him: “I begin to think this is a very disorderly

game.” The mob are shouting, “Go it, Hunt,” which is displeasing to

the now elevated orator: “D---- the Rabble, they take me for one of

themselves.” Brougham is brought to his knees: “Hullo! you’ll have

off my wig;” O’Connell, firmly seated on the chancellor’s back, is

crying, “Oh! never mind; _I’ll_ take care of that!” The king is brought

to the earth; “This is the levelling system with a vengeance.” He is

overturned by Hume, who is exclaiming, “This summing-up is the _tottle_

of the whole.”

[Illustration: Hume on Lord King.

Dan O’Connell on Lord Brougham.

Orator Hunt on Lord Grey.

W. Cobbett on Sir Francis Burdett.

R. Carlile.

LEAP-FROG ON A LEVEL; OR, GOING HEADLONG TO THE DEVIL. MAY 6, 1831. BY

J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 358._

“‘But God is with us,’ said the King,

‘The people must be free.

I will create an hundred Peers

If need should ever be.’”]

The House had dissolved on the 22nd of April, 1831, and the elections

which ensued were remarkable for spirit. A quantity of literature, in

the shape of broadsides, songs, and squibs of a startling character,

was produced on this occasion, in such abundance that even for small

constituencies in out-of-the-way places these _jeux d’esprit_ form

huge volumes. A number of parodies appeared on the great question

of the Reform Bill, imitations of scripture among others. Of the

ballads published over the border, the one most descriptive of the

constitutional struggle is found in a parody of “Chevy Chase.”

“THE NEW CHEVY CHASE.

“God prosper long our noble king,

Our lives and safeties all;

Some dreadful battles late there were

Fought in St. Stephen’s Hall.

“Long o’er the land, with pride and scorn,

The Tories held their sway;

The child will rue that is unborn,

That has their debts to pay.

“The Tory Lords throughout the land,

A vow to God did make,

Their pleasure in their borough towns

As formerly to take.

“For they would keep their borough towns,

Whate’er the King might say.

These tidings to Lord Russell came,

In Bedford, where he lay.

“Who sent the Tories present word,

He would prevent their sport;

These noble Lords not fearing him,

Kept up their old resort:

“With nigh two hundred Tories bold,

All men of the old light,

Who knew full well, but would not own,

They were not in the right.

“Dark rumours through the country ran,

And many filled with fear--

And an old ‘Blacking man,’ called Hunt,

At Preston did appear.

“And long before this time they had

Been lab’ring in vain,

And fencing round their borough towns,

That must be sieged and ta’en.

“The Bill-men muster’d on the hills,

Unable to endure;

They of their bare backs show’d a part,

Their clothing being poor.

“The ancient Whigs in front did stand,

Not one was seen to quake;

And with loud cries the hills and vales

Were rous’d for freedom’s sake.

“Duke Wellington stood in the bent,

And spoke with haughty sneer--

Says he, ‘Earl Grey he promised,

And Russell, to be here.

“‘But now I think they will not come,

To meet us here this day.’

With that a trembling pensioner

Thus to the Duke did say:--

“‘Lo! yonder doth Lord Russell come--

Earl Grey is in my sight--

Behind I see a countless host,

And gloomy as the night.

“‘All men displeased, from hill and dale

The King’s name gives them head.’

‘Fie on the King,’ said Wellington,

‘Although I eat his bread.

“‘And, now, my proud preservatives,

Your courage to advance;

Upon the plains of Belgium,

You know I conquer’d France.

“‘And even the great Bonaparte,

That filled the world with fear,

I him encounter’d man for man

With Blucher in his rear.’

“Lord John upon a gallant Grey,

Like his great sires of old,

Stood foremost of the company,

His bearing it was bold:

“‘Shew me,’ said he, ‘what right have ye

To kick up sic a steer,[65]

For a few dirty border towns,

Worth little goods or gear.’

“The first that then did answer make

Was Wellington so free,

Who said, ‘We’ll keep our borough towns,--

Corrupted though they be.

“‘For we have bought our borough towns

There’s none can that gainsay.’

Then Russell swore a solemn oath,

And likewise did Earl Grey.

“‘We will not thus outbravèd be:

Proud chief, thy strength we’ll try;

We know thee for a bloody man,

In this thy strength does lie.

“‘But as we wish for no man’s death,

Nor any blood to spill,

You see we’ve brought into the field

No weapons but a Bill.

“‘Let you and I the matter try,

With reason on each side.’

‘Curse on your cant,’ said Wellington;

‘You Whigs I can’t abide.’

“Then stept a quibbling lawyer forth,

Old Wetherell was his name,

Who said, ‘he would not have it told

In Boroughbridge for shame,

“‘That e’er his captain or himself,

While he stood looking on,

Would condescend, or reasons give,

For reasons they had none.

“‘I’ll do the worst that I can do,

These inroads to withstand;

While I have power to use my tongue,

The robbers I will brand.’

“The Tory archers seized their shafts,

And a long-bow they drew,

But in the flight they wanted might,

And were not pointed true.

“To urge the battle in its need,

Lord Althorp bade the bent,

He was not filled with any pride,

But had a good intent.

“They clos’d full fast on every side,

They fought at every mound,

Till at the last the Tories yield,

And quit the common ground.

“O but it was a joy to see,

And likewise for to hear,

The grateful sounds that through the land

Came pealing on the ear.

“At last Duke Wellington and Grey

Came in each other’s sight;

Like lions roused they stand at bay,

And parley ere they fight.

“‘Yield thee, proud Captain,’ said Earl Grey,

‘In name of our good King;

You little think, by this delay,

What mischief you may bring.’

“‘Thy praise I will most freely give,

And this report of thee,

Thou art the most outrageous Duke

That ever I did see.’

“‘To yield to thee,’ said Wellington,

‘Would bring me nought but scorn;

Bring up the bishops to the fight,

And blow the gospel horn.’

“With that there came an arrow keen,

Out of a bishop’s bow,

That struck Earl Grey upon the head,

And almost laid him low.

“But still he spoke these cheering words,

‘Fight on, my merry men all,

The bishops they are stumbling-blocks,

I’m stunn’d, but will not fall.”

“Then gaining strength, Lord Brougham took

The old Earl by the hand,

And bade him rest a little while,

While he took the command.

“O, but the very heart does bleed,

What sorrow does it make,

To see the holy men of God

Bound to a worldly stake.

“A peer amongst the Whigs there was,

Who did the bishops eye,

And instantly did vow revenge

Upon the carnal fry--

“The brave Lord King, well known to all,

Who, with the Bill in sight,

And mounted on an iron Grey,

Laid on from left to right.

“Lord Harrowby he swiftly past,

And Wharncliffe wav’ring near,

And sought the dastard bishops out,

Where they stood in the rear.

“With such a vehement force and might,

He drove down all before;

The Bill went through ’twixt Philpotts’[66] legs,

And turn’d him fairly o’er.

“So thus Earl Grey was well aveng’d,

And did no more complain;

A Tory archer then conceiv’d

That Philpotts he was slain.

“He had a bow bent in his hand,

Made of a rotten tree,

An arrow of the self-same root,

Without a head, drew he.

“Against the noble peer, Lord King,

The rotten shaft was set,

But wanting a good Grey goose wing,

It fell before it met.

“These battles they were fought at night,

Before the rising sun,

And when they rung the ev’ning bells,

Again the fray begun.

“There was not many nobles slain,

But some may yet atone;

Lord Eldon sunk, and his last speech

Is to all people known.

“Great Sir James Scarlett in the field

Was ta’en of small account;

John Wilson Croker would not yield,

His talking did surmount.

“For Wetherell I needs must wail,

As one in doleful dumps,

At Bristol town he took leg-bail,

With nothing but his stumps.

“On Russell’s side there did not fall,

A man who held degree,

But all yet live, and yet will fight,

If needs should ever be.

“With the Lord Durham, true and staunch

Did noble Stanley stand;

And Scotland, too, sustain’d her part,

Old Joseph shook his brand.

“And the Lord Althorp, he, likewise,

Disdained a foot to flee;

He held the bill still firm and fast,

And promis’d victory.

“Next day did many people come

Earl Grey for to bewail;

They found the old man at his post,

Determin’d to prevail.

“He had assurance from the King,

Who thus to him did say--

‘Betide, betide, whate’er betide,

I will support thee, Grey.’

“The news was brought to Edinburgh,

Where the French King ’s again,

That Wellington had won the fight,

And that Earl Grey was slain.

“‘O joyful news,’ King Charles[67] said,

‘Scotland will witness be,

That Wellington and Polignac[68]

Are Pears of the same tree.’

“Like tidings to King William came,

Within a shorter space--

Says he, ‘The bishops are great fools,

And really a disgrace.

“‘But God is with us,’ said the King,

‘The people must be free,

I will create an hundred Peers,

If need should ever be.

“‘Yet shall not Wellington long boast

What mischief he does make:

I saw him lately with the Queen,

I doubt he is a rake.

“‘This vow the King he will perform,

In honour of the crown;

A hundred peers he can create,

Or knock a hundred down.

“‘Then Peers will be of small account,

And Peel that stood so high,

Because he wants consistency,

I think we’ll pass him by.’

“God save the King, and bless the land,

May all dissensions cease,

And grant henceforth that foul debates,

Like this, may end in peace.”

This view of the situation is followed up by a cartoon aimed at the

opposition tactics, “Votaries at the Altar of Discord” (April 20,

1831). Hunt is the high priest fanning the incendiary flame at the

Altar of Discord, before which Sir Robert Peel, who seems to have

relinquished power reluctantly, as the mouthpiece of his kneeling

followers, is offering this invocation: “Powerful Goddess, deign to

hear our prayers; deserted in this, our great extremity, by justice and

wisdom, we fly to thee as a last refuge.” The other devotees are Horace

Twiss, Goulburn, Dawson, Sadler, Sir E. Sugden, Sir C. Wetherell, Earl

Carnarvon, and the Dukes of Wellington and Newcastle. The opposition in

the Upper Chamber was in a highly excited state, an example of this

is given in “Peerless Eloquence” (April 25, 1831). Lord Londonderry

is boiling with indignation: “Is it to be endured, I ask, that we

should be called _things_--things with Human pretensions? What was

the fish-woman’s virtuous indignation at being called ‘an individual’

to this? Nothing!” Brougham, on the woolsack, remains calm under the

torrent; Lords Aberdeen and Wharncliffe, with the Duke of Wellington,

are placidly surveying the outraged senator.

The slaughter of the innocents is figuratively told (May, 1831) in a

novel edition of the “Niobe Family.” Lord Grey is the destroyer, his

arrows are marked “Reform.” The Niobe of this version is the Duke of

Newcastle; the smitten are Sir Charles Wetherell, Attwood, Sadler, and

others, whose constituencies were threatened with extinction under the

Reform Bill.

The motion for reform, then in full swing, is summed up from a Tory

standpoint (May 13, 1831); the legend of “John Gilpin” is pressed into

the service of the caricaturist.

“Away went Gilpin, neck or naught,

Away went hat and wig,

He little dream’d when he set out,

Of running such a rig.”

William IV. is, of course, the Gilpin of the situation; the bottles

slung to his side are ginger-beer ones--“Rotunda Pop” and “Birmingham

Froth;” the “Grey” horse is running away with the king at a dashing

pace, and the crown is dislodged in the scuffle. John Bull, the

pike-keeper, has thrown open his gate, and is highly excited at the

sport: “Go it, my lads, never mind the turnpike!” Burdett is enjoying

the fun, but opines, “The Grey is evidently running away with him.”

Hume, Hunt, O’Connell, Cobbett, and others are following on horseback

in the king’s wake. One cries, “Make way, make way; we’ve a great stake

depending on it.” The Irish Repealer is urging on the pace, “Go along,

never mind the geese and old women.” The “geese” wear coronets,

to symbolize the scared peers scattered by the onslaught; and the “old

apple woman” capsized in the rush is old Eldon, the Tory ex-chancellor;

Croker is a “croaking” raven. The sign of the inn is changed to a new

version of the Crown up in the oak tree, and the balcony is filled

with the late ministers, travestied as the ladies of the Gilpin party.

Wellington is distressed beyond measure at this alarming spectacle, and

is appealing to John Bull: “Good Mr. Gatekeeper, stop him; he doesn’t

know where he is going!” Sir Robert Peel exclaims, “Oh, John Gilpin!

John Gilpin! where are you going? Don’t you know your old friends?”

Goulburn is declaring, “He must have lost his senses to ride at such a

rate!”

[Illustration: Wellington.

Sir. R. Peel.

Goulburn.

J. Hume.

Dan O’Connell.

Peers as Geese.

The King on the “Grey.”

Lord Eldon.

Sir Francis Burdett.

JOHN GILPIN. MAY 13, 1831. BY J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 366._]

[Illustration: “THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL.” MAY 26, 1831.

[_Page 367._

King (William IV.). _Loq._ “‘Reform _Bill_!’ Can that mean me?”]

Another admirable version, the felicity of which has been much

appreciated, is entitled “The Handwriting on the Wall” (May 26, 1831).

The King, taking his constitutional stroll in the Park, has come upon

the inscription, in huge white letters, painted on the wall, “Reform

Bill!” William IV., shading his eyes with his hand, is peering at this

legend,[69] exclaiming “‘Reform _Bill_!’ Can that mean me?”

The tendencies of the time were considered fraught with danger; the

measures of reform about to be experimentally tested would, it was

hinted, produce a political revolution--if not a total subversion of

everything; Lord Grey, the Mephistopheles of the situation, as viewed

through Doyle’s “Conservative Magnifiers,” occupied an unenviable

prominence, and might expect a day of terrible retribution. “Brissot’s

Ghost” (May 30, 1831) is the only hint which could be offered to

the innovating statesman. The ghastly figure of Brissot, with his

decapitated head under his arm, is disclosed to the premier as a

startling vision, with a significant warning, drawn from his fatal

revolutionary experience:--

“To lead the mob, ‘mid faction’s storm

I rode my hobby-horse--Reform,

And had it all my own way.

Till other levellers ruled the mob,

And then I lost my seat and nob,

Take warning, my Lord Grey.”

“Macbeth,” with the famous incantation scene, is impressed into the

service of parody to sum up the anticipated state of affairs before the

meeting of the House; “The Tricolored Witches” (June 6, 1831):--

“Black spirits and white,

Yellow spirits and Grey,

Mingle, mingle, mingle,

You that mingle may.”

There are five witches, wearing Republican red caps, and armed with

besoms of destructiveness, assembled round the cauldron.

The three chief witches are Lords Grey, Durham (“Yellow Lambton”), and

Brougham. As the ingredients are cast into the blaze, fed by Durham

coal, Grey is singing the charm:--

“Forty years of toil and trouble

Like a hell-broth now shall bubble.

When the pot begins to boil,

Sons and daughters seize the spoil.

Double, double, toil and trouble,

Fire burn, and cauldron bubble.”

Lord Brougham takes up the invocation:--

“Freeman’s votes, and Grants by Charter.

First-born rights in ev’ry quarter,

Law and Justice, Church and King,

These the glorious spoils I bring.”

Lord Durham has his allotted share:--

“Saving-Banks, the Funds, and Rent,

Insurances and money lent,

Orphans’ Claims, and widows’ pittance,

Throw them in, to make a quittance.”

Lords Althorp and Russell are acting as the chorus:--

“Round about the cauldron go,

In the Constitution throw.”

The king is unexpectedly surprising the incantation. He is dumbfounded;

the charm is already active, and away flies his crown. He is girt with

a scarf, “Repentance,” and apostrophizes his reform friends:--

“Filthy Hags!

Infected be the air whereon they ride,

And damn’d all those that trust them.”

“A _Tale_ of a Tub--and the Moral of the _Tail_!” (June 13, 1831) is

another view of the critical juncture, as it was then assumed to be.

The old constitutional ship is left for the whale-boat. The monster

is in such dangerous proximity that a dash from its tail--while

splashing “popular spray” over its would-be captors--threatens a

fatal catastrophe. Lord Althorp has thrown over a pretty considerable

tub, “Vested Interests and Chartered Rights;” “There,” he is made to

exclaim, “amiable monster! In order to please you, we have thrown you

all! Should you require more, you must only take ourselves.” Lord

Grey is steering; Lords Brougham, Holland, and Durham have the oars.

The king, wearing his naval uniform, is trying to keep the crown from

falling overboard; he is evidently apprehensive of the worst: “But

why approach so near the tail--the good-natured monster may, without

meaning any harm, upset us all in one of his gambols!” The man at the

helm is reassuring his chief: “My reasons for steering are pretty

plain, tho’ fortunately for me some people don’t see them. It is by

flattering the tail, that I command the head!” Lord Brougham, “the

schoolmaster abroad,” is imparting this useful piece of knowledge: “It

has been discovered in the march of Intellect, that the _Tail_ often

outstrips the _Head_!” Wellington and Peel have stuck to the ship; the

latter is still of opinion that he ought to have made an effort to

retain his post: “Yet I can’t but think we might have succeeded in

amusing it for a long time with a very small _Keg_.” Wellington is less

confident: “I tell you, Bob, the Monster is not to be satisfied!”

Other allusions of a seasonable character were also produced by Doyle,

apropos of the tendency of the epoch. One of the best is selected among

many, “Varnishing--a Sign (of _the Times_)” (June 1, 1831). The sign

of the King’s Head is undergoing renovation; Lord Brougham, in his

chancellor’s robes, is mounted on a ladder, and employed in touching up

the royal countenance with a pot of varnish. “I think that, considering

I was not bred to the trade, I am not a bad hand at bedaubing a King.

After all, to produce effect, I find there is nothing like plenty of

varnish.” Lord Grey, from an open window, is surveying with marked

satisfaction his colleague’s work. “Canning used to talk about a Red

Lion; but I say that, in our reforming times, there is no such sign for

a (re) publican as a King’s Head, although a Star and Garter is not to

be despised!”

The somewhat well-worn subject of the hustings is also treated

pictorially amongst the cartoons which appeared during the elections.

One version is entitled, “The _Rival_ Mount-O’-_Bankes_; or, the

Dorsetshire Juggler” (May 25, 1831). The scene of the hustings is again

travestied as a fair. “Bankes and Co.’s Old-Established Booth” is left

quite deserted; a pillar of the Church is the solitary patron. “If our

friends don’t come up faster, we may shut up shop,” says the showman;

while his assistant is declaring, in allusion to the success of the

rival show, “This Juggler is juggling all our customers away from us!”

The “Nonpareil Juggler” has, in fact, monopolized all the custom. Lord

Grey is the showman; he is holding forth his programme to the numerous

patrons: “The Bill, the whole Bill, and nothing but the Bill of the

Performance of the Nonpareil Calcraft.” The showman, “Grey, Licensed

Dealer in Curiosities,” is pointing to a glowing picture of

the entertainment to be seen within--Calcraft, in the very act of

swallowing a lengthy speech dead against the principles of the reform

party as represented by Lord Grey; he is described as “Lately exhibited

in the metropolis by Monsieur Villainton, with unheard-of success.” The

customers are thus exhorted:--

[Illustration: King William IV.

Lord Brougham.

Lord Grey.

VARNISHING--A SIGN (OF “THE TIMES”). JUNE 1, 1831. BY J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 370._]

[Illustration: THE RIVAL MOUNT-O’-_Bankes_; OR, THE

DORSETSHIRE JUGGLER. MAY 25, 1831. BY J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 371._]

“Valk up, gemmen, valk up! Here you may see the most wonderful

Juggler, _who eats his own words!_ not at all in the usual way

practised by pretenders to the ‘Craft, and which is now become

almost as common a trick as swallowing the sword, but in a

manner the most extraordinary and unparalleled! He likewise

plays off many strange antics, quite peculiar to himself and

most curious and amusing to behold. I aver, gemmen, I challenge

the universal world to produce such a show as this here Juggler

makes of himself!”

The crowds are flowing in,--says one, “I am tired of Bankes’s Booth,

besides, this _promises_ more amusement;” and another, “I like novelty,

so here goes.”[70]

Doyle has given a clever embodiment of a current political situation,

borrowed from the illustrious humourist, his predecessor: “LINEal

Descent of the Crown.” See Hogarth’s works, “Four Prints of an

Election” (June 23, 1832). A modernized version of the sign of the

“Crown” is dependent from a beam; Lord Grey, with his face to the

building, is seated upon that portion of the support which he is

hacking lustily with a sickle, marked “Bill.” Cobbett, Hume, and

O’Connell are tugging away at the rope which is to accomplish the

downfall. The former exclaims, “If we act in union, we’ll soon bring it

to our own level.” Hunt remarks, “I fear his exalted seat will turn his

head.” O’Connell is encouraging the dangerous exertions of the Reform

chief: “Ply the Bill well there, Grey, and it will soon be all down.”

A reference to the possible effects of changed politics upon the

suffrages of constituencies is slyly conveyed by HB’s sketch of “The

Cast-off Cloak.” Sir John Hobhouse is standing at the entrance of

the War Office; he has removed the red-lined cloak of “Radicalism,”

which he is thrusting on his old colleague, Sir Francis Burdett: “Pray

relieve me of this, Burdett. I shall find it a great incumbrance in

a _warm_ place like this.” The reply of the veteran Sir Francis is

more politic: “Ay, but don’t forget that you have an engagement in

Covent Garden.[71] You may find the atmosphere rather _cool_ in that

quarter.” Burdett’s own political convictions were to undergo as sudden

a transmutation, as HB has illustrated a few years later.

As it was felt by the Conservative party that the king, by whose

instrumentality the important measure of reform was alone carried,

was bound on an enterprise of which the results were doubtful, and,

according to their apprehensions, desperate, they tenaciously fought

for the inviolability of corruption.

“With nigh two hundred Tories bold,

All men of the old light,

Who knew full well, but would not own,

They were not in the right.

* * * * *

“And long before this time they had

Been lab’ring in vain,

And fencing round their borough towns

That must be sieged and ta’en.”

(_New Chevy Chase._)

According to Doyle’s new version of “Mazeppa” (August 7, 1832), the

king is bound and tied to “Reform,” represented as “the wild horse of

the steppes,” surrounded by wolves, some of whom bear Tory visages,

among which the face of the Duke of Wellington is easily identified.

Horse and rider are overleaping the barrier of “Vested Interests,”

while beneath the courser rushes the “Revolutionary Torrent,” whose

volume is increasing. The success of this spirited version induced the

designer to publish a second plate (September 25th), presenting

the sequel. It is evident in this--which exhibits the wild horse,

and Mazeppa, his rider, extended on the plains, but apparently

uninjured--that the threatening vortex of the “Revolutionary Torrent”

has been passed, and neither has been swamped; but the king is landed

in the midst of the herd of wild steeds, weirdly careering round the

prostrate pair are the rest of the tribe, on whose heads appear the

faces of the leading advocates of reform--Lord Brougham, Lord Grey,

Duke of Richmond, Lord John Russell, Lord Althorp, Sir James Graham,

etc.

[Illustration: MAZEPPA--“AGAIN HE URGES ON HIS WILD CAREER.” AUG. 7,

1832. BY J. DOYLE (HB).

[_Page 372._

“Freemen’s votes and grants by Charter,

First-born rights in every quarter,

Law and Justice, Church and King,

These the glorious spoils I bring.”]

The new parliament only sat from June 14, 1831, to December 3, 1832.

Towards the close of the session (November 22, 1832) it was hinted

that ministers were not altogether too happy, and they had flown to

stimulants to promote a fictitious confidence. “Ministers and (in)

their Cups!” is the title; each has a presentation gold cup in his

hand, and a punch-bowl is in the centre of the table. The Ministers are

half-seas-over; Grey is singing “Here’s Comfort when we Fret;” Russell

is joining in the chorus. Althorp declares, “I am quite overpowered;”

and Brougham, who has further been presented with a gold toddy-ladle,

is crying, “Ah, this is now the greatest consolation we have left. I

wish some one would give poor Palmy a cup!”

A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen Victoria · 第 13 / 15 章