II. THERE IS TO BE A LITERAL HELL

Having cleared the way by removing the misapprehension so common in the

minds of people to-day, that Hades and Hell are the same, now let us

say next that _there is to be a Hell_. The Bible says so, Jesus says

in Matt. 5:22, +"but I say unto you, that every one who is angry

with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment; and whosoever

shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council;

and whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of the hell

of fire."+ In the 29th verse of the same chapter the Lord Jesus

says: +"And if thy right eye causeth thee to stumble pluck it out,

and cast it from thee; for it is profitable for thee that one of thy

members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast

into hell."+ And in the 30th verse He says: +"And if thy right

hand causeth thee to stumble, cut it off, and cast it from thee; for

it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish,

and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell."+ We read

again what our Lord Jesus said in Mark 9:45-48, +"and if thy foot

causeth thee to stumble, cut it off; it is good for thee to enter

into life halt, rather than having thy two feet to be cast into hell.

And if thine eye causeth thee to stumble, cast it out; it is good

for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, rather than

having two eyes to be cast into hell; where their worm dieth not, and

the fire is not quenched."+ Some one may say that these words of

our Lord are figurative. There is not the slightest suggestion that

they are figurative. The whole context is against their being taken

figuratively. It is indeed wrong to interpret figurative language as

if it were literal, but it is just as unwarranted and just as wrong to

interpret literal language as if it were figurative. Of course, the

word "Gehenna," which is translated "Hell" is derived from the valley

of Hinnom, where in ancient times human sacrifices were offered, but

the _use_ of the word is literal throughout the New Testament, though

its _derivation_ is figurative. Many words that are figurative in

their derivation are literal in their use, and the meaning of words

is never determined by derivation, but by usage. For example, our

word "eclipse" is a figure of speech. According to the figure it is a

leaving or failing or fainting of the moon or sun, whichever it may be

that is eclipsed. But though it is figurative in its derivation, the

ordinary usage of it is literal. The universal use in the New Testament

of "Gehenna" or "Hell" is literal. The word here translated "Hell" is

found twelve times in the New Testament, eleven of these twelve times

it is used by our Lord Jesus Himself, and He uniformly uses it, as in

the passages which I have just read, of a literal hell. If there is

no literal hell, then our Lord Jesus was either a fool or a fraud.

He certainly meant to convey the impression that there was a literal

hell. There can be no doubt of that, if we go to His words to find out

what is the natural meaning of them. If there is no literal hell then

either Jesus thought there was one when there was not, in which case He

was a fool; or else He knew that there was not, but tried to make men

think that there was, in which case He was a fraud. There is no other

alternative but either to believe that there is a literal hell or else

to believe that Jesus of Nazareth, our Lord and Saviour, was a fool or

a fraud. I know that Jesus was not a fool. I know that He was the only

begotten Son of God, that in Him dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead

bodily, that He and the Father are one, that all men should honour the

Son even as they honour the Father. I know that He spoke the very words

of God, therefore I know that there is a literal hell, for He said so.

It is worthy of note, furthermore, that most of these words about hell

that I have read you to-night are taken from the Sermon on the Mount,

the one part of the Bible that pretty much all men claim to believe.

There are many who say they do not know about the Bible as a whole, but

they do accept the Sermon on the Mount. Well, these passages are for

the most part from the Sermon on the Mount. Either accept this part of

the Sermon on the Mount or else throw the whole thing overboard as the

utterance of a fool or a fraud. There is no other ground possible for

any man who is willing to think things through.

The Fundamental Doctrines of the Christian faith · 第 79 / 102 题