184. Enough sources of evil were here, in the temper and power of the

consummate art. In its practical methods there was another, the

fatallest of all. These great artists brought with them mystery,

despondency, domesticity, sensuality: of all these, good came, as well

as evil. One thing more they brought, of which nothing but evil ever

comes, or can come--LIBERTY.

By the discipline of five hundred years they had learned and inherited

such power, that whereas all former painters could be right only by

effort, they could be right with ease; and whereas all former painters

could be right only under restraint, they could be right, free.

Tintoret's touch, Luini's, Correggio's, Reynolds', and Velasquez's, are

all as free as the air, and yet right. "How very fine!" said everybody.

Unquestionably, very fine. Next, said everybody, "What a grand

discovery! Here is the finest work ever done, and it is quite free. Let

us all be free then, and what fine things shall we not do also!" With

what results we too well know.

Nevertheless, remember you are to delight in the freedom won by these

mighty men through obedience, though you are not to covet it. Obey, and

you also shall be free in time; but in these minor things, as well as in

great, it is only right service which is perfect freedom.

185. This, broadly, is the history of the early and late colour-schools.

The first of these I shall call generally, henceforward, the school of

crystal; the other that of clay: potter's clay, or human, are too

sorrowfully the same, as far as art is concerned. But remember, in

practice, you cannot follow both these schools; you must distinctly

adopt the principles of one or the other. I will put the means of

following either within your reach; and according to your dispositions

you will choose one or the other: all I have to guard you against is the

mistake of thinking you can unite the two. If you want to paint (even in

the most distant and feeble way) in the Greek School, the school of

Lionardo, Correggio, and Turner, you cannot design coloured windows, nor

Angelican paradises. If, on the other hand, you choose to live in the

peace of paradise, you cannot share in the gloomy triumphs of the earth.

186. And, incidentally note, as a practical matter of immediate

importance, that painted windows have nothing to do with

chiaroscuro.[14] The virtue of glass is to be transparent everywhere. If

you care to build a palace of jewels, painted glass is richer than all

the treasures of Aladdin's lamp; but if you like pictures better than

jewels, you must come into broad daylight to paint them. A picture in

coloured glass is one of the most vulgar of barbarisms, and only fit to

be ranked with the gauze transparencies and chemical illuminations of

the sensational stage.

[Footnote 14: There is noble chiaroscuro in the variations of their

colour, but not as representative of solid form.]

Also, put out of your minds at once all question about difficulty of

getting colour; in glass we have all the colours that are wanted, only

we do not know either how to choose, or how to connect them; and we are

always trying to get them bright, when their real virtues are to be

deep, mysterious, and subdued. We will have a thorough study of painted

glass soon: mean while I merely give you a type of its perfect style, in

two windows from Chalons-sur-Marne (S. 141).

187. But for my own part, with what poor gift and skill is in me, I

belong wholly to the chiaroscurist school; and shall teach you therefore

chiefly that which I am best able to teach: and the rather, that it is

only in this school that you can follow out the study either of natural

history or landscape. The form of a wild animal, or the wrath of a

mountain torrent, would both be revolting (or in a certain sense

invisible) to the calm fantasy of a painter in the schools of crystal.

He must lay his lion asleep in St. Jerome's study beside his tame

partridge and easy slippers; lead the appeased river by alternate azure

promontories, and restrain its courtly little streamlets with margins of

marble. But, on the other hand, your studies of mythology and literature

may best be connected with these schools of purest and calmest

imagination; and their discipline will be useful to you in yet another

direction, and that a very important one. It will teach you to take

delight in little things, and develop in you the joy which all men

should feel in purity and order, not only in pictures but in reality.

For, indeed, the best art of this school of fantasy may at last be in

reality, and the chiaroscurists, true in ideal, may be less helpful in

act. We cannot arrest sunsets nor carve mountains, but we may turn every

English homestead, if we choose, into a picture by Cima or John Bellini,

which shall be "no counterfeit, but the true and perfect image of life

indeed."

188. For the present, however, and yet for some little time during your

progress, you will not have to choose your school. For both, as we have

seen, begin in delineation, and both proceed by filling flat spaces

with an even tint. And therefore this following will be the course of

work for you, founded on all that we have seen.

Having learned to measure, and draw a pen line with some steadiness (the

geometrical exercises for this purpose being properly school, not

University work), you shall have a series of studies from the plants

which are of chief importance in the history of art; first from their

real forms, and then from the conventional and heraldic expressions of

them; then we will take examples of the filling of ornamental forms with

flat colour in Egyptian, Greek, and Gothic design; and then we will

advance to animal forms treated in the same severe way, and so to the

patterns and colour designs on animals themselves. And when we are sure

of our firmness of hand and accuracy of eye, we will go on into light

and shade.

189. In process of time, this series of exercises will, I hope, be

sufficiently complete and systematic to show its purpose at a glance.

But during the present year, I shall content myself with placing a few

examples of these different kinds of practice in your rooms for work,

explaining in the catalogue the position they will ultimately occupy,

and the technical points of process into which it is useless to enter in

a general lecture. After a little time spent in copying these, your own

predilections must determine your future course of study; only remember,

whatever school you follow, it must be only to learn method, not to

imitate result, and to acquaint yourself with the minds of other men,

but not to adopt them as your own. Be assured that no good can come of

our work but as it arises simply out of our own true natures, and the

necessities of the time around us, though in many respects an evil one.

We live in an age of base conceit and baser servility--an age whose

intellect is chiefly formed by pillage, and occupied in desecration; one

day mimicking, the next destroying, the works of all the noble persons

who made its intellectual or art life possible to it:--an age without

honest confidence enough in itself to carve a cherry-stone with an

original fancy, but with insolence enough to abolish the solar system,

if it were allowed to meddle with it.[15] In the midst of all this, you

have to become lowly and strong; to recognise the powers of others and

to fulfil your own. I shall try to bring before you every form of

ancient art, that you may read and profit by it, not imitate it. You

shall draw Egyptian kings dressed in colours like the rainbow, and Doric

gods, and Runic monsters, and Gothic monks--not that you may draw like

Egyptians or Norsemen, nor yield yourselves passively to be bound by the

devotion, or inspired by the passion of the past, but that you may know

truly what other men have felt during their poor span of life; and open

your own hearts to what the heavens and earth may have to tell you in

yours.

[Footnote 15: Every day these bitter words become more sorrowfully true

(September, 1887).]

190. In closing this first course of lectures, I have one word more to

say respecting the possible consequence of the introduction of art among

the studies of the University. What art may do for scholarship, I have

no right to conjecture; but what scholarship may do for art, I may in

all modesty tell you. Hitherto, great artists, though always gentlemen,

have yet been too exclusively craftsmen. Art has been less thoughtful

than we suppose; it has taught much, but erred much, also. Many of the

greatest pictures are enigmas; others, beautiful toys; others, harmful

and corrupting enchantments. In the loveliest, there is something weak;

in the greatest, there is something guilty. And this, gentlemen, if you

will, is the new thing that may come to pass,--that the scholars of

England may resolve to teach also with the silent power of the arts; and

that some among you may so learn and use them, that pictures may be

painted which shall not be enigmas any more, but open teachings of what

can no otherwise be so well shown;--which shall not be fevered or broken

visions any more, but filled with the indwelling light of self-possessed

imagination;--which shall not be stained or enfeebled any more by evil

passion, but glorious with the strength and chastity of noble human

love;--and which shall no more degrade or disguise the work of God in

heaven, but testify of Him as here dwelling with men, and walking with

them, not angry, in the garden of the earth.

Lectures on Art, Delivered Before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term, 1870 · 第 11 / 11 段