IV.--THE PROCESS BY PLACEMENT.

The place or position of a word may affect its significant use. Thus in

English we say _John struck James_. By the position of those words to

each other we know that John is the actor, and that James receives the

action.

By the grammatic processes language is organized. Organization

postulates the differentiation of organs and their combination into

integers. The integers of language are sentences, and their organs are

the parts of speech. Linguistic organization, then, consists in the

differentiation of the parts of speech and the integration of the

sentence. For example, let us take the words _John_, _father_, and

_love_. _John_ is the name of an individual; _love_ is the name of a

mental action, and _father_ the name of a person. We put them together,

John loves father, and they express a thought; _John_ becomes a noun,

and is the subject of the sentence; _love_ becomes a verb, and is the

predicant; _father_ a noun, and is the object; and we now have an

organized sentence. A sentence requires parts of speech, and parts

of speech are such because they are used as the organic elements of

a sentence.

The criteria of rank in languages are, first, grade of organization,

_i.e._, the degree to which the grammatic processes and methods are

specialized, and the parts of speech differentiated; second, sematologic

content, that is, the body of thought which the language is competent to

convey.

The grammatic processes may be used for three purposes:

First, for _derivation_, where a new word to express a new idea is made

by combining two or more old words, or by changing the vowel of one

word, or by changing the intonation of one word.

Second, for _modification_, a word may be qualified or defined by the

processes of combination, vocalic mutation or intonation.

It should here be noted that the plane between derivation and

qualification is not absolute.

Third, for _relation_. When words as signs of ideas are used together

to express thought, the relation of the words must be expressed by some

means. In English the relation of words is expressed both by placement

and combination, _i.e._, inflection for agreement.

It should here be noted that paradigmatic inflections are used for two

distinct purposes, qualification and relation. A word is qualified by

inflection when the idea expressed by the inflection pertains to the

idea expressed by the word inflected; thus a noun is qualified by

inflection when its number and gender are expressed. A word is related

by inflection when the office of the word in the sentence is pointed out

thereby; thus, nouns are related by case inflections; verbs are related

by inflections for gender, number, and person. All inflection for

agreement is inflection for relation.

In English, three of the grammatic processes are highly specialized.

_Combination_ is used chiefly for derivation, but to some slight extent

for qualification and relation in the paradigmatic categories. But its

use in this manner as compared with many other languages has almost

disappeared.

_Vocalic mutation_ is used to a very limited extent and only by

accident, and can scarcely be said to belong to the English language.

_Intonation_ is used as a grammatic process only to a limited

extent--simply to assist in forming the interrogative and imperative

modes. Its use here is almost rhetorical; in all other cases it is

purely rhetorical.

_Placement_ is largely used in the language, and is highly specialized,

performing the office of exhibiting the relations of words to each other

in the sentence; _i.e._, it is used chiefly for syntactic relation.

Thus one of the four processes does not belong to the English language;

the others are highly specialized.

The purposes for which the processes are used are _derivation_,

_modification_, and _syntactic relation_.

_Derivation_ is accomplished by combination.

_Modification_ is accomplished by the differentiation of adjectives and

adverbs, as words, phrases, and clauses.

_Syntactic relation_ is accomplished by placement. Syntactic relation

must not be confounded with the relation expressed by prepositions.

Syntactic relation is the relation of the parts of speech to each other

as integral parts of a sentence. Prepositions express relations of

thought of another order. They relate words to each other as words.

Placement relates words to each other as parts of speech.

In the Indian tongues combination is used for all three purposes,

performing the three different functions of derivation, modification,

and relation. Placement, also, is used for relation, and for both lands

of relation, syntactic and prepositional.

With regard, then, to the processes and purposes for which they are

used, we find in the Indian languages a low degree of specialization;

processes are used for diverse purposes, and purposes are accomplished

by diverse processes.

On the Evolution of Language First Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1879-80, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1881, pages 1-16 · 第 10 / 14 题