From 1806, the period of my entrance upon this noble theater, with

short intervals, to the present time, I have been engaged in the public

councils, at home or abroad. Of the services rendered during that long

and arduous period of my life it does not become me to speak; history,

if she deign to notice me, and posterity, if the recollection of my

humble actions shall be transmitted to posterity, are the best, the

truest, and the most impartial judges.

I have not escaped the fate of other public men, nor failed to incur

censure and detraction of the bitterest, most unrelenting, and most

malignant character. But I have not meanwhile been unsustained.

Everywhere throughout the extent of this great continent I have had

cordial, warmhearted, faithful, and devoted friends, who have known me,

loved me, and appreciated my motives.

In the course of a long and arduous public service, especially during

the last eleven years in which I have held a seat in the Senate, from

the same ardor and enthusiasm of character, I have no doubt, in the

heat of debate, and in an honest endeavor to maintain my opinions

against adverse opinions alike honestly entertained, as to the best

course to be adopted for the public welfare, I may have often

inadvertently and unintentionally, in moments of excited debate, made

use of language that has been offensive, and susceptible of injurious

interpretation towards my brother Senators. If there be any here who

retain wounded feelings of injury or dissatisfaction produced on such

occasions, I beg to assure them that I now offer the most ample apology

for any departure on my part from the established rules of

parliamentary decorum and courtesy. On the other hand, I assure

Senators, one and all, without exception and without reserve, that I

retire from this chamber without carrying with me a single feeling of

resentment or dissatisfaction toward the Senate or any one of its

members.

In retiring, as I am about to do, forever, from the Senate, suffer me

to express my heartfelt wishes that all the great and patriotic objects

of the wise framers of our Constitution may be fulfilled; that the high

destiny designed for it may be fully answered; and that its

deliberations, now and hereafter, may eventuate in securing the

prosperity of our beloved country, in maintaining its rights and honor

abroad, and upholding its interests at home. I retire, I know, at a

period of infinite distress and embarrassment. I wish I could take my

leave of you under more favorable auspices; but, without meaning at

this time to say whether on any or on whom reproaches for the sad

condition of the country should fall, I appeal to the Senate and to the

world to bear testimony to my earnest and continued exertions to avert

it, and to the truth that no blame can justly attach to me.

May the most precious blessings of heaven rest upon the whole Senate

and each member of it, and may the labors of every one redound to the

benefit of the nation and the advancement of his own fame and renown.

And when you shall retire to the bosom of your constituents, may you

receive that most cheering and gratifying of all human rewards--their

cordial greeting of "Well done, good and faithful servant."

And now, Mr. President, and Senators, I bid you all a long, a lasting,

and a friendly farewell.

THE DEATH OF GARFIELD

From an address before both houses of Congress, February, 1882

BY JAMES G. BLAINE

Surely, if happiness can ever come from the honors or triumphs of this

world, on that quiet July morning James A. Garfield may well have been

a happy man. No foreboding of evil haunted him, no slightest

premonition of danger clouded his sky. His terrible fate was upon him

in an instant. One moment he stood erect, strong, confident in the

years stretching peacefully out before him. The next he lay wounded,

bleeding, helpless, doomed to weary weeks of torture, to silence and

the grave.

Great in life, he was surpassingly great in death. For no cause, in the

very frenzy of wantonness and wickedness, by the red hand of Murder he

was thrust from the full tide of this world's interest, from its hopes,

its aspirations, its victories, into the visible presence of death. And

he did not quail. Not alone for the one short moment in which, stunned

and dazed, he could give up life, hardly aware of its relinquishment,

but through days of deadly languor, through weeks of agony that was not

less agony because silently borne, with clear sight and calm courage he

looked into his open grave. What blight and ruin met his anguished eyes

whose lips may tell--what brilliant broken plans, what baffled high

ambitions, what sundering of strong, warm, manhood's friendships, what

bitter rending of sweet household ties! Behind him a proud, expectant

nation; a great host of sustaining friends; a cherished and happy

mother wearing the full, rich honors of her early toil and tears; the

wife of his youth, whose whole life lay in his; the little boys not yet

emerged from childhood's day of frolic; the fair young daughter; the

sturdy sons just springing into closest companionship, claiming every

day, and every day rewarding, a father's love and care; and in his

heart the eager, rejoicing power to meet all demand. Before him

desolation and great darkness! And his soul was not shaken. His

countrymen were thrilled with instant, profound, and universal

sympathy. Masterful in his mortal weakness, he became the center of a

nation's love, enshrined in the prayers of a world. But all the love

and all the sympathy could not share with him his suffering. He trod

the winepress alone. With unfaltering front he faced death. With

unfailing tenderness he took leave of life. Above the demoniac hiss of

the assassin's bullet he heard the voice of God. With simple

resignation he bowed to the divine decree.

As the end drew near, his early craving for the sea returned. The

stately mansion of power had been to him the wearisome hospital of

pain, and he begged to be taken from its prison walls, from its

oppressive, stifling air, from its homelessness and its hopelessness.

Gently, silently, the love of a great people bore the pale sufferer to

the longed-for healing of the sea, to live or to die, as God should

will, within sight of its heaving billows, within sound of its manifold

voices. With wan, fevered face tenderly lifted to the cooling breeze he

looked out wistfully upon the ocean's changing wonders--on its far

sails whitening in the morning light; on its restless waves rolling

shoreward to break and die beneath the noonday sun; on the red clouds

of evening arching low to the horizon; on the serene and shining

pathway of the stars. Let us think that his dying eyes read a mystic

meaning which only the rapt and parting soul may know. Let us believe

that in the silence of the receding world he heard the great waves

breaking on a farther shore, and felt already upon his wasted brow the

breath of the eternal morning.

THE SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS

Delivered from the steps of the Capitol at Washington, 1865.

BY ABRAHAM LINCOLN

FELLOW COUNTRYMEN,--At this second appearing to take the oath of the

Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than

there was at first. Then a statement, somewhat in detail, of a course

to be pursued seemed very fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of

four years, during which public declarations have been constantly

called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still

absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little

that is new could be presented.

The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as

well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably

satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no

prediction in regard to it is ventured.

On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago, all thoughts were

anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all

sought to avoid it. While the inaugural address was being delivered

from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war,

insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it with war--

seeking to dissolve the Union and divide the effects by negotiation.

Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than

let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let

it perish, and the war came. One eighth of the whole population were

colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized

in the Southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and

powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of

the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the

object for which the insurgents would rend the Union by war, while the

Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial

enlargement of it.

Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which

it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the

conflict might cease when, or even before, the conflict itself should

cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental

and astounding. Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God, and

each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any

men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread

from the sweat of other men's faces; but let us judge not, that we be

not judged. The prayer of both could not be answered. That of neither

has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. Woe unto

the world because of offenses, for it must needs be that offenses come,

but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh. If we shall suppose

that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence

of God, must needs come, but which having continued through His

appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North

and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense

came, shall we discern there any departure from those divine attributes

which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we

hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may

speedily pass away. Yet if God wills that it continue until all the

wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of

unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with

the lash shall be repaid by another drawn with the sword, as was said

three thousand years ago, so still it must be said, that the judgments

of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the

right as God gives us to see the right, let us finish the work we are

in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have

borne the battle, and for his widow and his orphans, to do all which

may achieve and cherish a just and a lasting peace among ourselves and

with all nations.

THE DEATH OF PRINCE ALBERT

From an address in the House of Commons, February, 1862

BY BENJAMIN DISRAELI

No person can be insensible to the fact that the House meets to-night

under circumstances very much changed from those which have attended

our assembling for many years. Of late years--indeed, for more than

twenty years past--whatever may have been our personal rivalries, and

whatever our party strife, there was at least one sentiment in which we

all coincided, and that was a sentiment of admiring gratitude to that

Throne whose wisdom and whose goodness had so often softened the

acerbities of our free public life, and had at all times so

majestically represented the matured intelligence of an enlightened

people.

Sir, all that is changed. He is gone who was "the comfort and support"

of that Throne. It has been said that there is nothing which England so

much appreciates as the fulfillment of duty. The Prince whom we have

lost not only was eminent for the fulfillment of duty, but it was the

fulfillment of the highest duty under the most difficult circumstances.

Prince Albert was the Consort of his Sovereign--he was the father of

one who might be his Sovereign--he was the Prime Councillor of a realm,

the political constitution of which did not even recognize his

political existence.

Sir, it is sometimes deplored by those who admired and loved him that

he was thwarted occasionally in his undertakings, and that he was not

duly appreciated. But these are not circumstances for regret, but for

congratulation. They prove the leading and original mind which has so

long and so advantageously labored for this country. Had he not

encountered these obstacles, had he not been subject to this occasional

distrust and misconception, it would only have shown that he was a man

of ordinary mold and temper. Those who improve must change, those who

change must necessarily disturb and alarm men's prejudices. What he had

to encounter was only a demonstration that he was a man superior to his

age, and therefore admirably adapted for the work of progress. There is

one other point, and one only, on which I will presume for a moment to

dwell, and it is not for the sake of you, Sir, or those who now hear

me, or of the generation to which we belong, but it is that those who

come after us may not misunderstand the nature of this illustrious man.

Prince Albert was not a mere patron; he was not one of those who by

their gold or by their smiles reward excellence or stimulate exertion.

His contributions to the cause of State were far more powerful and far

more precious. He gave to it his thought, his time, his toil; he gave

to it his life. On both sides and in all parts of the House I see many

gentlemen who occasionally have acted with the Prince at those council

boards where they conferred and consulted upon the great undertakings

with which he was connected. I ask them, without fear of a denial,

whether he was not the leading spirit, whether his was not the mind

which foresaw the difficulty, his not the resources that supplied the

remedy; whether his was not the courage which sustained them under

apparently overpowering difficulties; whether every one who worked with

him did not feel that he was the real originator of those plans of

improvement which they assisted in carrying into effect?

But what avail these words? This House to-night has been asked to

condole with the Crown upon this great calamity. No easy office. To

condole, in general, is the office of those who, without the pale of

sorrow, still feel for the sorrowing. But in this instance the country

is as heart-stricken as its Queen. Yet in the mutual sensibility of a

Sovereign and a people there is something ennobling--something which

elevates the spirit beyond the level of mere earthly sorrow. The

counties, the cities, the corporations of the realm--those illustrious

associations of learning and science and art and skill, of which he was

the brightest ornament and the inspiring spirit, have bowed before the

Throne. It does not become the Parliament of the country to be silent.

The expression of our feelings may be late, but even in that lateness

may be observed some propriety. To-night the two Houses sanction the

expression of the public sorrow, and ratify, as it were, the record of

a nation's woe.

AN APPRECIATION OF MR. GLADSTONE

From an address in the House of Commons

BY ARTHUR J. BALFOUR

I feel myself unequal even to dealing with what is, perhaps, more

strictly germane to this address--I mean, Mr. Gladstone as a

politician, as a Minister, as a leader of public thought, as an eminent

servant of the Queen; and if I venture to say anything, it is rather of

Mr. Gladstone, the greatest member of the greatest deliberative

assembly, which, so far, the world has seen.

Sir, I think it is the language of sober and unexaggerated truth to say

that there is no gift which would enable a man to move, to influence,

to adorn an assembly like this that Mr. Gladstone did not possess in a

supereminent degree. Debaters as ready there may have been, orators as

finished. It may have been given to others to sway as skillfully this

assembly, or to appeal with as much directness and force to the simpler

instincts of the great masses in the country; but, sir, it has been

given to no man to combine all these great gifts as they were combined

in the person of Mr. Gladstone. From the conversational discussion

appropriate to our work in committees, to the most sustained eloquence

befitting some great argument, and some great historic occasion, every

weapon of Parliamentary warfare was wielded by him with the success and

ease of a perfect, absolute, and complete mastery. I would not venture

myself to pronounce an opinion as to whether he was most excellent in

the exposition of a somewhat complicated budget of finance or

legislation, or whether he showed it most in the heat of extemporary

debate. At least this we may say, that from the humbler arts of

ridicule or invective to the subtlest dialectic, the most persuasive

eloquence, the most cogent appeals to everything that was highest and

best in the audience that he was addressing, every instrument which

could find place in the armory of a member of this House, he had at his

command without premeditation, without forethought, at the moment and

in the form which appeared best suited to carry out his purpose.

It may, perhaps, be asked whether I have nothing to say about Mr.

Gladstone's place in history, about the judgment we ought to pass upon

the great part which he has played in the history of his country and

the history of the world during the many years in which he held a

foremost place in this assembly. These questions are legitimate

questions. But they are not to be discussed by me to-day. Nor, indeed,

do I think that the final answer can be given to them--the final

judgment pronounced--in the course of this generation. But one service

he did--in my opinion incalculable--which is altogether apart from the

judgment which we may be disposed to pass on the particular opinions,

the particular views, or the particular lines of policy which Mr.

Gladstone may from time to time have adopted. Sir, he added a dignity

and he added a weight to the deliberations of this House by his genius

which I think it is impossible adequately to express.

It is not enough, in my opinion, to keep up simply a level, though it

be a high level, of probity and of patriotism. The mere virtue of civic

honesty is not sufficient to preserve this assembly from the fate which

has overcome so many other assemblies, the products of democratic

forces. More than this is required, more than this was given to us by

Mr. Gladstone. Those who seek to raise in the public estimation the

level of our proceedings will be the most ready to admit the infinite

value of those services, and realize how much the public prosperity is

involved in the maintenance of the work of public life. Sir, that is a

view which, it seems to me, places the services of Mr. Gladstone to

this assembly, which he loved so well, and of which he was so great a

member, in as clear a light and on as firm a basis as it is possible to

place them.

WILLIAM E. GLADSTONE

From an address in the House of Lords, May, 1898

BY LORD ROSEBERY

My Lords, this is, as has been pointed out, an unique occasion. Mr.

Gladstone always expressed a hope that there might be an interval left

to him between the end of his political and of his natural life. That

period was given to him, for it is more than four years since he

quitted the sphere of politics. Those four years have been with him a

special preparation for his death, but have they not also been a

preparation for his death with the nation at large? Had he died in the

plenitude of his power as Prime Minister, would it have been possible

for a vigorous and convinced Opposition to allow to pass to him,

without a word of dissent, the honors which are now universally

conceded? Hushed for the moment are the voices of criticism; hushed are

the controversies in which he took part; hushed for the moment is the

very sound of party conflict. I venture to think that this is a notable

fact in our history. It was not so with the elder Pitt. It was not so

with the younger Pitt. It was not so with the elder Pitt--in spite of

his tragic end, of his unrivaled services, and of his enfeebled old

age. It was not so with the younger Pitt--in spite of his long control

of the country and his absolute and absorbed devotion to the State. I

think that we should remember this as creditable not merely to the man,

but to the nation.

My Lords, there is one deeply melancholy feature of Mr. Gladstone's

death--by far the most melancholy--to which I think none of my noble

friends have referred. I think that all our thoughts must be turned,

now that Mr. Gladstone is gone, to that solitary and pathetic figure

who, for sixty years, shared all the sorrows and all the joys of Mr.

Gladstone's life; who received his every confidence and every

aspiration; who shared his triumphs with and cheered him under his

defeats; who, by her tender vigilance, I firmly believe, sustained and

prolonged his years. I think that the occasion ought not to pass

without letting Mrs. Gladstone know that she is in all our thoughts to-

day. And yet, my Lords--putting that one figure aside--to me, at any

rate, this is not an occasion for absolute and entire and unreserved

lamentation. Were it, indeed, possible so to protract the inexorable

limits of human life that we might have hoped that future years, and

even future generations, might see Mr. Gladstone's face and hear his

matchless voice, and receive the lessons of his unrivaled experience--

we might, perhaps, grieve to-day as those who have no hope. But that is

not the case. He had long exceeded the span of mortal life; and his

latter months had been months of unspeakable pain and distress. He is

now in that rest for which he sought and prayed, and which was to give

him relief from an existence which had become a burden to him. Surely

this should not be an occasion entirely for grief; when a life

prolonged to such a limit, so full of honor, so crowned with glory, had

come to its termination. The nation lives that produced him. The nation

that produced him may yet produce others like him; and, in the

meantime, it is rich in his memory, rich in his life, and rich, above

all, in his animating and inspiring example. Nor do I think that we

should regard this heritage as limited to our own country or to our own

race. It seems to me that, if we may judge from the papers of to-day,

that it is shared by, that it is the possession of, all civilized

mankind, and that generations still to come, through many long years,

will look for encouragement in labor, for fortitude in adversity, for

the example of a sublime Christianity, with constant hope and constant

encouragement, to the pure, the splendid, the dauntless figure of

William Ewart Gladstone.

THE SOLDIER'S CREED

From a centennial address at the United States Military Academy at West

Point, with the author's permission.

BY HORACE PORTER

As we stand here to-day a hundred years of history pass in review

before us. The present permanent Academy was founded in 1802. The class

that year contained two cadets. During the ten years following the

average number was twenty. We might say of the cadets of those days

what Curran said of the books in his library--"not numerous, but

select."

Public Speaking: Principles and Practice · 第 13 / 27 段