SECTION X.--AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAWS

ARTICLE I. These by-laws may be amended at any Annual Meeting by a

two-thirds vote of the members present provided such amendments shall

have been submitted to the membership in writing at least thirty days

prior to that meeting.

Proceedings

44th Annual Meeting

Northern Nut Growers Association

Rochester, New York

August 31--September 1, 1953

MONDAY MORNING SESSION

PRESIDENT BEST: We are opening this 44th Annual Meeting of the Northern

Nut Growers Association with this historic gavel which was made from

wood grown in the Thomas Littlepage pecan grove near Washington, D. C.

Opening each session with this gavel has been a custom of this

organization for many, many years.

We are very anxious to have you folks meet some of the men who have made

our meeting possible here at Rochester. I would first like to introduce

Mr. W. Stephen Thomas, Director of the Rochester Museum of Arts and

Sciences. Mr. Thomas.

MR. THOMAS: Thank you, Mr. Best.

We are always glad to welcome groups such as yours. You represent a

unique organization to us with interests not in our field. We are a

public institution, and are glad to have you here.

I feel there are many things of interest in this museum and in our

program to interest you, because you are horticulturists and people

interested in the out-of-doors.

This museum is owned by the City of Rochester. By the way, there are

only about 12 museums throughout the country that are supported as we

are. We get 98 per cent of our funds from the City of Rochester. It is

not endowed. It is the people's museum. In the exhibit upstairs are

three dimensional models showing the evolution of the Genesee Valley in

New York from early times to the present. Here you will see a beautiful

panorama of what it looked like two hundred million years ago right

where we are sitting and standing now when the seas overlay the area

during the Devonian and Silurian times. We have reconstructed the little

sea creatures that lived in the rocks in their natural colors.

Another exhibit is the Indian story, primitive man, not just before the

white man came, but going back 1500 years. On the top floor you may see

how the pioneer man worked here as a woodcutter and running flour mills

and how the city came about. The whole story of our region is in the

museum.

But more important than these exhibits is what we do through the

educational system; adult lectures, and so forth. That is just a little

background of our work. I know you have your important business at hand,

but I hope you will have a little time to view the exhibits. We want to

help you in any way we can. If there is anything we can do, don't fail

to ask.

PRESIDENT BEST: Thank you, Mr. Thomas. Most of you met Mr. Wilbur Wright

last night out at the park. He is going to make an address of welcome

from the City of Rochester and from the parks. Mr. Wright.

MR. WRIGHT: Ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the City of Rochester and

the Park Department, we want to welcome you to The Friendly City. We

want you to feel that Rochester has its hand out for a wide open welcome

for anything we can do to make you happy while you are here.

The parks are particularly interested in the fact that you have chosen

Rochester as your conference city for 1953. The parks, as you know, are

a good deal like the museum. They are botanical collections in the heart

of the city, the money coming from the city; the taxpayers pay the bill.

We have a tremendous botanical collection here, and are known the

country over for our lilac and other collections.

We have, in the past two years, appointed Bernard Harkness to take

charge of our plant collections, with the title of taxonomist. It took

quite a bit of backing to get Civil Service to break down and make such

a title. There wasn't such a title in the State of New York, and they

couldn't understand why they should give it.

Mr. Grant is another good Cornellian coming along as Assistant

Superintendent of Parks, and he is, again, looking after the maintenance

and upkeep of the various plant materials that we have.

We have a very large organization here, the Parks Division includes the

cemeteries, 90,000 street trees, 56 playgrounds, and about 2,000 acres

of parks. Our peak employment is 756 people. All-in-all we have a

tremendous amount of interest in our parks, and they are increasing. We

are exchanging plants with about 25 foreign countries right now, and we

expect to expand that now with the various facilities we are setting up

at our new herbarium, which you visited last night.

We are proud of Rochester, and the park system. We are doing our best to

continue the excellent work of Dunbar, Laney, and Slavin who built up

the park collections. Our aim is to increase the collections, and make

the park system better for the people to enjoy. We hope you have a fine

time while you are here. Thank you.

PRESIDENT BEST: Dr. MacDaniels, ex-president of our Association will

give our organization's response.

DR. MACDANIELS: Chairman Best, Director Thomas and Director Wright, I

don't know whether I am particularly well qualified for this particular

assignment, but I am certainly very happy to express the thanks of the

Northern Nut Growers Association for the excellent cooperation in

arranging the facilities which we have found here in Rochester. Few of

us can recall any situation in which the Association has been helped all

along the way, as they have been here, and we feel most welcome in this

truly friendly city.

Before the meeting I thought I was going to be able to claim a sort of

paternal interest in the training of Director Wright in that he studied

just prior to the war in the Department of Floriculture and Ornamental

Horticulture at Cornell University where I am stationed. Although we saw

a good deal of him after the war, he came directly here, so I can't say

that I knew him "way back when" he was an undergraduate student. Still

we do have a proprietary interest in all Cornellians, and we like to see

the home team make good as has certainly been the case here.

Fortunately, Ithaca is close enough to Rochester, so that our classes

can come to the Rochester parks on field trips where we have always

received the most friendly cooperation and help just as the Northern Nut

Growers is receiving today. I assure you that we are most grateful.

PRESIDENT BEST: We will proceed with the business of the organization.

On the Resolutions Committee which will give us resolutions for adoption

at our final night session, I appoint Mr. Davidson, Mr. Allaman, Mr.

Oakes and Mr. Snyder.

The next item of business is the election of a Nominating Committee.

This committee is to nominate the officers which will be elected at our

next annual meeting. Nominations are now in order.

DR. MCKAY: I nominate Mr. Machovina.

MR. DAVIDSON: Mr. Silvis.

DR. CRANE: I'd like to nominate Mr. Salzer.

MR. DAVIDSON: I think Dr. Crane ought to be nominated.

MR. STOKE: I nominate Mr. Kyle from Iowa.

DR. DOWELL: I move nominations be closed.

PRESIDENT BEST: Is there a second to Dr. Dowell's motion that

nominations be closed? (Motion seconded and passed.)

PRESIDENT BEST: Nominations are closed. Those in favor of this list, Mr.

Kyle, Dr. Crane, Mr. George Salzer, Mr. Silvis, Mr. Machovina, for

Nominating Committee for next year make it known by saying "Aye."

(Chorus of "ayes") Opposed? (None.)

PRESIDENT BEST: May we have the report of the Program Committee. They

have been at work, we can see that. The evidence is on every hand. Dr.

McKay?

DR. MCKAY: The program you have in your hands represents the work of the

Program Committee. The work of the Program Committee is done prior to

the meeting and I want to say that this year I really did have fine

cooperation from the members and from the members of the committee in

responding to requests for numbers on the program. That always makes the

work of a committee easy. Because of this fine cooperation I can say

truthfully that the effort on my part was relatively small.

As all of you know, we now have a larger group of people to draw from

for our programs than formerly. We always go back, of course, to our

tried and true members who, year after year, give us numbers for the

program, but we also like to give the new members a chance and recruit

from new sources whenever possible. I haven't analyzed the program

enough to know exactly how many new members are listed on the program

this year, but I think you will find a few, and as the organization

continues to grow, it will be desirable to use these new sources of

information for items on the program as much as we can.

PRESIDENT BEST: That's fine. I don't think we can emphasize that too

much, this new-member proposition.

We are ready now for the report of the Secretary, Mr. Chase.

MR. CHASE: About the only report that I have to make is one that was

prepared by Mr. Carl Prell, and I don't see why in the world he didn't

give it, since it's such a fine job of getting together the information

on membership. I am going to try to sum this up for you, in order that

you will know the progress we made in the membership drive to which so

many of you contributed.

On the books as of today we have 1013 paid up members. (Applause.) In

addition to that, we have 15 more who will begin membership the

beginning of our fiscal year, and in addition to that, there are ten

more too new to be acknowledged yet. So we are in pretty good shape on

membership.

New members total is 455, which is, I think, just about double from last

year, if my memory serves me correctly. Leader in the members by state

is our good, old friend Ohio with 126. They produced 42 new members this

year. Second on the list is Illinois, with 102, and they came up with 38

new members.

DR. MACDANIEL: I think this is the first year we have had a hundred

members from any state.

MR. CHASE: Pennsylvania has 83, with 26 new members. New York 78, with

27 new members. Indiana 70 with 31 new members. Michigan 58 with 28 new

members. That covers the top six states.

During the year we lost 71 members. That breaks down to five deceased,

12 resigned and 54 that we haven't heard from. Out of the 12 that

resigned, seven were one-year old and only 5 older members. Now, of the

54 not heard from, 40 were one-year members and 14 were older members.

Total loss is 71, actually. We had 14 reinstatements this year.

Does anyone have a question on membership? There are quite a few folks

in the Association who are really working hard to get new members, and a

great number have come up with at least one. But, actually, I believe,

Carl, it's a very small percentage of the membership that's really

working, is that correct?

MR. PRELL: I am afraid so.

MR. CHASE: And the 71 lost, you considered about normal, didn't you? We

have to figure on losing about 10 per cent. Well, we can't afford to

lose a hundred.

I don't have too much to report as Secretary, except we might briefly

review this hectic year since the little sub-zero walnut story appeared

in the Farm Journal. In June a year ago I received a request for an

article on the hardy English walnut. I handled it as a routine request

and sent it to the Farm Journal. Of course, Joe McDaniel was secretary,

and I referred all the interested readers to him for further

information. The first batch of mail hit Joe right after our meeting in

Rockport, and he had 1500 inquiries within two weeks. I forgot to warn

him that this might be coming up, and he went ahead and handled about

1500 of these inquiries, and then I don't know what happened to him, he

started sending them down to me. Between myself, my secretary, my wife,

and my boy we handled the other 4,000, and they are still, as Joe says,

actually coming in.

To handle that, took some of our funds as you see under "promotion

business", in the treasurer's report. The mimeographing was gratis, also

the assembling and mailing, but the postage we had to pay for.

So all we have to show for that is about how many members, Carl?

MR. PRELL: I will say 200.

MR. CHASE: That's about right. As these inquiries came in we compiled

lists of names and sent them to Mr. Best. Then Mr. Best mimeographed a

letter and some other material, along with an application folder and

followed up these inquiries except the last 500. So we hit them once

with a three-page information sheet from the Secretary's office, then

Mr. Best at least once again with a follow-up letter, and out of almost

5,000 we get about 200 members, which is pretty good. And there are a

lot of other folks I know would join if somebody would contact them.

MR. CHASE: So ever since last October I don't know what side is up so

far as N.N.G.A. is concerned. I don't pretend it hasn't taken a good

deal of effort and a lot of time from some things that I should have

done, but I enjoyed doing it for the Association, and I have no regrets.

The only thing I am sorry about is that we didn't get 500 instead of

just 200 members.

PRESIDENT BEST: Thank you. Spencer. (Applause.) That's a fine report.

May we hear from our Auditing Committee, Mr. Silvis.

MR. SILVIS: The report of the Treasurer, which I have just had an

opportunity of inspecting, is the most professional document I have ever

had the pleasure of examining as a member of this Auditing Committee on

which I have been several times. And I think a testimonial is due our

Treasurer, Mr. Carl Prell, who has combined the rare talents of

bookkeeping and comparative reporting.

The Auditing Committee, composed of Sterling Smith, who was not able to

be here, Mr. Pape of Indiana, and myself, accept this report of Carl

Prell on behalf of this Northern Nut Growers Association,

PRESIDENT BEST: Let's have the Treasurer's report. Mr. Prell

Report of the Treasurer

CARL PRELL, _South Bend, Indiana_

At the beginning of this fiscal year it seemed likely to your Board of

Directors that the Association's investment in government bonds would

have to be converted into cash to meet the year's expenses. There was

barely enough money in the treasury to pay for the 42nd Annual Report,

which should have been billed the preceding year.

Normally, the treasurer collects only enough money to pay for one

report, plus the year's operating expenses. The problem this year was to

pay operating expenses and to discharge our obligation on two reports.

Anticipating this problem, and in an effort to correct recurring

deficits, your Board made plans back in 1951 for a drive to increase

membership. Some momentum was gained by the end of last year, which

carried into this year with increasing force. The result was the

substantial gain in membership reported upon by your Secretary--with a

substantial increase in revenue.

Membership drives, of course, are a mixed blessing. They may produce

more dues; but they certainly cost money. Our promotion expenditure

jumped from practically nothing in 1951 to $115 in 1952 to $620 in 1953.

However, our dues collection from new members thus gained, were more

than $1200 in 1953 alone--twice as much as was spent. And it is

important to note that an expenditure to gain a member is made only

_once_, whereas the member's dues continue year after year.

In any event, increased membership was a factor in keeping us from

cashing our reserves.

Another important factor was the very generous response of the

membership to a plea for Sustaining and Contributing dues. Thirty

percent of our old members responded with $10.00 payments for

Contributing Memberships or $5.00 payments for Sustaining Memberships.

This help was needed. It is deserving of special mention in this report.

One other factor contributed to successful operation this year, as it

has in other years. This factor does not show up in figures in a

financial statement for the simple reason that the figures are modestly

withheld from the treasurer. I refer to the out-of-pocket and unreported

expenditures of officers and committeemen, which expenditures sometimes

are sizeable. Certainly they were this year. The fact that such

contributions were made should be noted.

The sum total of all this is a financial showing for the year that may

be considered satisfactory. Our debts are all paid. No bonds were

cashed. Nothing was borrowed. And we have money in the bank.

At this time last year we had a cash balance of $1313.78. Today our

balance is $303.70. We spent $1,000 more than we took in. But we paid

for two Annual Reports. The lesser report cost $1200. If this were

subtracted from this year's business, where it does not belong, our cash

balance would be $1500.00. In short, on this year's business--even with

all its unusual expenses for promotion--our income was more than our

disbursements--by $200.00. This reverses the deficit trend of recent

years.

_RECEIPTS_

Membership Dues $3,638.05

Sale of Annual Reports 394.00

Advertising in Nutshell 110.00

Contributions 39.00

Interest on Government Bonds 37.50

_________

TOTAL $4,218.55

_DISBURSEMENTS_

42nd Annual Report (Urbana) $1,205.53

Printing (1000 copies) $1,050.00

Reporting (addi. billing) 97.05

Postage & Addressing 58.48

43rd Annual Report (Rockport) $1,760.72

Printing (1200 copies) $1,477.42

Envelopes, 800 19.60

Reporting 100.00

Postage & Addressing 163.70

The Nutshell

Printing, 4 issues 353.11

American Fruit Grower 39.00

73 Subscriptions at 50c 36.50

2 Subscriptions at 75c 1.50

1 Subscription at 1.00 1.00

Association Promotion 620.47

Application folder, printing 11,200 164.28

Stationery for Sub-Zero and V. P. campaigns 337.24

Mimeo Sub-Zero and follow-up, 1500 59.00

Postage, Things of Science 59.95

Secretary's Fee, 50c per member 517.50

1952-53 Fee to date 506.50

Balance of 1951-52 11.00

Stationery and Supplies 268.22

Secretary's Expense 315.87

Treasurer's Expense 143.21

Dues, American Horticultural Society 5.00

_________

TOTAL $5,228.63

Cash on deposit, First Bank, South Bend $ 303.70

Disbursements 5,228.63

_________

$5,532.33

On hand, August 18, 1952 $1,313.78

Receipts 4,218.55

_________

$5,532.33

U. S. Bonds in Safety Deposit Box $3,000.00

MR. PRELL: I am going to close right now with this information which the

Association, I think, should have. The membership promotion consisted of

a campaign called the "Vice-president's Campaign" sparkplugged by Mr.

Best. Thousands of letters were sent out through the vice-president's

and from the president's office to the membership. You may have received

some of them. In addition to that, thousands of other letters were sent

out to people who had responded to a story that appeared in Farm Journal

wanting to know about the Association. I can't calculate how many went

out, I have never been told, but I would guess about 5,000 of them. And

those all went out from Mr. Best's office. In addition, our

addressograph plate system was not in very good shape, due to the fact

the organization was too poor to keep it up. Mr. Best supplied

addressograph plates for the whole list.

I wrote to Mr. Best on April 27th, as I wanted all the bad news, and I

wrote to some other people. I said, "You have not yet rendered a bill

for postage on your mailing. Will you please make your request?" And he

answered,

"I was surprised you asked about the postage charge from here. It has

been my intent from the beginning of the campaign to carry the postage

charge myself."

Thank you very much.

PRESIDENT BEST: Carl, I know you have done a lot of hard work, and I'd

like to say for the organization that we do appreciate what you have

done for us.

I see Mr. Slate has come in back here. Mr. Slate have you a word from

the Publications Committee?

MR. SLATE: I have no formal report. The part of the Publications

Committee with which I am concerned is the proceedings. The speed with

which that job was done depends upon how fast the papers come in and the

transcript of the proceedings finished. The transcript is rather

complicated and a lot of things are said that shouldn't go into the

report. It takes a lot of work with the blue pencil to boil the material

down to something that's useful and worth paying a printing bill for.

One other thing that I should mention is the cost of mailing. I don't

know whether that has been mentioned previously or not. We had a little

difficulty with the Post Office Department. Carl Prell can tell you

about that.

PRESIDENT BEST: Yes, he did. I have heard only good reports of your fine

job. I think we all agree that it was a scholarly production.

Do we have anything from the Survey Committee?

Blossoming Habits of the Persian Walnut

H. F. STOKE, _Roanoke, Va._

The Survey Committee, as its project for the current year, has

undertaken a study of the blossoming habits of the Persian walnut. The

prime object of this study is to solve the problem of pollination, so

that the planter may be reasonably sure of a satisfactory crop, whether

his planting be a single tree or an orchard.

While this study has dealt exclusively with the Persian species,

_Juglans regia_, the habits and principles involved apply equally to all

walnut species.

In most plants the reproductive function inheres in a single bisexual

flower, consisting of both male and female elements. In walnuts, as well

as most other nuts, the male and female functions are performed by

unisexual flowers of very different type and appearance.

Both the male or staminate flower and the female or pistillate flower

spring from buds that are formed in the axils at the base of leaves of

the previous season's growth. In the Persian walnut they may be detected

as early as July. The staminate bud that forms the pollen-producing

catkin of the next season, can be distinguished by its checkered

appearance, something like a tiny pine cone. They occur in the axils of

the lower leaves of the shoot of the current season.

The pistillate bud, which produces the nut, occurs at or near the tip of

the growth of the current season. It can usually be distinguished from

leaf buds by its larger size and plumpness.

When these blossom buds develop the following season, the male or

staminate blossom assumes the form of a catkin, which elongates rapidly

a few days before maturity. As the pollen is shed, beginning at the

stem end, the pale yellow-green of the bursted pollen capsule turns dark

or black, proceeding to the tip of the catkin. This change readily shows

that pollen is shedding, which may be confirmed by touching such a

catkin with the tip of the finger, and noting the yellow pollen that

adheres, or rises in a tiny cloud.

Making note of the date when a given variety begins shedding pollen, and

the date when all catkins on the tree have opened, gives the period

during which that variety is effective as a pollinizer.

The female, or pistillate flower, does not, like the catkin, spring

directly from the wood of last season's growth, but occurs at the end of

the new growth of the current year, being preceded by a number of leaves

which nourish the young nut to maturity.

The pistillate blossom assumes the form of one or more tiny nutlets with

little sharp-pointed tips. When the blossom has become receptive to

pollen, each tip has separated into two separate pistils which spread

apart and present fresh, slightly sticky surfaces, which are known as

stigmas. This is the time that pollination can take place, which period

continues until the stigmas have lost their freshness and stickiness.

This period marks the time during which pollination can occur.

In many cases Persian walnut trees remain barren when planted alone, not

because of incompatibility between the pollen and the pistillate flower,

but because pollen shedding and receptivity do not occur at the same

time. Sometimes pollen shedding is over before pistils are receptive.

Such blooming is termed protandrous by botanists. In about an equal

number of cases the pistils lose their receptivity before pollen is

shed. Such blooming is termed protogynous. There are quite a number of

varieties, however, that mature both types of blossoms simultaneously,

in which the variety is self-fertile and will produce crops, even if

isolated from other trees of the species. Of these Hanson and Bedford

are representative. On some other trees there is some overlapping of the

shedding and receptive periods, enough to produce partial, but not full

crops.

Warm weather hastens blooming; cool cloudy weather retards it. A warm

spell may start blossoming early, but if broken by a cool wave the

period of bloom may be greatly extended.

A southern exposure with a light soil will cause a variety to blossom

earlier by some days than in the same locality in heavy soil. The

blossoming period is generally shorter in the North than in the South.

Climax, Michigan reports blooming beginning May 10 and ending May 31, a

period of 21 days. Millerton, N. Y., and Massillon, Ohio, report the

same.

Urbana, Ill., reports blooming beginning May 5 and ending June 1, a

period of 27 days.

At Roanoke, Va., the period begins April 9 and ends May 10, running 31

days.

At Greensboro, North Carolina, the season began April 2 and ended May 5,

a total of 33 days.

The report of Mr. Royal Oakes of Bluffs, Ill., is unique in the

shortness of the blossoming period, both of individual varieties and as

a whole. Blossoming began April 29 and ended (estimated) May 13, a

period of only 14 days. The reason may partly lie in the weather and

partly because the planting is on high bluffs overlooking the broad

Illinois River valley, affording excellent air drainage.

One major difficulty the Committee encountered in tabulating the reports

was the fact that so few of the same varieties were being grown by the

various reporters, making it difficult and sometimes impossible to

synchronize the blossoming period of the various varieties from

different places with sufficient accuracy. Because of this, two tables

have been prepared.

Table Number 1 shows named varieties, for the most part.

Table Number 2 shows varieties that are being propagated asexually, but

have not yet been given variety names. Seedlings not propagated by

budding or grafting, if recognized have been omitted because of

individual variability.

Each table consists of five vertical columns, earliest to the right,

successively later towards the left.

Varieties above the dividing line are shedding pollen at the time

varieties in the same column below the line are receptive. A variety

like Hanson, appearing in the same column both above and below the line,

is self-pollinizing. Varieties appearing in more than one column

indicate a long blooming period.

MR. BECKER: The Crath No. 1 I have been able to propagate is what Mr.

Neilson gave to me as Crath No. 1--I guess he called it Crath.

MR. STOKE: We may have to discard a number of other Crath No. 1's,

because the variation between them indicates a mixture of several clones

with the same name.

PRESIDENT BEST: The next thing to consider is this resolution which is

given word for word on page 26 of our 1952 annual report.

TABLE 1.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Broadview Bijur Carpathian D Beckman Parnell

Lancaster Cutleaf S Bayer Bedford Watt

McDermid Fort Custer Beckman Caesar

[symbol: male] Hanson Breslau Etter

Hilltop Caesar Eureka

Ill. No. 23 Eureka Lake

Mundt Grande S-24

Metcalfe James

Lancaster

Littlepage

McKinster

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Caesar Beckman Bijur Bayer Burtner

McKinster Bijur Cutleaf Bedford Dewey

Breslau Colby Broadview Etter

Fort Custer Fickes No. 22 Etter Eureka

Carpathian D Hanson Fort Custer Franquette

Colby Hilltop Grande Mayette

Cutleaf S Jacobs Ill. No. 23 L-2

[symbol: female] Fickes No. 22 James Lake

Hansen Lake Lancaster

Jacobs Lancaster Mundt

Keener S-24 S-24

McDermid Metcalfe Metcalfe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE 2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Early Medium early Midseason Medium late Late

S-6 S-6 S-12 S-22 S-17

[symbol: male] S-12 S-12 S-22 S-24 S-57

S-33 S-66 S-24 S-25

Littlepage S-XD S-25 S-29

S-29 S-32

S-33 S-41

S-35 S-45

S-66 S-66

S-XD

----------------------------------------------------------------------

S-5 S-5 S-6 S-6 S-7

[symbol: female] S-25 S-17 S-17 S-12 S-12

S-29 S-22 S-22 S-17 S-33

S-32 S-24 S-32 S-35

S-35 S-25 S-38 S-46

S-66 S-29 S-41 S-57

S-35 S-45 Littlepage

S-38 S-46

S-41 S-48

S-45 S-XD

S-48 Littlepage

S-XD

Littlepage

----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was made by Mr. Dowell of the Ohio group, although it is of interest

to every state that has an affiliated group or a chapter. Last year the

matter was referred to the Board for their consideration. The Board

carefully considered the resolution of the Ohio group, and the spirit of

the Dowell resolution, was approved.

The matter was finally left with a committee made up of J. C. McDaniel,

Mr. Carl Prell and Mr. Machovina. It is now in order to hear from these

men the changes necessary in our by-laws to create the right atmosphere

for the formation and operation of our state organizations, because we

do want to encourage them. After hearing the proposals, a motion will be

in order that they be approved. If approved, a year from now we will

vote on the amendments to the by-laws. Mr. McDaniel will give the report

of the committee.

DR. MACDANIEL: Your committee agreed on the suggested revision of Section

IX, which covers chapters and affiliations. If this meets with the

approval of the members here, final action must be deferred until the

45th annual meeting. Proposed amended Section IX of the by-laws reads as

follows:

"Section IX.--Chapters and Affiliations.

"Article 1. The Association shall encourage the formation of

regional groups of its members into chapters, which may elect their

own officers and organize local field days and other programs. Such

chapters need not limit their membership to members of the parent

organization. They may publish their proceedings and selected

papers in the proceedings of the parent society subject to review

of the Association's Committee on Publications.

"Article 2. Any independent association or society interested in

nut tree culture may affiliate with the Northern Nut Growers

Association by payment of an annual affiliation fee of $5.00.

Selected papers presented at the meetings of such an affiliated

society may be published in the proceedings of this society subject

to review of the Association's Committee on Publications."

It is the thought of this special committee that the new wording

simplifies and clarifies these two articles in regard to organization of

chapters or sections, and second, affiliation of independent

organizations. We thought we shouldn't limit it to affiliation of nut

growers associations as such but to extend affiliation possibility to

any society from garden club on up which is interested in nut growing.

And under Article 1, whether we call this state group a chapter or a

section doesn't seem to matter materially. I believe the Michigan group

prefers to be called a chapter. The Ohio group, I think, will take it

either way. At the present I think we have called that the Ohio Section

of the Northern Nut Growers Association.

Any discussion? I submit this proposed amendment, Mr. President, to be

printed in the 44th annual report for action at next year's meeting, the

45th annual meeting of this Association.

PRESIDENT BEST: Do we have a motion to accept the report? (The motion to

accept was made by Dr. Crane, seconded and passed without dissent.)

PRESIDENT BEST: I was in hopes that we wouldn't have time for the next

feature, but since some of the committees haven't reported yet, I am

afraid that we have. That is the address by the president.

President's Address

RICHARD B. BEST, _Eldred, Ill._

The task of setting down ideas for the reflection of the NNGA fills me

with consternation. My scanty rills of thinking are inadequate.

You remember the old Arabian tale of the poor student who was shut up in

an enchanted room in the bosom of the earth. You remember how the earth

opened only once each year. The student was waited upon by demons and

spirits who furnished deep and dark knowledge. When the door opened, the

student emerged, loaded with great lore and pertinent facts. Like this

Arabian student, by delving into antiquity and our old annual reports of

the NNGA, I have put together some thoughts from men living and dead.

Irving says: this pilfering disposition which some of us have may be

implanted in us for a good reason. Maybe through us pilferers or

borrowers, Heaven takes care of the seeds of knowledge and wisdom from

age to age. The worthwhile thoughts which some of our early members gave

us may be purloined by me and made to sparkle again in today's light,

even though the early members' general idea is obsolete.

So, just as nature has provided for the distribution of her plant

varieties through the maws of birds and animals, so it may be that

Heaven has provided for the fine thoughts of our old members to be

caught by us predatory individuals and made to bear fruit again in this

new day. Really this is one way we exist and go forward in our

organization.

A crop of "tares" which we read about in the scripture enriches the soil

for the next crop. As a forest dies, a new crop of trees spring up. Even

a dead tree gives rise to a whole creation of countless bacteria and

fungi.

So on "ad infinitum." Members who have talked and studied our problems

in the past have made possible our work here today. So, likewise, our

words will sleep with the others from whom we have borrowed. So, to

escape with a good conscience, to avoid having fingers pointed at me, of

hearing cries of--"you stole this from me," I will try to give credit

where credit is due.

Otherwise, I might be, figuratively speaking, stripped of my material

here piece by piece, and I would finally stand before you with hardly a

loin cloth of an idea which I could call my own.

There is a popular appeal to the nut business which most of us are

susceptible to,--like wanting to produce large nuts,--and of seeing the

first nut,--and to again gather nuts like we did as children. Ask a man

how large a nut he found and he will lie as he will about a fish he has

just caught.

Then, there is the romantic visionary who would transform the whole

universe into a sort of fairyland nut grove--where there are no insects,

diseases, or squirrels,--and where the nuts fall polished into open

bags.

Then, there are those of us--and I am one--who reasoning that the

"groves were God's first temples," flee to a twilight hill top or to a

forest shade, and, as Mr. Stokes said, "Sit humbly at the feet of the

great mother of us all. There is wisdom and healing in the shadow of her

wings."

We need this philosophical attitude to generate encouragement and

inspiration to withstand the hard knocks that we have had--and will have

coming. But, the NNGA must be more realistic and really do some

grappling.

Read the experiences which all our reports are filled with. Mr. G. A.

Miller on page 99 of the 1940 report handles this matter of success and

failure very well. We live on our successes and not on our failures. Nut

culture is pioneering, and it is well to be fully aware of the

possibility of failure so that we may be steeled for it when it comes.

Failure makes our successes sweeter.

Abraham Lincoln's life was a series of failures. Thomas Edison usually

failed. Plant breeders at our stations nearly always fail. But, once in

a while they succeed. In the nut business, if we succeed 1 in 10,000

times, success may be cheap at that.

Dr. MacDaniels stated so many important aspects of the NNGA that I want

to list his outline here and then simply hang some thoughts on the

skeleton of his report. For your own enjoyment and understanding, please

read again Dr. MacDaniels's address "The Forward Look," which is found

on page 27 of our 1952 report. I just mention his subjects and comment

on them for emphasis.

1. _Variety Evaluation_

The Ohio Nut Growers did a fine job of getting this job of evaluation in

the groove. Read about it on page 29 of the 1946 report. How many of us

here have wasted years on varieties that good evaluation might have

discarded, before we started to plant the nut.

2. _Judging Standards_

Which covers such things as--

(a) Sealing of nuts

(b) Recovery of halves

(c) Size, quality, etc.

Evaluation and judging include all those fine things we look for in a

nut.

3. _The Naming of Varieties_

Many of us have the same tree growing but calling it a different name.

4. _Securing New Varieties_

And getting them into as many channels. Mr. Wilkinson started several

"Chief" pecan trees last year and gave them all away. Chief is a fine

new variety of pecan. If we had a few more Ford Wilkinsons in this

organization, "God bless him," we wouldn't have so many problems.

5. _The Work of Individuals_

There is always the possibility of finding the "perfect nut," so we need

to continue our search through the earth for better varieties.

Scientific techniques must be applied before we breed better nuts.

We simply cannot have nuts put in our coffins expecting to continue our

work in the next world; so we need to do the next best thing to

this--that is of instructing our sons in the little we have found and

where our different varieties are planted. Then, some of our sons will

start where we left off.

Private research is playing a more important part in the world today.

Private research, using the large amount of basic research available,

could accomplish wonders in the nut world.

I am deeply grieved when I see vast estates which have had a fortune

spent in plantings that had little practical value. The men who spent

this money would gladly have furnished the land, labor, capital and

management for a nut breeding program had we been there to have sold

them on nut trees.

As Mr. Churchill said--"Too little and too late."

But members of the NNGA forget "what might have been." New estates are

developing and younger men are wondering how they can immortalize their

lives and work. Men pass away; their names perish from record and

recollection; their history is only a tale and their tombstone becomes a

ruin, but a good nut tree bearing a man's name, gives that name

immortality.

6. _Work of the Experiment Stations._

In the most practical vein, our basic research and most of our actual

breeding must still be done by our Experiment Stations.

Any nut project is a long-time program and it lends itself best to an

Experiment Station which is not set up on "a three score and ten" basis

like we as individuals are. Stations also have trained workers and

information at hand.

7. _The Real Aim of the NNGA_

Is better living on the farm and the improvement of the garden and

farmstead. Almost every farm and home, especially in the great corn

belt, needs shelter, shade trees, and the beautifying effect of trees.

Psalm 19:1-4 says: "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the

firmament showeth his handiwork. Day unto day uttereth

speech and night unto night showeth knowledge. Their voice goes out

through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world."

8. _Nut Growing as a Hobby._

For people who like to see things growing, there are few projects that

yield more genuine satisfaction than hardy-adapted varieties of nut

trees.

Few people know what a heart nut or chestnuts are, and most have never

cracked a butternut. Most of us have never tasted a good persimmon, and

the paw-paw is practically unknown. We of the NNGA have something to

offer our members.

9. _Keep our Organization Solvent and Functioning._

All costs have increased. Our strength lies in our letters, reports and

information which we send to our membership. To keep this information

coming through letters and our annual report takes money.

10. _How to Finance the NNGA._ Dr. MacDaniels makes the following

suggestions after stating that we have reached the point where

increasing the dues will not give us more income, because of loss of

membership.

(a) Increase our number of members.

(b) Provide different types of membership to encourage contributions.

(c) Gifts.

(d) Special fund raising projects.

Increasing the membership seems to have the most promise in the future.

We are now at the cross roads. Do we want a strong, hard-hitting

organization, capable of doing these things which we know NNGA can do,

or do we want to ease down the other road to a whimpering senile

existence, in the plant society world?

We have increased our membership 40% the past year, and after hurriedly

congratulating ourselves, let us hurry on to this problem of setting

ourselves another goal for 1954.

What shall our new goal be? 30%, 50%, 100%--let us think "high." It is

easier to come down than to go higher.

I'd like to have someone's idea in the audience here. Does anybody have

some figure we should hit at? 10%, 20%, 25%?

MR. KINTZEL: I think since we have a thousand members, for each of the

thousand to bring in one more member and make it a hundred per cent.

PRESIDENT BEST: Now, the high man is going to win here, you know. Is

there anyone that can raise this man, that can say that we increase our

membership more than a hundred per cent? If not shall we take that as a

goal?

We have now reached the point in this discussion of goals where we can

make the following profound deduction--"Nothing is worth two cents until

it is sold."

Our church bells ring to tell the world that something good is being

offered and that the church has something to sell. Everything in this

world must be sold. The NNGA is competing not only with the resistance

people offer it, but also against every other human activity. People buy

what they think will give them the most satisfaction.

We are living in a cold-blooded society and people are not going to

choke with emotion when we mention the old hollow tree where the possums

hatched, or the wide spreading chestnut. People may not even want to

join our NNGA. This is a free country and people can just sit in the sun

on the bare ground if they want to. They may not want trees and can eat

grape nuts if they want. We know they need the hobby--the shade--the

beauty--the protection or even nuts which nut trees will bring them.

Because we know people need these fine things, then we must ask them to

join the NNGA. If everybody knew what you know about the NNGA, we would

have a membership of 100,000 members. But they do not.

This is what we mean by selling our organization. Indirectly as we sell

our memberships to help other people, we help our organization.

Finally, let me suggest that we build up a backlog of ideas here at

Rochester to add to what we have on increasing our membership.

Give your ideas to our Vice President, Mr. George Salzer and his

publicity committee and you will be helping to solve our NNGA problems.

MR. DAVIDSON: It seems to me the most successful thing that was done

during the past year, as far as the raising of membership was concerned,

was done by Mr. Chase, when he wrote that article on Persian walnuts

that survived sub-zero temperatures. That had a tremendous impact on the

public imagination, and it got a tremendous number of inquiries. I think

it had more effect than even the work of individual members, so I would

suggest that anybody who has an idea that can be sent to a magazine that

would have a public appeal should do that thing.

MR. MACHOVINA: The thought strikes me that in addition to the goal for

new members, we should also work to keep these members we have picked up

this year. That means the older members should contact the newer

members, help them, give them trees. Otherwise, a lot can be lost

quickly.

PRESIDENT BEST: In this world no matter whether we are selling seed

corn--if you will pardon that little plug--or you are running a

restaurant or any form of human activity, you can figure each year about

a 10 per cent loss in your clientelle or your customers, whatever you

want to call them, and we of N.N.G.A. are no exception to that rule. We

do have to keep working for that replacement; otherwise, in 10 or 12

years we are going to be out of business entirely.

MR. KERR: I am a Spanish War veteran. At the national convention in

Portland, Oregon, in 1938, one of my comrades showed me a walnut tree

that he planted before he went to the Philippines during that war. It

was on the banks of the Willamette River where he had planted three

nuts. Two were so near the river that a log boom had torn them out, but

one was left. It was 80 feet high, four feet in diameter, and on one

occasion had produced almost a ton of very good nuts.

I told that to the science editor of the Associated Press, and he put a

little article in the local paper, but no picture. If he had a picture

with that article, everybody would have read it. I think we need more

publicity on these old trees that are bearing nuts. I live in Plymouth,

Mass., where the Pilgrims settled. In their settlement papers they

mentioned the groves of walnuts and other wild nuts in the territory. We

found a low-branched walnut 5 feet in diameter and over 450 years old.

MR. BROOK: Let me suggest Mr. Kerr write such an article for such a

magazine, because he is just the person.

MR. KERR: I have already written a few articles for several men's clubs,

and I am writing another article.

MR. BROOK: When are you releasing it?

MR. KERR: Pretty soon. The Northern Nut Growers will get a copy.

PRESIDENT BEST: The report of the Place of Meeting Committee, Mr.

Allaman?

MR. ALLAMAN: A year ago this summer I went to Lancaster to visit the

Franklin Marshall College to see if we could hold our convention there

next year. They considered it quite an honor to have us there, feeling

that it is an educational feature. They can furnish us a nice auditorium

with a cafeteria nearby. Sleeping quarters would be scattered throughout

the grounds. They can furnish our meals and a banquet. About ten days

ago I checked to see if things were still all right, and they said,

"Come ahead," so I am suggesting that the Association hold its next

annual convention at Lancaster, Pa. at Franklin Marshall College.

Our field trip at Lancaster would be to Mr. W. W. Posey's orchard. He

has by far the biggest planting in the state with trees of various ages

and many different varieties. He entertained the Pennsylvania group a

year ago. He has a nice pavilion up on the hill, where we can have our

lunch. We had a most enjoyable time, and he is delighted to have us. Mr.

Posey is owner of the Posey Iron Works in Lancaster.

For 1955 we were thinking about Michigan, probably Michigan State

College. For the following year we were wondering about Connecticut.

Just the place in Connecticut has not been given any thought.

Session adjourned.

MONDAY AFTERNOON SESSION

PRESIDENT BEST: In the morning session Mr. Allaman proposed that we hold

our next convention in Lancaster, Pa. Is there a motion to that effect?

MR. RICK: I move that our next meeting, 1954, be held in Lancaster

County, Pennsylvania. That is supposed to be one of the garden counties

in the country. It has stood first and second in production. I don't

know what it stands now, but it wouldn't be far from the top. It would

be most interesting to all our members, I am sure, to pay Lancaster

County a visit. Motion seconded by Mr. Ellis and passed.

PRESIDENT BEST: According to the by-laws, we get a report of the

Nominating Committee at this time. We have our election at the last

business session.

MR. SLATE: The Nominating Committee, consisting of Max Hardy as chairman

and some others, including myself, presents the following candidates:

For President, R. B. Best. For vice-president, Gilbert Becker; for

Treasurer, W. S. Clark; and for Secretary Spencer Chase.

PRESIDENT BEST: Are there other nominations? (No response.) You will

have a chance for further nominations at our last business session.

PRESIDENT BEST: Now, then, we have an opportunity to hear from a group

of what we might call authorities in their various fields. We have quite

an assortment. The only way I know of to express it is to say we have

the wise men out of the east and the wild men out of the west. I think

we first might hear from Mr. Kyhl of Sabula, Iowa. Mr. Kyhl, you come up

and give us your version of the nut business.

About Nuts

IRA M. KYHL, _Sabula, Iowa_

What we all have in mind at this time is nuts and more nuts. One way to

get them is to plant more nut trees. Why not start a campaign in this

direction? Where I live in the midwest the black walnut is at home and

likewise the hickory, hazel, etc. Farmers may be reluctant to set aside

acreage for this purpose but they could be planted along fence rows

around the entire farm and would produce shade for livestock, an

abundance of marketable nuts, and later a fortune in saw logs. The

average size farm of 160 acres could support a great many black walnuts

if planted along fence rows which ordinarily grow up to brush and weeds.

Seedlings are cheap or one could buy 2 or 3 bushels of Thomas nuts and

raise their own. One could also plant hickories, heartnuts, filberts and

chestnuts if variety is desired along fence rows, but the main thing is

to get this work started. We could no doubt get cooperation from County

Agents and Conservation Departments because of wind breaks and erosion

control. Farmers who could be induced to do this work would no doubt

become nut enthusiasts in due time.

I feel that at this time it may be in line to pay a slight tribute to

our friend the squirrel. I wonder how many of us gave a thought as to

who was responsible for all of our wild trees, such as black walnuts,

butternuts, hickories, hazels and so forth, and how they came about.

The answer is simple, the squirrels, of course. They have been planting

nuts for centuries and without their good work in the past, there would

be very few wild nut trees.

The squirrel has been wrongfully condemned for his apparently good work

and has even been cussed a little for living on the efforts of his own

labor, and due to my appreciation of his good work, I have grafted or

rather topworked some of the trees he planted to Persian walnuts,

pecans, etc., so that he may have more of a variety of nuts. Someday I

expect to have some of the largest and fattest squirrels in America. I

cover some of the choice varieties with stove pipe. They seem to take

the hint and don't bother the nuts. One more thing, there does

not seem to be enough nuts to go around, that is, enough for both the

squirrels and ourselves. So let's plant more trees so that the squirrels

can't possibly eat them all and when we have done that, then let's plant

a lot more.

We now have many species of nuts and many varieties of each species,

many of which have proven hardy in cold climates. It is very encouraging

to note the good work that is being done to produce better and more

varieties. One very fine nut that doesn't seem to have had much work

done on it is the hard shell almond. It does very well for me, is

self-pollinating, bears very heavily, and can be grafted on peach stocks

with good results. I have also had very good success with Persian

walnuts, heartnuts, filberts, chestnuts, hickories, pecans, hazels and

black walnuts.

Natural Variation Observed in Shagbark Hickory, _Carya ovata_ (Mill.) K.

Koch. in Central New York

DAVID H. CALDWELL, _N. Y. State College of Forestry, Syracuse, N. Y._

The shagbark hickory has been extremely important in the economy of the

United States during its period of early development. The handles of the

axes which leveled extensive forested areas in Colonial days were

frequently made from sturdy hickory wood. The nuts furnished food for

man in the form of oil or nutmeats and often hogs were fattened on

hickory nuts, beechnuts and chestnuts. As settlement progressed, the

demand on hickory as wood for wagon parts increased while the use of the

thick-shelled nuts for food decreased except by the country boy or girl

who wandered from tree to tree in the fall collecting nuts for cracking

by the fireside in the wintertime.

The author remembers bounding out of bed as a child in the fall before

dawn on the nights when there had been a frost or a heavy wind, in an

effort to beat the squirrels in the race to obtain the rich harvest of

hickory nuts to be found lying beneath the fine old trees near Herkimer,

N. Y. By some coincidence, both the boys and the squirrels knew of the

same trees which were most sought after for their crops of nuts. It was

at this time that the variability of hickory nuts was first observed.

Thus it was that the nuts of certain trees were never gathered, while

the grass beneath other favorite trees was gleaned carefully for all

fallen nuts.

The present investigation of the shagbark began in the fall of 1949 and

continued through the summer of 1953. It was initiated with the previous

knowledge of the extreme variability to be observed between the nuts of

individual shagbark hickory trees and was conducted for the purpose of

determining whether or not that variability was also expressed through

other features of the tree such as buds, leaves, bark or form.

Consequently, a systematic study was begun of individual trees totaling

158 found mostly in Onondaga County, New York plus the edges of

surrounding counties. The trees were observed throughout the growing

season so that the various tree parts could be observed for comparison.

It was a preconceived idea by the author that there might be several or

more distinct subdivisions into which individuals of shagbark might be

placed through the use of macroscopic characters.

Observations were made over a period of three growing seasons on the

following characters of each tree:

(1) bark

(2) buds and twigs

(3) leaves

(4) flowers

(5) fruit

Each character was observed more than once for each tree as a check on

possible yearly variation for specific characteristics in the trees from

which data was collected.

The generalized description for shagbark hickory is as follows:

SIZE--a tree ranging at maturity from 50 to 100+ feet in height,

generally 2 to 3 feet in diameter and very occasionally reaching 4

feet in diameter.

BARK--usually under 3/4 of an inch in thickness, occasionally up to

1 inch thick with a characteristic light or smoky-gray color when

dry and breaking up into long plates or strips loosely attached to

the trunk near the middle of the plate.

BUDS--terminal buds usually 3/8 to 3/4 of an inch long, subglobose

to narrowly ovate, with 8-10 imbricate scales, the outermost of

which are a blackish brown with dark brown tomentum, and a short

mucronate or attenuate apex, inner scales light brown with longer

lanate pubescence and apex acute to obtuse; lateral buds smaller,

about 1/4 of an inch with tightly appressed scales.

TWIGS--angled or rounded, reddish brown to yellowish brown, or gray,

turning more or less gray with age; pubescent the first year.

LEAVES--compound--ranging from 3-7 ovate to oblong lanceolate

leaflets, usually 5, terminal leaflet as large or larger than the

first two laterals, usually 4-8" long, generally glabrous on both

surfaces but with a finely serrate, ciliate margin; total leaf size

ranging from 8-15" for mature leaves.

FLOWERS--(a) _female_--occurring in 2 to several flowered spikes,

with a one-celled ovary, about 1/4 to 1/3 inch long covered with

tomentum; flowers rusty to yellowish green in color; stigma with two

stigmatic lobes; bracts much longer than the lateral bractlets. (b)

_male_--in three parted or branched aments, each flower usually

containing 4 stamens with a 2 or a 3 lobed calyx; aments 3-4" long

with glandular hairs.

FRUIT--oval, globose or pear shaped, consisting of a woody husk 1/4

to 1/2" thick breaking usually along 4 lines of suture exposing a

flattened nut generally 4 ridged, smooth or slightly roughened;

usually white or cream in color, seed sweet with 2 cotyledons.

RESULTS OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS

BARK--Most of the shagbark hickory trees observed were found to have

a smoke-gray, shaggy bark from 20 years of age to maturity. However,

among the 158 individual hickory trees observed, there were found 7

trees which had a bark much more blackish than the normal shagbark

type and with closely furrowed bark consisting of inter-lacing scaly

ridges more similar in character to that of _Carya ovalis_

(Wangenh.) Sarg.

The trees found growing under timberland conditions rather than as

open field or hedgerow trees did not have the characteristic shaggy

bark except for the upper trunk which had been exposed to the

weather conditions of the forest canopy. Where the trunks of the

trees were somewhat protected from direct rays of the sun and force

of the wind, the bark was smooth, gray and but slightly plated with

none of the shagginess typical of open field grown shagbark.

BUDS AND TWIGS--The buds of shagbark were observed to divide

themselves into two general groups based upon terminal bud shapes

and two more groups based upon the sizes of the attenuated apex of

the outermost bud scales. In all cases the bud scales were observed

to be pubescent though the degree of pubescence varied considerably

in the outer scales only.

The two general bud shapes were globose-ovate and narrowly

elliptical. The broadly oval (Fig. 1a) type of buds were smaller,

generally under 1/2 inch in length while the elliptical (Fig. 1b)

type of buds were usually over 1/2 inch in length.

[Illustration: Fig. 1a Fig. 1b

Shagbark Hickory Terminal Buds (1-X)]

The long attenuated apex on the outer bud scales of the elliptical type

of buds is evident in Figs. 1b and 2b.

[Illustration: Fig. 2a Fig. 2b

Shagbark Hickory Terminal Bud Scales (1-X)]

The number of lateral buds at one position varied considerably with the

usual number being one (Fig. 3a) bud located just above the lobed leaf

scar. On exceedingly vigorous sprout growth, or on very vigorous

terminal growth twigs, it was found that 2, 3, 4 and occasionally 5

superposed buds might occur (Fig. 3b).

Twigs of shagbark varied considerably both in the rapidity of growth and

in color. Frequently the color seemed to be associated with the incident

rays of the sun and orientation of the twig on the branch seemed to

largely control color.

Twigs upon the same tree would vary from gray to reddish brown to

yellowish brown or tan. The majority of observed trees had a reddish

brown as the predominant color. Terminal shoot growth of as much as 40

inches was observed and as little as 2-3 inches in very slowly growing

mature trees.

[Illustration: Fig. 3a Fig. 3b

Shagbark Hickory Lateral Buds (1-X)]

[Illustration: Fig. 4a Fig. 4b

Shagbark Hickory Leaves (1/3X)]

The degree of pubescence on the surface of the twigs varied considerably

and was found to frequently follow group location patterns. Thus nearly

all of the individuals growing in one field might be found with dense

pubescence on the twigs while a similar group several miles away might

have, for all practical purposes, no pubescence on the twigs. In

general, the most rapidly growing trees (or twigs) had the least amount

of pubescence on the twigs.

LEAVES--There was extreme variability found with the leaves of the 158

individual trees observed. All trees were found to have compound leaves,

but the leaflet numbers varied greatly. The typical number for shagbark

is 5, but 3 to 7 were found; three leaflets were common, 5 were abundant

and 7 leaflets were rare. Six cases of leaves with 7 leaflets were

obtained from the vast number of leaves checked on the 158 trees; thus

the frequency of occurrence is quite low for the group as a whole. Where

7 leaflets were observed, 5 of the leaves were normal pinnately compound

leaves (Fig. 4a), while one leaf consisted of five palmately arranged

leaflets plus two normal pinnately compound leaflets (Fig. 4b). The

leaflets on each tree were fairly uniform in shape but the shape of

leaflets between trees varied considerably. Thus one tree might have 5

leaflets quite broadly ovate to obovate in shape while another equally

valid shagbark would be found with narrowly elliptical to lanceolate

leaflets similar to those of red hickory (oval pignut hickory), _Carya

ovalis_ (Wangenh.) Sarg.

[Illustration: Fig. 5a Fig. 5b Fig. 5c

Shagbark Hickory Fruits (1/2X)]

The margins of the leaflets were generally finely serrate and disposed

to be ciliate--i.e. with a fringe of hairs along the serrate margins.

The presence of cilia tend to differentiate shagbark hickory from red

hickory in the field. This feature is a consistently good one if a hand

lens is available but the degree of ciliation varies considerably from

tree to tree and during different parts of the growing season. The

presence of cilia on the margin of the leaflets should not be used as a

means of differentiating shagbark from shellbark hickory, _Carya

lacinoisa_ (Michx. f.) Loud., since shellbark also has a ciliate margin

on the leaflets.

FLOWERS--The female flowers of shagbark are found on short 1 to 5

flowered spikes produced on the current season's growth. Most of the

flowers are around 1/3" long, sessile and covered with a tawny tomentum.

Each flower tends to have two yellowish green stigmatic lobes but

three-lobed stigmas may be found and one case of a 4-lobed stigma was

observed. Various amounts of an amber, or yellow scurfy, substance was

also observed on the new flowers. The male flowers occur on 3 parted,

slender, glandular-hairy aments from the basal portion of the current

season's growth. The aments are usually 3-4 inches long with individual

flowers consisting of 4 stamens with their surrounding bract and calyx

lobes. The anthers are yellowish or greenish yellow. Occasionally a two

branched ament may be found but this seems to occur when one branch of

the ament has failed to develop due to an injury of some sort. One case

of an unbranched ament was observed.

Both female and male flowers are found to be mature after the leaves

have grown to nearly their fully expanded mature size. There are more

male aments to be found on the lower branches than female spikes of

flowers, which would tend to aid in cross pollination of the flowers by

wind action. In general the stigmatic lobes are not quite mature at the

time that the bulk of the pollen is being shed, yet individual trees, at

a considerable distance from another pollen bearing shagbark tree, will

bear considerable quantities of nuts indicating self fertility.

FRUIT--The husk of the shagbark is extremely variable in size, shape,

thickness and opening habits. In general the husk consists of 4 segments

which split along 4 sutures and fall apart at maturity dropping the nut

to the ground. In many cases the husk falls to the ground with the nut

and does not break apart until it reaches the ground. A few of the trees

examined had husks which were not quite deciduous to the base and were

retained on the tree until after the nut had been released. One tree

among the 158 examined consistently had a 5 parted husk.

The husks varied considerably in thickness, the dried measurements

ranging from 1/8 to 1/2 inch with the bulk of the measurements averaging

around 1/4" thick. Two trees had husks so thin as to be more typical of

red hickory while only 6 trees had husks 1/2 inch thick or more.

The overall shape of the husk around the nut ranged from globose (Fig.

5a) to ovoid (Fig. 5b) to obovate (Fig. 5c).

It would seem that the shape of the nut enclosed within the husk might

be predetermined by examination of the husk itself. The obovate husk

shape could most frequently be depended on to produce either elliptical

or obovate nuts but this was not an absolute certainty. The thickness of

the husk effectively concealed the true shape of the nut beneath; the

thinnest husks most nearly conforming to the true nut shape.

The size of the mature shagbark hickory nut and husk ranged from as

small as one inch in a tree which had a seed barely 3/8" wide to as

large as 2-1/4 inches. The size of husk and nut is variable and adjacent

trees which may have developed from the same parent seldom have similar

nuts in the area examined.

The nut itself exhibited the greatest variability of all features

examined on the test trees. These trees exhibited striking

dissimilarities in:

(1) nut size

(2) nut shape

(3) shell color

(4) thickness of shell

(5) sweetness or palatability of nutmeat.

One tree was discovered with a nut which might have caused a taxonomist

to coin the name _Carya ovata_ var. _microcarpa_ due to the very small

dimensions of about 3/8 x 3/8 x 3/4 inches in width, thickness and

depth. Even the squirrels of the area did not feel that this tree

deserved their attention The largest nut

obtained had overall dimensions of 1 x 3/4 x 1 inches in width,

thickness and depth. The majority of average sized nuts were roughly 3/4

x 1/2 x 3/4 inches.

The nut shapes have fallen into a general pattern which include the

following normal types:

Type A--The normal 4 angled nut, nearly rectangular in cross section

(Fig. 6a).

Type B--An elliptical form, nearly oval in cross section (Fig. 6b).

Type C--A smooth oval nut, oval or elliptical in cross section (Fig.

6c).

Type D--An obovate nut, oval to angled in cross section (Fig. 6d).

Type E--A fat globose nut, broadly oval to orbicular in cross

section (Fig. 6e).

[Illustration: Type A Type B Type C Type D Type E

Fig. 6a Fig. 6b Fig. 6c Fig. 6d Fig. 6e

Normal Fruit Forms of Shagbark Hickory (1X)]

[Illustration: Type F Type G Type H

Fig. 6f Fig. 6g Fig. 6h

Abnormal Fruit Forms of Shagbark Hickory (1X)]

In addition to the afore mentioned 5 normal types, three abnormal types

were encountered:

Type F--A smooth or angled nut, triangular in cross section--found

in the same trees as normal nut forms (Fig. 6f).

Type G--A smooth or angled nut square in cross section--found

on the same trees as normal nut forms (Fig. 6g).

Type H--A Siamese twin form occurring very rarely on the same

trees as other normal forms (Fig. 6h).

Type A was the commonest form of nut found in the Onondaga County area.

It roughly exceeded Types B, D and E by a 2:1 ratio. Type C exceeded

Types B, D and E with a ratio of about 7:5 in frequency of occurrence.

Types B and D were the two most easily cracked nut forms when using a

hammer and anvil for a cracking device. It should be noted at this time

that _all_ of the abnormal fruit types were found in _conjunction with_

normal fruit types. Thus, one individual tree used as a collection might

produce _both_ a normal nut type (A, B, C, D or E) _and_ an abnormal nut

type (F, G or H). Occasionally a few nuts in a collection from one tree

might be classed as a _second_ normal type. This was rare however (5

cases) and only occurred in "borderline trees" which were then

classified and recorded as per the dominant nut type for the tree. It

should be noted here that the nut type did _not_ vary from year to year

for the trees examined. Also the frequency of nut crops varied

considerably; less than 1/4 of the sample trees produced nuts each year.

Most of the trees produced crops in alternate years, and a very few have

not fruited in the third year following a heavy nut crop.

The 158 trees examined provided the following distribution by fruit types:

---------------+------------------+--------------------------------

| Number of | Number of abnormal types found

Fruit Type | Individual Trees | in conjunction with

| | normal types

-----------+---+------------------+--------------------------------

| | | F G H

-----------+---+------------------+--------------------------------

Normal | A | 54 | 5 2 1

| B | 23 | 2 1

| C | 36 | 1 2

| D | 21 | 7 1

| E | 24 | 4 1

-----------|---+------------------+--------------------------------

| | 158 collections |

-----------+---+------------------+--------------------------------

Abnormal | F | 15 | 15

| G | 8 | 8

| H | 4 | 4

---------------+------------------+--------------------------------

27 collections

Shell color of the nuts varied between a brownish white and a pinkish

white color when fully dried. From the trees used as a sample, there

were 14 which might be classed in the brownish white categories, and the

remainder (144) as pinkish white or creamy white. Types B and C were the

ones which most frequently were found with the brownish white nutshell

color. Type A was typically pinkish or creamy white in color.

Nutshell thickness varied somewhat. In all but 2 cases, the nuts were

too hard to crack with the teeth. The thin-shelled ones are

_comparatively_ thin only, being about like paper-shelled pecans with

the shell thinnest on the sides of the nut. It is not suggested that

these two thin-shelled nuts be exploited as paper-shelled shagbarks

since they are poorly formed nuts and of small size. One of the two

trees might be a hybrid since it does not have a ciliate leaflet margin

although the buds, bark and leaves are typical of shagbark hickory. The

minimum shell thickness observed for the side of the nut was 1/2 a

millimeter (0.5 mm.) and the thickest was 2.0 millimeters. As previously

stated, nut types B and D (the elliptical and obovate nut forms) were

the easiest to crack. Nut type A was the most difficult and had

generally the thickest shell.

The seed coat color range was from a light tan to a bronze color. The

seed itself was in all cases sweet although certain of the nuts had a

more pleasing taste than others. The nuts eventually became rancid

though 3 years of storage in a heated room did not cause the bulk of the

test samples to change in flavor. This is unlike the pecan which, stored

in the same room with the hickory nuts, became rancid by the following

year after collection.

Summary of Observations

The following observations concerning shagbark hickory may be made from

this study:

(1) The buds of shagbark fall into 2 classes based on bud shape, (1)

globose-ovate and (2) elliptical, the latter being the largest bud

as a rule.

(2) The buds of shagbark fall into 2 classes based upon the length

of the attenuated apex of the outer bud scales. The elliptical form

of bud consistently had the longest drawn out apex.

(3) Normal buds of shagbark occur singly on the twigs above the

lobed leaf scar; however, 2, 3 or 4 superposed buds may occur on

very fast grown sprouts or terminal shoots of vigorously growing

trees.

(4) The twigs of shagbark are pubescent but range in degrees from

almost none to densely pubescent. The fastest grown twigs are apt to

be the least pubescent.

(5) Leaves are compound with 3-5 leaflets commonly found and 7

leaflets rarely found.

(6) Leaflet shapes varied from tree to tree being ovate, obovate or

elliptical.

(7) Leaflet margins with one exception were more or less ciliate.

(8) Most female flowers of shagbark have 2 stigmatic lobes, however,

3 stigmatic lobes resulting in triangular nuts are not uncommon.

(9) The typical male ament is three branched but one and two

branched aments have been observed.

(10) The husk of shagbark varies in thickness from 1/8 inch to 1/2

inch in thickness when dry. The usual husk is 4-parted but one tree

bore 5-parted husks consistently.

The average husk thickness is around 1/4 inch.

(12) There are three general fruit shapes, (1) globose, (2) ovoid

and (3) obovate.

(13) There are at least 5 general types of normal nut shapes for

Onondaga County, N. Y. as listed in the text of this paper.

(14) Three abnormal nut types were also encountered growing

concurrently with the normal types.

(15) Nutshell color varied from brownish to creamy white. The darker

colors were generally associated with the elliptical, oval or

obovate nut forms.

(16) Nutshell thickness varied between 1/2 and 2 millimeters; the

more angled the nut, the thicker the shell.

(17) All of the hickory nuts tested had sweet, edible seeds. The

seed coats varied from a light tan to a bronze in color.

Conclusions

Within the single species of nut tree called shagbark hickory, _Carya

ovata_ (Mill.) K. Koch., in central New York, there exists a great

degree of diversity. However, in spite of these differences, the

examined sample trees may be placed without a question in their proper

genus and species and the author would venture the opinion that the

advisability of placing variety names on portions of the species is a

doubtful and hazardous procedure until much more is known concerning the

species than is known at present.

MR. PAPE: This paper is the result of the fact that some of us down in

Indiana are losing 75 to 95 per cent of our hickory crop each year by

the curculio, and what we are trying to do is work up a little interest

with this paper, so at the conclusion of this we can get a discussion

started and learn the experiences of other people. Maybe you will be

able to help us down in Indiana.

The Control of the Hickory Weevil (Curculio caryae)

EDWARD W. PAPE, _Marion, Indiana_

It is our thought that if some effort were made to bring to this

assembly, a digest of what has been done to control the Hickory weevil,

we might arouse enough interest to carry on some experiments.

If, at the conclusion of this paper, we can get enough discussion, we

will be able to avail ourselves of the knowledge and experiences of

others who have made attempts to control this pest, it would be to our

advantage.

The Pecan weevil of the south and the Hickory weevil are identical and

we learn the following from the experiments carried out by G. F.

Moznette, Bureau of Entomology, U.S.D.A.

Pecan weevil damage is of two types--(1) that resulting from attack

before the shell-hardening period in July and August and causing all

affected nuts to drop, and (2) that resulting from attack after kernel

formation and usually causing the shuck of infested nuts to stick tight

to the shell instead of opening normally. Weevil-injured nuts of the

second type contain grubs which destroy the kernels, or they contain

holes about one-eighth inch in diameter which mature grubs have bored

and through which they escaped after destroying the kernels. The first

type of damage often passes unnoticed and is due to the feeding of early

emerging weevils, which puncture the immature nuts with their long

lancelike beaks to feed on the juices within. Since all nuts punctured

in this way before the shell-hardening period drop to the ground, the

entire crop may be lost if weevils are abundant and the crop is light.

Such damage may be heavy even when a large crop is attacked. The second

type of damage is generally noticeable at harvest-time in October and

November, and in seasons when large numbers of weevils have been present

practically the entire crop may be wormy at harvest.

Since the weevils do not feed very much on the outer surface of

developing pecan nuts, stomach poisons applied to trees have been of

little practical value in control. In 1944, however, laboratory tests

showed that DDT could kill the adults, and that it was worthy of field

trial.

Field tests were made at Fort Valley, Georgia, with DDT and the

conclusions drawn from these tests show that the effectiveness of two

applications of DDT at the rate of 6 pounds of a 50-percent wettable

powder to 100 gallons of water in reducing harvest infestations to 1

percent gives rise to the hope that this treatment, applied for several

seasons, will eliminate a pecan weevil infestation in an orchard, or

will reduce it to such an extent that spraying every year will not be

necessary.

The time of the first application of DDT cannot be based on the time of

the first drop of nuts, because other pecan insects also cause the nuts

to drop during July and August. However, pecan growers who wish to make

the effort can time the first application accurately by spreading a

sheet on the ground beneath an infested tree and lightly jarring the

branches to dislodge the weevils. When the weevils are disturbed they

fall and "play possum" and can be easily collected. When a minimum of

six weevils can be taken by jarring the branches on any one tree, it is

time to make the first application.

While the above will probably give an indication as to what can be done,

using DDT to control the Hickory weevil, for those who have large

plantings and can afford the expensive spraying equipment necessary, it

will be necessary to look farther for control methods for the small

orchard, where expensive equipment is not feasible.

The following is part of a letter from Dr. C. C. Compton, Entomologist

for the Julius Hyman and Company.

"It is our thought that since DIELDRIN is so highly toxic to

Curculionids it might be possible to take advantage of the habits of

this insect and control it by spraying the soil surface. The larval

stage of this insect leaves the nuts and enters the soil sometime in the

fall. It is believed that the larvae penetrate the soil rather deeply,

to a depth of perhaps a foot or more and remain in the soil over winter.

In the spring or early summer the larvae transform to adults and emerge

to lay their eggs. In some regions at least the adults do not emerge

until the second year after the larvae enter the ground.

It is our thought that if DIELDRIN was applied to the surface of the

soil that many of the larvae would be killed upon entering the soil or

would be killed at some later time when the adults emerge.

Dr. C. L. Fluke at the University of Wisconsin has been working for the

past several years with DIELDRIN applied as an orchard spray for the

control of plum curculio. In Dr. Fluke's work he applied the DIELDRIN to

the orchard floor or cover. He has had some very promising results. Dr.

Fluke has used two application rates, namely, six pounds and three

pounds of DIELDRIN per acre. Since he obtained a high degree of control

at the three pound level, it would seem worthwhile to investigate the

possibilities of applying even a lower rate, say one and a half pounds

per acre. In Dr. Fluke's work he applied the DIELDRIN to the soil in the

orchard using a DIELDRIN emulsifiable concentrate containing one and a

half pounds per gallon.

DIELDRIN is now available impregnated on a 30-60 mesh attapulgus clay.

Such formulations are now available containing 5%, 10%, and 15%

DIELDRIN. The DIELDRIN granules would appear to have certain advantages

over liquid sprays where the grove has considerable ground cover. A high

percentage of the insecticide is retained by the cover and does not

reach the soil. The 30-60 mesh granules have the advantage of

penetrating even the densest cover and their application results in a

maximum deposit of the insecticide on the soil surface.

Groves or orchards under cultivation can be sprayed or treated with the

granules. In either case it is advisable to disc the insecticide into

the soil following application.

The granules are free flowing and can be applied quite readily with any

fertilizer or distributor.

Without any field experience to go by it would seem that a 5% 30-60 mesh

DIELDRIN granule formulation would be most convenient to use. By using a

5% DIELDRIN granule material you would obtain a dosage of 1-1/2 pound of

actual DIELDRIN per acre by applying 30 pounds of granules per acre.

Likewise, 60 pounds of the granules per acre would give a dosage of 3

pound of DIELDRIN. On the basis of work done with DIELDRIN for the

control of the Japanese beetle, 3 pounds of DIELDRIN per acre will

control this insect for more than 5 years. While it is not safe to

assume that we could expect the same results in the case of the Hickory

weevil, it does give us something to go by."

It seems likely that the foregoing will create some interest and that by

the time of the next annual meeting we should have the results from the

use of DIELDRIN to control the Hickory weevil.

MR. PAPE: It is my thought now if we could get a little discussion here

concerning what some of you have been doing to control this pest, we

might get somewhere, or at least get enough suggestions or get enough

parties interested to carry on some experiments in different parts of

the country.

MR. SILVIS: What company makes Dieldrin?

MR. PAPE: Julius Hyman Company is the one that sent the most literature

and Shell Corporation local agents handle it. Also in Indiana the Farm

Bureau Cooperative store handles it. The cost in small quantities is two

pounds for 85 cents.

MR. KYHL: Is Dieldrin poison?

MR. PAPE: It's poison like all of these modern sprays, but it isn't as

dangerous as Parathion.

MR. STOKE: In Virginia I have had no experience with DDT, except with

chestnut, and it takes three sprays at two-week intervals to control the

pest.

DR. GRAVES: What time of the year?

MR. STOKE: Apply the last spray about two weeks before the nuts ripen.

That means, with us, starting in late July. You have to figure it for

your own region.

MR. GRAVATT: There is literature available from the Bureau of Entomology

in Washington on spraying to control pecan and chestnut weevils. They

have done quite a bit of research on it.

MR. STOKE: If this ground treatment is effective, I'd like to try it.

It's a lot easier.

MR. PAPE: That would be very nice if you would repeat the work in

Virginia. I know that the Pecan Growers will work on the problem in the

South. If we could get work done in the Central States, it would be an

advantage for all of us.

MR. STOKE: In my area the control of the pest is complicated by the

presence of the chinquapin.

PRESIDENT BEST: We have a surprise feature this afternoon. Dr. Graves of

the Connecticut Experiment station, who, as you know, is the father of a

lot of this work on chestnuts, has consented to discuss with us certain

new procedures that he used in grafting chestnuts.

DR. GRAVES: We have worked with this method of inarching blighted

chestnuts so long and found it so successful that I felt it my duty to

tell you people something about it. It's really a method of cure for the

blight on Oriental chestnuts and their hybrids. I have not found it to

work well on the American chestnut.

Now, suppose we have our tree, with a blighted area on the trunk. I am

assuming that the blight starts near the base of the tree as it usually

does.

When you see it, you cut it out with a sharp knife removing the bark to

the wood. Blighted trees send up shoots from the base, below the

blighted bark. So you take one of these shoots, sharpen it at the top

and insert this sharpened tip under the healthy bark at the top of the

blighted area. The shoot should be a little longer than the blighted

area so that you can get a spring to the shoot as you push its tip in

between the bark and the trunk. Even if it goes up above and breaks the

bark a little bit, it doesn't matter. This inarched shoot renews the

connection between the leaves and the roots across the blighted area.

You know the leaves make the food of the tree, which goes down in the

bark to the roots. The reason blight kills these trees is that it begins

to girdle and sometimes does girdle the tree and destroys the connection

between the leaves and the roots, so the roots eventually die. But by

this method of inarching you restore that connection between leaves and

roots.

Now, you'd be surprised to see how well that's worked with us. We tried

it first in 1937. We have been doing it now for 16 years. Every spring

we take our trees that show the blight, our hybrids and Oriental

chestnuts, and inarch, and the whole thing doesn't take more than a few

minutes. Then after our shoot is inarched here, we tie it with

old-fashioned string. The tips of the inarched grafts should be covered

with grafting wax or paraffin.

The scion will probably send out shoots which should be removed. And

another thing, cut the string when you know the graft has taken above.

If the blighted area is higher up in the tree, you can use bridge graft.

This, you can see, is a kind of bridge grafting. But in bridge grafting,

the scion must be anchored in the bark both above and below the lesion.

As I say, we have cured our hybrids. There doesn't need to be anybody

losing a Chinese chestnut tree ever, using this method. No sense in it.

You can usually do this grafting in the spring about April when the

leaves and the buds are beginning to show their green.

Any questions?

MR. DAVIDSON: You say you paint the wood?

DR. GRAVES: Yes, with any ordinary paint. There is a tree wood paint, I

know, that's better, but we use ordinary paint.

Meeting adjourned at 4:50 o'clock, p.m.

MONDAY EVENING SESSION

"What's Your Problem?"--Round Table Discussion

_Moderator_: J. W. McKay

_Panel_: J. C. McDaniel, D. C. Snyder, Jesse D. Diller, Stephen Bernath

DR. MCKAY: In these panel discussions the moderator usually lays a

little background as an introduction to the subject of the evening. This

title came from a conversation with Dr. Crane. We were talking about

people asking questions about their problems, and decided to have a

panel discussion. Right there we chose the title, "What's your problem?"

All of us have problems to deal with in every walk of life. We run up

against difficulties, and usually much of our time is taken up in

solving or coping with them. At Beltsville we answer a great many

letters, and a great many people ask us about their problems. In

answering problems, we push the industry forward, because we remove

something that is holding it back.

Sometimes the answer to a problem is found by trying to analyze our

successes. In growing nut trees we may have an unusually good crop on a

particular variety or tree. The question is, why does that tree bear

well that particular year, and very frequently it is difficult to

understand why. It is very difficult, for example, in the case of one

success, to repeat that success, because the second time you try to do

it, something else comes in, and you probably have a failure and, well,

you don't know why. It is frequently very difficult to analyze our

successes. Another way of stating it is, of course, that our successes

are often Nature's gift, and we do not know the factors and the forces

that go into that gift.

I want to digress here just a little bit by quoting one thing that Mr.

Best said. I wish, by the way, that we could incorporate some of his

homey philosophy into some of our minutes so as to really benefit by

some of his remarks. I was impressed this morning by his statement in

dealing with a "fairyland of nuts," you remember that language he used,

"no diseases, no insects, no failures."

DR. MACDANIEL: No squirrels.

DR. MCKAY: Wouldn't that be wonderful? I was impressed with another

thing he said; I wrote it down here: "People are not going to break down

with emotion when we talk about the old hollow tree down in the corner

of the pasture where the 'possums were hatched." Language like that, to

me, strikes a very harmonious note. I want to continue this digression a

little to consider the fact that all of us, in a sense, are hobbyists in

nut growing.

Hobbies in this day and age are coming to be more important all the

time, because of the fast pace at which we live. We need to leave our

regular duties once in a while and get out in the garden or the forest

where we can observe nature and get away from some of the stresses and

strains that modern living places upon us.

On this trip we were taking a hike along the north rim of Grand Canyon

in an organized nature walk. The trees, bushes and flowers were all

labelled right down the walk, and we came to this little poem on a

regulation label. It goes like this:

"If you keep your nose to the grindstone rough,

And you keep it there long enough,

You will cease to hear the birds that sing,

And the brooks that babble in early spring,

And finally all that your world will compose,

Will be the grindstone and your poor, old nose."

So that little poem strikes a real note about a person's hobby. You keep

your nose to the grindstone, you will forget all these things. You need

to get away from the grindstone once in a while. I don't mean to neglect

your work, but I do mean to at least take a little time to go out and

look at your trees and forget your troubles and relax and get away from

the stresses and strains that modern living places on us.

Going back now to the subject; we asked you, through the Nutshell and

through members of the Program Committee, to send in the biggest problem

in connection with whatever nut species you grow.

The seventeen replies received included eight problems as follows: (1)

brooming disease of walnut; (2) early vegetating particularly of

Carpathian walnut and frost damage resulting therefrom; (3) delayed

fruiting of chestnut seedlings; (4) season too short for ripening of

fruit; (5) squirrels get the nuts; (6) failure of hicans to set fruit;

(7) grafting problems under which are grouped all asexual propagation

and cuttings; and, finally, (8) getting hickory trees established.

This is a rather low number, but I think out of those eight problems

submitted you have a good representation of some of the things about

which members of this Association talk when they come to meetings. I

will first ask the audience if there is any one who would like to ask a

particular question at this time.

MR. BECKER: At the Weber planting at Rockport, Indiana last year, we saw

no nuts on the trees. I would like to know what is the cause for those

trees not bearing.

DR. MACDANIEL: I would think that failure to bear was caused by a

combination of things; lack of soil fertility, in the first place, soil

physical conditions, probably insect damage and diseases like

anthracnose keeping the trees from being vigorous, overcrowding now,

with many of them, and perhaps to some extent genetic, some varieties

that just naturally don't fruit very heavily.

DR. McKAY: Any others in the audience care to comment on that question?

MR. STOKE: Weather conditions, freezing may have caused it.

DR. MACDANIELS: My impression was that the trees were starving to death.

Cutting down the competition with the weeds and feeding them nitrate

would help.

DR. MCKAY: I think most members felt there that the trees were probably

crowding each other.

MR. BECKER: They had never borne, had they?

MR. WILKINSON: I don't like to comment on it. My opinion is it's due to

the undergrowth under the trees. Keeping the circulation of the air to

the roots of the trees has an effect on its non-bearing. Up until they

quit cultivating and pasturing the orchard, it bore, but after they

quit, production stopped. There is a two- or three-year growth of grass

and weeds, a mat on the ground, and I think it's a lack of air to the

roots of the trees.

DR. MCKAY: Mr. Wilkinson, I heard the question raised as to whether the

orchard had ever produced heavily or not. Can you answer that?

MR. WILKINSON: Yes, it certainly did for several years. As long as it

was cared for, it was a heavy producer.

DR. MCKAY: How long ago was that, could you say?

MR. WILKINSON: That's been eight years and farther back. Nothing has

been done for it in the past eight years.

MR. BEST: May I make a comment? Last year in our part of the country,

which is a little bit west of the orchard we are talking about, we had

almost zero weather in November before the leaves were off of the trees,

and I felt that that took all the buds off our trees. We didn't have any

nuts even on varieties that would bear every year. There are hardly any.

And I think that cold freeze in the fall before the buds really got

ready for it did a lot of damage.

DR. MACDANIEL: I believe that was a factor in the light walnut crop in

that area last year, though some trees did bear.

DR. MCKAY: Of course, I think many of us fail to realize that a tree is

a thing that's confined to one spot, and when it fills the ground with

feeding roots and mines the soil of all nutrients near it, it's stymied,

so to speak, until we give it some more food. Isn't that right, Dr.

Crane.

DR. CRANE: That's right.

DR. MCKAY: And trees, when they reach out as far as they can and can't

get any more food and no more leaves are allowed to fall on the ground,

nature doesn't add any nutrients anymore, naturally, those trees are in

a bad way and will continue to be until fertilizer is applied in some

way.

A MEMBER: I'd like to trim my Persian walnuts so I can walk under the

lowest limb. Does that have an adverse effect upon the bearing of the

tree?

MR. BERNATH: I don't think that's good, to trim them too high. I think

the lower the tree the better it handles all along. Take the fruit

growers, they aim to have the trees as low as possible to make picking

and spraying easy. If you prune a tree, especially the Persian walnut,

too much, it will have a bad effect on the tree.

DR. McKAY: What about the effect on bearing?

MR. BERNATH: You won't have fruit for several years until the tree

recovers what it has lost in foliage.

MR. KINTZEL: I have followed the orchards in California, and I have

noticed they follow the practice of leaving the lower branches on the

trees, and I have noticed that the lower branches have a lot of nuts on

them, also. The branches are hanging down on the ground.

MR. KERR: In France and Germany, they are crazy to get wood, and so they

cut off all the low limbs. I have a Persian walnut that is beside the

walk, and they cut off the low limbs because they hit the sidewalk. This

year I got a tremendous crop.

MR. SILVIS: I think this man has a tree that he wants to walk under.

Under these circumstances he can cut off the low limbs. I agree with Mr.

Bernath, however, that it will reduce the crop for two or three years.

MR. BERNATH: Yes, but he should start pruning when the tree is young. A

tree is just like a child: you have to start to train them while they

are young.

MR. STOKE: You must consider the tree at all ages. In the young tree Mr.

Bernath is right, it will produce sooner if you leave all the leaves on.

But we must consider the mature tree. The branches that are low to the

ground have to have the sunlight and if they do not get it they become

practically barren during later years. If the lower branches are cut

back when they are young and the tree headed higher, the Persian walnut

will have a trunk, say, 10 feet to 14 feet to the first limb, but these

will produce walnuts ultimately. I think the gentleman is right in

having the tree pruned high enough to walk under, and he will get more

nuts in the long run than if he lets the lower limbs develop and then

eventually cut them down.

DR. MACDANIEL: We had an example of that with that huge black walnut tree

with black walnuts starting out 30 feet in the air arching down and

touching the ground. But you wouldn't want to do that immediately with a

young tree, take all the branches up so high.

A MEMBER: Do you have any control for the stink bug on filberts?

DR. MCKAY: We haven't worked with the control of stink bug, because it

is what might be classed as one of our minor problems. The damage is not

so great but what we can overlook it at the present time.

DR. CRANE: In pecan and almond growing in California the effective

control measure for stink bug is the elimination of the host plants on

which the stink bug breeds. Peach growers have the same problem. Stink

bug will, if allowed to multiply in a peach orchard, ruin the peaches,

making injuries very similar to that caused by the plum curculio. The

only satisfactory method of control of stink bug injury is to eliminate

the host plants on which they live, such as most legume plants,

blackberry briars and other brambles. In an orchard, in a grass sod,

stink bug is no problem, but where we have soy beans or cow peas or

something like that growing in the orchard, or we have blackberry briars

or wild raspberries nearby, stink bug is a bad problem.

DR. GRAVATT: I have filbert trees, and the stink bug gets practically

all the nuts. The entomologists looked into the situation, and the

condition that Dr. Crane mentioned was borne out. If there are

blackberries around, it will be quite a problem to control the stink

bugs.

DR. MCKAY: Now I am going to take up the problems that have been sent in

by mail. The one dealing with early vegetating and frost damage to

Persian walnuts was sent in by the most people.

Mr. Snyder lives in a fairly cold country. I am going to ask him to give

us his ideas on this problem and what might be done with it.

MR. SNYDER: I am not qualified to discuss that problem, because we can't

do anything much with Carpathian walnuts. We do have some grafted this

year, and we will have one, in particular, Carpathian, No. 5--I don't

know where it got that number--Crath No. 5, I believe it is, on a young

grafted black walnut tree which is ripening up almost ahead of the black

walnut, and both have made a remarkable growth. But so far as the spring

is concerned, I don't know how they will come out.

DR. MCKAY: Mr. Bernath, what are your views? You live in a fairly cold

area. You propagate Persian walnuts. What is your opinion of this

problem?

MR. BERNATH: Well, there is a way to help that situation. After the

ground freezes, keep that ground frozen. That will delay the growth of

that tree, if you have the time and patience to keep the ground frozen.

MR. SNYDER: I don't believe it.

MR. BERNATH: Yes, it will.

DR. MCKAY: It seems to me we have a difference of opinion here between

Mr. Snyder and Mr. Bernath. The question is this: During a warm spell in

the spring will a tree with frozen roots grow up here in the air. That's

the question.

(There was a chorus of "yes"es from the audience).

MR. STOKE: I would say that one good solution is to select late

vegetating varieties. Mr. Oakes in a report to me on the blooming habits

of Persian walnuts, stated that the variety Schaeffer did not start

growth until the 29th of April. That is almost four weeks later than

most other varieties. And I know from the tabulations that I have made

that some varieties are weeks ahead of others. So let's select the late

varieties that are good and worthwhile and plant those.

In my section our latest spring frost averages the 20th of April, and

yet I have several varieties that do not bloom until after the first of

May. That's the ideal condition.

DR. MCKAY: That's true, Mr. Stoke, but here is another point to

consider. Persian walnuts have a short cold requirement, you know that.

Hence, in February or early March or any time, even in January, when we

have a warm spell of a week or ten days or even shorter, sap will rise

in the trees, and they will start to grow.

MR. STOKE: Not all. In plants of some varieties new growth will hardly

start.

DR. MCKAY: Perhaps you may have varieties that will not start, but the

tendency is to start.

MR. STOKE: If you have one with that early tendency, cut it out.

DR. MCKAY: I'd like to get back to this opinion here on the question of

frozen ground, dormant roots and the effect it has on the top of the

tree. Now, how about our academicians over here, Dr. MacDaniels or Dr.

Crane. Let's hear from one of you.

DR. MACDANIELS: It is my opinion that with a walnut tree of good size

the frozen ground would have little or no effect on the buds starting

growth. The twigs and the trunk would warm up to the temperature of the

air, and when that happens growth occurs. Water is available from that

in the trunk and the deeper roots. This would happen regardless of how

the surface roots were treated.

DR. MACDANIEL: Or whether the tree had any roots on at the time.

DR. MACDANIELS: The best solution to the frost damage problem is to find

trees which vegetate late enough to avoid the spring frosts. Somewhere

on this terrestrial globe there must be some, because I remember years

ago J. F. Jones sent out some Persian walnuts of Chinese origin. I

planted three, and they did not start any growth until about the first

of July, and they were still growing strong when frost hit them in the

fall. Now, somewhere in between these extremes, somewhere in the

climatic analogue of our region we will find Persian walnuts which will

have a delayed vegetating period, and that will be the final answer. At

least, I think so.

DR. MACDANIEL: I'd like to ask a question. In F-2 hybrid walnuts do you

find much segregation of those for later initiation of vegetation?

DR. MCKAY: Yes, we find in those seedlings in some cases the tendency to

vegetate very early and others very late. The most striking case that I

know is an F-1 hybrid which is a very, very late starter in the spring.

It is perfectly dormant when the other young walnuts are in practically

full leaf. We do not have any offspring from that particular one yet,

but it gives us some hope that from this hybrid we may get something

later.

MR. BECKER: With us I don't think this early vegetation means anything.

We are in Michigan. Dark, cold weather continues until about the middle

of May, when frost ends, and then all of a sudden spring breaks loose,

everything comes out, and we don't have any setback, as a rule, from

then on. So early vegetation matters little, means nothing, the way I

feel about it.

DR. CRANE: Mr. Moderator, you ought to point out that most of the United

States isn't Michigan. If we had climatic conditions that Michigan has,

we wouldn't have that problem, but this problem becomes much more acute,

for example, as you go south.

The north knows nothing about cold injury, absolutely nothing. If you

want to see cold injury, you go south. I told Dr. George Potter that

twelve years ago. He was born and raised in Wisconsin and spent 17 years

in the mountains of New Hampshire. I told him he never saw any winter

injury, and he said, "Why, I never heard such a wild statement in my

life." Well, that was because of the fact he had never seen it. He has

been in the South now for 12 years, and he says, "You made a very

truthful statement." He has seen the injury.

In Oregon in 1950 or '51 we had a fall freeze. The temperature was

measured by the Experiment Station in Eastern Oregon, where they are

trying to grow some fruit and nut trees so they will have something else

to eat besides sage brush. They had extensive plantings of walnuts,

Mayette, Franquette and all of those hardy varieties, and along with

them they had some Carpathians. The temperature there in the fall

dropped to 36 degrees below zero, and all of their walnuts of these

other strains were killed to the ground, but the Carpathian came through

uninjured. In the spring of the year however it warmed up, the

Carpathians leafed out and were about ready to bloom when there was a

sharp freeze, and the Carpathians sure got it in the neck. So what

difference does it make whether you lose the trees in the winter or you

lose them in the spring? You have lost them just the same. I think we

ought to hear Spencer Chase cite the history of their big collection of

Carpathians in Tennessee Valley Authority. I understand from him that

they have never fruited any Carpathians down there at all. It's not

winter hardiness, it's this early foliation. So we have got a lot of

areas that are vastly different from that peninsula in Michigan which

the Good Lord designed to make a favored country in a lot of respects.

DR. MCKAY: I recognize Mr. Devitt, who is here from Canada and is well

qualified to discuss Reverend Crath's work there.

MR. DEVITT: It is interesting to me to hear of this early budding and

late fruiting. Along the north shore of Lake Ontario and down through

the Niagara Peninsula our climate is quite consistent. There was only

one year when we had a late frost--it was on May 19th. That was in the

year 1936. Every other year since they have bloomed every year.

MR. STOKE: I'd like to speak of a tree Mr. Crath sent me. The tree was

bearing in Toronto 20 years ago. With me it winter kills sometime in the

winter each year, I don't know when. In some years it has been killed

back to 5-year-old wood, and this spring I found it was all dead. This

tree comes out of dormancy as soon as the sun gets warm. It's hardy in

Toronto but not hardy in Virginia.

DR. MCKAY: I think you can all see why this problem is one of the most

acute ones we have to deal with today. This variation over the country

in the behavior of this so-called hardy strain of walnut is of great

interest now to people everywhere. People are believing that it can be

grown, and there are still problems we have not solved. I would like to

have just a brief statement from Spencer Chase on the performance of

Carpathian varieties at Norris, Tennessee.

MR. CHASE: We reported this, I think, at our Beltsville meeting several

years ago. Trees we had at Norris are Carpathian types secured from the

Wisconsin Horticultural Society about 1940. After two years in the

nursery they were planted, and last year, 1952, was the first year that

they bore any nuts. But that was simply because we did not have a late

frost last year. This year, they were all frosted again. So we have, in

the South, from Virginia and Tennessee to a little farther southward,

a problem of early vegetation of English walnuts. We should encourage

everyone to watch for any late vegetating kinds for trial in the South.

MR. STOKE: Dr. Dunstan reported two walnut trees in North Carolina,

where the season is about ten days earlier than at my place in Virginia

that blossomed after the first of May. I am going to investigate these

trees further.

DR. MCKAY: We have about five minutes that we might devote to some other

problem. Nearly all of us do grafting work of one sort or another. Do I

have a question from the floor on grafting?

MR. MACHOVINA: With cleft grafts or splice grafts held with grafting

rubbers, do you have to cut the rubbers?

DR. MACDANIEL: If it's a chestnut and you have it waxed, I think the

answer is yes.

MR. MACHOVINA: The wax is a hot wax and the rubber does not disintegrate

very quickly.

DR. MACDANIEL: Probably you will have to cut it on species in which the

growth bulges up between the turns of the rubber. This is true of

chestnuts in particular, possibly persimmons, walnuts probably not quite

so much trouble. Let's hear from one of the nurserymen.

MR. BERNATH: I think the best way is after the union is firm enough, to

cut the rubber with a sharp knife.

MR. STOKE: I'd make one qualification. I said I didn't think you had to

cut rubber. I think that's true with grafting above ground. Underneath

ground, with moisture around it, it should be cut.

MR. BERNATH: If you leave the rubber on and bury it, that lasts for

years. Even above ground you find it sometimes.

MR. PATAKY: If you get a fast-growing callus, you have to cut the rubber

band, but if it is rather slow you don't. I do a lot of budding with

roses. I don't cut the rubber bands off, because they will eventually

drop off. If you graft a black walnut or Persian, you will have to cut

it or it will girdle the graft.

MR. STOKE: It doesn't do it for me.

A MEMBER: Has anybody done work with polyethylene film in grafting?

MR. BECKER: I hesitate to tell you my experiment. I don't think much of

it. I used polyethylene bags on chestnuts early in the season, and

practically every one grew, but everything else that was out in the hot

sun boiled. In the hot weather of June the grafts actually cook in the

bags.

MR. MACHOVINA: Did you use a bag over the whole graft, or just a tube

around it?

MR. BECKER: A bag over the whole thing. I have a few Carpathian grafts

that grew well. I think I have better luck with hot wax than anything

else.

DR. McKAY: Our time is up. I want to thank the panel, although we didn't

work you too hard. The panel is adjourned.

PRESIDENT BEST: Dr. Gravatt will show a film entitled: "It Bringeth

Forth Much Fruit."

* * * * *

DR. GRAVATT: Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, you all are familiar

with the fact that the chestnut blight is loose in Europe. It was

reported in Italy in 1938, and it spread rather rapidly in Italy. It had

been there many years before they found it. In spite of our numerous

warnings to get them to watch for it, they let it get away. It has

spread into Switzerland, caused a great deal of damage there with no

hope of saving the larger chestnuts there or in Italy. It's spreading

into Yugoslavia. They are making very energetic efforts to control the

disease in Yugoslavia, trying to delay it as much as possible. It

happens the forest pathologist who handles this work is a young lady,

and she has got the forester and other people interested to try to hold

it back as long as possible.

The threat of the chestnut blight to the entire chestnut growth in all

of Southern Europe helped to bring about the organization of an

International Chestnut Council and Congress. This is made-up of

delegates from a number of the European countries, Spain, Portugal,

France, Switzerland, Yugoslavia, Greece, Turkey, Japan and the United

States. They have been meeting every other year, first for two years in

succession, but the plan now is to meet every other year. They had a

meeting in Spain and Portugal this past June, and the State Department

paid my expenses over, and so forth, to attend as a delegate from the

United States at this international meeting.

The meeting was very enjoyable. They have a very fine system there. They

hire big buses to take you around over the country. Your hotel is all

arranged for in advance, and you go sightseeing to the orchards and

utilization plants. We have meetings just here and there along the way

where we stop a half day or a day.

The next meeting will probably be held in about two years. They have

decided now that the meetings will be more in the way of conferences,

because the last three meetings have been partly sightseeing to observe

chestnut orchards and laboratories.

The possibility of holding the meeting in the United States has been

discussed by the delegates there. But it involves a lot of expense and

the delegates were of the opinion that there would be a very small

meeting in the United States, because the countries over there simply

couldn't afford the expense of sending them over here.

The problem in Italy is very serious, because they have something over a

million acres of grafted chestnut orchards, all of which they are

probably going to lose, and something like a million acres of coppice

growth that is going to be damaged but not such a severe loss. In

connection with the work in Italy I suggested the production of a movie

film that could be shown to the Italian people showing the chestnut

industry and also the chestnut blight. This was to be shown in different

parts of Italy to arouse more interest in watching out for the disease.

They have more opportunity there of slowing up the disease if they will

work hard at it, but they are not doing too much.

As some of you know when a lot of different people and agencies work on

a movie film there must be all sorts of compromises. This was done by a

temperamental Italian director, and other people had parts in it, so

what you see is a compromise. They made 30 copies in Italian. H has been

shown in many moving picture houses, and it is also on the loan basis to

the United States. There are extensive film loan libraries, located in

different parts of Italy, so any high school, college forestry group can

borrow films showing different operations, many of them prepared in the

United States and part of them in Italy.

DR. MACDANIEL: What about this so-called Korean chestnut? Is it actually

a third species?

DR. GRAVATT: I don't think so, We had quite a bit of argument on this

question, because in Spain where I found chestnut blight on chestnuts

brought from Japan, we found the name Korean chestnut. Sometimes the

Korean chestnut looks more like a Jap, sometimes it looks more like a

Chinese, and usually it's sort of a blend between the two. We prefer to

recognize these two species and call the Korean a natural hybrid. Both

species are grown in pure form in Korea, and they intercross readily,

and we do not regard it as a new species.

MR. WILSON: Are the Italian enough aware of their problem so that they

will have developed an Asiatic chestnut in time to replace their present

orchards, so that there will not be an interim?

DR. GRAVATT: There will be a big interim. That's an opportunity in this

country to get the market before the Italians ever come back, I think.

(The film, "It Bringeth Forth Much Fruit" was shown.)

The International Chestnut Commission and the Chestnut Blight Problem in

Europe, 1953

G. FLIPPO GRAVATT, _Senior Pathologist, U. S. Plant Industry Station,

Beltsville, Maryland_

Northern Nut Growers Association Report of the Proceedings at the 44th Annual Meeting Rochester, N.Y. August 31 and September 1, 1953 · 第 10 / 13 章