A WILDE "IDEAL HUSBAND."

Mr. OSCAR WILDE'S _Ideal Husband_, at the Haymarket, is an interesting

play up to the end of the Third Act; and if this climax had been

contrived more artistically, and less conventionally, the situation at

the fall of the curtain in this act would have been a very powerful

one. As it is it is frittered away in conventional dialogue, and the

Fourth Act is decidedly weak. It is throughout excellently played by

Miss JULIA NEILSON and Mr. WALLER in the two principal characters. Mr.

HAWTREY'S performance, in spite of his curious habit of raising his

voice to such a pitch as to suggest his playing to the cab-rank

outside, is admirable. There are here and there sharp bits of dialogue

in it, though scarcely a line in the lighter vein that rises above

farcical comedy.

Mr. BISHOP'S _Earl of Caversham_ is a thoroughly natural piece of

acting, and Mr. BROOKFIELD'S _Phipps_, the Butler, a bit of character

so perfectly rendered that, like _Sam Weller's_ Valentine, it makes

you "wish as there was more in it." Miss FANNY BROUGH, having plenty

to say, but not much worth listening to, does her best with a poor

part. Miss MAUDE MILLETT is nice, and Miss FLORENCE WEST as

unsympathetic as her part was intended to be. That when _Sir Robert

Chiltern_ proposed to retire from Parliamentary life no one suggested

to him that he should take "the Chiltern Hundreds" is evidently an

oversight of the author's, which no doubt he now deeply regrets. The

play, though in sharp dialogue not up to Mr. WILDE'S high

spirits-and-water mark, is an unmistakable success.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 108, February 2, 1895 · 第 25 / 42 题