THE THIRD SAMNITE WAR.

The peace between the Romans and the Samnites had lasted four years

at most. During this interval, the Samnites had, by the defence

of Nequinum or Narnia, paved the way for the continuance of the

war: they wanted merely to rest themselves, and to collect their

strength. By the conditions of their agreement with Rome, they ought

to have kept themselves from every sort of hostility against the

neighbouring states; yet this was impossible. In Lucania the feuds of

the two parties soon broke out again: the country had recovered its

independence, and attacked Tarentum; the Samnites declared war with

Lucania, and the Lucanians, being hard pressed, put themselves under

the protection of the Romans. As these did not like to see the Samnites

recovering their power, they required them to give up the Lucanian

conquest, in accordance with the peace. The Samnites returned a haughty

answer, and warned the Roman ambassadors not to make their appearance

in Samnium. In the year 454, whilst in Etruria there was at one moment

a truce, and at another a quarrel with some of the towns, open war

broke out again with the Samnites. We behold the Apulians allied with

Samnium; for Apulia was too far away for Rome to have maintained

her dominion there: the Sabines also we find on good terms with the

Samnites, and in some instances even in a league with them. Thus

therefore had circumstances taken a turn by which the condition of

Samnium became somewhat more favourable; on the other hand, the power

of Rome had so much spread in the meanwhile, that she was a much more

terrible enemy for Samnium to face.

This war took quite a different course from the former ones, from which

we may infer that the state of things had changed. The Romans do not

again transfer the scene of war into Apulia, whether it was that the

Apulians had fallen away from them, or because they were hindered by

other circumstances. They now attacked the Samnites in front, who do

not go into the Æquian country, but into the Falernian district in the

neighbourhood of Vescia. The war lasted eight years, and was still more

ruinous for the Samnites than the one before; yet they carried it on

with great energy, and the whole of their plan, although not crowned

with success, is one of the grandest which history can produce; but

_victrix causa Diis placuit_. In the first campaign, the Romans were at

once in the heart of Samnium, and they advanced into Lucania to assist

its people: Rome indeed had also sometimes the worst of it; but she did

not lose any great battles. In the year 455, both the Roman armies,

that of Fabius, and that of Decius, were in Samnium, waging there a war

of extermination, of which the account in Livy clearly bears the stamp

of authenticity: he had genuine memoirs before him; yet these often

contained most irreconcilable statements. The Romans marched from place

to place, and wherever they encamped, they destroyed in the country

round every trace of cultivation: Fabius had his camp in eighty-six,

Decius in forty-five places. They took but few towns; for the Samnites

defended themselves on their hills with such lion-hearted courage, that

it was impossible to reduce them.--In 456, Volumnius and Ap. Claudius

were consuls, Decius proconsul. Volumnius is said to have beaten the

Samnites again and again, and at last to have compelled their army

to flee into Etruria: this is a calumnious misrepresentation of the

heroic spirit and the vast plan of the Samnites. Their army was so

far from having been driven out of the country, that Gellius Egnatius

fought for several years in Etruria; and even after the destruction of

his force, the Samnites a long time held their ground in Samnium: they,

on the contrary, conceived the grand idea of abandoning their country

to the mercy of the enemy, and of carrying the war into Etruria. The

Etruscans had during the last hundred years become better acquainted

with the Gauls, who, being settled in the Romagna, had lost their

love of roving, and were peacefully engaged in husbandry: individuals

only enlisted as warriors. But as on the other side of the Alps the

national migration was still going on, the transalpine hosts from

time to time crossed the mountains, and then the Gauls were again set

in motion. Such a migration must have taken place about this period;

and the Etruscans availed themselves of the favourable moment, to

take the Gauls in their pay against the Romans. It must have cost

them much to come to this resolution; for if the Gauls had settled on

the lower Tiber, amid the ruins of Rome, Etruria was surrounded and

annihilated. Nevertheless, passion and hatred against the Romans were

stronger motives than prudence. The Etruscans, with the exception of

a few townships, had in the hope of this reinforcement again taken up

arms, violating even their accustomed faith with regard to armistices;

Perusia, for instance, did not keep the thirty years’ peace. Now as

the Etruscans were indeed a wealthy, and with their serfs to fight at

their side, a valiant people, but wanting in generals; the Samnites

determined to march through the land of the Pentrians, Marsians,

Sabines, and Umbrians, to Etruria. This is not here the fate of the

heroic Vendeans, who in the month of October 1793, with all their

population passed the Loire, and left their home to be laid waste,

because they could not defend it: the Samnites were but an army,

and the Romans did not hinder their march. This is one of the most

brilliant feats in ancient history, and it excited in Rome not a little

dismay.

The junction of Gellius Egnatius with the Etruscans was difficult to

effect on account of the new Roman colonies: the Samnites had to march

by Antrodoco; Volumnius followed them, but he could not prevent the

union. It took place in 456; and the Romans were so far from looking

upon them as fugitives, that the consul Volumnius received orders

from the senate, to transfer the war from Samnium into Etruria, where

Ap. Claudius seemed not to be equal to the emergency of the case. Ap.

Claudius, in his patrician pride, considered this as an insult; and he

demanded that Volumnius should leave the province: this insolent and

egregious folly might have put the very existence of the republic in

jeopardy. Volumnius was ready to return, and was only induced by the

entreaties of his army to remain. In this year, the Gauls had not yet

stirred; it is possible that the hosts which were expected, had not yet

crossed the Alps.

The campaign of the year 457, is the turning point of the fate of

Italy. The Romans made immense exertions. One body of troops was left

behind on the frontier of Samnium, in order to hinder the Samnites

from any attempt at offensive war against Rome: perhaps it consisted

chiefly of Campanians and Lucanians: it merely acted on the defensive.

The army under the proconsul Volumnius marched against the Gauls;

and the old consular one of Appius, which was stationed in the

neighbourhood of Foligno, was reinforced by two new legions, which

Fabius had enlisted. Besides these, there were two armies of reserve,

consisting of those who had to take up arms in case of need only, part

of them perhaps a mere militia armed with spears: one was encamped

on the Vatican hill before the city; the other was thrown forward as

far as Falerii, in order to keep up the communication. The consul

Decius went to the army, to take the command of the legions; to him

Fabius brought his reinforcement. The Romans had posted themselves in

the Umbrian mountains, near Nuceria, and had gone into cantonments

there; a detachment was sent to Camerinum[149] on the most northern

slope of the Apennines, to prevent the Gauls from marching through

the defiles to Spoleto in the rear of the Romans. The Gauls, we must

assume, passed the Apennines by Ariminum and Sena. Here Polybius comes

to our aid. The legion which had been pushed on as far as Camerinum,

was surprised and cut to pieces; so that the Romans knew nothing of the

defeat, until the Gallic horsemen, charging on, displayed the heads

of the slain Romans stuck on their lances.--The Etruscans, Samnites,

and Umbrians, had combined their forces; until then they had remained

on the defensive. Then the two Roman generals again resolved on an

exceedingly bold undertaking: elsewhere ἀσφάλεια is wont to be the

leading principle of their strategy. They made a movement in flank

against an enemy immensely their superior in numbers; the main army

marched from Nuceria through the Apennines, which are not very high

there, to Sentinum; the Gauls and Samnites were stationed on the right,

the Etruscans and Umbrians on the left of it. Between the two, they

advanced as far as where the Apennines towards the Adriatic end in

ranges of low hills, as if they meant to invade the country of the

Senones; the latter, however, instead of advancing, fell back upon

their frontier, and the Romans disposed themselves _en échelons_. The

consuls called in the reserves. Cn. Fulvius moved from Falerii (Civita

Castellana) into the position which had been left by the main army,

and was detached against Assisium in the neighbourhood of Perusia:

here there is a very high and strong range of mountains, from which

he might invade the country, and entice the Etruscans to separate

themselves from the Gauls. All this is quite certain, and I am led to

think that the second reserve also marched afterwards on to Falerii. At

Rome, they were surely forward enough in their preparations for arming,

to be able to withstand any sudden invasion from Samnium. Another fact

besides is hardly to be doubted, although Polybius merely gives it as a

supposition. Volumnius also, who again faced the Samnites in their own

country, must have been summoned back; so that by forced marches, he

approached on the decisive day through the country of the Sabines above

Terni, and abandoned Samnium to its fate.

The diversion of Fulvius against Perusia was crowned by the most

complete success; the Etruscans and Umbrians detached considerable

divisions of their main army to their own country, to protect the

frontiers from the devastations of the enemy. These were the best

troops of the Etruscans, whilst, on the other hand, Fulvius had the

worst of the Roman. As generals in the battle, there are mentioned only

the two consuls Q. Fabius V. and P. Decius IV.; but most certainly, as

mentioned before, Volumnius also was there as proconsul: about fifty to

sixty thousand men faced an enemy of infinitely superior numbers. There

were a great many reasons for proceeding to Sentinum: in the first

place, to draw the Etruscans away from their own home, so that, if they

should be obliged to retreat, being separated from their allies, they

would have to move by the arc of which the Romans had cut the chord; in

the next place, they made the Gauls tremble for their own country, and

it was to be expected that a great part of them would be scattered in

order to protect their open villages; and lastly, they were afraid of

the ἀπόνοια of the Gauls. If they had cut off the retreat of the Gauls

in the south, these would have fought much more desperately; now they

had the retreat into their own land open before them, and they had not

yet crossed the mountains.

The result rewarded their wisdom. Yet the numbers of the enemy were so

much superior, that the Romans did not trust to the efforts of human

bravery alone; but Decius had resolved upon devoting himself to the

infernal gods, and he had induced the plebeian pontiff M. Livius to

accompany him, in order, if necessary, to perform the consecration in

the midst of the battle. Decius faced the Gauls; Fabius the Etruscans,

Umbrians, and Samnites; the legions of Volumnius may have been

stationed in the centre. Of these enemies, the Samnites were by far

the most formidable. Fabius had a style of his own in his strategy,

as is the case with nearly every distinguished general;[150] he kept

back the reserve to the very last,--a manœuvre the practicability of

which entirely depends upon the composition of the army; it is only

possible with very well trained troops; with young soldiers one risks

a defeat;--when the foremost battalions were nearly destroyed, then

only he led on the reserve, which was still quite fresh, and in this

manner he almost always succeeded. Thus also now against the Samnites.

But a different system was that of Decius against the Gauls, and must

have been: this is the grand characteristic of the Roman order of

battle, that they fought against every enemy in a special manner. The

Greek wars are not by any means interesting, but so much the more are

those of the Romans. The Greek phalanges pushed against each other,

and the masses were immoveable; the Roman method on the contrary was

light and flexible: Polybius, a very good officer, found it adapted

to every circumstance. Fabius tried to weary out the Samnites, as it

was summer, a season which the labourer from the warmer country bears

much more easily than the Samnite, who dwelt in the cooler valleys.

The Gauls also were easily wearied; but they were a numberless swarm

which with the utmost impetuosity threw themselves upon the enemy; the

first onset was the worst; if its shock was resisted, the victory was

almost sure. To meet this first attack, Decius did everything in his

power, but in vain: the innumerable cavalry of the Gauls, although at

first driven back, advanced again with its overwhelming superiority

of numbers; and now they brought forward their thousand war chariots,

which were a terrible sight for the horses of the Romans. These took

fright, and the flight began without any fault of the riders. For two

days, the armies had faced each other; on the morning of the third, the

Romans had an omen which prophesied victory to them; namely, a hind

came down from the mountains, chased by a wolf, who caught her, and

tore her in pieces. The day notwithstanding seemed to end disastrously;

but Decius, after the example of his father, now devotes himself to

death, and he rushes into the midst of the Gallic hosts, adding yet to

the form in use the prayer, that fear and death might go before him.

Hereupon affright is said to have spread through the army of the foe,

and to have stopped it in its career. However this may have been, the

death of Decius decided the battle. The Romans rallied, picked up the

_pila_ from the field of carnage, and hurled them against the Gauls;

the barbarian cavalry, having pushed on too far, was surrounded and

overpowered; and Fabius, who had already discomfited the Samnites,

sent his troops to give aid, and he now also led on the reserve. On

this, the Gauls, who, like the Russians at the battles of Zorndorf and

Austerlitz, were in one dense mass, broke, and could only scatter and

flee: the retreat of the Samnites, Etruscans, and Umbrians to their

camp was less of a rout. The loss of the Romans is stated to have been

about seven thousand men of one army, and twelve hundred of the other;

the Gauls had five and twenty thousand killed, and between seven and

eight thousand taken prisoners, which is very credible. They went back

again into their own land, without troubling themselves about any thing

further, and the Samnites again accomplished an immense undertaking.

Gellius Egnatius himself had fallen, either in the battle, or in the

retreat; but the Samnite army was once more obliged to march round that

of the Romans, or else quite through it, pursued by Volumnius, and

attacked by the peoples into whose territory they trespassed, and whom

they had to plunder in order to live. Five thousand of them reached

their homes.

Thus ended the greatest campaign for achievements, known in the earlier

Roman history. The numbers of the armies are corrupted in most of

the books: Livy has for the Gauls 40,330 foot, and 46,000 horse; the

former number has been left unchanged, but the 46,000 were brought down

to 6,000; it ought, however, to have been 1,000,000 foot and 46,000

horse.[151] These are numbers, however, which do not belong to history,

but merely to the chroniclers. The battle of Sentinum was so glorious,

that the Greeks also knew of it, and Duris of Samos mentions in his

history that a hundred thousand Gauls had been slain in it.

A campaign of such historical importance as that of the year 457,

fills one indeed with pity, but at the same time with the greatest

respect. The end of the third Samnite war brought misery and ruin upon

Samnium. However blind the struggles of the Samnites may seem to have

been, yet in truth they were great. We shall now give a short sketch

of the rest of the war. Until 461, when it ended (the peace itself

was only concluded in 462), it was continued in the same manner, and

the Samnites renewed their attempts to break through into Etruria,

but in vain. The Romans wedge themselves into Samnium; the Samnites

retaliate in the country between the Liris and the Vulturnus. On the

whole, during the last years, they still display mighty efforts: even

as late as the year of the battle of Sentinum, they make an inroad

through Campania. In the second year after,[152] they are said to

have sent two great armies into the field, one of which binds itself

by a solemn oath to fight to the last man. The only wonder is where

they found the means, especially to keep up the style that they did,

as Livy mentions that they had shields embossed with gold and silver:

such magnificence sounds quite fabulous in a people which had been

so reduced for years.[153] That, however, the consuls Postumius and

Carvilius won _spolia_ of extraordinary splendour in their victories

over the Samnites, is an historical fact; from part of these, a brazen

colossus was erected in front of the Capitol.

But in reality, the war was decided as early as in 459 by the consuls

L. Papirius and Sp. Carvilius. It is characteristic of the way in

which it was waged, that the Samnite towns, both then, and afterwards

in the war of Sylla, so entirely vanished from the earth, that the

later geography did not know of them any more; and that no Samnite

antiquities whatever are found in those regions. The last great battle

was fought in the year 460. At that time, the son of the great Fabius,

Q. Fabius Gurges, had marched into the country of the Pentrians;

against him commanded C. Pontius, the conqueror at Caudium: from this

we may infer, that the Caudines certainly took part in the war. The

Romans were beaten, and they lost the whole of their baggage, the news

of which reached Rome: they had, it is true, cut their way through

the enemy; but they were not able to go on with the campaign. Then

Fabius begged hard that the _imperium_ might not be taken from his son;

and he succeeded in carrying a motion to that effect, and in getting

permission to go out as legate to his son with a reinforcement: this

was the greatest reward which the republic could give to that great

man. He now gained a most decisive victory, by which, as Orosius justly

remarks, an end was put to the Samnite war; for, although Eutropius

tells us that it lasted a year longer, he is indeed such a careless

writer, that no stress is to be laid on what he says. The sequel of the

victory was horrid: C. Pontius was taken prisoner, led in the triumph,

and then put to death: a fouler stain than this is not to be found in

the whole of the Roman history. His native city Caudium must also at

that time have been razed to the ground.

At the end of this war, when it was too late to turn the scale, it

happened that new allies declared for the Samnites. These were the

Sabines, whose peace with Rome had lasted for a century and a half, and

that in such a manner, that we must believe what we are told by one

whose authority is otherwise not quite to be trusted, that they had

the right of Roman citizenship. This might have induced the Romans to

grant the Samnites the peace, although they were not crushed: on what

conditions, we are not able to make out. The Romans took advantage of

it to establish on the frontiers of Apulia, Samnium, and Lucania, the

large colony of Venusia, the native place of Horace: twenty thousand

_coloni_ are said to have been sent thither; if this be true, it must

have got a large country district. By means of this colony, Samnium

was cut off from Tarentum, and such indeed was its importance, that

the number given becomes not unlikely: in the war against Pyrrhus,

it saved Rome; without it, after the battle of Heraclea, the army of

Lævinus would have been utterly destroyed. Some time afterwards, they

founded a colony besides at Æsernia in Samnium.

Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 1 (of 3) · 第 34 / 39 题