MARCH, 1861.

Inauguration day -- The message -- Scott watching at the door of

the Union -- The Cabinet born -- The Seward and Chase struggle --

The New York radicals triumph -- The treason spreads -- The

Cabinet pays old party debts -- The diplomats confounded -- Poor

Senators! -- Sumner is like a hare tracked by hounds -- Chase in

favor of recognizing the revolted States -- Blunted axes -- Blair

demands action, brave fellow! -- The slave-drivers -- The month

of March closes -- No foresight! no foresight!

For the first time in my life I assisted at the simplest and grandest

spectacle--the inauguration of a President. Lincoln's message good,

according to circumstances, but not conclusive; it is not positive; it

discusses questions, but avoids to assert. May his mind not be

altogether of the same kind. Events will want and demand more

positiveness and action than the message contains assertions. The

immense majority around me seems to be satisfied. Well, well; I wait,

and prefer to judge and to admire when actions will speak.

I am sure that a great drama will be played, equal to any one known in

history, and that the insurrection of the slave-drivers will not end

in smoke. So I now decide to keep a diary in my own way. I scarcely

know any of those men who are considered as leaders; the more

interesting to observe them, to analyze their mettle, their actions.

This insurrection may turn very complicated; if so, it must generate

more than one revolutionary manifestation. What will be its

march--what stages? Curious; perhaps it may turn out more interesting

than anything since that great renovation of humanity by the great

French Revolution.

The old, brave warrior, Scott, watched at the door of the Union; his

shadow made the infamous rats tremble and crawl off, and so Scott

transmitted to Lincoln what was and could be saved during the

treachery of Buchanan.

By the most propitious accident, I assisted at the throes among which

Mr. Lincoln's Cabinet was born. They were very painful, but of the

highest interest for me, and I suppose for others. I participated some

little therein.

A pledge bound Mr. Lincoln to make Mr. Seward his Secretary of State.

The radical and the puritanic elements in the Republican party were

terribly scared. His speeches, or rather demeanor and repeated

utterances since the opening of the Congress, his influence on Mr.

Adams, who, under Seward's inspiration, made his speech _de lana

caprina_, and voted for compromises and concessions,--all this spread

and fortified the general and firm belief that Mr. Seward was ready to

give up many from among the cardinal articles of the Republican creed

of which he was one of the most ardent apostles. They, the

Republicans, speak of him in a way to remind me of the dictum, "_omnia

serviliter pro dominatione_," as they accuse him now of subserviency

to the slave power. The radical and puritan Republicans likewise dread

him on account of his close intimacy with a Thurlow Weed, a Matteson,

and with similar not over-cautious--as they call them--lobbyists.

Some days previous to the inauguration, Mr. Seward brought Mr. Lincoln

on the Senate floor, of course on the Republican side; but soon Mr.

Seward was busily running among Democrats, begging them to be

introduced to Lincoln. It was a saddening, humiliating, and revolting

sight for the galleries, where I was. Criminal as is Mason, for a

minute I got reconciled to him for the scowl of horror and contempt

with which he shook his head at Seward. The whole humiliating

proceeding foreshadowed the future policy. Only two or three

Democratic Senators were moved by Seward's humble entreaties. The

criminal Mason has shown true manhood.

The first attempt of sincere Republicans was to persuade Lincoln to

break his connection with Seward. This failed. To neutralize what was

considered quickly to become a baneful influence in Mr. Lincoln's

councils, the Republicans united on Gov. Chase. This Seward opposed

with all his might. Mr. Lincoln wavered, hesitated, and was bending

rather towards Mr. Seward. The struggle was terrific, lasted several

days, when Chase was finally and triumphantly forced into the

Cabinet. It was necessary not to leave him there alone against Seward,

and perhaps Bates, the old cunning Whig. Again terrible opposition by

Seward, but it was overcome by the radicals in the House, in the

Senate, and outside of Congress by such men as Curtis, Noyes, J. S.

Wadsworth, Opdyke, Barney, &c., &c., and Blair was brought in. Cameron

was variously opposed, but wished to be in by Seward; Welles was from

the start considered sound and safe in every respect; Smith was

considered a Seward man.

From what I witnessed of Cabinet-making in Europe, above all in France

under Louis Philippe, I do not forebode anything good in the coming-on

shocks and eruptions, and I am sure these must come. This Cabinet as

it stands is not a fusion of various shadowings of a party, but it is

a violent mixing or putting together of inimical and repulsive forces,

which, if they do not devour, at the best will neutralize each other.

Senator Wilson answered Douglass in the Senate, that "when the

Republican party took the power, treason was in the army, in the navy,

in the administration," etc. Dreadful, but true assertion. It is to be

seen how the administration will act to counteract this ramified

treason.

What a run, a race for offices. This spectacle likewise new to me.

The Cabinet Ministers, or, as they call them here, the Secretaries, have

old party debts to pay, old sores to avenge or to heal, and all this by

distributing offices, or by what they call it here--patronage. Through

patronage and offices everybody is to serve his friends and his party,

and to secure his political position. Some of the party leaders seem to

me similar to children enjoying a long-expected and ardently wished-for

toy. Some of the leaders are as generals who abandon the troops in a

campaign, and take to travel in foreign parts. Most of them act as if

they were sure that the battle is over. It begins only, but nobody, or

at least very few of the interested, seem to admit that the country is

on fire, that a terrible struggle begins. (Wrote in this sense an

article for the National Intelligencer; insertion refused.) They, the

leaders, look to create engines for their own political security, but no

one seems to look over Mason and Dixon's line to the terrible and with

lightning-like velocity spreading fire of hellish treason.

The diplomats utterly upset, confused, and do not know what god to

worship. All their associations were with Southerners, now traitors.

In Southern talk, or in that of treacherous Northern Democrats, the

diplomats learned what they know about this country. Not one of them

is familiar, is acquainted with the genuine people of the North; with

its true, noble, grand, and pure character. It is for them a terra

incognita, as is the moon. The little they know of the North is the

few money or cotton bags of New York, Boston, Philadelphia,--these

would-be betters, these dinner-givers, and whist-players. The

diplomats consider Seward as the essence of Northern feeling.

How little the thus-called statesmen know Europe. Sumner, Seward, etc.

already have under consideration if Europe will recognize the secesh.

Europe recognizes _faits accomplis_, and a great deal of blood will

run before secesh becomes _un fait accompli_. These Sewards, Sumners,

etc. pay too much attention to the silly talk of the European

diplomats in Washington; and by doing this these would-be statesmen

prove how ignorant they are of history in general, and specially

ignorant of the policy of European cabinets. Before a struggle decides

a question a recognition is bosh, and I laugh at it.

The race, the race increases with a fearful rapidity. No flood does it

so quick. Poor Senators! Some of them must spend nights and days to

decide on whom to bestow this or that office. Secretaries or Ministers

wrangle, _fight_ (that is the word used), as if life and death

depended upon it.

Poor (Carlylian-meaning) good-natured Senator Sumner, in his earnest,

honest wish to be just and of service to everybody, looks as a hare

tracked by hounds; so are at him office-seekers from the whole

country. This hunting degrades the hounds, and enervates the patrons.

I am told that the President is wholly absorbed in adjusting,

harmonizing the amount of various salaries bestowed on various States

through its office-holders and office-seekers.

It were better if the President would devote his time to calculate

the forces and resources needed to quench the fire. Over in Montgomery

the slave-drivers proceed with the terrible, unrelenting, fearless

earnestness of the most unflinching criminals.

After all, these crowds of office-hunters are far from representing

the best element of the genuine, laborious, intelligent people,--of

its true healthy stamina. This is consoling for me, who know the

American people in the background of office-hunters.

Of course an alleviating circumstance is, that the method, the system,

the routine, oblige, nay force, everybody to ask, to hunt. As in the

Scriptures, "Ask, and you will get; or knock, and it will be opened."

Of course, many worthy, honorable, deserving men, who would be

ornaments to the office, must run the gauntlet together with the

hounds.

It is reported, and I am sure of the truth of the report, that

Governor Chase is for recognizing, or giving up the revolted Cotton

States, so as to save by it the Border States, and eventually to fight

for their remaining in the Union. What logic! If the treasonable

revolt is conceded to the Cotton States, on what ground can it be

denied to the thus called Border States? I am sorry that Chase has

such notions.

It is positively asserted by those who ought to know, that Seward,

having secured to himself the Secretaryship of State, offered to the

Southern leaders in Congress compromise and concessions, to assure, by

such step, his confirmation by the Democratic vote. The chiefs

refused the bargain, distrusting him. All this was going on for weeks,

nay months, previous to the inauguration, so it is asserted. But

Seward might have been anxious to preserve the Union at any price. His

enemies assert that if Seward's plan had succeeded, virtually the

Democrats would have had the power. Thus the meaning of Lincoln's

election would have been destroyed, and Buchanan's administration

would have been continued in its most dirty features, the name only

being changed.

Old Scott seems to be worried out by his laurels; he swallows incense,

and I do not see that anything whatever is done to meet the military

emergency. I see the cloud.

Were it true that Seward and Scott go hand in hand, and that both, and

even Chase, are blunted axes!

I hear that Mr. Blair is the only one who swears, demands, asks for

action, for getting at them without losing time. Brave fellow! I am

glad to have at Willard's many times piloted deputations to the doors

of Lincoln on behalf of Blair's admission into the Cabinet. I do not

know him, but will try to become nearer acquainted.

But for the New York radical Republicans, already named, neither Chase

nor Blair would have entered the Cabinet. But for them Seward would

have had it totally his own way. Members of Congress acted less than

did the New Yorkers.

The South, or the rebels, slave-drivers, slave-breeders, constitute

the most corrosive social decompositions and impurities; what the

human race throughout countless ages successively toiled to purify

itself from and throw off. Europe continually makes terrible and

painful efforts, which at times are marked by bloody destruction. This

I asserted in my various writings. This social, putrefied evil, and

the accumulated matter in the South, pestilentially and in various

ways influenced the North, poisoning its normal healthy condition.

This abscess, undermining the national life, has burst now. Somebody,

something must die, but this apparent death will generate a fresh and

better life.

The month of March closes, but the administration seems to enjoy the

most beatific security. I do not see one single sign of

foresight,--this cardinal criterion of statesmanship. Chase measures

the empty abyss of the treasury. Senator Wilson spoke of treason

everywhere, but the administration seems not to go to work and to

reconstruct, to fill up what treason has disorganized and emptied.

Nothing about reorganizing the army, the navy, refitting the arsenals.

No foresight, no foresight! either statesmanlike or administrative.

Curious to see these men at work. The whole efforts visible to me and

to others, and the only signs given by the administration in concert,

are the paltry preparations to send provisions to Fort Sumpter. What

is the matter? what are they about?

Diary from March 4, 1861, to November 12, 1862 · 第 34 / 55 题