CONCLUSION.

If, as seems most likely, there was in South America an ancient

development of civilized human life, out of which arose the

civilizations found in Peru and Central America, its antiquity was much

greater than can be comprehended by the current chronologies. This,

however, can not make it improbable, for these chronologies are really

no more reasonable than the monkish fancies used in the sixteenth and

seventeenth centuries to explain these civilizations. We find the

hagiologists very absurd, but the condition of mind which made them

possible is closely akin to that which moves some men in our time to

deny or limit the past, and reject the results of any investigation

which tend to enlarge it. Rational inquiry constantly forces upon us the

suggestion that there was more in the unwritten history of the human

race than our inherited modes of thinking have allowed us to suppose,

and that the beginning of civilization is far more ancient than our long

accepted theories of antiquity are able to admit.

What may be discovered in South America by a more complete geological

and palaeontological investigation it is not now possible to say.

Professor Orton, in his recent book, "The Andes and the Amazon," far

exceeds Montesinos in his estimate of the antiquity of Peruvian

civilization. He says on this point:

"Geology and archaeology are combining to prove that Sorato and

Chimborazo have looked down upon a civilization far more ancient than

that of the Incas, and perhaps coeval with the flint-flakes of Cornwall

and the shell-mounds of Denmark. On the shores of Lake Titicaca are

extensive ruins which antedate the advent of Manco-Capac, and may be as

venerable as the lake-dwellings of Geneva. Wilson has traced six

terraces in going up from the sea through the province of Esmeraldas

toward Quito, and underneath the living forest, which is older than the

Spanish invasion, many gold, copper, and stone vestiges of a lost

population were found. In all cases these relics are situated below the

high-tide mark, in a bed of marine sediment, from which he infers that

this part of the country formerly stood higher above the sea. If this be

true, vast must be the antiquity of these remains, for the upheaval and

subsidence of the coast is exceedingly slow."--P. 109.

This refers to discoveries made on the coast of Ecuador in 1860, by

James S. Wilson, Esq. At various points along this coast he found

"ancient or fossil pottery, vessels, images," and other manufactured

articles, all finely wrought. Some of these articles were made of gold.

The most remarkable fact connected with them is that they were taken

from "a stratum of ancient surface earth" which was covered with a

marine deposit six feet thick. The geological formation where these

remains were found is reported to be "as old as the drift strata of

Europe," and "identical with that of Guayaquil in which bones of the

mastodon are met with." The ancient surface earth or vegetable mould,

with its pottery, gold-work, and other relics of civilized human life,

was, therefore, below the sea when that marine deposit was spread over

it. This land, after being occupied by men, had subsided and settled

below the ocean, remained there long enough to accumulate the marine

deposit, and again been elevated to its former position above the sea

level. Since this elevation, forests have been established over it

which are older than the Spanish Conquest, and now it is once more

subsiding. In 1862, at a meeting of the Royal Geological Society, Sir

Roderick Murchison spoke of these discoveries as follows:

"The discoveries Mr. Wilson has made of the existence of the works of

man in a stratum of mould beneath the sea level, and covered by several

feet of clay, the phenomenon being persistent for sixty miles, are of

the highest interest to physical geographers and geologists. The facts

seem to demonstrate that, within the human period, the lands on the west

coast of Equatorial America were depressed and submerged, and that after

the accumulation of marine clays above the terrestrial relics the whole

coast was elevated to its present position."

Assuming the facts to be as Mr. Wilson reports (and they have not been

called in question), it follows that there was human civilization to a

certain extent in South America at the time of the older stone age of

Western Europe. The oldest Peruvian date of Montesinos is quite modern

compared with this. The fact may be considered in connection with

another mentioned in the section on American Ethnology, namely, that the

most ancient fauna on this continent, man probably included, is that of

South America. But, without regard to what may be signified by these

discoveries of Mr. Wilson, there is good reason for believing that the

Peruvian civilization was much more ancient than it has been the fashion

to admit.

Peru would now be a very different country if the Spaniards had been

sufficiently controlled by Christianity and civilization to treat the

Peruvians justly, and seek nothing more than friendly intercourse with

them. But they went there as greedy buccaneers, unscrupulous robbers,

and brought every thing to ruin. At no time since the Spanish Conquest

has the country been as orderly, as prosperous, or as populous as they

found it. It has fallen to a much lower condition. Industry and thrift

have been supplanted by laziness and beggarly poverty. Ignorance and

incapacity have taken the place of that intelligence and enterprise

which enabled the old Peruvians to maintain their remarkable system of

agriculture, complete their great works, and made them so industrious

and skillful in their manufactures. The region covered by the Peruvian

empire has not half as many people now as it had in the time of the

Incas. Is it possible to imagine the present inhabitants of Ecuador,

Peru, and Bolivia cultivating their soil with intelligent industry,

building aqueducts five hundred miles long, and constructing

magnificently paved roads through the rocks and across the ravines of

the Andes, from Quito to Chili? One of the scholars connected with the

scientific expedition which visited South America in 1867, describing

the ancient greatness and present inferior condition of Quito, exclaims,

"May the future bring it days equal to those when it was called the

'City of the Incas!'" He might appropriately utter a similar wish for

the whole country.

Ancient America, in Notes on American Archaeology · 第 82 / 96 题