VII

We come, then, to this: how can the way be made plainer for those women

and also men who are unsuited for marriage and do not wish to devote

their lives to its duties?

I believe that if there were some open recognition of honorable

partnerships outside of marriage, not necessarily permanent, with proper

provision for the future, guarding the woman, who, in my opinion, should

be in all cases protected; a provision not dependent on the generosity

of the man and made after the love which sanctioned the union has

waned, but decided upon by the man and the woman in the form of a

registered contract before the relationship was entered upon, then there

would everywhere be women ready to undertake such unions gladly, there

would, indeed, be many women, as well as men, who, for the reasons I

have shown, would prefer them to marriage.

There is (I must again insist upon this), whether we like it or not, a

new kind of woman about, who is to snatch from life the freedom that men

have had, and to do this, she knows, if she thinks at all, that she must

keep marriage at bay. For marriage binds the woman while it frees the

man, and this injustice--if so you like to term it--is dependent on

something fundamental; something that will not be changed by endowment

of motherhood, an equal moral standard in the marriage laws, or any of

the modern patent medicines for giving health to marriage and liberty to

wives. There is an inescapable difference in the results of marriage on

the two partners. I mean, marriage holds the woman bound through her

emotions, while it liberates the man through what he receives from her.

The woman gains her greatest liberation only from the child, but again

that holds her bound. Perhaps this is the way nature will not let women

get away from their service to life.

Sometimes there is the necessity of purifying by loss. I do not believe

in changing the ideal of marriage so that its duties are less binding on

women, already we have gone too far in that direction. Thus, I think it

better to make provision for other partnerships to meet the sex-needs

(for we can cause nothing but evil by failing to meet them) of those

women who, desiring the same freedom as the man, would delegate the

duties of wife and mother to the odd moments of life, and choose to

pursue work or pleasure unvexed and unimpeded by the home duties and

care of children. Marriage also is a trust; we are the trustees to the

future for the most sacred institution of life.

Women's Wild Oats: Essays on the Re-fixing of Moral Standards · 第 64 / 87 题