With her work at Vittel accomplished, Mata Hari was free to enjoy the

more congenial atmosphere of the capital, having renounced her intention

of surrendering what she admitted was a life of debauchery in order to

consecrate herself to the care of her one true lover. It would seem that

she was incapable of denying herself any sensual pleasure. Being in

Paris with the gratifying feeling of having accomplished safely a piece

of difficult and dangerous espionage, she plunged whole-heartedly into

the old life with a gusto stimulated by denial. Whatever luxuries could

be provided in the capital were procured to replace the substitutes she

had been forced to endure in half-starved Vittel. She reappeared on the

stage, to the admiration of the officers on leave and the Parisians who

sought distraction from the accumulation of troubles that threatened

their entire happiness; in a few houses, wealthy old bachelors whose

selfish profligacy overcame their fears for the national safety,

continued to dispense a furtive hospitality which was incomplete without

the central figure of the entrancing _bayadère_, with or without her

veils. Vittel must have seemed very remote and poor Captain Marov

completely forgotten in the mad whirl of pleasure which so soon engulfed

her.

However, her stay in the French capital was of short duration. She

departed this time on what seemed a perfectly legitimate journey, for

she had a well-advertised dancing engagement to fulfil in the Spanish

capital. There was a repetition of her former triumphs in this

engagement, for she was so favourably received that her visit was

extended. During this stay in Madrid, Mata Hari was lionized by the

artistic groups among whom she had already many friends, but the artists

did not monopolize her time. Conspicuous among her friends at this time

were Lieutenants von Kalle and von Kroon, the naval and military

_attachés_ at the German Embassy and known to be the heads of their

respective Intelligence departments in that country.

All during the summer of 1915 the agents of France and Britain were

reporting to Paris and London that most of Mata Hari’s time was spent in

the company of these two officers and that one time she had paid a hasty

visit to Barcelona, where she went directly to the headquarters of the

German secret service in that city and returned without apparently

having visited anyone else. They further reported that she was talking

of paying a visit to Holland early in the next year.

Before embarking for this visit, however, Mata Hari returned to Paris

and resumed her old life, which had been interrupted by the Madrid

engagement. She made no public appearances at the Paris music-halls but

she continued to frequent the dens of midnight revelry where officers

went to pass the feverish hours of liberty granted by a few short days

of leave in Paris. The officers of the Second Bureau were anxious to

learn what line of investigation she was now following in accordance

with the secret instructions hinted at in the first intercepted message

from Holland, but her activities were so cleverly conducted that no hint

of her purpose escaped the secrecy surrounding her. Then came a ray of

hope for the much harassed officials of the Second Bureau. In January of

1916 Mata Hari left France after having announced her intention of

returning to her home in Holland. There seemed little doubt in their

minds that this was merely an opportunity to consult with her employers,

but, on the other hand, there did not appear much likelihood that Mata

Hari would attempt to return to the scene of her successful spying, so

that Paris would be well rid of an undesirable guest. No obstacles were

placed in the way of her departure. But her passing was signalled to the

British.

Accordingly, when the boat in which Mata Hari was travelling touched at

Falmouth, the police ordered her to accompany them to London for

examination as a dangerous person. The chief of Scotland Yard at that

time was Sir Basil Thomson, who has left an account of the interviews in

his book of reminiscences. Thomson admits that he was impressed by the

intelligence the spy displayed in her answers to his questions and her

quick repartee. He was not impressed, however, by her beauty, which, he

says, had begun to fade (she was then forty and had lived through ten

dissipated years which must have left their mark on her features), and

she was growing plump.

Thomson did not mince matters in the two interviews he had with her. In

fact, he quite frankly accused her of carrying on a correspondence with

the enemy. This Mata Hari denied as an absurdity, only to be confronted

with the names of the various German agents with whom she had spent so

much of her time while in Madrid. Instead of being at all disconcerted

by this revelation of his knowledge of her actions, Mata Hari merely

expressed astonishment, assuring him that she had no idea von Kalle and

von Kroon were engaged in Intelligence work; she knew them as _attachés_

at the Legation, but not as the chiefs of the German secret service in

Spain.

This first interview ended in a stalemate. A painstaking search of the

actress’ baggage was no more profitable. There appeared no reason why

Mata Hari’s departure for Holland should be further delayed. The cause

of the delay and the reason why the interview was resumed lie in a fact

upon which Thomson retains a discreet silence.

The President of the Council in Holland had written to the head of

Scotland Yard begging him to obtain Mata Hari’s deportation. There was

no secret about the Dutch premier’s infatuation for the dancer; that was

a piece of scandal which no longer excited surprised comment. But it is

uncommon for a statesman to request a friendly nation to deport his

lover. There can be little doubt that Van der Linden foresaw her tragic

end if she persisted in such dangerous employment, and he feared that

the redoubtable Scotland Yard authorities might penetrate her secret

unless he could get her home without delay.

Therefore, Sir Basil Thomson decided to have one more attempt to extract

some admission from his captive and, if he failed, then to allow her to

proceed to Holland with a caution, thereby performing a humane action by

liberating a known spy and at the same time do a small favor to the

Dutch premier, which might be added to the Allies’ credit balance, then

at a low ebb in certain quarters in Holland.

The second interview had a curious termination. The examination was even

more severe than the first, but, while it failed to extract any of the

knowledge of her activities that Thomson wanted, it did at last induce

Mata Hari to admit that she was a spy. But not for Germany. She was, she

said, employed by the French. This was a piece of sheer stupidity, for

the dancer should at least have known that the French had enough

difficulty in watching their enemies to have any desire to spy upon

their friends. In any event, the risk she ran by lying was great because

all Thomson had to do was to ask the French military mission in London

to verify this statement.

Of course, we know now that Thomson was under no misapprehension, for he

had been forewarned of Mata Hari’s journey by the French. But he had

failed to obtain orthodox evidence which would have enabled him to lay

the case before a British court with any hope of securing a conviction.

He told her, therefore, that as she had done no injury to his country he

would permit her to depart for Holland. He added a piece of friendly

counsel which the dancer would have done well to heed. He advised her

not to leave Holland during the war and solemnly warned her against

trying to visit either Germany or France. Probably profoundly relieved

at the prospect of release from this very embarrassing situation, Mata

Hari said:

“Sir, I thank you from my heart. What I have been doing I will do no

more. You may trust me implicitly.”

So Mata Hari was allowed to step out of the frying-pan _and_ the fire.

But she ignored both Thomson’s warning and her own promise. Apparently

she did not know that the British agents in Holland and Germany were

warned to be on the lookout for her, and that the chief of the English

counter-espionage service was kept informed of her movements.

Almost immediately upon her arrival in Amsterdam, Mata Hari paid a visit

to the tobacco shop kept by Max Neuder. This establishment was already

under the close surveillance of the Allies’ agents, for it was known to

be a “letter-box” for numerous German agents. The postal censors knew

that they had a prize each time they intercepted a letter addressed to

the innocent-looking tobacco shop. Mata Hari’s visits to this place were

promptly reported to headquarters in London and in Paris, thus

confirming further the existing suspicion against her.

At the time of the dancer’s return to her home, the German authorities

had become exasperated by the audacious exploits of an English agent who

defied their best efforts at detection. When, finally, they received an

awe-inspiring rebuke from the All Highest for a particularly impudent

performance by this spy, it was decided to call in the aid of Mata Hari,

to whom the man was believed to be known.

In order to appreciate the situation which faced the dancer one must

have at least a glimpse of her opponent.

The fame of “Mr. C.” is already known to those American secret agents

whose work lay along naval lines. Few people either in his own country

or abroad knew that this symbol covered the identity of an English army

captain called Reilly, who was the Admiralty’s “ace” in espionage.

Reilly had an extraordinary faculty for acquiring a perfect knowledge of

languages and for impersonating exactly the type of people whose

language he was speaking. To this he added the advantages of his Irish

ancestors’ quickness of thought, fertile imagination, readiness of

tongue, and unbounded courage. He knew several European countries better

than he knew his own.

Reilly’s most astounding _coup_ against the Germans reads like a

romance. It has rarely been equalled, and only excelled by his own later

exploits in Russia.

An order had been sent to German army headquarters to send a responsible

officer to receive instructions on naval policy from the Emperor. The

man chosen was an unknown junior officer, for the staff had their own

ideas concerning responsibility. However, he displayed considerable

intelligence and a broad knowledge of naval and military matters during

the explanation of the new submarine policy which was laid before him.

He requested amplification of indefinite points, clarity in place of

some obscurities, and a detailed instruction upon the army’s

co-operation to produce the desired political effect. His alertness and

zeal so impressed the seniors that they were convinced that their policy

would not be misinterpreted at army headquarters, and the Emperor was so

struck by the amiable young officer that he invited him to lunch.

The visitor to the Kaiser’s luncheon table was “Mr. C.” the British

Admiralty agent.

Reilly exhibited the signs of a master-craftsman in this performance. He

displayed a technique that shows how profoundly he studied the men

against whom he was working. It was not so well known then as now, that

the German headquarters staff frequently courted disaster in employing

young and inexperienced officers upon tasks that are usually delegated

to more experienced men. The classic example is that recounted in von

Kluck’s memoirs, where a visiting colonel from the staff overrode this

army commander’s orders and ignored the general plan for the invasion of

Belgium in order to impose his own ideas upon the handling of the

situation.

Reilly’s close study of the men he was watching must have acquainted him

with this peculiarity of the staff. How he should have known who was

entrusted with the mission I do not pretend to know, but it will look

less like a miracle when the reader knows that during many months of the

war one of Prince Rupprecht’s staff majors was a British agent, and that

he contrived to keep his employers well furnished with information in

spite of the vigilant observation of other men who were jealous of his

influence with their commander and who sought his downfall in order to

occupy his place.

How Reilly contrived to waylay or kidnap his victim in order to

impersonate him remains a mystery, and will probably continue to do so,

for the files of the British secret service are well nigh inaccessible.

Nor is it known how long it was before the German authorities realized

they had been duped. Their side of the question is no less enshrouded in

silence that is likely to remain impenetrable, unless one of the actors

should choose to speak. But before dismissing Captain Reilly to make way

for Mata Hari, space might be found for mention of another sensational

_coup_.

After the war he was sent to Russia, where he struck up an acquaintance

with Trotsky, then Commissioner of War, who introduced him to Lenin. The

leader of the revolution speedily recognized that Reilly’s great

knowledge of Europe made him a decided acquisition in the Foreign

Office. It was while acting as an official in this department that the

British agent saw a letter which he judged would be of interest to his

employers. This was the famous Zinovief letter which was instrumental in

wrecking MacDonald’s first labour government in England.

But the Russian secret police had come to suspect him during an absence

from his post in connection with the disposal of this document. The G.

P. U. have an unenviable reputation as a power for vengeance. When

Reilly was travelling back to Russia, their secret agents picked up his

trail in Berlin and accompanied the train to the frontier. No sooner was

the frontier line passed than these agents took Reilly off the train

and, without even the apology of a trial, riddled his body with bullets.

Such, then, was the man whom Mata Hari was called upon to expose. Her

choice in the search depended entirely upon her acquaintance with the

agent who was supposed to be operating. Her meeting with this agent

antedated the war and took place in a Balkan town. Mata Hari had been

instructed at that time to scrape up an acquaintance with the man who

was believed to be in possession of some exceedingly valuable knowledge

much envied by the Germans. Knowing that he was an old Indian army

officer, Mata Hari thought that her imaginary Hindu origin might serve

as a suitable basis of common interest. She approached the British

agent, therefore, and said to him:

“Have we not met before? Ah yes. In India, was it not?”

“More likely in Berlin,” was the uncompromising retort, which should

have warned Mata Hari that the British were fully aware of her

activities long before war broke out.

However, this lesson never seems to have been completely mastered by

Mata Hari, and as she was most probably too vain to report these snubs

to her employers, they were unable to warn her that they were portents

of danger. But her efforts to locate the man who was causing so much

uneasiness at Fräulein Lesser’s headquarters proved completely

unavailing, and after having employed herself about the usual haunts of

Intelligence agents in Amsterdam and Antwerp, the dancer spent some

little time in Germany, where she had no professional engagements to

fulfil.

It would be an insult to the undoubted intelligence of the chiefs of the

German secret service to suppose that they entertained any great hope of

success that Mata Hari would have their intended victim surrendered to

her by some chance encounter. They were much too wise to be so sanguine

of fate’s friendly assistance, and much too subtle to admit a limit to

their resources. They planned a _coup_ which was intended to relieve

them of much anxiety on the score of Belgian spies.

The information concerning the dropping of enemy agents behind their

lines must have been exceedingly welcome to the German Intelligence

staff, for they were enduring much annoyance from the existence of an

efficient and well-organized counter-espionage service in addition to

the extending activity of energetic spies. The amount of spying and

counter-spying which went on in Belgium must have been phenomenal. The

Allies had the assistance of practically every Belgian in the occupied

territory who possessed the necessary hardihood and who was capable of

responding to the claims of patriotism. This patriotic motive placed the

invading army under a severe handicap, since the best minds were thus

employed against them, either actively in espionage or passively in the

resistance of their own agents.

But the famous Stieber (and Fouché before him) had found that felons and

crooks, if poor material for spies, made excellent counter-spies. Thus,

while occupying France and Belgium, the Germans organized regular gaol

deliveries of every convict who would undertake the malodorous work of

treachery in return for his liberty. These hired renegades proved of

incalculable value in the famous sweep which resulted in the seizure of

the sixty-six French agents. The most notorious of them, Armand Jeannes,

boasted that he had betrayed no fewer than one hundred and twenty-six of

his fellow countrymen and women.

Every class of Belgian was engaged in the task of outwitting their

invading hosts. Simple peasants did what they could, educated men like

the Judge Lacroix accomplished infinitely more because they occupied

influential positions, and cultured women like Louise de Bettignies

achieved marvels of deception.

Louise de Bettignies deserves special mention because her refinement

seemed to render her singularly unfitted for the rough and active work

of organizing a corps of spies to operate in British interests. Yet this

girl, and others like her, developed a resource, a courage, and a

fortitude of which many men could justifiably be proud. One day, while

somewhat of an amateur at the business, Louise was trying to cross the

frontier into Holland without the necessary papers, when she was

overtaken by a patrol. Her message was so ill-concealed that exposure

must certainly follow capture, and the prospect of death before a firing

party did not appeal to Louise. She preferred to risk another form of

calamity. Somehow or other she had to cross a wire fence which was

charged with 14,000 volts of electric current. In her flight from the

advancing patrol the girl had scrambled to the top of the roof of a

stable and, seeing that she had been observed, she took a flying leap

which barely carried her over the sinister barrier into safety.

Thereafter, Louise de Bettignies resolved to use her brain in order to

spare her body. Two of her deceptions are masterly. Her usual disguise

was that of a lace-seller, which enabled her to tramp from village to

village, organizing her little band of spies, but this did not spare her

from periodical searches by the alert women agents of the German police.

Her principal tormentor was one woman agent who made a practice of

seizing and searching Louise on sight. On one occasion this active

counter-espionage agent encountered Louise at a moment when the girl

would gladly have been spared a meeting, because she was carrying papers

that would certainly involve a terrible punishment were they discovered.

It was a stormy, wet day, and Louise was carrying an umbrella which she

humanely offered as cover to the police agent who fell into step beside

her. For once they chatted more or less amicably, but it is

characteristic of the devotion to their duty which distinguishes the

good agents, that the German woman did not permit this courtesy to

interfere with her duty. As soon as they arrived at the first town

Louise was ordered to enter the police station and submit to a very

thorough search.

Although the girl was stripped naked and all her possessions examined

with minute care, nothing of interest was revealed. But the search

appeared to have frightened the girl; she was abnormally agitated when

informed that she might proceed on her way. This agitation was stage

play. Louise knew very well that she was under suspicion of being in

possession of secret documents, and at all costs she had to draw the

attention of the agents from the hiding-place of her treasure. But their

attentions were considered sufficient excuse for the girl’s apparent

agitation, and the police saw nothing extraordinary in the fact that she

should walk out of their station without her umbrella and have to return

some minutes later to recover it. That mere act was a fine stroke, for

it showed the enemy agents that this article was a trifle which could be

easily overlooked when, in point of fact, the papers were concealed in a

hollow rib of the umbrella. No ruse could have distracted attention from

the hiding-place better than this.

On yet another occasion this same spy was requested by the British to

furnish them with information which would enable them to locate enemy

gun positions in the neighbourhood of Lille. The task of giving such

exceedingly exact information was beyond the capability of any code.

Nothing but a very accurate map could suffice. Nevertheless, Louise had

among her many assistants several who could draw a map with creditable

accuracy and also a photographer who was able to apply his art to the

reproduction of a minute copy of this work. The precious map was

eventually reduced to the size of a large pin head, but even this had to

be carefully concealed. At last a lens was removed from the frame of a

pair of spectacles, the paper stuck on the edge, and the glass replaced.

It went safely over the frontier in this hiding-place and the English

were able to undertake one of the most successful counter-battery shoots

which marked the war.

Louise de Bettignies was eventually caught. She was then on the verge of

nervous breakdown produced by her unremitting labours, and her

subsequent examination proved exceedingly valuable to the Germans. The

girl and some of her companions, whom she unwillingly involved, were

sentenced to death, although the sentence in her case was commuted to

one of twenty-seven years imprisonment. Louise died in Cologne shortly

before the armistice and was accorded full military honours by the

British and French when her body was disinterred for burial at her own

home.

In order to overcome this menace of spying in Belgium where the enemy

agents were giving evidence of increased audacity, the Germans

determined to make use of their accomplished instrument, Mata Hari. The

dancer was sent back to Paris with instructions to obtain the necessary

information which would enable them to break up this nest of spies.

After her experience in London it was out of the question to send her

back by that route. Had she not promised Sir Basil Thomson to avoid

France? Had she not also broken her promise to him to remain away from

Germany? She had visited that country and it was not improbable that the

chief of Scotland Yard had been informed of the violation of her

undertaking. So she went back to France through Switzerland and, thanks

to her diplomatic associations, she experienced no difficulties at the

carefully-guarded frontier.

Left to herself, Mata Hari seems to have been equal to most occasions,

but now that she was only the instrument of a prearranged scheme, the

whole affair was sadly bungled. It was conducted in full accordance with

a routine that never varied. It lacked the subtle touch of the

master-spy. To appreciate the significance of her subsequent actions it

is necessary to understand another phase of spy tactics.

It is impossible to apply the ordinary standards of conduct to the

well-trained spy. Not only is his psychology a thing apart, but every

action must be studied, nothing can be left to chance if suspicion is to

be averted. Thus, what would be a simple, automatic action on the part

of an innocent person becomes a tortuously complex proceeding for a spy.

The most severe test of all must naturally come when the secret agent

finds he is being watched by his opponents. Unless the man has an

abnormally strong character he is likely to become panic-stricken when

he first learns that the police are observing his movements and he may

commit some foolish indiscretion which will lead to his conviction as an

enemy agent. To guard against this contingency all the German spies were

carefully instructed in their behaviour should this emergency arise.

Calculating that a bold action would best divert suspicion, their agents

were instructed how to act in the manner best designed to convince the

watchers of their loyalty.

Mata Hari · 第 8 / 16 段