He said, "The FBI agents told me, ordered me not to discuss this case."

I pointed out to him that if he did not wish to discuss the case

with me, I would not force him to. There was no way that he would

be compelled to answer any of the questions that I asked him. But,

however, in our democratic society, the FBI cannot order anyone not to

discuss a case, and that such an order to him was not a valid order, if

he wanted to discuss the case with me--he could.

So he did. And he told me what I informed you--that the FBI told him

not to discuss the case, and that he mailed this rifle with the holes

already bored and with the telescopic sight already mounted to someone

named A. Hidell.

He also said that "No ammunition was purchased from me by Hidell at

that time or since."

Senator COOPER. Mr. Chairman, may I ask a question?

The CHAIRMAN. Yes, sir.

Senator COOPER. Did he name any person with the FBI who told him not to

discuss the case?

Mr. LANE. No; he did not.

Senator COOPER. Can you identify--did he identify him in any way?

Mr. LANE. He did not identify him. Earlier, perhaps before you arrived,

Senator, I made reference to a statement made by Mrs. Hill, who was

told by the Secret Service--I think perhaps you were here--that only

three shots were fired. And I asked her specifically if she could

identify that Secret Service agent, and she told me that she could not,

there was such tremendous confusion at that time, there were so many

agents of the FBI and Secret Service that she spoke to, that she did

not think she could. But possibly if she saw him, she might be able to

recognize him.

I didn't go any further into that question, however, with Mr. Klein. He

seemed very reluctant to discuss that entire area--to discuss anything,

but particularly that area.

I read in the Dallas Times Herald, on November 25, 1963, the statement

made by Mr. Wade, when asked what they had tying Oswald to the

"crime of the century" and his response was, according to the Dallas

Times Herald, "If I had to single out any one thing, it would be the

fingerprints on the rifle, and the book cartons which he used to prop

the weapon on."

On the same day the World Telegram and Sun reported "Federal

authorities have concluded that no readable print was found on the

murder weapon when it was flown to Washington for laboratory studies."

There were certain leaks that a fingerprint or a palm print was

discovered on the bolt of the rifle. If that is so, it would be

remarkable if it were a print belonging to anyone other than Captain

Fritz of the Homicide Squad in Dallas, because according to the

affidavit signed by Officer Weitzman, who discovered the weapon, and I

am quoting now from the affidavit on file--at that time on file with

the district attorney's office, "The time the rifle was found was 1:22

p.m. Captain Fritz took charge of the rifle, and ejected one live round

from the Chamber. I then went back to the office after this."

Now, you know if you have worked with that rifle that the--on most

Italian carbines that bolt is not worked too easily. One really has to

grab a hold of it and pull back. It would be unusual if a fingerprint

belonging to someone other than the person who did that survived.

The first statement made by Mr. Wade in reference to the taxi driver

who he alleged--he, Wade, alleged took Oswald generally from this

scene, indicated that the driver's name was Daryl Click.

Now, that statement was not made in the first hours of the arrest. That

statement was not made until after Chief Curry had announced to the

press in Dallas, on that day, November 24th that the case was closed,

there would be no further investigation--Oswald was the assassin, he

had acted alone, he was then dead. And as a result of the change in

policy, to reopen the case and have Mr. Wade assume a position in front

of the radio and television microphones and cameras of the Nation, on

that evening November 24, Mr. Wade then presented what he said was the

evidence "for you piece by piece." And part of the evidence which he

had secured was the proof that a taxi driver named Daryl Click drove

Oswald roughly from the scene to his home, to Oswald's home.

When I was in Dallas--I suppose this was on January 2d, my first trip

there in reference to this matter--I spoke with a Mr. Roseboro of the

Teamsters Union--they have organized the taxi drivers in Dallas--and

asked him if he knew--if he could give me any information about a Daryl

Click. He said he did not have the name in his files, but Texas being a

right-to-work law State, it is possible, he said, that Mr. Click was a

driver but not a member of that union. He referred me to the personnel

department of the City Transportation Co., which he told me was the one

company monopoly running all the taxis in Dallas.

I spoke with the City Transportation Co. personnel office, Mr. Pott, as

I recalled, who checked the records, and indicated to me that there was

no Daryl Click who drove a taxi in Dallas.

Some time after Mr. Wade stated that Daryl Click was the taxi driver,

he then stated that a person by the name of William Whaley was the taxi

driver who took Oswald from the scene after he left the bus to his home.

It is therefore alleged by the prosecution that Oswald, after firing

upon the Presidential limousine, walked the entire floor from the front

of the Book Depository Building to the rear of the warehouse, almost

to the extreme rear, where he hid the rifle, where it was found, and

then took the stairs at the rear of the Book Depository Building and

walked down four flights, until he arrived at the second floor, and

then he walked to the Coca-Cola machine, which was at the front of the

building, meaning he crossed the entire warehouse floor again, and

he purchased a Coca-Cola, and was sipping it when a police officer

arrived with a gun drawn, questioned him briefly. Mr. Truly explained

to the officer that Oswald worked there. And eventually Oswald left the

building, boarded a bus, then walked, after leaving the bus--walked two

blocks and entered Mr. Whaley's taxi, at exactly 12:30, according to

Mr. Whaley. The shots that killed the President were fired at 12:31.

Now, there is on file in the district attorney's office--I assume you

have the original or copies of it--a report of a paraffin test taken

of Oswald, of both his hands and his face. The test proved, according

to Mr. Curry, and the statement that he made on Saturday, November

23, to the press that Oswald had fired the murder weapon. However, a

reading of the test indicates that one could come to a very different

conclusion.

The test in reference to the face proved negative, indicating that

Oswald had not fired a rifle on November 22, 1963--although the test on

the hands showed positive--indicating, according to the person who did

the analysis, the kinds of patterns consistent with one having fired

a revolver. That was the statement on the test taken and conducted by

a Louis L. Anderson, on November 23, 1963, by the Dallas City County

Crime Investigation Laboratory.

Now, it has, of course, been alleged that after Oswald shot the

President and took a bus and a taxi, and went home and got a jacket,

he then shot and killed Officer Tippit. The affidavit in the district

attorney's office indicates that a person saw a stopped police car,

walked up to the police car, leaned on it with his arms on the window,

or what would be a windowsill or window ledge of the automobile, and

then stepped back a step or two, the officer came out, and this person

shot Officer Tippit to death.

The affidavit is peculiarly sparse in reference to the description of

the assailant, the man who killed Tippit, by an eyewitness who said she

was just 50 feet away.

Her description of this person is found in two different portions of

the affidavit--he was young, white, male, and that is the entire

description present in the affidavit at that time.

I spoke with the deponent, the eyewitness, Helen Louise Markham,

and Mrs. Markham told me--Miss or Mrs., I didn't ask her if she was

married--told me that she was a hundred feet away from the police

car, not the 50 feet which appears in the affidavit. She gave to me

a more detailed description of the man who she said shot Officer

Tippit. She said he was short, a little on the heavy side, and his

hair was somewhat bushy. I think it is fair to state that an accurate

description of Oswald would be average height, quite slender, with thin

and receding hair.

Helen Markham said to me that she was taken to the police station on

that same day, that she was very upset, she of course had never seen

anyone killed in front of her eyes before, and that in the police

station she identified Oswald as the person who had shot Officer Tippit

in the lineup, including three other persons. She said no one pointed

Oswald out to her--she was just shown four people, and she picked

Oswald.

She said--when I asked her how she could identify him--she indicated

she was able to identify him because of his clothing, a gray jacket and

dark trousers. And this was the basis for her identification--although

Oswald physically does not meet the description which she indicated.

Representative FORD. When did you have this conversation with the

deponent?

Mr. LANE. Within the last 5 days.

Representative FORD. Some time in late February 1964?

Mr. LANE. Or perhaps even early March, yes, sir.

Now, I inquired--I told her that I was coming here today, and that I

was completing my investigation as Oswald's lawyer, and asked her if

she would discuss the matter with me, and she said she would.

I asked her if anyone had asked her not to discuss this matter with me.

At first she seemed reluctant, and she said she was reluctant because

I called her at her place of employment, the Eat Well Cafe in Dallas.

I tried her at home many times before then, but her phone was always

busy. I believe it is a phone which is not her personal one, but is a

common phone shared by others in the building where she resides.

I apologized for calling her at her place of employment. And she seemed

reluctant to talk to me. I asked if anyone had asked her not to talk

about this case with anyone. She said yes, she had been told by the

FBI, by Secret Service agents, and by Dallas police, all three groups,

not to discuss anything in relation to this case, and that by and large

she had not.

I told her that somewhere it occurred to me that I had seen an article

in a newspaper in which she described the assailant of Oswald as short,

stocky, and with bushy hair--I'm sorry, the assailant of Tippit--as

being short, stocky, with bushy hair. And she said she did talk to a

reporter, she thinks, for one of the Dallas newspapers, the Dallas

Times-Herald or the Dallas Morning News--but that is the only time she

talked to anybody.

I would like to call to the Commission's attention the entire brief

narrative of the entire case, as presented by the district attorney's

office at this point, or at least on the 24th, because it seems to me

to be so full of incredible happenings, that it would be very difficult

to submit such a story to a jury by a prosecution generally.

If everything that the prosecution in this case says is true, one must

conclude that Oswald behaved in a very, very unusual manner from the

beginning to the end.

He decided on Thursday, November 21, that he was going to assassinate

the President, and so he decided to go back to Irving, Tex., to secure

a rifle there, in order to carry out that purpose. He had on his person

some $13 when arrested, and almost $150 in cash in the top drawer

of his dresser--so we can assume that on Thursday, the 21st, he had

roughly that amount of money present.

One can purchase a rifle for less than $13 in many stores in Dallas.

There is no question about that. By using a small portion of that $150,

he could have purchased a rifle absolutely superior to the Italian

carbine at home in Irving in many respects. And there are gun magazines

which have had editorials dwelling on this question, saying that if

Oswald did it with this weapon, and they do not move into the question

of whether or not he did, it was an absolute miracle, because no one

who knew anything about rifles would have chosen such a decrepit,

worthless rifle, as this Italian carbine, manufactured in 1938, for

which there is such pure ammunition. There are a series, I believe, of

editorials in gun magazines proving that Oswald, I think, as a matter

of pride, from a sportsman's viewpoint--that Oswald was in no way

associated with weapons and did not belong in that category, because he

could not have chosen such a weapon.

Representative FORD. Could you give us the citations of one of these

magazines?

Mr. LANE. Yes. One is called Gun Magazine. I do not recall the names.

But that is one of them. I am sure there was such an editorial in that

one. I will get the other one and mail those to you also.

But I think there would have to be a more compelling reason for Oswald

not to go home and get that particular inferior rifle if he decided on

Thursday to kill the President. That was the only rifle in the whole

world probably that could be traced to him. One can purchase a rifle

in almost any community in this country, certainly in Dallas, without

any notoriety attaching to it, without giving one's name or address, or

having a serial number attached to a receipt kept by a store indicating

who owns that particular rifle.

But here we have Oswald going home to get an inferior rifle, which

rifle is the only rifle in the whole world which can be traced to him,

which rifle he is going to leave behind as a calling card after the

assassination is complete.

And so he goes home to Irving, Tex., and he gets this rifle, and

he wraps it up in paper, we are told, and brings it in to the Book

Depository Building.

Now, the rifle can be broken down, I believe, from examining other

Italian carbines. But it would be not much shorter if it was broken

down--perhaps 6 or 7 inches shorter. Evidently, though, he did not do

that.

So he took this rifle into the book depository building, which I

suggest, gentlemen, is a most remarkable thing. This was going to be

the greatest series of precautions in the history of the United States

to protect an American President. As we know now, and suspected then,

with very good reason, because of the nature of what had gone before,

with reference to public officials in Dallas--and here we have a

man who has defected to the Soviet Union, who has married a Russian

national, active on behalf of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, we

see a discharge less than honorable from the U.S. Marine Corps, who

was working in the building exactly on the Presidential route. Not

only is it on the Presidential route, but it is the building where the

automobile is going to have to clearly slow down because of the sharp

turn, sharp left turn, made right in front of the building.

And despite all of these precautions--and I have been informed that

there were serious precautions taken in Dallas on that day by the

Dallas police and by others, and that persons who did no more publicly,

who did no more ever politically than to publicly speak in favor of

school integration, were followed that day as potential assassins in

Dallas.

Nevertheless, Oswald, with that background, is permitted to walk into

the Book Depository Building, directly on the Presidential route,

carrying with him in his hand a full rifle.

Mr. RANKIN. Can you tell us the information on which you base this,

about anyone who merely spoke about school integration?

Mr. LANE. Yes. A reporter for the Dallas Morning News told me that,

told me he was absolutely certain that was so. But before revealing

his name, I am going to have to call him and indicate I am going to do

that. I will be happy to do that. I am glad you are interested in that

matter, because I think it is a most important one.

I suggest that the Federal Bureau of Investigation knew that Oswald

worked at the Texas Book Depository Building, which was on the

Presidential route. An FBI agent by the name of Hosty visited the home

of the Paines in Irving, Tex., sometime during September and October.

He visited that home on more than one occasion. Each of the at least

two times that he was there, possibly three but I am not certain--but

I was told he was there two times--I know I was told by Mrs. Paine

in the presence of her husband, Michael Paine, that Agent Hosty was

there at least on two occasions--each time he was there he asked

where Oswald was. Mrs. Paine explained to Agent Hosty, she told me,

that Oswald lived there only on weekends, and that during the week

Agent Hosty could find him at his room in Dallas, where he stayed

during the week, or during the daytime could find him at the Texas Book

Depository Building, where he was an employee. Nevertheless--and that

Oswald would not be found in Irving, Tex. at the Paine's home during

the week. Nevertheless, Agent Hosty returned again at least one more

time to the Paine home in Irving, during the week, during the day,

I believe--certainly during the week--and again asked about Oswald,

and again Mrs. Paine told him that he worked at the Book Depository

Building, he would not be there, she said, "As we told you last time

he won't be here during the week. During the daytime during the week

you can find him at his job at the Book Depository Building, and during

the nighttime during the week you can find him at his rooming house in

Dallas."

Mr. RANKIN. Did she tell you whether she told him where the rooming

house was?

Mr. LANE. I do not believe I asked her that question, and I don't

believe she mentioned that.

Well, to go back to the prosecution narrative, or narrative according

to the facts presented by the prosecution, Oswald was on the sixth

floor, fired at the Presidential limousine, not as the automobile

approached the building, when the automobile came extremely close to

the building, so close that possibly even with that weapon one could

have shot occupants of the automobile from that window--but it is

alleged that Oswald never shot--it is now alleged that Oswald never

shot when the automobile was right outside of the building, but fired

when the automobile was some 75 yards beyond the building, when the

first shot was fired.

Then Oswald walked the entire floor--or ran--the entire floor of the

warehouse to the rear of the building, placing the rifle in between

some boxes, but visible, so that one can see it when one arrives on

the floor; went to the rear stairs, walked down the four flights to

the second floor, then to the front of the building again, where he

purchased a Coca-Cola--made no effort to leave the building at that

time, evidently was going to wait until the building was surrounded by

police before leaving.

He stayed at the top of the stairs near the Coke machine long enough so

that a police officer could come up and place a pistol near him, and

Roy Truly, the director, then intervened indicating that Mr. Oswald was

employed at the building at that time, and the officer then went on to

do other things in the building, including later on, I believe, to find

the rifle, if it was the same officer.

Mr. Truly stated that Oswald was quite calm when the officer approached

him on the stairs. He said although he did seem a little concerned

about that pistol being stuck at him--but otherwise he seemed quite

calm at that time.

Warren Commission (02 of 26): Hearings Vol. II (of 15) · 第 40 / 291 题