MR. W. W. GRENVILLE TO THE MARQUIS OF BUCKINGHAM.

Whitehall, July 14th, 1788.

My dear Brother,

I now sit down to answer your three letters of the 5th, the 8th,

and the 9th, the last of which I received this morning. I am

much concerned that anything which I have said respecting this

business should have given you the impression of my having

treated it with unfairness towards you. I do most solemnly

assure you, that in every reflection that has passed in my mind

upon the subject, I have endeavoured to put myself in your

place, and to ask what line of conduct would be the most

desirable for you to adopt, with a view not only to any present

impression, but to your permanent reflections upon it. You must

allow me to say, that I persevere in my opinion, that your

resigning your office on this ground would neither be justified

in the opinion of the world in general, nor by your own cooler

reconsideration of the subject; and I must beg you to observe

that this is not my sentiment only, but that of every one of the

few other friends with whom you have communicated upon it.

The only reason which you yourself adduce, in support of such a

measure, injurious to yourself and to your friends, is the sort

of impression which you say this transaction has made in Dublin.

To this I reply, in the first place, that I must still think

that you, of all men, who ever held that situation are exactly

in those circumstances in which you can have nothing to fear

from such an expression; and although I cannot refuse, on your

evidence, to believe the actual existence of such an impression,

yet I am fully satisfied that it can neither be permanent in its

duration, nor mischievous in its effects. But it is surely at

least sufficient, even in your view of the subject, if such a

solution accompanies this difficulty, as can leave no doubt in

the mind of any man that you have weight and influence fully

sufficient for carrying on the business of your situation.

It is on this ground that you rest it, and I think with great

propriety, in your letter to Pitt, and his answer, which you

will receive with this, can hardly fail of proving to you that

you _was_ premature in stating yourself to be abandoned by those

on whom you had claims. You cannot wonder that I, who had seen

the activity and zeal which he has shown in this business, from

his first being acquainted with it, should feel hurt at being

obliged to put into his hands a complaint from you so little

merited. I felt also that in the generality of that expression I

was myself involved, and you must allow me to say that I could

not reproach myself with having deserved it.

I trust, however, that there will be no occasion for the

exertions which Pitt engages himself to make on this subject,

and that your proposal will be acceded to by the King without

reluctance. It seems to me that Fawcitt shows a real disposition

to accommodate the wishes of Pitt and yourself, and that the

terms which he proposes are by no means unreasonable. I

sincerely hope that you will not find any difficulty in making

the arrangement for the sort of intermediate compensation, which

is effected before a Government fall. It has occurred to me

that, _faute de mieux_, Hobart's office might facilitate such a

plan. You know, I presume, that he is coming into Parliament

here, and, consequently, that he must be desirous of making some

arrangement with respect to his office which he cannot well

execute by deputy. I have a place to dispose of at Chelsea (the

Comptrollership), which might be made worth about £200 or £250

per annum; but it is the sort of office that Hobart himself

could certainly not take or execute. I have endeavoured to find

some man fit for it, and who could resign to Hobart a place of

equal value, but I cannot find such a man. Perhaps, in some way

or other, this may be made useful to you; but you must observe

that the Comptroller must be a man of steadiness, integrity, and

some clearness of head.

I do not know whether Fitzherbert has written to you about

Captain Macgrath. The King thinks him entitled to the preference

which he claims, but Lord Sydney does not send over the despatch

at present, as till this other business is settled it might be

unpleasant to you.

I do not very well see how he could avoid sending over Gwynne's

commission to you, as you yourself agree that there could be no

idea of the King's revoking the appointment which he considered

as a thing actually done. You will, I trust, unquestionably

think it better to issue this commission without waiting the

result of your negotiation with Fawcitt, as a few days can make

no difference in point of impression with respect to a thing so

publicly known, and the appearance of keeping it back is not, I

think, what you yourself wish. I confess, I think, there is the

same sort of ground with respect to sending over a

recommendation ante-dated, which was not a part of Lord Sydney's

proposal as stated to you by Pitt; that was, that both his

letter and yours should be withdrawn. There could then remain

nothing but the commission, without any trace how it was

granted. Whereas, a recommendation of that sort must be felt by

the King as putting him avowedly in the wrong, and to a greater

extent than ever your construction of your commission and

instructions warrants. I think them more disputable than you do,

but they were sent not to prove that the _notification_ ought

not to have been waited for, but that there was, according to

the letter of those papers, no necessity for the

_recommendation_. The mere writing to say that Lord C.'s

appointment vacates his lieutenant-colonelcy, is surely no

object to you; and a recommendation goes beyond the claim you

can urge under the instructions. If you are satisfied with the

assurances you have received that the substantial cause of

complaint, viz., the interference with your patronage, shall not

be repeated, it is surely better to let this business rest, than

to squabble with the King about the form of what has been done,

and which substantially you cannot alter.

We hear this evening that Lord J. Townshend is to oppose Lord

Hood.

Ever most affectionately yours,

W. W. G.

Lord Hood's contest for Westminster was now dividing the attention of

the Government with graver questions. Mr. Grenville and Sir William

Young furnish some details, those of the latter bringing the features of

the scene vividly before us.

Memoirs of the Courts and Cabinets of George the Third From the Original Family Documents, Volume 1 · 第 175 / 201 题