MEAT EATING OF THE FUTURE.

Boycotting the butchers may be an effective way of temporarily lowering

the price of meat, but to make it permanently cheaper another method

must be followed: we must eat less and thus decrease the demand.

This we can do _without depriving ourselves of any of the coveted

pleasures of the table_. We like to eat meats because we enjoy their

Flavors; but it is possible and easy to enjoy these same Flavors in

a way which makes our meals not only more economical but also more

nutritious.

This method has long been in use, but not to such an extent as it

should be. It consists in _extending the flavor of meat_ to other

material which costs less but has a higher nutritive value.

The most valuable pages of the Bulletin referred to in the last section

are those exemplifying the diverse methods of thus extending the flavor

of meat. The recipes are preceded by these illuminating words:

"Common household methods of extending the meat flavor through a

considerable quantity of material which would otherwise be lacking in

distinctive taste are to serve the meat with dumplings, generally in

the dish with it, to combine the meat with crusts, as in meat pies or

meat rolls, or to serve the meat on toast and biscuits. Borders of

rice, hominy, or mashed potatoes are examples of the same principles

applied in different ways. By serving some preparation of flour, rice,

hominy, or other food rich in starch with the meat we get a dish which

in itself approaches nearer to the balanced ration than meat alone and

one in which the meat flavor is extended through a large amount of the

material."

Dr. Wiley, in discussing this aspect of the question, goes so far as to

express the conviction that "the meat eating of the future may not be

regarded so much as a necessity as it has in the past, but that _meats

will be used more as condimental substances than as staple foods_."

Meats as condiments rather than as foods! _There_ is a revolutionary

doctrine for you!--a doctrine subversive of all the beliefs and

practices of the past! Yet it is a doctrine which meat-eaters may

accept calmly in view of the fact that what delights them in meat is

its Flavor, and that even with a minimum quantity of meat this flavor

can be preserved, developed, and extended in the diverse ways hinted at

in the preceding pages.

In view of this truth, meat-eaters should ponder what Dr. Wiley says in

favor of our eating less meat than we do and using it as a condiment:

"In all meat, for instance, that costs twenty-five cents a pound, such

as steaks, there is over one-third or a half of it which is inedible,

so that the edible portion really costs double the amount. On the

contrary, when a pound of flour or maize is purchased, the price of

which is perhaps only one-eighth that of meat, the whole of it is

edible. Thus, from the mere point of economy as well as nutrition, the

superiority of cereals and other vegetable products is at once evident.

On the one hand, a cereal is almost a complete food containing all the

elements necessary to nutrition, and it costs only a few cents a pound.

On the other hand, a steak or roast is only a partial food and it costs

much more than cereals."

Food and Flavor: A Gastronomic Guide to Health and Good Living · 第 96 / 219 题