A DISPUTANT

Is a holder of arguments, and wagers too, when he cannot make them good.

He takes naturally to controversy, like fishes in India that are said to

have worms in their heads and swim always against the stream. The

greatest mastery of his art consists in turning and winding the state of

the question, by which means he can easily defeat whatsoever has been

said by his adversary, though excellently to the purpose, like a bowler

that knocks away the jack when he sees another man's bowl lie nearer to

it than his own. Another of his faculties is with a multitude of words

to render what he says so difficult to be recollected that his adversary

may not easily know what he means, and consequently not understand what

to answer, to which he secretly reserves an advantage to reply by

interpreting what he said before otherwise than he at first intended it,

according as he finds it serve his purpose to evade whatsoever shall be

objected. Next to this, to pretend not to understand, or misinterpret

what his antagonist says, though plain enough, only to divert him from

the purpose, and to take occasion from his exposition of what he said to

start new cavils on the bye and run quite away from the question; but

when he finds himself pressed home and beaten from all his guards, to

amuse the foe with some senseless distinction, like a falsified blow

that never hits where 'tis aimed, but while it is minded makes way for

some other trick that may pass. But that which renders him invincible is

abundance of confidence and words, which are his offensive and defensive

arms; for a brazen face is a natural helmet or beaver, and he that has

store of words needs not surrender for want of ammunition. No matter for

reason and sense, that go for no more in disputations than the justice

of a cause does in war, which is understood but by few and commonly

regarded by none. For the custom of disputants is not so much to destroy

one another's reason as to cavil at the manner of expressing it, right

or wrong; for they believe _Dolus an virtus_, &c., ought to be allowed

in controversy as war, and he that gets the victory on any terms

whatsoever deserves it and gets it honourably. He and his opponent are

like two false lute-strings that will never stand in tune to one

another, or like two tennis-players whose greatest skill consists in

avoiding one another's strokes.

Character Writings of the Seventeenth Century · 第 357 / 429 题