MR. NEAL CADDIES FOR SIR ERIC GEDDES.]

A few days ago the CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER facetiously compared

the critics of the Government to the poet of _Rejected Addresses_

who declared that it was BUONAPARTE "who makes the quartern loaf and

Luddites rise." Out of the Government's own mouth the critics are now,

at any rate, partially justified, for the PRIME MINISTER announced

that the bread subsidy was to be halved, and that on and after April

12th the quartern loaf would rise--he did not quite know where.

In view of the occasional rumours of friction between Government

departments it is pleasant to record that the Ministry of Transport

and the War Office are on the friendliest terms. Invited to abolish,

in the interests of the taxpayer, the cheap railway tickets now issued

to soldiers, Mr. NEAL said it was primarily a question for the War

Office, as in this matter Sir ERIC GEDDES would wish to move in

harmony with Mr. CHURCHILL. As the WAR SECRETARY promptly announced

his intention of doing his best to maintain the soldiers' privilege it

is conjectured that he will return from the ride with Sir ERIC inside.

The new Member for Paisley delivered his maiden speech to-night, and

acquitted himself so well that in the opinion of Members many months

his senior he is likely to go far. The Government had proposed to

"guillotine" the remaining Supplementary Estimates in order to get

them through before March 31st. Some ardent economists, mainly drawn

from the Coalition, while ready to concede the end, protested

against the means, and proposed that the House should make its own

arrangements.

[Illustration: _RARA AVIS IN TERRIS_.

"Never since the days of Icarus had there been an aviator quite like

the right hon. gentleman [Mr. WINSTON CHURCHILL]. He had displayed

much sympathy with the Air Force and had almost been one of its

martyrs."--_Lord HUGH CECIL_.]

Mr. BONAR LAW promptly perceived the advantage of transferring from

the Government to the House a disagreeable responsibility. Forgetting

that he was cast for the executioner, not the hero, he murmured, "It

is a far, far better thing," and graciously accepted the proposed

alternative. Mr. ASQUITH, not unwilling to help in establishing a

precedent which some day he himself may find useful, backed him up,

and the House, as a whole, congratulating itself on its escape from

the public executioner, cheerfully proceeded to commit _harakiri_.

_Tuesday, March 9th_.--Mr. SHORTT relieved our apprehensions by

stating that the few spurious "Bradburys" in circulation are of home

manufacture, and that, while a few specimens emanating from Russia had

been sent here for identification, they were so poorly executed that

they would scarcely pass muster in this country. It is comforting to

think that there is one British industry which has nothing to fear

from foreign dumping, but is cheerfully forging ahead.

The HOME SECRETARY also denied that there had been any remarkable

increase in pocket-picking or that schools existed for the training of

young criminals. As Sir MAURICE DOCKRELL pointed out, there is

indeed no need for them so long as the cinemas provide their present

facilities. _Fagin_ has been quite knocked out by the film.

The Parliamentary vocabulary extends apace. Mr. RENDALL, whose motion

on divorce had been postponed under the new arrangements for business

until after Easter, complained that Sir FREDERICK BANBURY had "done

him down."

Part of the evening was devoted to the bread-subsidy. The debate

incidentally illustrated the intellectual independence of Ministers.

A few days ago Mr. LLOYD GEORGE, in advocating the resumption of trade

with Russia, declared that "the corn-bins of Russia were bulging with

grain." To-night Mr. MCCURDY told the House that, according to his

information, the resumption of trade With Russia was not likely to

open up any large store of wheat or grain in the near future.

Possibly there is no real incongruity. The grain may be there, but the

Russians, greedy creatures, may be going to eat it themselves.

_Wednesday, March 10th_.--Even in the gloomy atmosphere of the

Upper Chamber the subject of divorce lends itself to humour. Lord

BUCKMASTER, who introduced a Bill founded on the recommendations of

the Royal Commission, performed his task with due solemnity, but

some of the noble Lords who opposed it were positively skittish. Lord

BRAYE, for example, thought that, if the Bill passed, _Who's Who_

would require a supplement entitled _Who's Who's Wife_; and Lord

PHILLIMORE illustrated the effects of easy divorce by a story of a

Swiss marriage in which the bride-elect was attended by four of the

happy man's previous spouses. He also told another of an American

judge who, having explained that in this department of his duties he

was "very strict," added, "Of course I make no difficulty the first

time, but if they come again within twelve months I want a good

reason."

Mr. HOGGE led a vigorous attack on the Ministry of Transport, which

he seemed to think had done very little for its money except to divert

the omnibuses at Westminster and so make it more difficult for

Members of Parliament to get to the House. Mr. KENNEDY JONES, who was

responsible for the innovation, rather hinted that in the case of some

Members this might not be altogether an objection. The brunt of the

defence fell upon Mr. NEAL, owing to the regretted absence of his

chief, who had been ordered away by his doctor for a much-needed

holiday and was reported to be recruiting himself on the golf-links.

If exercise is what he needs he could have got plenty of it in the

House to-night. Thanks to a persistent minority, Members were kept

tramping through the Lobbies for the best part of five hours, and did

not complete the full round of eighteen divisions until 2.15 A.M.

_Thursday, March 11th_.--Possibly the news of "direct action's" heavy

cropper at the Trade Union Conference had reached the Front Bench

before the PRIME MINISTER, in reply to a question regarding the

shortage of labour in the building trades, bluntly attributed it

to the stringency of the Trade Union regulations. When Mr. ADAMSON

attempted to shift the blame on to a Government Department Mr. LLOYD

GEORGE retorted that he would be perfectly ready to deal with any

peccant official if the Labour Leader for his part would deal with the

Trade Unions.

General SEELY repeated his familiar arguments in favour of an

independent Air Ministry, and Mr. CHURCHILL once more defended his

position, urging that it was better for the Air Service to have half

a Minister in the Cabinet than none at all. To a suggestion that

the lives of the Armenians might have been saved if we had sent more

aeroplanes to Asia Minor, Mr. CHURCHILL replied that unfortunately the

Armenian and Turkish populations were so intermingled that our bombs

would be dropping indiscriminately, like the rain, "upon the just and

unjust feller."

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Actor_ (_who has brought friend in for supper--to

lodging-house keeper_). "TUT, TUT, MA! CEASE YOUR APOLOGIES. WHAT IF

THERE IS BUT TWOPENNYWORTH OF FISH AND CHIPS? BRING IT FORTH. THIS IS

BOHEMIA!"

_Ma_ (_politely bowing to stranger_). "HOW D'YE DO, SIR?"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 158, March 17, 1920 · 第 22 / 33 题