CHAPTER X

INTERPRETATION OF PROPHETIC SYMBOLS

[Sidenote: Value of prophecy]

The value of prophecy in establishing the religion of the Bible as the

religion, of God has been generally recognized. Its value, however,

is not limited to the proof of the divinity of Biblical truth which it

furnishes: it serves a definite and most important purpose in the life

and work of God's believing children in all ages. By it we are better

able to understand God's own plan and purposes in human history, and

by it we are made conscious of our own whereabouts along the pathway

of time. The movements of God in the history of the past that were

predicted by earlier prophets have received their chief inspiration

from the conscious knowledge the leaders had of the prophetic

character of their work. It was Daniel's study of prophecy that

stirred his soul for the restoration of Israel to the favor of God

and to their own land (Dan. 9:2), and at the same time opened his own

heart for the wonderful revelation concerning future events. It was

the consciousness of prophetic fulfilment that gave John the Baptist

his inspiration for work (John 1:23); and in establishing the truths

of the gospel of Christ, the apostles placed leading emphasis on the

fact that these things were written in the law and in the prophets.

The love and care that Christ had for his people did not cease in the

beginning of the gospel dispensation; for he gave the promise, "I

am with you alway, even unto the end of the world." It is altogether

reasonable, then, that we should receive "the revelation of Jesus

Christ, which God gave unto him, to _show unto his servants_ things

which must shortly come to pass" (Rev. 1:1). Through the varying

conditions of time, Christ leads his people on to certain victory.

Since the mission of the church was to be world-wide and perpetual, it

is fitting that the church should be described prophetically in order

that we might have definite information concerning the operations

of the divine hand in working out the great problem of the church's

destiny after the close of the sacred canon.

[Sidenote: Prophetic symbols]

Before proceeding with our discussion of those prophecies which

concern the church, let us pause and consider briefly the character

of symbols. The prophecy of the Scriptures is presented to us in two

distinct forms--direct statements in the ordinary language of life and

in symbolic representations, but far the greater part is expressed

in symbols, as in the book of Daniel and in the Revelation of John.

Without an understanding of the nature of symbols we can not get a

proper understanding of such prophecies.

Spoken or written language is a very complicated affair, but it is

in reality an arbitrary arrangement. The name that we attach to a

particular object could as well be given to a totally different object

instead if we only agreed to make the change. For this reason spoken

language is variable. Changes are constantly taking place. The

language of Bible symbols, on the other hand, is not subject to

the law of change, as we shall see; it is not based on arbitrary

arrangement or mere convenience, but its foundational principles exist

in the very nature of things.

Webster defines _symbol_ as follows: "The sign or representation of

any moral thing by the images or properties of natural things. Thus,

a lion is the symbol of courage; the lamb is the symbol of meekness or

patience." Horne, in his Introduction to the Study of the Bible, says:

"By symbols we mean certain representative marks, rather than express

pictures; or, if pictures, such as were at the time _characters_, and

besides presenting to the eye the resemblance of a particular object,

suggested a general idea to the mind, as when a _horn_ was made

to denote _strength_, an _eye_ and _scepter_, _majesty_, and in

numberless such instances, where the picture was not drawn to

express merely the thing itself, but something else, which was or was

conceived to be, analogous to it."

According to these definitions, the main idea of a symbol is the

representation of an object or quality, not by exhibition of itself,

but by another object or character analogous to it. Nor are we limited

in the use of symbols to the exhibition of moral subjects alone.

Any object may be symbolized, provided a corresponding object can be

found.

[Sidenote: Analogy the basic law]

Analogy, then, is the fundamental law of symbols. This being true,

it is clear that symbols must be definitely applied. They are not

arbitrary. There is no reason why we could not call a book a table,

and a table it would be, provided we agreed universally to adopt that

designation; but we violate nature if we attempt to represent the

quiet, peaceful, gentle disposition of a child by a lion or a tiger,

or a cruel, vindictive, tyrannical disposition by a lamb. A polluted

harlot may represent an apostate church, but not the true church. A

proper correspondence of character and quality must be observed. We

must follow nature strictly. And this is the law of symbols.

Symbols are drawn from different departments--from angelic life, human

life, animal life, and inanimate creation. But in every case there

is in the selection and use of the symbol a proper correspondence of

character and quality.

[Sidenote: Twofold object of symbols]

The deciding factor in the original selection of a symbolic object

is the nature of the thing to be symbolized. In the field of Bible

prophecy the general design is in the main twofold--the representation

(1) of the affairs of the church and (2) of the political history of

those nations and kingdoms which were to exert an important influence

on the life and development of the church. It is evident that in the

divine estimation the church and its welfare is of infinitely greater

importance than the affairs of nations and kingdoms. Therefore we may

reasonably expect that, according to the nature of symbolic language,

symbols designed to represent the church will be found to be of the

most exalted type, whereas those representing political things will be

found to be selected from an inferior department. In accordance with

this fundamental classification we shall find that symbols drawn from

angelic life and human life invariably refer to the department

of ecclesiastical affairs, while those drawn from animal life or

inanimate nature represent political things. The only apparent

exception to this rule is that certain inanimate objects formerly

consecrated to the service of God and thus associated with the

department of the church are sometimes used to represent spiritual

things, because the analogy is obvious. Bearing in mind this

fundamental distinction between the representation of things political

and things ecclesiastical, we are prepared to understand other shades

of distinction.

Nations may be peaceful or tyrannical and oppressive, and churches

may be good or apostate; but the exact character can be analogously

represented by the symbolic object. A vicious wild beast stamping and

devouring would naturally represent a cruel, tyrannical government;

and a good woman represents the true church, while a vile harlot

represents the church apostate. But whatever the nature of the symbol,

whether beast, locust, lion, horse, temple, angel, or man, we may

know at once from the nature of the symbol where to look for its

fulfilment. This important guide in the study of prophetic truth--a

guide overlooked by most of the commentators--relieves us of much of

the uncertainty hitherto connected with the subject.

Since, as we have seen, symbolic language is based on analogy, it

is evident that there are some objects whose nature forbids their

symbolization, there being no corresponding object in existence.

God can not be symbolized. "To whom then will ye liken God? or what

likeness will ye compare unto him" (Isa. 40:18). There may be certain

symbols connected with his person setting forth the dignity, majesty,

and eternal splendor of his name, but he himself appears unrepresented

by another. The same is true also of the person of Jesus, our

Redeemer, although in this case we must distinguish between the

Christ incarnate and Jesus in his essential divinity. Considered as

incarnate--both God and man--the human aspect of his character as

manifested in his sacrificial death may be analogously represented as

a Lamb slain. But considered in his essential divinity, he can not

be symbolically represented. Therefore, whenever the glorified Christ

appears on the symbolic stage, he always appears in his own person

proclaiming his own name. "I am he that liveth, and was dead; and,

behold, I am alive for evermore" (Rev. 1:18). "He hath on his vesture

and on his thigh a name written, King of kings, and Lord of lords."

In Rev. 6:9 the souls of the martyrs are represented as crying unto

God for the avenging of their blood on them that dwell on the earth.

There is no object analogous to a disembodied spirit. It is easy to

give them an arbitrary name. Therefore they simply appear under their

own appropriate titles as "the _souls_ of them that were slain."

Whenever we attach a literal significance to a symbolic object, we

immediately destroy its character as a symbol. This should not be

done. With the exception of those instances where the nature of

an object forbids its symbolization and where the description must

therefore of necessity be literal, we should always look for the true

fulfilment, not in that department from which the symbol is drawn, but

in another department--that to which the symbol by analogy refers us.

[Sidenote: Field of present inquiry]

The limits and object of the present work preclude an exhaustive

treatment of prophecy in general. Our immediate purpose is to set

forth particularly those prophecies of the divine Word which clearly

portray and outline the character of a world-wide religious movement

in the last days. To do this effectually, however, we must briefly

consider those prophecies which describe the principal ecclesiastical

events in history which form the basis of, or lead up to, the Last

Reformation. The subject as outlined in the prophecies and as based on

the facts of history, naturally divides into four parts, or epochs, as

follows:

I The Apostolic Period

II The Medieval Period

III Era of Modern Sects

IV The Last Reformation

For the sake of brevity, we shall, as far as possible, exclude from

our present inquiry those prophecies pertaining to civil and political

affairs, retaining only such as have an important bearing on the

church subject.

The Last Reformation · 第 2 / 6 章