859. O'erlive. Several eds. misprint "o'erlived."

Addendum.

Since our first edition appeared we have had the privilege of examining

a copy of Scott's 2d ed. (1810), belonging to Mr. E. S. Gould, of

Yonkers, N. Y. This 2d ed. is in smaller type than the 1st, and in

octavo form, the 1st being in quarto. A minute collation of the text

with that of the 1st ed. and our own shows that Scott carefully revised

the poem for this 2d ed., and that the changes he afterwards made in

it were few and unimportant. For instance, the text includes the verbal

changes which we have adopted in i. 198, 290, 432, ii. 103, 201, 203,

534, iii. 30, 173, 190, 508, v. 106, 253, 728, 811, iv. 6, 112, 527,

556, 567, etc. In vi. 291 fol. it reads (including the omissions and

insertions) as in our text. In i. 336, 340, the pointing is the same as

in the 1st ed.; and in i. 360, the reading is "dear." In ii. 865, 866,

it varies from the pointing of the 1st ed.; but we are inclined to

regard this as a misprint, not a correction. In ii. 76 this 2d ed.

has "lingerewave" for "lingerer wave," and in ii. 217 it repeats the

preposterous misprint of "his glee" from the 1st ed. If Scott could

overlook such palpable errors as these, he might easily fail to detect

the misplacing of a comma. We have our doubts as to i. 336, 340, where

the 1st and 2d eds. agree; but there a misprint may have been left

uncorrected, as in ii. 217.

Jan. 25, 1884.

The Lady of the Lake(#3011) · 第 575 / 576 题