---- ----: _Communication quoted in_ ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller

Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Miss Martineau’s view of the Boston Class.]

While she was living and moving in an ideal world, talking in private

and discoursing in public about the most fanciful and shallow conceits

which the transcendentalists took for philosophy, she looked down

upon persons who acted instead of talking finely, and devoted their

fortunes, their peace, their repose, and their very lives to the

preservation of the principles of the republic. While Margaret Fuller

and her adult pupils sat “gorgeously dressed,” talking about Mars and

Venus, Plato and Goethe, and fancying themselves the elect of the earth

in intellect and refinement, the liberties of the republic were running

out as fast as they could go, at a breach which another sort of elect

persons were devoting themselves to repair: and my complaint against

the “gorgeous” pedants was that they regarded their preservers as

hewers of wood and drawers of water, and their work as a less vital one

than the pedantic orations which were spoiling a set of well-meaning

women in a pitiable way.

HARRIET MARTINEAU: ‘Autobiography.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Margaret as a member of the Greeley household.]

Though we were members of the same household, we scarcely met save at

breakfast; and my time and thoughts were absorbed in duties and cares,

which left me little leisure or inclination for the amenities of social

intercourse. Fortune seemed to delight in placing us two in relations

of friendly antagonism, or rather, to develop all possible contrasts in

our ideas and social habits. She was naturally inclined to luxury and a

good appearance before the world. My pride, if I had any, delighted in

bare walls and rugged fare. She was addicted to strong tea and coffee,

both which I rejected and contemned, even in the most homœopathic

dilutions; while, my general health being so sound, and hers sadly

impaired, I could not fail to find in her dietetic habits the causes

of her almost habitual illness; and once, while we were still barely

acquainted, when she came to the breakfast-table with a very severe

headache, I was tempted to attribute it to her strong potations of

the Chinese leaf the night before. She told me quite frankly that

she “declined being lectured on the food or beverage she saw fit to

take,” which was but reasonable in one who had arrived at her maturity

of intellect and fixedness of habits. So the subject was thenceforth

tacitly avoided between us; but, though words were suppressed, looks

and involuntary gestures could not so well be; and an utter divergency

of views on this and kindred themes created a perceptible distance

between us.

HORACE GREELEY: _Communication_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Her description of the Greeley house.]

This place is, to me, entirely charming; it is so completely in the

country, and all around is so bold and free. It is two miles or more

from the thickly-settled parts of New York, but omnibuses and cars

give me constant access to the city, and, while I can readily see what

and whom I will, I can command time and retirement. Stopping on the

Harlem road, you enter a lane nearly a quarter of a mile long, and

going by a small brook and pond that locks in the place, and ascending

a slightly rising ground, get sight of the house, which, old-fashioned

and of mellow tint, fronts on a flower-garden filled with shrubs, large

vines and trim box-borders. On both sides of the house are beautiful

trees.... Passing through a wide hall, you come out upon a piazza,

stretching the whole length of the house, where one can walk in all

weathers; and thence by a step or two, on a lawn, with picturesque

masses of rocks, shrubs and trees, overlooking the East River.

MARGARET FULLER: _Letter_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Contributions to the “Tribune.”]

Her earlier contributions to the _Tribune_ were not her best, and I

did not at first prize her aid so highly as I afterwards learned to

do. She wrote always freshly, vigorously, but not always clearly;

for her full and intimate acquaintance with continental literature,

especially German, seemed to have marred her felicity and readiness of

expression in her mother tongue. While I never met another woman who

conversed more freely or lucidly, the attempt to commit her thoughts

to paper seemed to induce a singular embarrassment and hesitation.

She could write only when in the vein; and this needed often to be

waited for through several days, while the occasion sometimes required

an immediate utterance. The new book must be reviewed before other

journals had thoroughly dissected and discussed it, else the ablest

critique would command no general attention, and perhaps be, by the

greater number, unread. That the writer should wait the flow of

inspiration, or at least the recurrence of elasticity of spirits and

relative health of body, will not seem unreasonable to the general

reader; but to the inveterate hack-horse of the daily press, accustomed

to write at any time, or on any subject, and with a rapidity limited

only by the physical ability to form the requisite pen-strokes, the

notion of waiting for a brighter day or a happier frame of mind,

appears fantastic and absurd. He would as soon think of waiting for

a change in the moon. Hence, while I realized that her contributions

evinced rare intellectual wealth and force, I did not value them as I

should have done had they been written more fluently and promptly. They

often seemed to make their appearance “a day after the fair.”

HORACE GREELEY: _Communication_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Carlyle’s first impression of Margaret Fuller.]

Yesternight there came a bevy of Americans from Emerson, one Margaret

Fuller, the chief figure of them, a strange, lilting, lean old maid,

not nearly such a bore as I expected.

THOMAS CARLYLE: _Letter_ in ‘Thomas Carlyle: A History of his Life in

London,’ by James Anthony Froude. New York: Chas. Scribner’s Sons,

1884.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Free translation of the above.]

Miss Fuller came duly as you announced; was welcomed for your sake

and her own. A high-soaring, clear, enthusiast soul; in whose speech

there is much of all that one wants to find in speech. A sharp, subtle

intellect too; and less of that shoreless Asiatic dreaminess than

I have sometimes met with in her writings.... Her dialect is very

vernacular,--extremely exotic in the London climate.

THOMAS CARLYLE: _Letter to R. W. Emerson_, December, 1846. ‘The

Correspondence of Thomas Carlyle and Ralph Waldo Emerson’:

Supplementary Letters. Boston: Ticknor & Co., 1886.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Account of her visit to Ambleside.]

Margaret Fuller, who had been, in spite of certain mutual repulsions,

an intimate acquaintance of mine in America, came to Ambleside....

I gave her and the excellent friends with whom she was travelling,

the best welcome I could. My house was full: but I got lodgings for

them, made them welcome as guests, and planned excursions for them.

Her companions evidently enjoyed themselves; and Margaret Fuller as

evidently did not, except when she could harangue the drawing-room

party without the interruption of any other voice within its precincts.

There were other persons present, at least as eminent as herself, to

whom we wished to listen; but we were willing that all should have

their turn: and I am sure I met her with every desire for friendly

intercourse. She presently left off conversing with me, however;

while I, as hostess, had to see that my other guests were entertained

according to their various tastes. During our excursion in Langdale

she scarcely spoke to anybody, and not at all to me; and when we

afterwards met in London, when I was setting off for the East, she

treated me with the contemptuous benevolence which it was her wont to

bestow on common place people. I was, therefore, not surprised when I

became acquainted, presently after, with her own account of the matter.

She told her friends that she had been bitterly disappointed in me.

It had been a great object with her to see me, after my recovery by

mesmerism, to enjoy the exaltation and spiritual development which

she concluded I must have derived from my excursions in the spiritual

world; but she had found me in no way altered by it; no one could have

discovered that I had been mesmerised at all; and I was so thoroughly

common place that she had no pleasure in intercourse with me.

HARRIET MARTINEAU: ‘Autobiography.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: A true heroic mind.]

Margaret is an excellent soul: in real regard with both of us here.

Since she went, I have been reading some of her Papers in a new Book

we have got; greatly superior to all I knew before; in fact the

undeniable utterances (now first undeniable to me) of a true heroic

mind;--altogether unique, so far as I know, among the Writing Women of

this generation; rare enough, too, God knows, among the Writing Men.

She is very narrow, sometimes; but she is truly high.

THOMAS CARLYLE: _Letter to Emerson_, 2d March, 1847. ‘Correspondence

of T. Carlyle and R. W. Emerson,’ 1834-1872. Boston: James R. Osgood &

Co., 1883.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Margaret in Italy.]

[Sidenote: “Not the same person.”]

During the month of November, 1847, we arrived in Rome, purposing to

spend the winter there. At that time, Margaret was living in the house

of the Marchesa ----, in the Corso, _ultimo piano_. Her rooms were

pleasant and cheerful, with a certain air of elegance and refinement,

but they had not a sunny exposure, that all-essential requisite for

health, during the damp Roman winter. Margaret suffered from ill health

this winter, and she afterwards attributed it mainly to the fact, that

she had not the sun. As soon as she heard of our arrival, she stretched

forth a friendly, cordial hand, and greeted us most warmly. She gave

us great assistance in our search for convenient lodgings, and we were

soon happily established near her. Our intercourse was henceforth most

frequent and intimate, and knew no cloud nor coldness. Daily we were

much with her, and daily we felt more sensible of the worth and value

of our friend. To me she seemed so unlike what I had thought her to be

in America, that I continually said, “How have I misjudged you; you are

not at all such a person as I took you to be.” To this she replied, “I

am not the same person, but in many respects another; my life has new

channels now, and how thankful I am that I have been able to come out

into larger interests--but, partly, you did not know me at home in the

true light.” It was true, that I had not known her much personally,

when in Boston; but through her friends, who were mine also, I had

learned to think of her as a person on intellectual stilts, with a

large share of arrogance, and little sweetness of temper. How unlike to

this was she now! So delicate, so simple, confiding and affectionate;

with a true womanly heart and soul, sensitive and generous, and, what

was to me a still greater surprise, possessed of so broad a charity,

that she could cover with its mantle the faults and defects of all

about her.

[Sidenote: The Marquis Ossoli.]

We soon became acquainted with the young Marquis Ossoli, and met him

frequently at Margaret’s rooms. He appeared to be of a reserved and

gentle nature, with quiet, gentleman-like manners, and there was

something melancholy in the expression of his face, which made one

desire to know more of him. In figure, he was tall, and of slender

frame, with dark hair and eyes; we judged that he was about thirty

years of age, possibly younger.

MRS. STORY: _Communication_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: The meeting of Margaret and Ossoli.]

Our meeting was singular--fateful, I may say. Very soon he offered me

his hand through life, but I never dreamed I should take it. I loved

him, and felt very unhappy to leave him; but the connection seemed so

every way unfit, I did not hesitate a moment. He, however, thought I

should return to him, as I did. I acted upon a strong impulse, and

could not analyze at all what passed in my mind. I neither rejoice nor

grieve--for bad or for good, I acted out my character.

[Sidenote: Her suffering during the siege of Rome.]

During the siege of Rome, I could not see my little boy. What I endured

at that time, in various ways, not many would survive.... I went, every

day, to wait, in the crowd, for letters about him. Often they did not

come. I saw blood that had streamed on the wall where Ossoli was. I

have a piece of a bomb that burst close to him. I sought solace in

tending the suffering men; but when I beheld the beautiful, fair young

men bleeding to death, or mutilated for life, I felt the woe of all the

mothers who had nursed each to that full flower, to see them thus cut

down. I felt the consolation, too, for those youths died worthily.

MARGARET FULLER OSSOLI: _Letter to her Sister_, in ‘Memorials of

Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Margaret in the hospitals.]

Margaret had ... the entire charge of one of the hospitals, and was the

assistant of the Princess Belgioioso, in charge of “_dei Pellegrini_,”

where, during the first day, they received seventy wounded men, French

and Romans. Night and day, Margaret was occupied, and, with the

princess, so ordered and disposed the hospitals, that their conduct was

truly admirable. All the work was skilfully divided, so that there was

no confusion or hurry, and, from the chaotic condition in which they

had been left by the priests--who previously had charge of them--they

brought them to a state of perfect regularity and discipline. Of

money, they had very little, and they were obliged to give their time

and thoughts, in its place. From the Americans in Rome, they raised a

subscription for the aid of the wounded of either party; but, besides

this, they had scarcely any means to use. I have walked through the

wards with Margaret, and seen how comforting was her presence to the

poor suffering men. “How long will the Signora stay?” “When will the

Signora come again?” they eagerly asked. For each one’s particular

tastes she had a care: to one she carried books; to another she told

the news of the day; and listened to another’s oft-repeated tale of

wrongs, as the best sympathy she could give. They raised themselves up

on their elbows, to get the last glimpse of her as she was going away.

MRS. STORY: _Communication_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Margaret’s description of Ossoli.]

He is not in any respect such a person as people in general would

expect to find with me. He had no instructor except an old priest, who

entirely neglected his education; and of all that is contained in books

he is absolutely ignorant, and he has no enthusiasm of character. On

the other hand, he has excellent practical sense; has been a judicious

observer of all that passed before his eyes; has a nice sense of duty,

which, in its unfailing, minute activity, may put most enthusiasts to

shame; a very sweet temper, and great native refinement. His love for

me has been unswerving and most tender.... Amid many ills and cares, we

have had much joy together, in the sympathy with natural beauty--with

our child--with all that is innocent and sweet.

I do not know whether he will always love me so well, for I am the

elder, and the difference will become, in a few years, more perceptible

than now. But life is so uncertain, and it is so necessary to take good

things with their limitations, that I have not thought it worth while

to calculate too curiously.

[Sidenote: The little Angelo.]

What shall I say of my child? All might seem hyperbole, even to my

dearest mother. In him I find satisfaction, for the first time, to the

deep wants of my heart.... He is a fair child, with blue eyes and light

hair; very affectionate, graceful, and sportive. He was baptized, in

the Roman Catholic Church, by the name of Angelo Eugene Philip, for his

father, grandfather, and my brother.

MARGARET FULLER OSSOLI: _Letter to her mother_, in ‘Memoirs of Margaret

Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: Their last spring in Florence.]

I passed about six weeks in the city of Florence, during the months

of March and April, 1850. During the whole of that time Madame Ossoli

was residing in a house at the corner of the Via della Misericordia

and the Piazza Santa Maria Novelle. This house is one of those large,

well-built, modern houses that show strangely in the streets of the

stately Tuscan city. But if her rooms were less characteristically

Italian, they were the more comfortable, and, though small, had a

quiet, home-like air.... I saw her frequently at these rooms, where,

surrounded by her books and papers, she used to devote her mornings

to her literary labors. Once or twice I called in the morning, and

found her quite immersed in manuscripts and journals. Her evenings

were passed usually in the society of her friends, at her own rooms,

or at theirs.... [Ossoli] seemed quite absorbed in his wife and child.

I cannot remember ever to have found Madame Ossoli alone, on those

evenings when she remained at home. Her husband was always with her.

The picture of their room rises clearly on my memory. A small, square

room, sparingly, yet sufficiently furnished, with polished floor and

frescoed ceiling, and, drawn up closely before the cheerful fire, an

oval table, on which stood a monkish lamp of brass, with depending

chains that support quaint classic cups for the olive oil. There,

seated beside his wife, I was sure to find the Marchese, reading from

some patriotic book, and dressed in the dark brown, red-corded coat of

the Guardia Civica, which it was his melancholy pleasure to wear at

home.

W. H. HURLBUT: _Communication_ in ‘Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: The homeward voyage.]

Why did she choose a merchant vessel from Leghorn? Why one which was

destined to carry in its hold the heavy marble of Powers’s Greek

Slave? She was warned against this, was uncertain in her own mind, and

disturbed by presages of ill. But economy was very necessary to her

at the moment. The vessel chosen, the barque _Elizabeth_, was new,

strong and ably commanded. Margaret had seen and made friends with the

captain, Hasty by name, and his wife. Horace Sumner [Charles Sumner’s

youngest brother, of whom they had seen much in Florence during the

winter], was to be their fellow-passenger, and a young Italian girl,

Celeste Paolini, engaged to help in the care of the little boy. These

considerations carried the day.

[Sidenote: Margaret’s forebodings.]

Just before leaving Florence, Margaret received letters, the tenor

of which would have enabled her to remain longer in Italy. Ossoli

remembered the warning of a fortune-teller, who in his childhood had

told him to beware of the sea. Margaret wrote of omens which gave her

“a dark feeling.” She had “a vague expectation of some crisis,” she

knows not what.... She prays fervently that she may not lose her boy at

sea, “either by unsolaced illness, or amid the howling waves; or if so,

that Ossoli, Angelo, and I may go together, and that the anguish may be

brief.”

These presentiments, strangely prophetic, returned upon Margaret with

so much force that on the very day appointed for sailing, the 17th of

May, she stood at bay before them for an hour, unable to decide whether

she should go or stay. But she had appointed a general meeting with her

family in July, and had positively engaged her passage in the barque.

Fidelity to these engagements prevailed with her.... In spite of fears

and omens, ... she went on board, and the voyage began in smooth

tranquillity....

On Thursday, July 18th, the _Elizabeth_ was off the Jersey coast, in

thick weather, the wind blowing east of south. The former mate was now

the captain. [Captain Hasty had died on the voyage.] Wishing to avoid

the coast, he sailed east-north-east, thinking presently to take a

pilot, and pass Sandy Hook by favor of the wind. At night he promised

his passengers an early arrival in New York. They retired to rest in

good spirits, having previously made all the usual preparations for

going on shore.

[Sidenote: The wreck of the “Elizabeth.”]

By nine o’clock that evening the breeze had become a gale, by midnight

a dangerous storm. The commander, casting the lead from time to

time, was without apprehension, having, it is supposed, mistaken his

locality, and miscalculated the speed of the vessel, which, under

close-reefed sails, was nearing the sandbars of Long Island. Here, on

Fire Island beach, she struck, at four o’clock on the morning of July

19th. The main and mizzen masts were promptly cut away, but the heavy

marble had broken through the hold, and the waters rushed in. The bow

of the vessel stuck fast in the sand, her stern swung around, and she

lay with her broadside exposed to the breakers, which swept over her

with each returning rise--a wreck to be saved by no human power.

The passengers sprang from their berths, aroused by the dreadful

shock, and guessing but too well its import. Then came the crash of

the falling masts, the roar of the waves, as they shattered the cabin

skylight and poured down into the cabin, extinguishing the lights.

These features of the moment are related as recalled by Mrs. Hasty,

sole survivor of the passengers.... The leeward side of the cabin was

already under water, but its windward side still gave shelter, and

here, for three hours, the passengers took refuge, their feet braced

against the long table. The baby shrieked, as well he might, with

the sudden fright, the noise and chill of the water. But his mother

wrapped him as warmly as she could, and in her agony cradled him on

her bosom and sang him to sleep. The girl Celeste was beside herself

with terror; and here we find recorded a touching trait of Ossoli, who

soothed her with encouraging words, and touched all hearts with his

fervent prayer.... The crew had retired to the top-gallant forecastle,

and the passengers, hearing nothing of them, supposed them to have

left the ship. By seven o’clock it became evident that the cabin could

not hold together much longer, and Mrs. Hasty, looking from the door

for some way of escape, saw a figure standing by the foremast, the

space between being constantly swept by the waves. She tried in vain

to make herself heard; but the mate, Davis, coming to the door of

the forecastle, saw her and immediately ordered the men to go to her

assistance. So great was the danger of doing this, that only two of the

crew were willing to accompany him. The only refuge for the passengers

was now in the forecastle, which, from its position and strength of

construction, would be likely to resist longest the violence of the

waves.

Pen-portraits of literary women(#70200) · 第 9 / 17 段