POULTRY.

Poultry should never be eaten in less than six or eight hours after

it is killed; but it should be picked and drawn as soon as possible.

There is no direr disgrace to our Northern markets than the practice of

sending whole dead fowls to market. I have bought such from responsible

poultry dealers, and found them uneatable, from having remained undrawn

until the flavor of the craw and intestines had impregnated the whole

body. Those who are conversant with the habit of careful country

housewives, of keeping up a fowl without food for a day and night

before killing and dressing for their own eating, cannot but regard

with disgust the surcharged crops and puffy sides of those sold _by

weight_ in the shambles. If you want to know what you really pay for

poultry bought in these circumstances, weigh the offal extracted from

the fowl by your cook, and deduct from the market weight. “But don’t

you know it actually poisons a fowl to lie so long undressed?” once

exclaimed a Southern lady to me. “In _our_ markets they are offered for

sale ready picked and drawn, with the giblets—also cleaned—tucked under

their wings.”

I know nothing about the poisonous nature of the entrails and crops. I

do assert that the custom is unclean and unjust. And this I do without

the remotest hope of arousing my fellow-housekeepers to remonstrance

against established usage. Only it relieves my mind somewhat to grumble

at what I cannot help. The best remedy I can propose for the grievance

is to buy live fowls, and, before sending them home, ask your butcher

to decapitate them; the probabilities being greatly in favor of the

supposition that your cook is too “tinder-hearted” to attempt the job.

One word as to the manner of roasting meats and fowls. In this day

of ranges and cooking-stoves, I think I am speaking within bounds

when I assume that not one housekeeper in fifty uses a spit, or even

a tin kitchen, for such purposes. It is in vain that the writers of

receipt-books inform us with refreshing _naïveté_ that all our meats

are baked, not roasted, and expatiate upon the superior flavor of

those prepared upon the English spits and in old fashioned kitchens,

where enormous wood-fires blazed from morning until night. I shall

not soon forget my perplexity when, an inexperienced housekeeper and

a firm believer in all “that was writ” by older and wiser people, I

stood before my neat Mott’s “Defiance,” a fine sirloin of beef ready

to be cooked on the table behind me, and read from my Instruction-book

that my “fire should extend at least eight inches beyond the roaster

on either side!” I am not denying the virtues of spits and tin

kitchens—only regretting that they are not within the reach of every

one. In view of this fact, let me remark, for the benefit of the

unfortunate many, that, in the opinion of excellent judges, the

practice of roasting meat in close ovens has advantages. Of these I

need mention but two, to wit, the preservation of the flavor of the

article roasted, and the prevention of its escape to the upper regions

of the dwelling.

Common Sense in the Household: A Manual of Practical Housewifery · 第 127 / 1129 题